Recent achievements in electronic tongue and bioelectronic tongue as taste sensors

Recent achievements in electronic tongue and bioelectronic tongue as taste sensors

Accepted Manuscript Title: Recent Achievements in Electronic Tongue and Bioelectronic Tongue as Taste Sensors Author: Da Ha Ning Hu Qiyong Sun Kaiqi S...

442KB Sizes 29 Downloads 138 Views

Accepted Manuscript Title: Recent Achievements in Electronic Tongue and Bioelectronic Tongue as Taste Sensors Author: Da Ha Ning Hu Qiyong Sun Kaiqi Su Hao Wan Haibo Li Ning Xu Fei Sun Ping Wang PII: DOI: Reference:

S0925-4005(14)01163-0 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.snb.2014.09.077 SNB 17453

To appear in:

Sensors and Actuators B

Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:

12-5-2014 7-8-2014 22-9-2014

Please cite this article as: D. Ha, N. Hu, Q. Sun, K. Su, H. Wan, H. Li, N. Xu, F. Sun, P. Wang, Recent Achievements in Electronic Tongue and Bioelectronic Tongue as Taste Sensors, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.09.077 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Recent Achievements in Electronic Tongue and Bioelectronic Tongue as Taste Sensors

ip t

Da Ha+, Ning Hu+, Qiyong Sun, Kaiqi Su, Hao Wan, Haibo Li, Ning Xu, Fei Sun, Ping Wang*

Biosensor National Special Laboratory, Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering

+

us

Hangzhou, P. R. China, 310027

cr

of Education Ministry, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Zhejiang University,

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

* Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Tel: +86 571 87952832.

1

Page 1 of 47

Abstract This review presents recent achievements concerning work with electronic tongue

ip t

(ET) and bioelectronic tongue (BioET) for taste assessment. These two emerging

cr

analytical technologies can be designed as taste sensors, which simulate the taste

us

detection modality of human tongue by means of electrochemical sensors or biosensors array. For electronic tongue, the potentiometric and voltammetric types are

an

mainly discussed together with applications in food and pharmaceutical analysis. Enzymatic and gustatory receptor-based biosensors towards bioelectronic tongues are

M

presented.

d

Keywords: Electronic tongue, Bioelectronic tongue, Potentiometry, Voltammetry,

Ac ce p

te

Enzymatic biosensor, Gustatory receptor-based biosensor, Taste assessment

2

Page 2 of 47

1. Introduction In taste assessment in the food and pharmaceutical industries, sensory tests are

ip t

generally implemented by human panelists. The human tongue which contains taste

cr

receptors, in the form of 10000 taste buds of 50-100 taste cells each [1], can generate

us

unique signal patterns of a variety of substances to the human brain. Then the brain interprets these signals and makes a judgment or classification to identify the

an

substances concerned, based on the experiences or neural network pattern recognition. However, the human-panel method is problematic due to its low objectivity and

M

reproducibility, as well as the potential stress imposed onto the panelists. Use of taste sensors is expected to largely improve this situation. Electronic tongue and

te

d

bioelectronic tongue, known as two promising tools for the taste assessment of foodstuffs, can mimic the human taste sensors and their communication with the

Ac ce p

human brain, thereby making themselves analytical instruments that artificially and effectively reproduce the taste sensation. According to the IUPAC technical report, an electronic tongue is defined as “a

multisensory system, which consists of a number of low-selective sensors and uses advanced mathematical procedures for signal processing based on the Pattern Recognition (PARC) and/or multivariate data analysis” [2]. Therefore, the electronic tongue can be an analytical tool including an array of non-specific, poorly selective chemical

sensors

with

partial

specificity

(cross-selectivity),

coupled

with

chemometric processing, for recognizing the qualitative and quantitative composition 3

Page 3 of 47

of multispecies solutions. Various sensing methodology can be used in electronic tongue, such as electrochemical methods (e.g., potentiometry or voltammetry), optical methods, mass change sensing techniques based on some principles like

ip t

quartz-crystals. Unlike the other analytical methods, electronic tongues only present a

cr

digital fingerprint of the food stuff, without acquiring data on the nature of the

us

compounds. The distorted information due to overlapping or interference signals can be operated by chemometric tools. The data processing algorithms involved mainly

an

include Principal Component Analysis (PCA) which is mostly used in identification/classification for qualitative purpose, Partial Least Squares (PLS) which

M

is mainly used in multidetermination for quantitative purpose, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) which is a massively parallel computing method, especially suitable

te

d

for non-linear sensor signals and extremely related to human pattern recognition. Recently the concept of bioelectronic tongue is emerging and has been used for

Ac ce p

taste evaluation. This one is characterized by including one or several biosensing elements into the sensor array. To be designed as a biosensor, the sensor’s recognition should be of biological origin, such as enzymes, antigens, antibodies, receptor proteins, cells or tissues. Although bioelectronic tongues have been applied to some taste characteristics and selective detection of food components, it is worth mentioning it is still in the early stage and much fewer applications to the assessment of the taste or quality of food are reported. Nevertheless, bioelectronic tongue still shows a promising perspective for the achievement of this goal. This review lists the recent achievements concerning work with electronic 4

Page 4 of 47

tongue and bioelectronic tongue for taste assessment. The sense of taste may include two meanings. One aspect refers to the five basic tastes of the tongue, namely sourness, saltiness, bitterness, sweetness and umami. The other aspects refer to the

perceptions.

us

2. Development of various electronic tongue

cr

ip t

components or additives of edible stuffs which provide human tongue respective

an

2.1 Potentiometric sensors

Potentiometric sensors were utilized in the first application of sensor arrays for

M

multicomponent analysis of liquid, and they still remain the most widely used category in e-tongue system. The main advantages of potentiometric sensors such as

d

ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) are their well-known characteristics such as low cost,

te

simple set-up and easy fabrication. On the other hand, the temperature dependence

Ac ce p

and the absorption of solution components which may affect the membrane potential lead to their weakness.

Legin et al. proposed a potentiometric e-tongue system comprising a group of

ISEs based on PVC membranes or chalcogenide glass. The system has served for the discrimination of beer, soft drinks, juice, tea, coffee, mineral water and wine [3-5]. The research on quantifications of tastes provided discrimination between bitter, sweet and salty substances, and discrimination between substances eliciting the same taste, quantity and content in pharmaceutical products [6]. In a recent study [7], A. Rudnitskaya et al. employed an e-tongue comprising 17 potentiometric chemical 5

Page 5 of 47

sensors for the quantification of bitterness in red wines. It was found that bitter-tasting wines had higher concentrations of phenolic compounds (catechin, epicate-chin, gallic and caffeic acids and quercetin) than non-bitter wines. The data sets allowed

ip t

classifying wines according to the existence of bitter taste with correct classification

cr

rate of 94% for the ET system. Calibration model calculated using ET data allowed

us

good quantitative prediction of the bitterness intensity with RESEP of 2% and MRE of 6%. In another study [8], the ET capability of predicting Maderia wine age with

an

good accuracy (1.8 years) as well as quantification of some organic acids and phenolic compounds was demonstrated. Similar work can be found in other recent

M

literatures for analysis of beers according to their taste evaluation [9, 10]. In order to assess the bitter taste of structurally diverse active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs),

te

d

a potentiometric multisensory system was employed for bitterness quantification [11]. The 3wayPLS regression models were constructed from the yielded 3 way data array

Ac ce p

(samples × sensors × pH levels) with both human panel and rat model reference data.

It was demonstrated that the E-Tongue could be used for the artificial assessment of bitter taste of APIs, exhibiting average relative errors of 16% in terms of human panel bitterness score and 25% in terms of inhibition values form in vivo rat model data.

Figure 1

Ever since the first multi-sensor system for liquid analysis based on a 6

Page 6 of 47

non-specific sensor approach was produced by Toko et al. in 1990, the so-called “taste sensor” has been further developed towards advanced direction, with improvements leading to successful application in taste evaluation in food industry. The suggested

ip t

potentiometric taste sensor consisted of eight sensors with polymeric membranes

cr

containing PVC, a plasticizer such as DOPP (dioctylphenyl-phosphonate) and active

us

substances (artificial lipids such as TOMA (trioctylmethylammonium chloride), oleic acid and gallic acid), which were assumed to more specifically mimic the functions of

an

human taste receptors. The diagram of taste sensing system is presented in Fig. 1(a). Recently, based on this taste sensor system, the potentiometric responses of the

M

lipid/polymer membranes to saltiness [12], bitterness [13], sweetness [14, 15] and umami [16] have been investigated. The measuring procedure of taste evaluation by

te

d

this sensor system can be described as following: firstly, chemical substances with unknown taste are detected by taste sensor with global selectivity and high correlation

Ac ce p

to human sensory score. Then, sensor outputs are collected and converted to 11 types `of taste information. Finally, the combination of taste information, by means of radar chart [Fig. 1(b)] or taste map is illustrated to provide satisfactory results for taste qualities. The taste sensors have been extensively applied in food manufacturing [17-20] and evaluation of taste suppression [21-24]. In recent research, the development of the taste sensor has been promoted towards the concept of portable setup [25], high-throughput chip [26] and miniaturization [27]. The ion-selective field effect transistor (ISFET) and the light-addressable potentiometric sensor (LAPS) which was derived from ISFET are other sensor basis 7

Page 7 of 47

for electronic tongue construction. Based on semiconductor physics and microfabrication technology, these silicon-based sensors are easier to realize miniaturization and provide an effective platform for simultaneous detection of

ip t

several compounds. An e-tongue employing an array formed by ISFET potentiometric

cr

sensors was developed by L. Moreno et al. They used large area ISFET chips,

encapsulated in a single device, where photocurable polyurethane membranes

us

sensitive to K+, Na+, Ca2+ and Cl- were prepared, allowing for a six-channel device

an

after incorporation of pH and redox potential elements. The device has been used for the identification of mineral waters [28], grape juice and wine samples [29]. Very

M

recently, K. Maehashi has fabricated a highly sensitive and selective K+ sensor by modifying grapheme FETs with valinomycin [30], as shown in Fig. 2(a). The

te

d

elaborated sensor showed sensitivity over a wide concentration range from 10 nM to 1.0 mM [Fig. 2(b)], with no apparent interference of additional Na ions. An ultrathin

Ac ce p

InN ISFET was fabricated and characterized to show a gate sensitivity of 58.3 mV/pH in the pH range of 2-12, with the response time of less than 10 s [31]. Fig. 2(c) shows the schematic section and physical top-view of InN-ISFET. The current variation ratio was 4.0%/pH and the resolution of detection was less than 0.03 pH [Fig. 2(d)]. With regard to the LAPS sensors, polymer membranes [32] or chalcogenide glass membranes [33, 34] containing specific receptor molecules can be coupled with them for simultaneous detection of heavy metals.

Figure 2 8

Page 8 of 47

2.2 Voltammetric/amperometric sensors

ip t

Voltammetric/amperometric sensors are also widely used in E-tongue systems, owing to their merits of high selectivity, high signal-to-noise ratio, low detection limit

cr

and various modes of multicomponent measurement. Moreover, by surface

us

modification with various chemosensitive materials, the electrodes exhibit various sensitivity and selectivity towards diverse species. However, their applicability is

an

limited to redox-active substances and they share the same problem of temperature

M

dependence and large surface alteration leading to sensor response drifts. For amperometric E-tongues there are three main classes including noble metal,

d

conducting polymer and phtalocyanine film. The voltammetric E-tongue composing

te

an array of noble metal working electrodes has been developed and applied to the

Ac ce p

analysis of different foodstuffs by Winquist et al. [35-37]. Noble metals, such as platinum, gold, iridium, palladium, and rhodium were selected for the array and two types of voltammetry, namely small-amplitude pulse voltammetry (SAPV) and large-amplitude pulse voltammetry (LAPV) were investigated. The most informative data points were extracted during the data processing and utilized for calibration and recognition. Different techniques including SAPV, LAPV and staircase voltammetry has been used for characterization of tea [38], detergents [39], juices [35] and milk [40]. Moreover, the e-tongue has been utilized to detect various species of molds growing in water environment [41], different microbial species [42], and quality of drinking water [43]. Tian et al. developed the ET system incorporated several metallic 9

Page 9 of 47

working electrodes (platinum, gold, palladium, titanium, nickel, etc.), with the combination of multifrequency large amplitude pulse voltammetry (MLAPV). This system could successfully classify the six Chinese distilled spirits and seven Longjing

ip t

teas in different frequency segments [44]. Recently, micro-fabrication techniques were

cr

used to prepare a sensor array for construction of voltammetric e-tongue by depositing

us

Au, Pt, It, Rh on a silicon wafer [45].

To obtain cross-selectivity and better performance, various materials such as

an

polymers, graphite-epoxy, phthalocyanines and doping agents have been used as coating membranes for sensor design[46-48]. For instance, E-tongue with

M

modification of conducting polymers such as polypyrrole and polyaniline showed a variation of conductivity with adsorption of different analytes [49]. E-tongues based

te

d

on conducting polymers have been used to evaluate bitterness [50], as well as sweet, salty, acid, and astringent tastes [51]. Xavier Cetó and co-workers developed a novel

Ac ce p

E-tongue containing five modified graphite-epoxy electrodes for the analysis of cava wines [48]. In general, the advantage of conducting polymers is the rapid adsorption/desorption and partial selectivity through modifying the dopant of the polymer.

On the other hand, voltammetric sensors chemically modified with

phthalocyanines have also been successfully utilized in electronic tongues. Sensing areas composed of different phthalocyanine derivatives can offer significant cross-selectivity owing to their versatility, varied ion-binding and electrocatalytic properties. Apart from this, another benefit of phthalocyanines as sensing materials is 10

Page 10 of 47

that they can be modified by different techniques, such as the carbon paste technique and Langmuir-Blodgett technique, thereby providing different structures with different properties. A sensor array based on voltammetric electrodes with surface

ip t

modification of bisphthalocyanines has been used to discriminate between the

cr

samples of five basic tastes [52]. Similarly, based on this system, bitter substances

us

including MgCl2, quinine, and four phenolic compounds which are the main responsible of the bitterness detected in olive oils were investigated [50]. In another

an

study, antioxidants usually present in foods have been discriminated by a sensor array modified with bisphthalocyanines and heteroleptic derivatives [53]. Sensor arrays

M

based on phthalocyanines have been extensively applied in the analysis of food and beverages, particularly in the field of wines, for the reason that the objective analytes

te

d

such as ions and electroactive materials lead a crucial role in the organoleptic properties of wines. For example, this type of voltammetric e-tongue has been able to

Ac ce p

discriminate red wines with different organoleptic characteristics [54] and antioxidant capabilities [55]. Multisensors based on phthalocyanines have also been successfully used in discrimination of different olive oils [56], beers of different qualities [57] or in evaluation of the fish freshness [58] through the level of biogenic amines. 2.3 Other variants of electrochemical sensors Regarding the sensor array used in the design of e-tongues, a wide variety of other chemical sensors can be employed. For example, other electrochemical sensors including impedimetric sensors[59-61] and conductimetric sensors, optical sensors[62, 63], piezoelectric sensors such as surface acoustic wave (SAW) device and quartz 11

Page 11 of 47

crystal microbalance (QCM) device can be used as the sensor basis (summarized in Table 1.). Impedemic e-tongues have been used for different analytes such as cations (K+, Na+, NH4+) [64]. In another study, the sensors were utilized to monitor the

ip t

representatives of the five basic tastes, namely sodium chloride (saltiness), citric acid

cr

(sourness), glucose (sweetness), glutamic acid (umami), and sodium dehydrocholate

us

(bitterness) [65]. QCM sensors modified by dioctadecyldimethylammonium poly (styrene sulfonate) was used to predict bitterness intensity of beer [66], while QCM

an

sensor coated with dimyristoylphosphatidylethanolamin was used for measuring body, smoothness, bitterness, and astringency of beer [67, 68]. A miniaturized taste sensing

M

system based upon a dual shear horizontal surface acoustic wave (SH-SAW) device was designed for distinguish between liquids of different basic taste [69]. After the

te

d

data processing of PCA, this device could classify correctly four basic tastes of sour,

Ac ce p

salt, bitter and sweet, without a selective biological or chemical coating.

3. Development of bioelectronic tongue Basically, output signals of electronic tongues are analyzed by pattern

recognition techniques composed of an array of semiselective recognition elements. Even with technological advances and promising results, these sensors still cannot mimic the biological features of human tongue with regards to identifying elusive analytes in complicated mixtures. In this case, bioelectronic tongues can provide taste signals triggered by the binding activities between selective taste receptors and tastants, making it possible to develop artificial taste sensors that more closely mimic human taste system. To be considered as a bioelectronic tongue, the sensor’s 12

Page 12 of 47

recognition component should be of biological origin, namely enzymes, whole cells, tissues, receptors or antibodies. Table 2 summarized different types of bioelectronic tongue including biomolecule type, transducer part, biological recognition component

ip t

and target molecules. From the perspective of basic mechanism, the signal

cr

transduction in biological system involves a series of biochemical reactions leading to

us

the transport of electrons, ions or molecules. Although one would consider that bioelectronic tongues usually involve very selective, almost specific detection,

an

biosensors can present response to a group of specific substances. Thus the bioelectronic tongues always need to be utilized with the help of advanced statistical

M

methods for more accurate results. The synergistic coupling of biotechnology and electronics has promoted the development of biosensors[70]. Recently, the usage of

te

d

nanotechnology in biosensor which could enhance sensor selectivity and sensitivity

Ac ce p

has been of interest to the researchers [71-73]. 3.1 Enzymatic biosensor

Enzymatic biosensors have emerged as a promising tool for qualitative and

quantitative analysis of a variety of target analytes in environmental monitoring, food quality control and pharmaceutical industry. The most widely used enzyme-based biosensors are those designed for glucose, lactate, glutamate, urea, creatinine and cholesterol. Gutes et al. [74] have developed a voltammetric BioET grouping different glucose biosensors, formed by epoxy-graphite biocomposites with glucose oxidase enzyme and different metal catalysts to generate differentiated signals. This system 13

Page 13 of 47

has been successfully utilized for the simultaneous detection of glucose and ascorbic acid. Based on FET sensors, aptamers and single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNT) were used for surface modification, resulting in a system with capability of real-time

ip t

monitoring of thrombin, at concentrations as low as 7 pM [75], as shown in Fig. 3. A

cr

novel enzymatic FET was presented by Premanode, in which creatininase, creatinase

us

and urease were modified on the transistor for real-time detection of creatinine and urea [76]. Braeken [77] reported another enzymatic FET with surface coating of

an

glutamate oxidase layers. This sensor exhibited high sensitivity and long-term stability towards the determination of glutamate. For the detection of four wastewater

M

samples of different treatment qualities, namely untreated, alarm, alert and normal, an amperometric bioelectronic tongue with enzymatic modification was developed [78].

te

d

Seven out of eight platinum electrodes of the array were modified with four different enzymes; tyrosinase, horseradish peroxidase, acetyl cholinesterase and butyryl

Ac ce p

cholinesterase.

Figure 3

For the detection of urea, a urea biosensor based on SAW device was fabricated

and applied in the analysis of urine and blood samples, with a detection range of 0.5-1.5 mg/dl [79, 80]. In another study [81], the developed bioelectronic tongue provided a simple and direct procedure to detect the concentration of urea in real samples without the necessity of eliminating the alkaline interferences or 14

Page 14 of 47

compensating endogenous ammonia. A urea biosensor was reported using photocurable polymeric membranes with ISFET as the transducer, which possessed a response time of 2 min with a detection range of 0.04-36.0 mM [82].

ip t

For detection of phenolic compounds, a series of enzymatic biosensors by means

cr

of laccase [83], tyrosinase [84], peroxidase enzymes [85] have been developed as

us

BioETs. These sensors employed the modified enzymes for special oxidization of the phenolic compounds into their quinones, which were directly measured through an

an

amperometric sensor. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Linear Discrimination Analysis (LDA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were used for data

M

processing. This approach has already been applied toward the analysis of wines [86, 87] and beers [88, 89]. Xavier Cetó and co-workers has developed a BioET based on

te

d

voltammetric enzyme-modified graphite-epoxy electrodes for the determination of three major phenolic compounds found in beer, namely ferulic, gallic and sinapic acid

Ac ce p

[89]. Fig. 4 presents the schematic diagram of voltammetric BioET method. More specifically, other applications including the analysis of polyphenols and resolution of their mixture have been also explored [90-92]. It has been demonstrated that phthalocyanines (MPc) and their sandwich type lanthanide derivatives (LnPc2) can

also been used as electron mediators in tyrosinate biosensors [93, 94].

Figure 4

15

Page 15 of 47

3.2 Gustatory receptor-based biosensor Although the electronic tongues can produce analytically useful information

ip t

through the analysis of multi component matrices, there still exists a certain gap between the ET systems and biological taste, which mainly lies in the biological

cr

receptor structures and information coding mechanisms. In this case, the gustatory

us

receptors-based biosensors exhibit their inherent advantages and could be utilized as other biorecognition alternative to taste sensing. Cells, tissues or receptors which can

an

be immobilized with sensor surface as biometric sensing elements, can collect the functional information of bioactive analytes with high sensitivity and selectivity

M

[95-97].

d

The living taste receptor cells (TRCs) have been employed in the construction of

te

mimic bioelectronic tongues for taste assessment. Chen and co-workers [98] cultured taste cells (type II cells and type III cells with different expressed taste receptors, as

Ac ce p

shown in Fig. 5(a)) on the LAPS for the purpose of specific sensation based on taste firing encoding. Fig. 5(b) shows a schematic graph of a LAPS detection system. Fig. 5(c) shows the statistics of firing rate with different stimuli. It was found that firing rate of taste cells is concentration-dependent of stimulus [Fig. 5(d)]. From PCA analysis of the temporal firing, it was demonstrated that response from different types of taste receptor cells could be discriminated [Fig. 5(e)]. Analogous work was carried out by Zhang et al. [99]. The combination of LAPS and TRCs was fulfilled to test the taste cell response to taste stimuli, namely NaCl, HCl, MgSO4, sucrose and glumate.

Similarly, a novel sweet taste cell-based biosensor for tastants detection was reported 16

Page 16 of 47

[100, 101]. The human colorectal carcinoma NCI-H716 cell lines, which express α-gustducin and T1R1/T1R3 as sweet taste receptors were cultured on the carbon screen-printed electrode. Poly-L-ornithine and lamimin coating was undertaken to

ip t

improve adhesion in extracellular matrix. In order to investigate the cell-to-cell

cr

communication between type II (sour) and type III (sweet, bitter and umami) taste

cells, a serotonin sensitive sensor based on LAPS chip was fabricated [102]. The

us

sensor performed with a detection limit of 3.3×10-13 M and a sensitivity of 19.1

an

mV/decade. More interestingly, Wu et al. [103] successfully prepared ATP sensitive DNA aptamer on LAPS chip, to detect the local ATP secretion from single TRC

M

responding to tastant mixture, thereby investigating the mechanism of taste signal

Figure 5

Ac ce p

te

d

transmission and processing.

For taste transduction, the response of taste receptor cells to tastants is firstly

coded in taste buds of the epithelium by action potentials. Thus if the taste buds are employed as sensitive materials in developing bioelectronic tongues, the bionic design will possess high performance in taste detection. Liu et al. employed microelectrode arrays (MEAs) to record electrophysiological activities of taste epithelium, building a platform to investigate detections and recognitions of basic tastes [104], as shown in Fig. 6(a). This combination offers several advantageous characteristics. Firstly, MEAs 17

Page 17 of 47

can record the extracellular electrophysiological activities of cultured excitable cells or tissues from recording sites in a long-term manner [105-107]. Moreover, the information of taste perception can be well preserved in an intact tissue and primary

ip t

structure. Therefore, it is more convenient to realize in vitro detection of the neural

cr

potentials of taste receptor cells to taste stimuli. Furthermore, unlike cell networks

us

cultured on MEAs which are limited to a two-dimensional circumstance and which may lose internal cell-to-cell communications through biochemical and mechanical

an

cues, biological tissue such as taste epithelium can offer three-dimensional formation with inherent interaction between neighboring cells [108-110]. In their research, the

M

electrophysiological signals of taste receptor cells to five basic taste stimuli were extracted. The recorded action potential displayed different spatiotemporal patterns

te

d

for different taste and the temporal characteristics were derived by both time-domain and frequency-domain analysis [Fig. 6(b)]. On basic of this platform, Liu also

Ac ce p

investigated the extracellular potentials in the taste epithelium for bitter detection using 32-channel MEAs with the diameter of 30 μm. They found that stimulation of

different bitter substances such as quinine, denatonium and cycloheximide significantly evoked specific responses respectively, and with the increase of concentration of bitterness, firing rate, amplitudes and power spectrum, representing electrophysiological characteristics, also had a visible increase [111]. Successive and similar works had been carried out for salt sensing [112] and umami evaluation [113]. Additionally, for the purpose of sweeteners analysis, a 60-channel planar MEA device was employed and natural sugars (glucose and sucrose), artificial sweeteners 18

Page 18 of 47

(saccharin and cyclamate) and real samples (Coca-Cola) were chosen as testing samples[114]. In the recent decade, the advances in the research of taste transduction

ip t

mechanism have made a significant impact on the development of biomimetic

cr

receptor-based biosensors for chemical sensing. In an interesting study, the membrane

us

fractions of HEK-293 cell containing the successfully expressed T2R4, which is a human bitter receptor, were extracted and immobilized on the gold surface of QCM

an

device [115]. This biosensor showed its dose-dependent response to denatonium, with

M

high sensitivity (1.21 kHz mM-1) and high specificity.

te

d

Figure 6

Ac ce p

3.3 Nanotechnology-based biosensor With significant advances in the nanotechnology, the combination of

nanomaterials and biological sensing elements to selectively recognize biological molecules has promoted the development of novel nanobiosensors. A great number of nanomaterials with different sizes, shapes, and unique properties, such as carbon nanotubes (CNT), grapheme, conducting polymer nanotube (CPNT) and silicon nanowires (SiNW), have been employed for biosensing because of their unique physical, chemical, mechanical, magnetic, and optical properties, and these nanomaterials have notably enhanced the sensitivity and specificity of detection. Most biological processes involve electrostatic interactions and charge transfer, which can 19

Page 19 of 47

be directly determined by nanomaterials-based electronic device. Consequently, these types of biosensor will be the most suitable for biological sensing. Nanotechnology has been combined with the enzymatic biosensor design. A

ip t

multisensory system formed by nanostructured biosensor based on phenol oxidases

cr

has been constructed for the analysis of grapes [116]. In this work, enzymes were

us

immobilized in a nanostructured lipidic layer with a structure similar to that of the biological membranes, and this biomimetic environment could help to preserve the

an

functionality of the enzyme and improve the dynamic behavior and detection limit (in the range of 10-7-10-8 mol/L). Recently, several similar research works also focus on

M

the nanostructured biomimetic biosensor for phenol sensing [93, 94, 117, 118]. Polyaniline nanofibres deposited on microelectrodes have shown to be efficient

te

d

sensoactive layers in taste sensors for orange juices with different kind of orange ant degradations through variations of the presence of citric acid[119].

Ac ce p

In another study, an artificial taste sensor utilizing the human bitter taste receptor

protein was immobilized on a single-walled carbon nanotube field effect transistor (swCNT-FET) with lipid membrane, enabling a so-called “bioelectronic-super-taste (BST)”. The elaborated BST device could detect bitter tastants at 100 fM concentrations and distinguish between bitter and non-bitter with similar chemical structures

[120].

More

interestingly,

a

caboxylated

polypyrrole

nanotube

(CPNT)-based FET with human taste receptor protein, hTAS2R38 functionalization was developed as a nanobioelectronic tongue (nbe-tongue) which could display human-like performance with high sensitivity and selectivity [121]. Fig. 6(c) presents 20

Page 20 of 47

the schematic diagram of the sensor device. In their research, taster type (PAV) hTAS2R38 modified CPNT-FET could exclusively respond to target bitterness compounds, namely, phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and propylthiouracil (PROP), with a

ip t

high sensitivity at concentrations as low as 1 fM. On the contrary, no significant

cr

changes were observed in the nontaster type (AVI) hTAS2R38 modified ones in

us

response to the target bitter tastants, as shown in Fig. 6(d). In addition, the fabricated nbe-tongue exhibited different bitterness perception to mimic the function of the

an

human tongue through the test of real vegetable samples containing antithyroid toxin.

M

4. Conclusion

There has been an extensive demand for (bio)chemical information acquiring in

d

the different human life aspects, such as environmental monitoring, healthcare and

te

food quality. Among the various standards evaluation, taste assessment leads an

Ac ce p

important role and has extensively aroused the social concerns. The emerging electronic tongue (ET) and bioelectronic tongue (BioET), which employ electrochemical sensors or biosensors array, provide a useful platform for fast, simple, clear gathering of taste information. Nowadays, the developed ET and BioET have exhibited well correlation with the human sensory panel and can effectively mimic the human taste sensors and their communication with the human brain. Through the combination with different chemometric processing, the sensors have showed intelligent capability for recognizing the qualitative and quantitative composition of multispecies solutions. Although all the achievements presented in this review seem to be very 21

Page 21 of 47

promising, these devices are still in an early stage of development, especially bioelectronic tongues. More effort should be made to further extending their applications in food industry and the other fields. Apart from this, the noteworthy

ip t

limitation of drift in sensor signals, which may be caused by sensor aging and surface

cr

contamination, is still one of the weaknesses that should be solved. Consequently, the

us

effective compensation models for specific correction of sensor response should be constructed and periodically undertaken. What is needed are optimized basic

an

conditions on simplicity, reproducibility, accuracy, reliability for ET and BioET, which will eventually pave the way for their encouraging future. The value of their

M

related research and development is seriously underestimated and needs to be reevaluated. In our opinion, there will still be an increase of research and commercial

te

d

interests in this area in the near future.

Ac ce p

5. Acknowledgement

This work was supported by International Cooperation Project between NSFC

and RFBR (No. 812111252), Marine Public Welfare Project of China (No. 201305010), Ministry of Education Doctoral Station Foundation of China (No. 20120101130011).

22

Page 22 of 47

6. Reference

ip t

[1] A.K. Deisingh, D.C. Stone, M. Thompson, Applications of electronic noses and tongues in food analysis, International journal of food science & technology, 39(2004) 587-604.

cr

[2] Y. Vlasov, A. Legin, A. Rudnitskaya, C. Di Natale, A. D'amico, Nonspecific sensor

us

arrays (" electronic tongue") for chemical analysis of liquids (IUPAC Technical Report), Pure and Applied Chemistry, 77(2005) 1965-83.

[3] Y. Vlasov, A. Legin, Non-selective chemical sensors in analytical chemistry: from

an

“electronic nose” to “electronic tongue”, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry, 361(1998) 255-60.

M

[4] A. Legin, A. Rudnitskaya, Y. Vlasov, C. Di Natale, E. Mazzone, A. D'Amico, Application of electronic tongue for quantitative analysis of mineral water and wine,

d

Electroanalysis, 11(1999) 814-20.

te

[5] A. Legin, A. Rudnitskaya, L. Lvova, Y. Vlasov, C. Di Natale, A. D’Amico, Evaluation of Italian wine by the electronic tongue: recognition, quantitative analysis

Ac ce p

and correlation with human sensory perception, Analytica Chimica Acta, 484(2003) 33-44.

[6] A. Legin, A. Rudnitskaya, D. Clapham, B. Seleznev, K. Lord, Y. Vlasov, Electronic tongue for pharmaceutical analytics: quantification of tastes and masking effects, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 380(2004) 36-45. [7] A. Rudnitskaya, H.H. Nieuwoudt, N. Muller, A. Legin, M. du Toit, F.F. Bauer, Instrumental measurement of bitter taste in red wine using an electronic tongue, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 397(2010) 3051-60. [8] A. Rudnitskaya, S. Rocha, A. Legin, V. Pereira, J.C. Marques, Evaluation of the feasibility of the electronic tongue as a rapid analytical tool for wine age prediction and quantification of the organic acids and phenolic compounds. The case-study of Madeira wine, Analytica chimica acta, 662(2010) 82-9. 23

Page 23 of 47

[9] E. Polshin, A. Rudnitskaya, D. Kirsanov, A. Legin, D. Saison, F. Delvaux, et al., Electronic tongue as a screening tool for rapid analysis of beer, Talanta, 81(2010) 88-94. [10] A. Rudnitskaya, E. Polshin, D. Kirsanov, J. Lammertyn, B. Nicolai, D. Saison, et

ip t

al., Instrumental measurement of beer taste attributes using an electronic tongue, Analytica chimica acta, 646(2009) 111-8.

cr

[11] A. Rudnitskaya, D. Kirsanov, Y. Blinova, E. Legin, B. Seleznev, D. Clapham, et

al., Assessment of bitter taste of pharmaceuticals with multisensor system employing

us

3 way PLS regression, Analytica chimica acta, 770(2013) 45-52.

[12] R. Chen, I. Hidekazu, K. Toko, Development of Sensor with High Selectivity for

an

Saltiness and Its Application in Taste Evaluation of Table Salt, Sensors and Materials, 22(2010) 313-25.

M

[13] Y. Kobayashi, H. Hamada, Y. Yamaguchi, H. Ikezaki, K. Toko, Development of an Artificial Lipid‐Based Membrane Sensor with High Selectivity and Sensitivity to

d

the Bitterness of Drugs and with High Correlation with Sensory Score, IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 4(2009) 710-9.

te

[14] K. Toyota, H. Cui, K. Abe, M. Habara, K. Toko, H. Ikezaki, Sweetness sensor

Ac ce p

with lipid/polymer membranes: sweet-responsive substances, Sensors and Materials, 23(2011) 465-74.

[15] K. Toyota, H. Cui, K. Abe, M. Habara, K. Toko, H. Ikezaki, Sweetness sensor with lipid/polymer membranes: response to various sugars, Sensors and Materials, 23(2011) 475-82.

[16] S. Iiyama, H. Kuga, S. Ezaki, K. Hayashi, K. Toko, Peculiar change in membrane potential of taste sensor caused by umami substances, Sensors and Actuators B-Chemical, 91(2003) 191-4. [17] N. Hayashi, R. Chen, H. Ikezaki, T. Ujihara, Evaluation of the umami taste intensity of green tea by a taste sensor, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56(2008) 7384-7. [18] Y. Arikawa, K. Toko, H. Ikezaki, Y. Shinha, T. Ito, I. Oguri, et al., Analysis of sake mash using multichannel taste sensor, Journal of Fermentation and 24

Page 24 of 47

Bioengineering, 82(1996) 371-6. [19] K. Toko, Taste sensor with global selectivity, Materials Science & Engineering C-Biomimetic Materials Sensors and Systems, 4(1996) 69-82. [20] Y. Mizota, H. Matsui, M. Ikeda, N. Ichihashi, K. Iwatsuki, K. Toko, Flavor

ip t

evaluation using taste sensor for UHT processed milk stored in cartons having different light permeabilities, Milchwissenschaft-Milk Science International, 64(2009)

cr

143-6.

[21] S. Takagi, K. Toko, K. Wada, H. Yamada, K. Toyoshima, Detection of

Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 87(1998) 552-5.

us

suppression of bitterness by sweet substance using a multichannel taste sensor,

an

[22] T. Nakamura, A. Tanigake, Y. Miyanaga, T. Ogawa, T. Akiyoshi, K. Matsuyama, et al., The effect of various substances on the suppression of the bitterness of

M

quinine-human gustatory sensation, binding, and taste sensor studies, Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 50(2002) 1589-93.

d

[23] Y. Hashimoto, C. Matsunaga, E. Tokuyama, E. Tsuji, T. Uchida, H. Oyada, The quantitative prediction of bitterness-suppressing effect of sweeteners on the bitterness

Ac ce p

55(2007) 739-46.

te

of famotidine by sweetness-responsive sensor, Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin,

[24] E. Tokuyama, T. Shibasaki, H. Kawabe, J. Mukai, S. Okada, T. Uchida, Bitterness

suppression

of

BCAA solutions

by

L-ornithine,

Chemical

&

Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 54(2006) 1288-92. [25] Y. Tahara, K. Nakashi, K. Ji, A. Ikeda, K. Toko, Development of a Portable Taste Sensor with a Lipid/Polymer Membrane, Sensors, 13(2013) 1076-84. [26] Y. Tahara, Y. Maehara, J. Ke, A. Ikeda, K. Toko, Ieee, Development of a Multichannel Taste Sensor Chip for a Portable Taste Sensor,

2012 Ieee Sensors

Proceedings, Ieee, New York, 2012, pp. 414-7. [27] Y. Tahara, A. Ikeda, Y. Maehara, M. Habara, K. Toko, Development and evaluation of a miniaturized taste sensor chip, Sensors, 11(2011) 9878-86. [28] L. Moreno, A. Merlos, N. Abramova, C. Jimenez, A. Bratov, Multi-sensor array used as an “electronic tongue” for mineral water analysis, Sensors and Actuators B: 25

Page 25 of 47

Chemical, 116(2006) 130-4. [29] L.M. i Codinachs, J.P. Kloock, M.J. Schöning, A. Baldi, A. Ipatov, A. Bratov, et al., Electronic integrated multisensor tongue applied to grape juice and wine analysis, Analyst, 133(2008) 1440-8.

ip t

[30] K. Maehashi, Y. Sofue, S. Okamoto, Y. Ohno, K. Inoue, K. Matsumoto, Selective ion sensors based on ionophore-modified graphene field-effect transistors, Sensors

cr

and Actuators B: Chemical, 187(2013) 45-9.

[31] Y.-H. Chang, Y.-S. Lu, Y.-L. Hong, S. Gwo, J.A. Yeh, Highly sensitive pH

us

sensing using an indium nitride ion-sensitive field-effect transistor, Sensors Journal, IEEE, 11(2011) 1157-61.

an

[32] D. Ha, N. Hu, C. Wu, D. Kirsanov, A. Legin, M. Khaydukova, et al., Novel structured light-addressable potentiometric sensor array based on PVC membrane for

M

determination of heavy metals, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 174(2012) 59-64. [33] J. Kloock, L. Moreno, A. Bratov, S. Huachupoma, J. Xu, T. Wagner, et al.,

d

PLD-prepared cadmium sensors based on chalcogenide glasses—ISFET, LAPS and

149-55.

te

μISE semiconductor structures, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 118(2006)

Ac ce p

[34] W. Hu, H. Cai, J. Fu, P. Wang, G. Yang, Line-scanning LAPS array for measurement of heavy metal ions with micro-lens array based on MEMS, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 129(2008) 397-403. [35] F. Winquist, P. Wide, I. Lundström, An electronic tongue based on voltammetry, Analytica chimica acta, 357(1997) 21-31. [36] F. Winquist, C. Krantz-Rülcker, P. Wide, I. Lundström, Monitoring of freshness of milk by an electronic tongue on the basis of voltammetry, Measurement Science and Technology, 9(1998) 1937. [37] F. Winquist, S. Holmin, C. Krantz-Rülcker, P. Wide, I. Lundström, A hybrid electronic tongue, Analytica Chimica Acta, 406(2000) 147-57. [38] P. Ivarsson, S. Holmin, N.-E. Höjer, C. Krantz-Rülcker, F. Winquist, Discrimination of tea by means of a voltammetric electronic tongue and different applied waveforms, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 76(2001) 449-54. 26

Page 26 of 47

[39] S. Holmin, F. Björefors, M. Eriksson, C. Krantz ‐ R ü lcker, F. Winquist, Investigation of electrode materials as sensors in a voltammetric electronic tongue, Electroanalysis, 14(2002) 839-47. [40] F. Winquist, I. Lundström, P. Wide, The combination of an electronic tongue and

ip t

an electronic nose, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 58(1999) 512-7.

[41] C. Söderström, H. Borén, C. Krantz-Rülcker, Use of an electronic tongue and

International journal of food microbiology, 97(2005) 247-57.

cr

HPLC with electrochemical detection to differentiate molds in culture media,

us

[42] C. Söderström, F. Winquist, C. Krantz-Rülcker, Recognition of six microbial species with an electronic tongue, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 89(2003)

an

248-55.

[43] C. Krantz-Rülcker, M. Stenberg, F. Winquist, I. Lundström, Electronic tongues

M

for environmental monitoring based on sensor arrays and pattern recognition: a review, Analytica chimica acta, 426(2001) 217-26.

d

[44] S.-Y. Tian, S.-P. Deng, Z.-X. Chen, Multifrequency large amplitude pulse voltammetry: A novel electrochemical method for electronic tongue, Sensors and

te

Actuators B: Chemical, 123(2007) 1049-56.

Ac ce p

[45] K. Twomey, E.A. de Eulate, J. Alderman, D. Arrigan, Fabrication and characterization of a miniaturized planar voltammetric sensor array for use in an electronic tongue, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 140(2009) 532-41. [46] Á.A. Arrieta, M.L. Rodríguez-Méndez, J.A. De Saja, C.A. Blanco, D. Nimubona, Prediction of bitterness and alcoholic strength in beer using an electronic tongue, Food chemistry, 123(2010) 642-6. [47] V. Parra, Á.A. Arrieta, J.A. Fernández-Escudero, M. Íñiguez, J.A.d. Saja, M.L. Rodríguez-Méndez, Monitoring of the ageing of red wines in oak barrels by means of an hybrid electronic tongue, Analytica chimica acta, 563(2006) 229-37. [48] X. Cetó, J.M. Gutiérrez, L. Moreno ‐Barón, S. Alegret, M. Del Valle, Voltammetric electronic tongue in the analysis of cava wines, Electroanalysis, 23(2011) 72-8. [49] M. Scampicchio, D. Ballabio, A. Arecchi, S.M. Cosio, S. Mannino, 27

Page 27 of 47

Amperometric electronic tongue for food analysis, Microchimica Acta, 163(2008) 11-21. [50] C. Apetrei, M. Rodrıguez-Méndez, V. Parra, F. Gutierrez, J. De Saja, Array of voltammetric sensors for the discrimination of bitter solutions, Sensors and Actuators

ip t

B: Chemical, 103(2004) 145-52.

[51] A. Arrieta, C. Apetrei, M. Rodríguez-Méndez, J. De Saja, Voltammetric sensor

cr

array based on conducting polymer-modified electrodes for the discrimination of liquids, Electrochimica acta, 49(2004) 4543-51.

us

[52] Y.-F. Wang, X.-R. Zhang, Y.-C. Ye, D.-J. Liang, Y. Wang, K. Wu, Self-Assemblies of Oxovanadium Phthalocyanine Molecules and Nanoclusters on

an

Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite, Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 26(2010) 933-8. [53] I. Yilmaz, T. Nakanishi, A. Gürek, K.M. Kadish, Electrochemical and

M

spectroscopic investigation of neutral, oxidized and reduced double-decker lutetium (III) phthalocyanines, Journal of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines, 7(2003) 227-38.

d

[54] N. Prieto, M. Gay, S. Vidal, O. Aagaard, J. De Saja, M. Rodriguez-Mendez, Analysis of the influence of the type of closure in the organoleptic characteristics of a

te

red wine by using an electronic panel, Food Chemistry, 129(2011) 589-94.

Ac ce p

[55] V. Parra, Á.A. Arrieta, J.-A. Fernández-Escudero, M.L. Rodríguez-Méndez, J.A. De Saja, Electronic tongue based on chemically modified electrodes and voltammetry for the detection of adulterations in wines, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 118(2006) 448-53.

[56] M. Rodríguez-Méndez, C. Apetrei, J. De Saja, Evaluation of the polyphenolic content of extra virgin olive oils using an array of voltammetric sensors, Electrochimica Acta, 53(2008) 5867-72. [57] Z. Haddi, A. Amari, B. Bouchikhi, J.M. Gutiérrez, X. Cetó, A. Mimendia, et al., Data Fusion from Voltammetric and Potentiometric Sensors to Build a Hybrid Electronic Tongue Applied in Classification of Beers,

OLFACTION AND

ELECTRONIC NOSE: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OLFACTION AND ELECTRONIC NOSE, AIP Publishing2011, pp. 189-90. 28

Page 28 of 47

[58] M. Rodríguez-Méndez, M. Gay, C. Apetrei, J. De Saja, Biogenic amines and fish freshness assessment using a multisensor system based on voltammetric electrodes. Comparison between CPE and screen-printed electrodes, Electrochimica Acta, 54(2009) 7033-41.

ip t

[59] F.P. Cabral, B.B. Bergamo, C.A. Dantas, A. Riul Jr, J.A. Giacometti, Impedance

e-tongue instrument for rapid liquid assessment, Review of Scientific Instruments,

cr

80(2009) 026107.

[60] G. Pioggia, F. Di Francesco, A. Marchetti, M. Ferro, A. Ahluwalia, A composite

us

sensor array impedentiometric electronic tongue: Part I. Characterization, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 22(2007) 2618-23.

an

[61] G. Pioggia, F. Di Francesco, A. Marchetti, M. Ferro, R. Leardi, A. Ahluwalia, A composite sensor array impedentiometric electronic tongue: Part II. Discrimination of

M

basic tastes, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 22(2007) 2624-8.

[62] J. Sànchez, M. del Valle, A New Potentiometric Photocurable Membrane

d

Selectiveto Anionic Surfactants, Electroanalysis, 13(2001) 471-6. [63] S.-M. Lee, S.-W. Jang, S.-H. Lee, J.-H. Kim, S.-H. Kim, S.-W. Kang,

te

Measurement of basic taste substances by a fiber optic taste sensor using evanescent

Ac ce p

field absorption, Sens Mater, 14(2002) 11-21. [64] M. Cortina-Puig, X. Muñoz-Berbel, M. del Valle, F.J. Muñoz, M.A. Alonso-Lomillo, Characterization of an ion-selective polypyrrole coating and application to the joint determination of potassium, sodium and ammonium by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and partial least squares method, Analytica chimica acta, 597(2007) 231-7. [65] M. Cortina-Puig, X. Muñoz-Berbel, M.A. Alonso-Lomillo, F.J. Muñoz-Pascual, M. del Valle, EIS multianalyte sensing with an automated SIA system—An electronic tongue employing the impedimetric signal, Talanta, 72(2007) 774-9. [66] H. Kaneda, M. Takashio, K. Shinotsuka, Y. Okahata, Adsorption to or desorption of beer components from a lipid membrane related to sensory evaluation, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering, 92(2001) 221-6. [67] H. Kaneda, J. Watari, M. Takashio, Y. Okahata, Adsorption and desorption of 29

Page 29 of 47

beer and coffee on a lipid membrane as related to sensory bitterness, Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 109(2003) 27-33. [68] H. Kaneda, M. Takashio, Development of beer taste sensor using a lipid-coated quartz-crystal microbalance, Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists,

ip t

63(2005) 89-95.

[69] G. Sehra, M. Cole, J.W. Gardner, Miniature taste sensing system based on dual

103(2004) 233-9.

us

[70] F. Scheller, F. Schubert, Biosensors: Elsevier; 1991.

cr

SH-SAW sensor device: an electronic tongue, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical,

[71] M. Darder, A. Valera, E. Nieto, M. Colilla, C.J. Fernández, R. Romero-Aranda, et

an

al., Multisensor device based on case-based reasoning (CBR) for monitoring nutrient solutions in fertigation, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 135(2009) 530-6.

M

[72] R. Lima, L. Hernandez, A. Carvalho, R. Carvalho, M. da Silva, Corrosion resistant and adsorbent plasma polymerized thin film, Sensors and Actuators B:

d

Chemical, 141(2009) 349-60.

[73] J.R. Siqueira Jr, L. Caseli, F.N. Crespilho, V. Zucolotto, O.N. Oliveira Jr,

te

Immobilization of biomolecules on nanostructured films for biosensing, Biosensors

Ac ce p

and Bioelectronics, 25(2010) 1254-63. [74] A. Gutés, A. Ibanez, M. Del Valle, F. Céspedes, Automated SIA e‐Tongue

Employing a Voltammetric Biosensor Array for the Simultaneous Determination of Glucose and Ascorbic Acid, Electroanalysis, 18(2006) 82-8. [75] K. SuáKim, S. KwangáHahn, Real-time, step-wise, electrical detection of protein molecules using dielectrophoretically aligned SWNT-film FET aptasensors, Lab on a Chip, 10(2010) 2052-6.

[76] B. Premanode, C. Toumazou, A novel, low power biosensor for real time monitoring of creatinine and urea in peritoneal dialysis, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 120(2007) 732-5. [77] D. Braeken, D. Rand, A. Andrei, R. Huys, M. Spira, S. Yitzchaik, et al., Glutamate sensing with enzyme-modified floating-gate field effect transistors, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 24(2009) 2384-9. 30

Page 30 of 47

[78] E. Tønning, S. Sapelnikova, J. Christensen, C. Carlsson, M. Winther-Nielsen, E. Dock, et al., Chemometric exploration of an amperometric biosensor array for fast determination of wastewater quality, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 21(2005) 608-17. [79] L. Dezhong, G. Kai, C. Kang, N. Lihua, Y. Shouzhuo, Sensitive specialization

ip t

analysis of urea in human blood by surface acoustic wave urea sensor system, Microchemical journal, 53(1996) 6-17.

cr

[80] D. Liu, K. Chen, K. Ge, L. Nie, S. Yao, A new urea sensor based on combining

the surface acoustic wave device with urease extracted from green soya bean and its

us

application—determination of urea in human urine, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 11(1996) 435-42.

an

[81] M. Gutierrez, S. Alegret, M. del Valle, Potentiometric bioelectronic tongue for the analysis of urea and alkaline ions in clinical samples, Biosensors and

M

Bioelectronics, 22(2007) 2171-8.

[82] C. Puig-Lleixà, C.l. Jiménez, J. Alonso, J. Bartrolı́, Polyurethane–acrylate

d

photocurable polymeric membrane for ion-sensitive field-effect transistor based urea biosensors, Analytica chimica acta, 389(1999) 179-88.

te

[83] D.M. Gil, M.J. Rebelo, Evaluating the antioxidant capacity of wines: a

Ac ce p

laccase-based biosensor approach, European Food Research and Technology, 231(2010) 303-8.

[84] V. Carralero Sanz, M.L. Mena, A. González-Cortés, P. Yanez-Sedeno, J. Pingarrón,

Development

of

a

tyrosinase

biosensor

based

on

gold

nanoparticles-modified glassy carbon electrodes: Application to the measurement of a bioelectrochemical polyphenols index in wines, Analytica Chimica Acta, 528(2005) 1-8.

[85] R. Solná, P. Skládal, Amperometric Flow‐Injection Determination of Phenolic Compounds Using a Biosensor with Immobilized Laccase, Peroxidase and Tyrosinase, Electroanalysis, 17(2005) 2137-46. [86] J. Zeravik, A. Hlavacek, K. Lacina, P. Skládal, State of the art in the field of electronic and bioelectronic tongues–towards the analysis of wines, Electroanalysis, 21(2009) 2509-20. 31

Page 31 of 47

[87] X. Cetó, F. Céspedes, M. del Valle, BioElectronic Tongue for the quantification of total polyphenol content in wine, Talanta, 99(2012) 544-51. [88] M. Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti, M.L. Rodríguez-Méndez, S.S. Mohtasebi, C. Apetrei, J. Lozano, H. Ahmadi, et al., Monitoring the aging of beers using a bioelectronic

ip t

tongue, Food Control, 25(2012) 216-24.

[89] X. Cetó, F. Céspedes, M. del Valle, Assessment of Individual Polyphenol Content

cr

in Beer by Means of a Voltammetric BioElectronic Tongue, Electroanalysis, 25(2013) 68-76.

us

[90] A. Gutés, F. Céspedes, S. Alegret, M. Del Valle, Determination of phenolic compounds by a polyphenol oxidase amperometric biosensor and artificial neural

an

network analysis, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 20(2005) 1668-73.

[91] X. Cetó, F. Céspedes, M.I. Pividori, J.M. Gutiérrez, M. Del Valle, Resolution of

M

phenolic antioxidant mixtures employing a voltammetric bio-electronic tongue, Analyst, 137(2012) 349-56.

d

[92] A. Gutes, A. Ibanez, F. Cespedes, S. Alegret, M. Del Valle, Simultaneous determination of phenolic compounds by means of an automated voltammetric

te

“electronic tongue”, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 382(2005) 471-6.

Ac ce p

[93] H. Yin, Y. Zhou, J. Xu, S. Ai, L. Cui, L. Zhu, Amperometric biosensor based on tyrosinase immobilized onto multiwalled carbon nanotubes-cobalt phthalocyanine-silk fibroin film and its application to determine bisphenol A, Analytica chimica acta, 659(2010) 144-50.

[94] E.G.R. Fernandes, L.C. Brazaca, M.L. Rodríguez-Mendez, J.A.d. Saja, V. Zucolotto,

Immobilization

of

lutetium

bisphthalocyanine

in

nanostructured

biomimetic sensors using the LbL technique for phenol detection, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 26(2011) 4715-9. [95] L. Bousse, Whole cell biosensors, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 34(1996) 270-5. [96] A.S. Rudolph, J. Reasor, Cell and tissue based technologies for environmental detection and medical diagnostics, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 16(2001) 429-31. [97] P. Wang, G. Xu, L. Qin, Y. Xu, Y. Li, R. Li, Cell-based biosensors and its 32

Page 32 of 47

application in biomedicine, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 108(2005) 576-84. [98] P. Chen, B. Wang, G. Cheng, P. Wang, Taste receptor cell-based biosensor for taste specific recognition based on temporal firing, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 25(2009) 228-33.

ip t

[99] W. Zhang, Y. Li, Q. Liu, Y. Xu, H. Cai, P. Wang, A novel experimental research based on taste cell chips for taste transduction mechanism, Sensors and Actuators B:

cr

Chemical, 131(2008) 24-8.

Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 26(2010) 929-34.

us

[100] T.-H. Wang, G.-H. Hui, S.-P. Deng, A novel sweet taste cell-based sensor,

[101] G. Servant, C. Tachdjian, X. Li, D.S. Karanewsky, The sweet taste of true

pharmacological sciences, 32(2011) 631-6.

an

synergy: positive allosteric modulation of the human sweet taste receptor, Trends in

M

[102] P. Chen, W. Zhang, P. Chen, Z. Zhou, C. Chen, J. Hu, et al., A serotonin-sensitive sensor for investigation of taste cell-to-cell communication,

d

Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 26(2011) 3054-8.

[103] C. Wu, L. Du, L. Zou, L. Zhao, P. Wang, An ATP sensitive light addressable

te

biosensor for extracellular monitoring of single taste receptor cell, Biomedical

Ac ce p

microdevices, 14(2012) 1047-53.

[104] Q. Liu, F. Zhang, D. Zhang, N. Hu, K.J. Hsia, P. Wang, Extracellular potentials recording in intact taste epithelium by microelectrode array for a taste sensor, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 43(2013) 186-92. [105] S. Morefield, E. Keefer, K. Chapman, G. Gross, Drug evaluations using neuronal networks cultured on microelectrode arrays, Biosensors and bioelectronics, 15(2000) 383-96. [106]

S.

Rajaraman,

Micromachining

Three-Dimensional Microelectrode Arrays,

Techniques

for

Realization

of

Nanotechnology and Neuroscience:

Nano-electronic, Photonic and Mechanical Neuronal Interfacing, Springer2014, pp. 135-82. [107] A. Stett, U. Egert, E. Guenther, F. Hofmann, T. Meyer, W. Nisch, et al., Biological application of microelectrode arrays in drug discovery and basic research, 33

Page 33 of 47

Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 377(2003) 486-95. [108] F. Pampaloni, E.G. Reynaud, E.H. Stelzer, The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue, Nature reviews Molecular cell biology, 8(2007) 839-45.

cell-based assays, Drug discovery today, 14(2009) 102-7.

ip t

[109] B.A. Justice, N.A. Badr, R.A. Felder, 3D cell culture opens new dimensions in

cr

[110] R. Dando, S.D. Roper, Cell‐to‐cell communication in intact taste buds through ATP signalling from pannexin 1 gap junction hemichannels, The Journal of

us

physiology, 587(2009) 5899-906.

[111] Q. Liu, D. Zhang, F. Zhang, Y. Zhao, K.J. Hsia, P. Wang, Biosensor recording of

Actuators B: Chemical, 176(2013) 497-504.

an

extracellular potentials in the taste epithelium for bitter detection, Sensors and

M

[112] Q. Liu, F. Zhang, D. Zhang, N. Hu, H. Wang, K. Jimmy Hsia, et al., Bioelectronic tongue of taste buds on microelectrode array for salt sensing,

d

Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 40(2013) 115-20.

[113] D. Zhang, F. Zhang, Q. Zhang, Y. Lu, Q. Liu, P. Wang, Umami evaluation in

te

taste epithelium on microelectrode array by extracellular electrophysiological

Ac ce p

recording, Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 438(2013) 334-9. [114] F. Zhang, Q. Zhang, D. Zhang, Y. Lu, Q. Liu, P. Wang, Biosensor analysis of natural and artificial sweeteners in intact taste epithelium, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 54(2014) 385-92. [115] C. Wu, L. Du, L. Zou, L. Huang, P. Wang, A biomimetic bitter receptor-based biosensor with high efficiency immobilization and purification using self-assembled aptamers, Analyst, 138(2013) 5989-94. [116] C. Medina-Plaza, J. de Saja, M. Rodriguez-Mendez, Bioelectronic tongue based on lipidic nanostructured layers containing phenol oxidases and lutetium bisphthalocyanine for the analysis of grapes, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 57(2014) 276-83. [117] I.M. Apetrei, C. Apetrei, Biosensor based on tyrosinase immobilized in single-walled carbon nanotubes modified glassy carbon electrode for epinephrine 34

Page 34 of 47

detection. [118] I. Apetrei, M. Rodriguez-Mendez, C. Apetrei, J. De Saja, Enzyme sensor based on carbon nanotubes/cobalt (II) phthalocyanine and tyrosinase used in pharmaceutical analysis, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 177(2013) 138-44.

ip t

[119] E.S. Medeiros, R. Gregório, R.A. Martinez, L.H. Mattoso, A taste sensor array

based on polyaniline nanofibers for orange juice quality assessment, Sensor Letters,

cr

7(2009) 24-30.

[120] T.H. Kim, H.S. Song, H.J. Jin, S.H. Lee, S. Namgung, U.-k. Kim, et al.,

us

“Bioelectronic super-taster” device based on taste receptor-carbon nanotube hybrid structures, Lab on a Chip, 11(2011) 2262-7.

an

[121] H.S. Song, O.S. Kwon, S.H. Lee, S.J. Park, U.-K. Kim, J. Jang, et al., Human taste receptor-functionalized field effect transistor as a human-like nanobioelectronic

Ac ce p

te

d

M

tongue, Nano letters, 13(2012) 172-8.

35

Page 35 of 47

Legends

ip t

Figure 1. (a)The diagram of taste sensing system. (b) Radar chart as pattern recognition of foodstuff with different taste properties. (Reprinted with permission

cr

from ref. 13.)

us

Figure 2. (a) Schematic image of the valinomycin-modified grapheme FET device. (b)

an

The fabricated valinomycin-modified grapheme FET showed a sensitivity to K+, over the concentration range from 10nM to 1 mM. (c) The schematic section and physical

M

top-view of InN-modified ISFET. (d) The InN-modified ISFET exhibited a sensitivity of 58.3 mV/pH and the current variation ratio was estimated to be 4.0%/pH.

te

d

(Reprinted with permission from ref. 30 and ref. 31.) Figure 3. (a) Schematic representation for the fabricated thrombin aptamer

Ac ce p

functionalized SWNT-FET biosensor. (b) Real-time determination for the specific binding of thrombin molecules under increasing concentrations to thrombin aptamer functionalized SWNT-FET biosensor. (Reprinted with permission from ref. 66.) Figure 4. The schematic diagram of voltammetric BioET method. Signals extracted

from sensor array were firstly compressed by FFT and then input in the ANN to build multidetermination model. (Reprinted with permission from ref. 78.) Figure 5. (a) Different taste receptors were expressed in Type II and Type III cells for respective stimuli. Meanwhile, the neurotransmitter ATP was transmitted between two type cells. (b) The LAPS set-up for extracellular electrophysiological recordings of 36

Page 36 of 47

taste receptor cells. (c) The statistics of firing rate with different stimuli. (d) The pH-dependency of firing rate on sour stimuli. (e) PCA analysis of the temporal firing

ip t

response to sour (blue) and ATP (red). (Reprinted with permission from ref. 89.) Figure 6. (a) The schematic diagram of the tissue biosensor, which had a combination

cr

of microelectrodes and taste epithelium to record the extracellular potentials of taste

us

buds to taste stimuli. (b) The average amplitude and duration of signals in time domain to different basic taste stimulations. (c) The schematic diagram of a liquid-ion

an

gate FET using hTAS2R38-functionalized CPNT. (d) Different bitterness perception of PAV-CPNT-FET and AVI-CPNT-FET for the target bitter tastants (PTC). The

M

former showed a high sensitivity at concentrations as low as 1 fM while the latter

d

exhibited no significant change. (Reprinted with permission from ref. 98 and ref. 111.)

te

Table 1. Summary of electronic tongues including sensor type, sensing materials, data

Ac ce p

processing algorithm and applications

Table 2. Summary of bioelectronic tongues including biomolecule type, transducer part, biological recognition component and target molecules

37

Page 37 of 47

Data processing algorithm

Ref

ISEs, PVC-plasticized cation- and anion-senstive membranes, Chalcogenide glass

Bitterness evaluation of pharmaceuticals

PLS, 3wayPLS

[11]

ISEs, Chalcogenide glass, Plasticized polyvinylchloride membranes

Bitter taste in red wine, wine age prediction

PLS-DA, MLR, PCA

[7, 8]

Potentiometric sensors with PVC membranes and Chalcogenide glass

Taste and flavor of beer

PCA, CCA, PLS

[9,10]

Lipidic membranes with active substances such as trioctylmethylammonium chloride, oleic acid and gallic acid, etc.

Five basic taste evaluation, tea, milk, taste suppression in pharmaceuticals

PCA

[12-16,17, 20,22]

ISFET, photocurable polyurethane membranes

Mineral waters, grape juice, wine samples

HCA, PCA, PLS

[28,29]

cr

us

an

LAPS, PVC membranes with ionophores such as N,N’-tetrabutyldipicolinediamide, etc.

Heavy metals detection in seawater

Noble metal electrodes, platinum, gold, iridium, palladium, and rhodium

Tea, milk, juice, detergents

PCA, PLS, ANN

[35,38-40]

Noble metal electrodes, platinum, gold, palladium, titanium, nickel, etc.

Chinese distilled spirit, Longjing tea

MVDA, PCA

[44]

Platinum plates, carbon paste electrodes, polypyrrole, phthalocyanines, etc.

Oleuropein, ligstroside, alcohol in beers

PCA, PLS

[46,50]

d

te

Impedance

Optics

Mass

[32]

Graphite-epoxy electrodes

Wines

PCA, ANN

[48]

Gold disks, carbon paste electrodes, Phthalocyanines, polypyrrole and perylenes

Red wines

PCA

[47]

platinum disks with electrodeposition layers (3-methylthiophene, aniline and pyrrole)

Five taste properties discrimination

PCA

[51]

Carbon paste electrodes modified with metallic phthalocyanines and polypyrrole-based electrodes

antioxidants analysis present in foods

PCA, PLS

[55]

Polypyrrole

Water and taste substances

PCA

[59]

Polylactic acid, carbon black, polyvinyl alcohol, etc.

Standard taste solutions

PCA

[60,61]

Urethane-acrylate, 2-cyanophenyl

Anionic surfactants

Dye/silicon and dye/lipid/ PVC-PVAc-PVA

Basic taste solutions

Ac ce p

Voltammetry

ip t

Applications

M

Potentiometry

Sensor type & Sensing materials

QCM, dioctadecyldimethylammonium poly (styrene sulfonate) Dual shear horizontal SAW

[62] PCA

Bitterness intensity and 39 astringency of beer Basic tastes analysis

[63] [66-68]

PCA

[69]

Page 38 of 47

Table 2 Summary of bioelectronic tongues including biomolecule type, transducer part, biological recognition component and target molecules

Cell

Target molecules or substances

Ref

Platinum disc, epoxy-graphine

Glucose oxidase

Glucose

[74]

SWNT-FET

Aptamer

Thrombin

[75]

FET

Creatininase, creatinase and urease

Creatinine and urea

[76]

FET

Glutamate oxidase

Glutamate

[77]

SAW

Urease

Urea

[79,80]

ISFET

Urease

Urea

[82]

Gold nanoparticles-modified glassy electrodes

Tyrosinase

polyphenols

[84]

Graphite-epoxy voltammetric electrodes

Tyrosinase, laccase, Copper nanoparticles

ferulic, gallic and sinapic acid

[89]

LAPS

taste receptor cells

Taste substaces

[98,99]

NCI-H716 cell lines

Sweet tastants

[100]

taste receptor cells

serotonin

[102]

taste epithelium

Bitter substances

[111]

taste epithelium

Salt substances

[112]

taste epithelium

Umami substances

[113]

taste epithelium

Sweeteners

[114]

QCM

membrane fractions of HEK-293 cell containing bitter receptor

Denatonium

[115]

LAPS

ATP-sensitive DNA aptamer

ATP secretion

[103]

swCNT-FET

Human bitter taste receptor protein hTAS2R38

PTC and PROP (bitter substances)

[120]

CPNT-FET

Taster type (PAV) and non taster type(AVI) hTAS2R38

PTC and PROP (bitter substances)

[121]

Carbon screen-printed electrode LAPS MEAs MEAs

te

Tissue

MEAs

Ac ce p

cr

us

d

MEAs

ip t

Biological recognition component

an

Enzyme

Transducer part

M

Biomolecule type

Receptor

41

Page 39 of 47

Biographies Da Ha received his B.S. and Ph.D. degree of biomedical engineering in Zhejiang

ip t

University, P.R. China in 2009 and 2014. His research interests include biomedical sensors and chemical sensors.

cr

Ning Hu received his B.S. and Ph.D. degree of biomedical engineering in Zhejiang

us

University, P.R. China in 2009 and 2014. Now he is a postdoctor of biomedical engineering of Zhejiang University. His work includes cell-based biosensor, biosensor

an

instrument establishing and signal processing.

M

Qiyong Sun received his BS degree in Shandong University, P. R. China in 2012. Presently, he started his Ph.D. thesis in the Department of Biomedical Engineering of

te

chemical sensors.

d

Zhejiang University, from 2012. His research interests include biomedical sensors and

Ac ce p

Kaiqi Su received his B.S. and M.S. degree of biomedical engineering in Zhejiang University, P.R. China in 2011 and 2014. Now he is a Ph.D. candidate of biomedical engineering of Zhejiang University. His work includes biosensor instrument establishing, software design and signal processing. Hao Wan received his BS degree in Huazhong University of Science and Technology,

P. R. China in 2010. Presently, he started his Ph.D thesis in the Department of Biomedical Engineering of Zhejiang University from 2010. His research interests include biomedical sensors and chemical sensors. Haibo Li received his BS degree in Tianjin University, P. R. China in 2012. Presently,

he started his MS thesis in the Department of Biomedical Engineering of Zhejiang 42

Page 40 of 47

University, from 2012. His research interests include chemical sensors. Ning Xu received her BS degree in Zhejiang University, PR China in 2012. Presently, she started her MS thesis in the Department of Biomedical Engineering of Zhejiang

ip t

University from 2012. Her research interests include chemical sensors.

cr

Fei Sun received his BS degree in Tianjin University, P. R. China in 2013. Presently,

us

he started his MS thesis in the Department of Biomedical Engineering of Zhejiang University, from 2013. His research interests include chemical sensors.

an

Ping Wang received his BS degree, MS degree and Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, P. R. China in 1984, 1987

M

and 1992, respectively. He is currently a professor of Biosensors National Special Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering of Zhejiang University. He is also a visiting

te

d

professor in Electronic Design Center of Case Western Reserve University, USA and a visiting scholar in Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering of

Ac ce p

University of Arkansas, USA. His research interests include biomedical sensors, chemical sensors and measurement technique.

43

Page 41 of 47

Ac

ce

pt

ed

M

an

us

cr

i

Figure(1)

Page 42 of 47

Ac

ce

pt

ed

M

an

us

cr

i

Figure(2)

Page 43 of 47

Ac

ce

pt

ed

M

an

us

cr

i

Figure(3)

Page 44 of 47

Ac

ce

pt

ed

M

an

us

cr

i

Figure(4)

Page 45 of 47

Ac

ce

pt

ed

M

an

us

cr

i

Figure(5)

Page 46 of 47

Ac

ce

pt

ed

M

an

us

cr

i

Figure(6)

Page 47 of 47