352
Nuclear
RAPID THERMAL ON INSULATOR M. TAKAI,
ANNEALING
and Methods
OF ARSENIC-IMPLANTED
M. IZUMI, T. YAMAMOTO
Faculty of Engineering
Instruments
in Physics
Research B39 (1989) 352-356 North-Holland, Amsterdam
POLY-Si LAYERS
and S. NAMBA
Science and Research Center for Extreme
Materials,
Osaka Uniwrtrity,
Toyonaka,
Osaka 560, Japan
T. MINAMISONO Faculty of Science, Osaka University, Toyonnka, Osaka 560, Japan
Atomic and carrier concentration profiles in poly-Si on insulator structures implanted with arsenic ions after furnace and rapid thermal annealing (RTA) have been investigated by Rutherford backscattering (RBS) and Hall effect measurements. Arsenic atoms at and near the implanted peak region show slow diffusion. while those at the tail region show fast diffusion. The diffusivity for As in cm*,/s for the tail region and D =1.7x103 exp(-3.8/kT) poly-Si on insulator is represented by D = 8.4 x IO4 exp(-3.8/kT) cm2/s for the peak re8ion. Poly-Si layers after implantation and annealing were found to have tensile stresses of 1.7-3.7 kbar.
1. Introduction Poly-silicon-on-insulator
(SOI)
structures
have
re-
attention because of the potential for application in thin-film transistors (TFT) such as drivers for flat panel display devices or liquid crystal shutter devices for printers. Improvement in electrical properties of poly-Si TFTs is possible by optimizing processes to fabricate TFT structures, such as short channel devices, or by increasing grain-size and reducing defects in poly-Si layers. Implanted-impurity behavior in SO1 structures such as redistribution of impurities in poly-Si layers during various heat treatments has not been studied in detail though it is a very important factor for device applications [1,2]. Arsenic (As) implantation followed by annealing is one of the possible doping processes for TFT in poly-Si layers with SOI structures, where precise controls of impurity profiles, i.e. junction depth, are necessary. Diffusions of implanted As in poly-Si layers on crystalline Si [3,4] or on SiO, after furnace annealing [l] or RTA [2] have been measured. The obtained profiles or diffusivity of As depend on the preparation process of the interface between poly-Si and underlying crystalline Si layers [4] or on the grain size of poly-Si, where fast diffusion of As through grain boundaries occurs [1,2]. In our previous study [2], As was implanted at 100 keV with a dose of 10” crne2 in poly-Si on insulator structures to obtain the diffusivity of As in poly-Si during RTA or furnace annealing. D.iffus~~ties of L3 = 0.28 exp( -2.84/kT) cm2/s for RTA and D = 1.81 exp( - 3.14/kT) cm2/s for furnace annealing were obtained at and near the peak region of the implanted As profiles. cently
attracted
great
0168-583X/89/$03.50 Q Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland Physics Publishing Division)
In this study, As profiles in poly-Si layers on insulator (SiO,) structures after RTA and conventional furnace annealing have been measured by Rutherford backscattering (RBS) to investigate parameters suitable for shallow As profiles. Implantation doses ranged from 5 X 10” to 1 X lOI cm-*, where faster diffusion took place in the tail region of the As profiles than in the peak region. Hall effect measurements in combination with successive layer removal techniques were used to obtain activated carrier and mobility distributions. We obtained the As diffusivity in poly-Si on insulator structures after two different annealing processes, including the activation energy of diffusion. Raman scattering spectroscopy was used to measure the residual stress in the poly-Si film and the crystallinity of poly-Si layers, i.e., grain boundary defects before and after implantation, followed by annealing. Preliminary results were published elsewhere IS].
2. Experimental procedures Poly-Si layers with a thickness of 540 nm were deposited by a low-pressure CVD method on a 50 nm thick thermal oxide of a (100) Si wafer. The pressure and substrate temperature during deposition were 1.5 Torr and 61OOC. The deposition rate was 7.5-7.8 nm/min. 100 keV As ions were implanted in poly-Si layers with a dose of S-10 x 1Or5 cme2. Conventional furnace annealing (FA) in a flowing nitrogen atmosphere was performed for 15 min at temperatures from 800 to 1000° C. RTA with a halogen flash lamp was performed for 15 s in an Ar atmosphere at temperatures from 900 to 1050 o C, as described elsewhere [2].
M. Takai et al. / Rapid thermal annealing ofpoly-Si
RBS measurements with 2 MeV helium ions were performed to investigate As redistribution in poly-Si layers on insulators. Samples were tilted 60 o off-axis to obtain higher depth resolution. The system energy resolution of 18.4 keV corresponds to 18.9 nm in As RBS spectra. The concentration profile of As before and after annealing was obtained by converting the energy scale of RBS spectra to a depth scale. Diffusion coefficients (D) of As were obtained by Gaussian fitting, as described elsewhere [2], at the peak (O-150 nm) and tail (150-400 nm) regions of the profiles, respectively, since, in this study, the diffusion behaviour near the peak region differed from that at the tail region, which was not observed for 5 X 1Ol5cm-2 implantation in our recent study [2]. Gaussian-fitted curves were illustrated in the concentration profiles in each of the figures. Raman scattering spectroscopy was used before and after implantation, followed by annealing, to measure residual stress and crystallinity, i.e. grain boundary defects in poly-Si layers. The relative peak position can be determined with an accuracy of about 0.1 cm-‘. A 488 nm line of an Ar laser with a penetration depth of about 500 nm was used to excite the sample, in which Raman signals only come from poly-Si layers. The experimental arrangement was described in detail elsewhere [6].
“w [L 2
353
layers on insulator
% O
4000
0
5 8 2000
0
8OO’C.
.
95O’C
15min
F A
D
. 15mm F A O
0
0
I
I
100
200 CHANNEL
00
1
0
CT.
300
400
500
NUMBER
Fig. 1. RBS spectra for As-implanted poly-Si on SiO, /Si after furnace annealing at 800 and 950 o C for 15 min.
keeps a Gaussian profile, while that after annealing at 950 o C shows a flat-top profile with a slight pileup at the interface between the poly-Si layer and the underlying insulating layer. Further, the As profiles were measured by RBS with samples tilted off-axis by 60” to investigate the diffusion behavior with better depth resolution [2]. Fig. 2a shows the As concentration profiles before and after furnace annealing at 800 and 850 o C. The As profile after annealing at 800 o C shows slight diffusion with a Gaussian shape, while that after annealing at 850°C shows fast diffusion at the tail region. The diffusion behavior at and near the peak region (O-150 nm) of the profile differs from that at the tail region (150-400 nm).
3. Results and discussion Fig. 1 shows the RBS spectra for As-implanted polySi layers on SiO,/Si after furnace annealing at 800 and 950” C. The As spectrum after annealing at 800” C 22
‘022y-yiigj
10
Furnace
Anneal
Id'
20
10
Id” 0
0.1
0.2 DEPTH
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.2 DEPTH
(pm)
0.3
0.4
(/HII1
Fig. 2. As concentration as a function of depth before and after furnace annealing (a) and RTA (b). Solid curves stand for Gaussian-fitted profiles. Arrows indicate the interface between the implanted amorphous layer and the underlying poly crystalline layer. IV. SEMICONDUCTORS:
Si
M. Takai et al. / Rapid thermal annealing ofpoly-Si
354
Furnace
layers on insulator
Anneal 10” z t
1
lo'71
0
0.2
0.1 DEPTH
I
’
1o”L
0.3
0
I
I
0.1
(pm)
I
’
0.2
DEPTH
11
0.3
(pm)
Fig. 3. Carrier concentration and Hall mobility as a function of depth for furnace annealing (a) and RTA (b).
Fig. RTA
2b
shows
the As concentration
slight
diffusion
900°C.
at
Further
hanced
the
tail
region
the diffusion
by annealing
at the peak
after
of the profile These
is applicable
95O’C
results
Fig. 3 shows the comparison at 900°C. nealing
profiles The
after
carrier
the profile
concentration is almost
profile
results
suggest
former
mechanism.
that
-1, 1100 10
’
by furnace
in diffusion
this difference
at
anneal[2]. These
may be due to the
’
TEMPERATURE
( ‘C )
1000
000
‘.\I
900
’
\\
and RTA
for furnace
has
followed
ing, did not show such difference
concentration
to the atomic
RTA
5 x 1015 cm-2,
that RTA
annealing
similar
as shown in fig. 3. The low dose implantation
and below
’
’
700
Ij
’
1 X10’6As’ cm+ OFA peak A RTA
an-
-
profile
a shallow
peak
of 3 x 102’ cmm3 at 60 nm. The mobility
constant
for both
also indicate
furnace
of carrier
region,
from
layers.
furnace
after
behavior
slightly
indicate
at
is en-
for shallow
concentrations
show flat profiles
[5], while
results
differs
in 540 nm thick poly-Si
and mobility
annealing
at 950 o C. The diffusion
region
at and below formation
after
shows
at the tail region
that at the tail region.
to
profiles
for 15 s at 900 and 950 o C. The As profile
annealing
that the RTA
annealing
processes.
These
at 900 o C is superior
in
obtaining
in As
diffusion
a shallow
carrier
profile. The region 2,
difference
is considered
induced peak
by ion
region
to
be
tail region. difference diffusion
due
are trapped
cal activity
residual
the As atoms
diffuse
slower
during
diffusion
peak in fig.
damage near
the
anneal-
than those at the
et al., however,
as a two-stream in the interior
the
the
observed
by the damage
Swaminathan
grain-boundary
to
implantation:
ing so that these atoms
about
between
and the tail region of the profile,
interpret
process
[l]:
this the
of grains near the peak and the
diffusion
at the tail region.
of As at the tail region
30% and was almost
The electri-
in this study
was
the same as that in the peak
,615 ‘-
0.7
1.0
0.9
0.8 103/T
( k-’
)
Fig. 4. Diffusion coefficient of As in poly-Si as a function of inverse temperature.
M. Takai et af. / Rapid thermal annealing ojpofy-Si I
I
A= 48Pnm
1
I
I
I
I
t: 510
520 WAVENUMBER
530 Cd)
Fig. 5. Raman scattering spectra for single-crystalline and poly-Si before and after implantation and annealing.
Fig. 4 shows the Arrhenius plot of the diffusivity for As in poly-Si on insulators after RTA and furnace annealing. Data for As in poly-Si on single-c~stalline Si, reported by Tsukamoto et al. [3] and Ryssel et al. [4], and for As in poly-Si on SiOJSi, reported by Swaminathan et al. [l], are also shown for comparison, The diffusivity for As in poly-Si on insulator in this study is represented by D = 8.4 X lo4 exp( - 3.8/W) cm2/s for the tail region and D = 1.7 X lo3 exp( - 3.8/W) cm2/s for the peak region, where k and T are Boltzman constant and temperature in K, respectively. Though the activation energy in this study, with an uncert~~ty of i-O.2 eV, is very close to that for As in poly-Si on SiO, by Swaminath~ et al. or that for As in poly-Si on crystalline Si by Ryssel et al. and Tsukamoto et al., the diffusivity is higher by a factor of lo-50 than that for As in poly-Si on crystalline Si [3,4]. This difference in diffusivity is considered to be due to the grain size of poly-Si layers [l]: poly-Si layers deposited on single-crystalline Si would have a larger grain size than those on insulators, and fast diffusion of As through grain boundaries occurs. Ryssel et al. [4], for example, observed higher diffusivity for As in poly-Si layers on crystalline Si with native oxide at the interface between the poly-Si and the underlying crystalline Si and attributed it to the structural difference in poly-Si layers, presumably gram size difference. High values of diffusivity for As in poly-Si on insulators by Swaminathan et al. [l] are due to their shallow
layers on insulator
355
As implantation, in which they measured As diffusion profiles far beyond the implanted area. As diffusion in such deep areas suffers less influence of implantationinduced defects. Grain sizes far beyond the implanted layer are smaller than those in the implanted layer. Fig. 5 shows the comparison of the Raman spectra obtained before and after implantation, followed by annealing at 9oo°C. A spectrum for crystalline Si is also shown for comparison. The Raman spectrum for crystalline Si has a peak at 520.2 cm-’ with a half width of 3.5 cm-‘, while the peak for poly-Si before implantation is located at 519.2 cm-’ with a half width of 9.0 cm- ‘. Further, the peak shift is enhanced by 1.5 cm-’ after implantation and RTA. The shift in peak position toward lower wave number is due to the residual tensile stress in poly-Si layers on SiO,/Si, induced by the difference in thermal expansion coefficient between the poly-Si and the underlying layers [S]. The stress in deposited poly-Si layers is estimated by the peak shift of 1.0 cm-’ to be 2.49 kbar, since the shift of 1 cm-’ turns out to be a residual stress of 2.49 kbar (or 2.49 X lo9 dyne/cm*) [6]. Such a stress is enhanced to 3.7 kbar by RTA. The half width of the Raman peak closely correlates with crystalline imperfections such as impurities and defects. The broadening in half width of poly-Si peaks, therefore, indicates grain boundary defects. The half width decreases from 9.0 to 6.1 cm-’ for RTA and to 5.3 cm-’ for furnace annealing, which indicates that the grain in poly-Si layers becomes larger
Table 1 A comparison corresponding
of the Raman peak intensity, width, residual stress for various processes
Sample c-Si poly-Si: as-deposited RTA 15s 900°C 5 x 10” As+/cm* RTA 15 s 900°C 950°c looO”c 1050°c FA 15 min 900°C 1000°C 1 X 10’6As+/cmz RTA 15 s 900°C 950°C 1ooo”c 1050 o c
Intensity
shift and
[a, u.1
Width [cm-‘]
Shift [cm-i]
3050
3.5
_
5.50
9.0
1.0
2.5
751
7.4
0.7
1.7
890 950 1140 1200
6.1 5.9 5.1 5.3
1.5 1.3 1.3 1.0
3.1 3.2 3.2 2.5
1135 1850
5.3 4.9
1.2 0.7
3.0 1.7
640 770 910 1200
6.1 5.6 5.6 4.9
1.4 1.4 1.4 1.0
3.5 3.5 3.5 2.5
Stress [kbar]
IV. SEMICONDUCTORS:
Si
M. Takai et al. / Rapid thermal annealing ojpoly-Si layers on insulator
356 and the grain
boundary
defects
decrease
after
anneal-
ing. Table
1 compares
Raman
peak intensity,
peak shift and corresponding samples.
The peak intensity
samples
followed
poly-Si for
before
the
These
as-deposited
results
samples sample
indicate
for various
RTA,
and the peak-
is narrower
before
and
that the implanted
than after
that RTA.
and annealed
have larger grain sizes and less grain boundary
defects
than
grain
unimplanted
size enhancement
is also found by TEM to the residual enhanced
stresses
samples.
Such
and annealing
stress
in this
case,
followed
processes
after
in poly-Si
layers.
however,
is
by annealing.
implantation
In
enhance
4. Conclusions 100
keV
SiO,/Si. surements RTA
As
RBS, on
ions
were
Hall effect,
layers
annealing.
of implanted
As in poly-Si
conventional
furnace
impurity The
profiles
diffusivity
sented
implanted
in
and Raman
implanted
and furnace
implantation
and annealing.
result
in higher furnace
RTA
stresses
processes in poly-Si
annealing.
The
authors
would
Miyauchi
(Matsushita
preparing
the samples.
Nojiri,
K. Matsuta
like The
T. Hirao
Industrial
authors
Co.,
and M. Ltd.)
are indebted
and Y. Takahashi
ation at the Van de Graaff and K. Kawasaki
to thank
Electric
accelerator
for their help during
for
to Y.
for their cooperand to K. Mino the experiment.
[8]. The peak shift, corresponding
tensile
RTA
residual
poly-Si
by implantation
by implantation
particular,
after
layer than conventional
for the implanted
samples
the
layers after implantation
than for the as-depostied
and after
for the implanted
peak width,
stress
is higher
by annealing
samples
width
residual
grain boundary defects than the unimplanted poly-Si layers. Tensile stresses of 1.7-3.7 kbar reside in poly-Si
were
Rapid in
performed
after
thermal
Poly-Si
is superior concentration.
after
is repre-
cm*/s
exp( - 3.8/kT)
layers
to
shallow
on insulator
by D = 8.4 x lo4 exp( - 3.8/kT)
tail region and D = 1.7 x lo3
annealing
obtaining
with a high peak carrier for As in poly-Si
on mea-
on insulators
annealing
poly-Si
scattering
for the
cm2/s for
the peak
region.
annealing
were found to have a larger grain size and less
implantation
and
References [l] B. Swaminathan, K.C. Saraswat, R.W. Dutton and T.I. Kamins, Appl. Phys. Lett. 40 (1982) 795. [2] M. Takai, M. Izumi, K. Matsunaga, K. Gamo, S. Namba, T. Minamisono, M. Miyauchi and T. Hirao, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B19/20 (1987) 603. [3] K. Tsukamoto, Y. Akasaka and K. Hone, J. Appl. Phys. 48 (1977) 1815. [4] H. Ryssel, H. Iberl, M. Bleier, G. Prinke, K. Haberger and H. Kranz, Appl. Phys. 24 (1981) 197. [5] M. Takai, M. Izumi, T. Yamamoto, A. Kinomura, K. Gamo, T. Minamisono and S. Namba, Polysilicon Films and Interfaces, eds. C.Y. Wong, C.V. Thompson and K.N. Tu (Mater. Res. Sot. Pittsburgh) p. 341. [6] M. Takai, T. Tanigawa, M. Miyauchi, S. Nakashima, K. Gamo and S. Namba, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 23 (1984) L363. [7] T. Englert, G. Abstreiter, and J. Pontcharra, Solid State Electron. 23 (1980) 31. [8] L.R. Zheng, L.S. Hung and J.W. Mayer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51 (1987) 2139.