Repairing sciatic nerve injury with an EPO-loaded nerve conduit and sandwiched-in strategy of transplanting mesenchymal stem cells

Repairing sciatic nerve injury with an EPO-loaded nerve conduit and sandwiched-in strategy of transplanting mesenchymal stem cells

Accepted Manuscript Repairing sciatic nerve injury with an EPO-loaded nerve conduit and sandwiched-in strategy of transplanting mesenchymal stem cells...

3MB Sizes 0 Downloads 9 Views

Accepted Manuscript Repairing sciatic nerve injury with an EPO-loaded nerve conduit and sandwiched-in strategy of transplanting mesenchymal stem cells Wei Zhang, Lihai Zhang, Jianheng Liu, Licheng Zhang, Jian Zhang, Peifu Tang PII:

S0142-9612(17)30423-4

DOI:

10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.06.024

Reference:

JBMT 18144

To appear in:

Biomaterials

Received Date: 5 January 2017 Revised Date:

9 June 2017

Accepted Date: 19 June 2017

Please cite this article as: Zhang W, Zhang L, Liu J, Zhang L, Zhang J, Tang P, Repairing sciatic nerve injury with an EPO-loaded nerve conduit and sandwiched-in strategy of transplanting mesenchymal stem cells, Biomaterials (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.06.024. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Repairing sciatic nerve injury with an EPO-loaded nerve conduit

2

and sandwiched-in strategy of transplanting mesenchymal stem

3

cells

RI PT

1

Wei Zhang 1, Lihai Zhang 1, Jianheng Liu 1, Licheng Zhang1, jian

5

Zhang 2, Peifu Tang 1*

6

1 Department of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Chinese PLA,

7

Beijing, 100853, China

8

2 Department of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Liaoyuan Mining

9

Group, Jilin Province, 136201, China

M AN U

SC

4

10

*Correspondence should be addressed to Peifu Tang;

11

pftang [email protected]

12 13

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

EP

16

AC C

15

TE D

14

25 26 27

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Abstract: Transplantation of a biosynthetic nerve conduit carrying

2

neuro-protective cytokines is promising for treating peripheral nerve

3

injury. Here we developed a novel strategy for repairing sciatic nerve

4

injury by EPO-loaded Chitosan nerve conduit (EPO/Chi) and

5

sandwiched-in transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Then,

6

the beneficial effect of EPO/Chi+MSCs on nerve regeneration was also

7

further investigated by in vitro cellular experiments. In vivo experiment

8

showed that combination of EPO-loaded Chitosan nerve conduit with

9

MSCs could significantly accelerate nerve healing and improve

10

morphological repair. Furthermore, the in vitro cellular experiments

11

results demonstrated that the loaded EPO in nerve conduit could

12

significantly reinforce the repair performance of both MSCs and

13

Schwann cells, which may also contribute to the therapeutic outcome of

14

the EPO/Chi + MSCs strategy. Collectively, the EPO-loaded nerve

15

conduit and sandwiched-in transplantation of MSCs we reported in the

16

study may represent a new potential strategy for peripheral nerve

17

reconstruction.

18

Key words: Sciatic nerve injury; Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC);

19

Nerve regeneration or repair; Erythropoietin (EPO); Chitosan

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

1

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

1.Introduction Despite the certain degree of self-regenerative capability, repair of

3

long-distance peripheral nerve transection injury was still a major

4

challenge in clinic and the therapeutic outcome was usually weak [1, 2].

5

Thus, tissue engineering-based efforts, such as biomaterials supplemented

6

with or without stem cells or neurotrophic factors, were proposed as

7

alternative promising ways to repair the injured peripheral nerve[3, 4].

8

Among

these

approaches,

the

RI PT

2

artificial

nerve

guidance

conduit-based surgery was considered as one of the most promising

10

strategies for treating peripheral nerve injury. These biodegradable

11

guidance conduits, with single/multi-channel hollow tubes [5] or more

12

complicated structure for bio-mimicking themacro- and micro-structures

13

of nerves [6, 7] demonstrated promising therapeutic benefits. A number

14

of materials, including the synthetic Poly-L-Lactide Acid (PLLA),

15

Polycaprolactone (PCL), and some natural biomaterials such as collagen

16

or fibrin, had been used for the guidance conduits development [2, 8, 9].

M AN U

SC

9

Recently, the natural derivative chitosan based porous and

18

biodegradable scaffolds were proved to be a potentially effective

19

candidate conduit material for nerve regeneration, especially for

20

promoting the long-distance regeneration of peripheral nerves [6, 10].

21

However, the biological response of single synthetic chitosan conduit

22

using is still underactive, especially for lacking of seeding cells for nerve

23

regeneration. In addition to single nerve conduit, supplemention of

24

growth-promoting and neuronal regulation cytokines, such as neurotropic

25

factors glial cell line derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and nerve

26

growth factor (NGF), were proved to further enhance the nerve

27

regeneration[2]. Recently, the normal known hematopoietic cytokine

28

erythropoietin (EPO) was demonstrated with neuro-protective on the

29

peripheral nerve system by targeting Schwann cells after nerve injury

30

[11-15]. Previously, we have demonstrated that sustained release of EPO

31

by poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) microspheres could significantly

AC C

EP

TE D

17

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

promote the recovery of injuried peripheral nerve in rats [16], and thus

2

we hypothesized in the study that the loading exogenous EPO in the

3

synthetic nerve conduits might increase their performance for peripheral

4

nerve repair. The application of stem cells therapy would provide not only large

6

numbers of exogenous seeding cells, but also adequate amounts of

7

paracrine secreted bioactive cytokines[17, 18]. However, traditional stem

8

cell transplantation was usually accompanied with excessive loss and

9

death of transplanted cells, which hampered the therapeutic efficacy for peripheral nerve injury.

SC

10

RI PT

5

The present study aimed to construct a simpler intraluminal modified

12

nerve guidance conduits and develop a sandwiched-in strategy for stem

13

cells transplantation. Based on the tissue engineering approach, the EPO

14

was loaded in the Chitosan scaffold for sustained release to further

15

enhance nerve regeneration and the functional repair of the sciatic nerve

16

injury. The immunohistochemical and histological monitoring methods

17

were performed to evaluate the performance. Finally, the in vitro cellular

18

experiments were performed to investigate beneficial effects of

19

EPO-loading Chitosan scaffolds on the repair performance of MSCs and

20

Schwann cells, as well as the potential underlying mechanism.

21

2. Materials and methods

22

2.1. Cell culture

TE D

EP

AC C

23

M AN U

11

Rat adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (Ad-MSC or MSC)

24

were bought from Cyagen Co. (China) and cultured at 37 °C in a

25

humidified atmosphere containing 5% carbon dioxide. The culture

26

medium of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Invitrogen

27

Co., USA) with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS, Thermo scientific,

28

Logan, USA), 100 units/ml Penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin was

29

used. 4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

2.2. Preparation of the EPO-Chitosan nerve guidance

2

conduit EPO-Chitosan nerve conduits were prepared as previously described

4

[8]. Briefly, 10 mg/mL (w/v) of chitosan in hydrochloric acid aqueous

5

solution (pH 5.8) with 1000 U/mL EPO were prepared and injected into a

6

casting mold with an outer sleeve (diameter = 3.8 mm) and an inner

7

sleeve (diameter = 1.2 mm) (Figure. 1 A). The solution was further

8

solidified under minus 20 oC overnight and dried by using a vacuum

9

freeze-drying machine with a FDP80 Oil Vacuum Pumps (Thermo

10

Scientific™, USA). The prepared nerve conduits were then washed with

11

phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) and sterilized with 25 kGy Cobalt 60

12

prior to use. The Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) was performed to

13

characterize the scaffold by using Mira3 LMH Schottky FE-SEM (Tescan,

14

Czech).

15

2.3.

16

guidance conduit

M AN U

SC

RI PT

3

of

TE D

Characterization

the

EPO-Chitosan

nerve

To characterize the in vitro release of the EPO from the conduit, 10

18

mg of EPO-Chitosan nerve conduits were emerged into 1mL 10 mM PBS and incubated at 37 °C with shaking at 110 rpm. The released supernatant with EPO at day 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7, 10, 14, 18 and 21 were obtained via centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 2 min and replaced the same volume of PBS after collecting the samples. The concentration of EPO protein in the supernatant was measured using an EPO ELISA kit. The cumulative release (%) of EPO was calculated and 5 samples were included. To determine the effective swelling ratio, the dry weights (Wdry) of lyophilized Chitosan (Chi) and EPO loaded Chitosan (EPO/Chi) conduits were measured. After that, the conduits were immersed in 10 mM PBS

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

AC C

19

EP

17

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

and incubated for 24 hours at 37 °C to reach equilibrium swelling state.

2

Five samples of each group were obtained and the weight of conduit after

3

swelling (Wwet) was measured. The swelling ratio (SR) was calculated

4

by the following equations: SR=( Wwet- Wdry)/ Wdry*100%. The

5

elastic modulus of conduits was measured using a sans CMT700 type

6

universal testing machine. The conduit were incubated in PBS for 24

7

hours at 37 °C and loaded on the machine. The elastic modulus of

8

conduits was at a stretching speed of 10 mm/min.

9

2.4.

injury

treatment.

animal

model

SC

nerve

and

M AN U

10

Peripheral

RI PT

1

The effect of EPO-loaded nerve conduit with MSCs on nerve

12

regeneration was examined in an experimental sciatic nerve defect injury

13

animal model employing specific pathogen-free (SPF) Sprague-Dawley

14

(SD) rats. The rats (about 220 g) were purchased from the Experimental

15

Animal Center, Academy of Military Medical Science (Beijing, China).

16

All animal experiments were approved by the local institution of Animal

17

Experimental Ethics Committee of Experimental Animal Center,

18

Academy of Military Medical Science (Beijing, China).

TE D

11

Animals were prepared and underwent surgery using the method as

20

described [7]. Briefly, zoletil (500 µg per animal) and rompun 2% (10 µL

21

per animal) of intramuscular injection were used to anesthetize the animal.

22

In the central area underneath the gluteus maximus, the sciatic nerve in

23

the right hind limb was exposed and transected by a scissor cut at a

24

constant point and a 5mm nerve defect was created. After that, four

25

different treatment approach were applied for the injury healing: (1) For

26

Control group, simple saline treatment was applied; (2) for Gel/MSC

27

group, 20uL Matrigel mixed with 2×105 MSC was injected to the defect

28 29

area (3) For Conduit group, only EPO- Chitosan conduit was applied for surgery transplantation; (4) for Conduit + Gel/MSC groups, 20uL

30

Matrigel mixed with 2×105 MSC was injected into the conduit after

AC C

EP

19

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Conduits implantation and then applied for the defect replacement. For

2

tracking of the exogenous MSC, the cells were labeled by DiI

3

(Invitrogen). There were 12 rats in every experimental group at each time

4

points.

5

2.5.

6

examination

analysis

and

electrophysiological

RI PT

Functional

Four and eight weeks after surgery, the walking track test for

8

foot-print analysis was applied for the all animals for functional recovery

9

of never injury as described [13, 19]. Briefly, a confined walking track

10

system (7 × 50 cm2) of an open and a darkened end corridor was used

11

respectively. The rats with black ink dyed paws were allowed to walk on

12

it to obtain the tractable paws prints. The footprint parameter sciatic

13

functional index (SFI) was calculated accordingly [13, 19] and an SFI

14

value (-100% - 0) stands for the incomplete nerve function recovery.

15

To further evaluate the motor performance of the rat, the extensor

16

postural thrust (EPT) and withdrawal reflex latency (WRL) were also

17

measure at the end of week 8. For EPT analysis, the entire body of rat

18

was wrapped in a surgical towel and held upright except for its one hind

19

limb. The foot extension of the rat was induced via lowering the rat

20

toward the surface a platform. The extension force to the platform of a

21

digital balance was recorded in grams. The EPT of normal hind limb

22

(EPT_nor) and experimental hind limb (EPT_exp) from every rat were

23

measured. The reduction in the extensor muscle force was set as the

24

indicative of a deficit in the motor function. The deficit percentage was

25

calculated with the formula EPT (%) = (EPT_nor – EPT_exp) / EPT_nor

26

*100%. For WRL measurement, the rat was fixed and the hind paw was

27

placed on a 56 oC platform. The WRL time was measured as the required

28

time for the rat to withdraw the paw. If the rat remain still for more than

29

12 seconds, removed the rat from the hot platform and the maximal WRL

30

of 12 seconds was assigned to the animal. Detailed descriptions of the

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

7

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

methods could be found in many relative published papers. The electrophysiological examination was further conducted to obtain

3

the Motor nerve conduction velocities (MNCV) of right sciatic nerve

4

using MEB-7102 instrument (Nihon Kohden,Osaka, Japan). The distance

5

between the stimulating and recording electrodes was then divided by the

6

latency of the distal and proximal to calculate the MNCV.

7

2.6.

8

examination.

histological

vivo

and

immunohistological

SC

In

RI PT

2

The sciatic nerves or targeting gastrocnemius muscles were harvest

10

from each group at relatively time points after surgery and fixed in 4%

11

paraformaldehyde for at least 24 hours. The tissue was embedded in

12

paraffin and 3-5 µm of paraffin sections were then prepared. After that,

13

hematoxylineosin (H&E) and Masson trichrome staining were applied for

14

the histological examination of nerve regeneration. An immunohisto-

15

chemical method was then performed to localize the expression of PGP

16

9.5 protein (protein gene product 9.5, 1:200, Abzoom, Wuppertal,

17

Germany). Modified Bielschowsky silver staining was also used and the

18

axon numbers were measured accordingly. In order to measure the

19

diameter of axons and thickness of myelin sheaths, the samples were also

20

observed by atomic force microscope (AFM) and calculated as previously

21

reported [13, 20]. For each section, at least 6 - 8 of random fields were

22

selected for the number counting and quantitative analysis.

23

2.7. In vitro cell viability and wound-healing migration

24

assay

25

2.7.1 Preparation of EPO/Chi coated glass substrates

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

9

26

In order to investigate the migratory response of MSCs to EPO/Chi,

27

the wound-healing migration assay was performed. For the in vitro 8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

wound-healing assay, glass slides with a size of 1 × 1 cm2 were used. The

2

glass slides substrates with different coating were prepared using a

3

slightly modified approach as reported previously [21]. Briefly, the glass

4

substrate was firstly ultrasonic cleaned with acetone for 15 minutes,

5

followed by 15 minutes of ethanol for two times. At last, the slides were

6

further ultrasonic treated with distilled water for 15 minutes. The cleaned

7

glass surface was then covered with a small amount of the chitosan

8

solution (10 mg/mL, w/v) with or without 1000 U/mL EPO and squeezed

9

a clean glass on the top to form a thin film. After solidification process,

10

the top glass was gently removed away and the thin film coated slide was

11

dried in a freeze-drying machine over night at a temperature of − 80 °C.

12 13

Before the cell seeding the coated slides were firstly incubated with culture medium to neutralize acidic film.

14

2.7.2 Cell migration (wound-healing) assay

M AN U

SC

RI PT

1

For wound-healing assay, the slides covered with chitosan (Chi) or

16

EPO loaded chitosan (EPO/Chi) were seeded with Ad-MSCs at the

17

density of 2×104/cm2, and the glass substrates without coating were used

18

as control. When the cells reach to 80–90% confluence, an artificial

19

wound was created by using a 10µL pipette tip by longitudinally straight

20

scratching the confluent cell monolayer. After washed two times with

21

PBS solution to removed the un-attached cells, the cells were then

22

incubated in DMEM containing 1% FBS for 12 hours. The cells at 0 h

23

and 12 h time points after the scratching were stained with fluorescein

24

diacetate (FDA) for observation and the images were obtained using an

25

inverted microscope (Olympus IX71, Japan). The total migrated cells

26

were then calculated by counting at least five random separate fields from

27

each sample (n=5) and then the cell numbers were normalized to control

28

groups.

29

2.7.3 Cell viability measurement

AC C

EP

TE D

15

30

The cell viability of Ad-MSC cultured on the substrates was assessed

31

using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazohl- 2-yl)- 2,5-diph enyltetrazolium

32

bromide (MTT; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and the absorbance at a

33

wavelength of 490 nm was measured. 9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

2

2.8. The transwell assay The transwell assay was further performed to evaluate the effects of Ad-MSCs

paracrine

cytokines

on

the

Schwann

cell

line

4

(RT4-D6P2T) migration. The Ad-MSCs were firstly cultured on the glass

5

slides in 24-well plats for 3 days and 2,0000 of RT4-D6P2T were seeded

6

into the upper chamber with a pore size of 8 µm (Corning, USA) in

7

serum-free medium. After incubation for 24 hours, the remained cells in

8

the upper chamber were gently removed, and the migrated cells under the

9

membrane were fixed and stained with crystal violet solution. The images

10

of immigrated cells were captured with an inverted microscope and the

11

cell numbers of 5 random separate fields from each sample (n=3) were

12

counted.

13

2.9. Gene expression assay

M AN U

SC

RI PT

3

After cultured for 3 days, Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was

15

applied to assay the mRNA levels of related neur-protective genes and

16

the ELISA was performed to measure the concentration of FGF-2

17

(fibroblast growth factor 2), BDNF (Basic fibroblast growth factor),

18

SDF-1 (Stromal cell derived factor 1, CXCL12) that secreted by rat

19

Ad-MSC using ELISA kit (RayBiotech, Norcross, GA, USA). The

20

concentration of proteins was then normalized to the total amount of

21

protein. For the qRT-PCR, briefly, the total RNA was extracted and

22

first-strand cDNA was synthesized according to the protocol using

23

PrimeScript RT reagent Kit (Takara, China). qRT-PCR was performed

24

using a Bio-Rad CFX (Bio-Rad, USA) using SYBR Select Master Mix

25 26

Thermo scientific, Logan, USA . FGF-2, BDNF, NGF (Nerve growth factor) and NT-3 (Neurotrophin-3) were analyzed and

27

Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was chosen as

28

housekeeping gene. Three independent experiments were performed for

29

each group. The primers used for real-time PCR experiments were listed

AC C

EP

TE D

14

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

in Supplementary Table S1.

2

2.10. Statistical Analysis. The results are presented as the mean ± SD. One-way analysis of

4

variance (ANOVA) was applied for statistical comparisons among groups

5

more than two, and t-test was used for the statistical comparisons among

6

two groups. All statistical analysis was performed in the software SPSS

7

13.0 (SPSS, Chicago, USA). The values of p < 0.05 or 0.01 was

8

considered statistically significant.

9

3.Results

SC

M AN U

10

RI PT

3

3.1.Fabrication of nerve conduits

In this study, EPO-Chitosan nerve conduits were fabricated by

12

freeze-drying approach to explore their application as nerve guidance

13

substrates in vivo. The conduits were of about 3.8 mm in outer diameter

14

and about 1.2 mm in inner diameter (Figure 1A). The topographical

15

observation by SEM were demonstrated in Figure 1B. SEM of Conduit’ s

16

cross-section

17

interconnected porous structures in EPO-Chitosan conduit. The porosity

18

of the internal surface (Figure.1 B-c) was less than that of the

19

cross-section. In addition, only a few porous structures (Figure.1 B-d)

20

were observed on the external surface of the conduits, which might be

21

helpful for cytokine or implanted cell reservation in conduits.

showed

the

flaky

texture

and

EP

(Figure.1B-a&b)

AC C

22

TE D

11

In vitro release curve showed that the conduits could sustain the

23

release of loaded cytokine for upto 18 days (Figure.1C), suggesting the

24

feasibility to achieve a long-term action of healing response in vivo.

25

What's more, the swelling ration

26

(Figure.1E) measurement confirmed that the physical and mechanical

27

properties of the prepared conduits were not significantly affected by the

(Figure.1D) and elastic modulus

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

adding of the EPO to the conduit.

2

3.2. In vivo transplantation and walking-foot-print

3

analysis

RI PT

1

The EPO-Chitosan nerve conduits with or without MSCs were

5

transplanted into the peripheral nerve injured animal model (Figure.

6

2A-a-e). Walking-foot-print analysis results showed that the value of SFI

7

in both Gel/MSC and Conduit group were significantly increased as

8

compared with control group 4 and 8 weeks after surgery (Figure. 2B &

9

C),

yet

by

the

combination

of

SC

4

Gel/MSC

and

conduit

in

Conduit+Gel/MSC, the SFI value was further significantly increased

11

(Figure. 2B & C). Similarly, both EPT and WRL results showed that the

12

rat (Figure. 2E & F) in Conduit+Gel/MSC treated group were observed

13

with significantly higher extensor force and WRL time as compared with

14

those in other groups. In addition, EPT and WRL demonstrated that the

15

motor performance of rats in both Gel/MSC and Conduit groups was

16

better than that in control group.

TE D

M AN U

10

The above beneficial effects of conduits-based therapy were further

18

confirmed by MNCV. As shown in Figure. 2D, MNCV values in both

19

Gel/MSC and Conduit groups were significantly higher (p<0.01) than

20

that in control group at 4 weeks and 8 weeks after surgery. Especially for

21

Conduit group at 8 weeks, the MNCV was even better than Gel/MSC

22

group (P<0.05). Similarly, the highest MNCV values (p<0.01) were

23

observed in Conduit+Gel/MSC group, at both 4 weeks and 8 weeks.

24

These results suggested that combination of Gel/MSC and Conduit could

25

significantly enhance the therapeutic potentials of single Gel/MSC or

26

Conduit for sciatic nerve injury.

27

3.3. Histological examination

28

AC C

EP

17

The survival of DiI-marked MSCs was analyzed in Gel/MSC and 12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Conduit + Gel/MSC groups 4 weeks after surgery. As shown in Figure.

2

3A, much more MSCs were observed in Conduit + Gel/MSC group

3

compared with Gel/MSC group. Quantitative analysis (Figure. 3B)

4

showed that the number of survived MSC in Conduit + Gel/MSC group

5

was about 4~5 fold than that in Gel/MSC group. H&E staining was performed to observe the circular nerve bundles

7

morphology. As shown in Figure. 4A, lots of injured nerve bundles with

8

irregular or incomplete ring shape were observed in control group. In

9

comparison, the application of Conduit or Gel/MSC alone significantly

10

improved the morphology of injured nerve bundles and more importantly,

11

the improvement was more significant by combination of Conduit and

12

Gel/MSC, which resulted in the highest level of morphological

13

restoration and regularity of nerve bundles (Figure. 4A, p<0.05 or

14

p<0.01).

M AN U

SC

RI PT

6

PGP 9.5 immunohistochemical staining and its histomophormetry

16

analysis showed that the protein expression levels in Gel/MSC and

17

Conduit group were significantly higher than those in control group, and

18

the expression level was further increased in Conduit+Gel/MSC group

19

(Figure. 4 B & C, p<0.05 or p<0.01).

20

3.4.Axon number, diameter and myelin thickness

EP

TE D

15

In order to count the axon number, the Modified Bielschowsky silver

22

staining was performed 8 weeks after surgery. As shown in Figure.5 A &

23

C, the number of axon in the injured nerve bundles were increased

24

significantly (p<0.01) in both Gel/MSC and Conduit groups compared

25

with that in Control group, and it was further increased in

26

Conduit+Gel/MSC group (p<0.01). The axon diameter (Figure. 5 B & D)

27

and myelin thickness (Figure. 5 B & E) of the regenerated nerve bundles

28

were measured according to the TEM images (Figure. 5 B). Similarly,

29

axon diameter and myelin thickness in Gel/MSC and Conduit alone

30

groups were increased compared with control group, and the best results

31

were observed in the Conduit+Gel/MSC group, indicating the best

AC C

21

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

performance of combining Gel/MSC and Conduit on repair of sciatic

2

nerve injury among the four groups.

3

3.5. Re-innervation of target gastrocnemius muscles According to the Masson trichrome staining in Figure. 6, much more

5

muscular cells with irregular shape (red color) and accumulation of the

6

collagen (blue color) were observed in control group than those in

7

Gel/MSC, Conduit and Conduit+Gel/MSC groups. In addition, the areas

8

of muscular cells in both Gel/MSC and Conduit were significantly larger

9

than that in control group (p<0.01), while the largest mean area of

SC

RI PT

4

muscular cells was observed in Conduit+Gel/MSC group.

11

3.6. The in vitro beneficial effects of EPO/Chi on Ad-MSC

12

and Schwann cells

M AN U

10

As shown in Figure.7C, the coating of EPO/Chi on the glass

14

significantly improved the cellular viability of MSCs compared with Chi

15

or Control group. Wound healing assay (Figure.7 A & B) indicated that

16

Chiostan-coated glass could improve the migration of Ad-MSCs, which

17

was further enhanced by adding of EPO compared with control (p<0.05 or

18

p<0.01). In order to investigate the neuro-protective effects of

19

EPO/Chi-regulated Ad-MSCs on nerve regeneration, the neurotrophins

20

gene analysis and transwell migration of Schwann cells assay were

21

performed. As shown in Figure.7 D-H, the Ad-MSC cultured on

22

EPO/Chi-coated glass showed higher levels of FGF-2 and BDNF gene

23

expression and proteins secretion, as well as SDF-1 concentration. The

24

exposure of Schwann cells to Ad-MSCs on EPO/Chi coated glass caused

25

more cells to migrate through the insert membrane (Figure. 7 I & J).

26

Interestingly, even without Ad-MSC, the EPO/Chi coated glass could also

27

result in certain numbers of Schwann cells, which was consistently with

28

previously reports that the EPO alone could also promote the cellular

AC C

EP

TE D

13

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

migration [11, 20]. What’s more, unlike the randomly distributed cells in

2

other groups, the migrated Schwann cells in EPO/Chi group were more

3

likely to cluster together (Figure. 7J), which might be resulted from the

4

combination of MSCs and EPO/Chi. These results indicated that EPO/Chi-coated glass could promote the

6

migratory response of Ad-MSCs, and activate its neurotrophins protein

7

secretion as well as gene expression. The EPO/Chi could also promote the

8

migration of Schwann cells alone or through the mediation of Ad-MSCs,

9

which might eventually contribute to the good performance of nerve repair

11

4. Discussion

SC

with EPO-loaded conduit + Ad-MSC.

M AN U

10

RI PT

5

Transplantation of a nerve implant between two nerve stumps has

13

been proposed for aiding injured peripheral nerve regeneration and

14

functional restoration guidance. In the past, biomaterial based strategies

15

like nerve conduits, or cell-based therapy were applied to bridge the

16

nerve gap for nerve repair as well as protect the injured nerve from

17

surrounding tissues during the healing process[3]. Some have achieved

18

certain success, but many results were still in controversy[2, 22, 23].

TE D

12

In the present study, a combination strategy of EPO-loading nerve

20

conduit and MSCs was developed to repair sciatic nerve injury. The

21

functional gait movements, global and detail nerve tissue morphologies,

22

neural protein expression and reinnervation of target gastrocnemius

23

muscles were used to evaluate the performance of these strategies. The

24

results indicated that, although the single application of nerve conduits (in

25

Conduit group) or mesenchymal stem cells plus hydrogels (in Gel/MSC

26

group) could improve axon regeneration compared with control group,

27

combining MSC with EPO-loading chitosan nerve conduits resulted in

28

the most favorable outcomes for guidance of nerve regeneration. In vitro

29

cellular experimental results indicated that EPO/Chi could increase the

30

migratory response of Ad-MSCs, and increase its neurotrophins protein

31

secretion and gene expression. The MSCs + EPO/Chi could also promote

AC C

EP

19

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

the migration as well as the clustering of Schwann cells. As is well known, the directly administration of exogenous cytokines

3

without protection would result in quickly degradation due to

4

deactivation by enzymes and other physical-chemical effectors in vivo

5

and in vitro. In recent years, we focus on the construction of localized and

6

sustained delivery system for controlled release of exogenous cytokines

7

to enhance its repair effects in vivo. Previously, we found that the

8

chitosan-based and NGF-loaded nerve conduits could be used for sciatic

9 10

nerve repair in rats which highlights good potential of Chitosan conduit for peripheral nerve treatments[8]. However, it was also demonstrated

11

that NGF might promote neural apoptosis after peripheral nerve injury

12

under certain circumstance[24], which indicated the bifacial effects of

13

NGF during nerve repair. The hematopoietic cytokine erythropoietin

14

(EPO) was also proved to be beneficial for the functional recovery of

15

injured peripheral nerve system via EPO receptor (EPOR) expressed by

16

Schwann cells [12, 13, 20]. Recently, we reported that the encapsulating

17

EPO in PLGA microspheres for localized and sustained delivery could

18

significantly improve the neural function of injured peripheral nerve,

19

which indicated its great potential for peripheral nerve treatments [16, 25].

20

What’s more, the results of some published papers also indicated that the

21

EPO is better than NGF to enhance nerve regeneration and promote

22

functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury in the rat[26]. In addition,

23

EPO was also confirmed to enhance the migration of MSCs, which might

24

be beneficial for the recruitment of endogenous MSCs and improve its

25

repair performance[11]. Therefore, the EPO was used as the

26

neuroprotective cytokine for preparation of “bio-active” chitosan nerve

27

conduit in the study.

28

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

2

To our knowledge, the present study was the first report to

29

encapsulate

EPO protein

in

the

30

transplantation of EPO-loading nerve conduit and MSCs for peripheral

31

nerve repair was also firstly evaluated. As expected, the survival of

32

transplanted MSCs was significantly enhanced in EPO-loaded conduit +

33

gel/MSCs group compared with that in Gel/MSC group. Further, the best 16

Chitosan

scaffold. Combined

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

results of SFI and MNCV were detected in EPO-loaded conduit +

2

gel/MSCs group compared with all the other groups. The histological

3

examination and histomorphometry results indicated the highest level of

4

morphological restoration and regularity of nerve bundles. Similarly,

5

PGP 9.5 protein expression, axon diameter and myelin thicknessas well

6

as the number of axon were also significantly improved in

7

Conduit+Gel/MSC groups compared with the other groups.

RI PT

1

In order to further investigate the beneficial effects of EPO-loading

9

Chitosan scaffolds on Ad-MSC and Schwann cells, as well as the

10

potential underlying mechanism, in vitro cell experiments were

11

performed. The surface mobilization of Chitosan and EPO on glass was

12

used for in vitro evaluation of MSC performance. CCK-8 assay showed

13

that the EPO loaded Chitosan could enhance the growth of seeding MSCs.

14

The scratch wound healing assay was applied as well in vitro.

15

Consistently, the results proved that EPO-loaded Chitosan could promote

16

the migration of MSCs during the wound healing process.

M AN U

SC

8

In recent years, transplantation of MSCs for neuro-diseases therapy

18

has drawn more and more attention. Several beneficial effects were

19

contributed to the therapeutic results of MSC transplantation, such as its

20

immunomodulatory, chemotactic properties, and the secretion of some

21

beneficial growth factors and cytokines [9, 18]. In the present study, the

22

qRT-PCR of gene expression and ELISA assay indicated that the EPO

23

loaded Chitosan could also promote the secretion of neuro-protective

24

cytokines FGF2, BDNF and SDF-1. What’s more, the transwell results

25

showed that the EPO/Chi coated glass could increase the migratory

26

response of Schwann cells directly or through the mediation of Ad-MSCs.

27

Taken together, we speculated that EPO/Chi conduit alone might also

28

enhance the response of both Schwann cells and endogenous MSCs

29

during the wound healing process, while single injection of Gel/MSC

30

only resulted in small distributed number of the exogenousMSCs (Figure.

31

3), and these might lead to better repair results (such as MNCV in

32

Figure.2) of Conduit group than control group, or even better than

33

Gel/MSC.

AC C

EP

TE D

17

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

What’s more, the MSCs cultured on EPO/Chi coated substrates could

2

also induce the clustering of migrated Schwann cells, which played vital

3

role in the Schwann cells’ mediated peripheral nerve regeneration [27].

4

These in vitro results indicated that the EPO-loaded Chitosan conduits

5

could not only protect the peripheral nerve via EPO proteins delivery, but

6

also be beneficial for the repair of injured peripheral nerve via MSC

7

regulation.

RI PT

1

Despite the encouraging preliminary results from our study, there

9

were still some limitations in the present study. Because the negative

10

outcomes were always associated with gaps greater than 5 mm for the

11

marketed bioartificial conduits, only 5 mm of gap distance was applied

12

[28]. Actually, treatment of larger nerve defects remains to be the big

13

challenge of the relative field. Ongoing studies are also directed toward to

14

apply the nerve conduits for long-distance regeneration of peripheral

15

nerves, which might be of great importance for peripheral nerve

16

reconstruction and recovery.

17

5. Conclusion:

TE D

M AN U

SC

8

In the present study, a new strategy of EPO-loaded Chitosan scaffold

19 20

and MSC transplantation for nerve regeneration was reported and the its repair performance for the sciatic nerve injury was evaluated in vivo and

21

in vitro. In vivo results showed that the combination of EPO-loaded

22

Chitosan scaffolds with MSCs eventually resulted in accelerated nerve

23

healing process. In vitro results indicated that the EPO-loaded Chitosan

24

could promote the MSC and Schwann cell repair performance, which

25

might contribute to the therapeutic outcome of the new strategy.

26

Therefore, the combined transplantation of the EPO-loaded Chitosan and

27

MSCs for nerve replacement represents a new generation of medical

28

device for peripheral nerve reconstruction.

29

Appendix A. Supplementary data

30

More information could be found in the “Supplementary data.DOC”.

AC C

EP

18

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

References

2

[1] Intiso D, Grimaldi G, Russo M, Maruzzi G, Basciani M, Fiore P, et al. Functional outcome and

3

health status of injured patients with peripheral nerve lesions. Injury 2010;41:540-543.

4

[2] Gu X, Ding F, Williams DF. Neural tissue engineering options for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials 2014;35:6143-6156.

RI PT

5 6

[3] Daly W, Yao L, Zeugolis D, Windebank A, Pandit A. A biomaterials approach to peripheral

7

nerve regeneration: bridging the peripheral nerve gap and enhancing functional recovery.

8

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface / the Royal Society 2012;9:202-221.

[4] Quigley AF, Bulluss KJ, Kyratzis IL, Gilmore K, Mysore T, Schirmer KS, et al. Engineering a

10

multimodal nerve conduit for repair of injured peripheral nerve. Journal of neural engineering

11

2013;10:016008.

M AN U

SC

9

12

[5] Bozkurt A, Boecker A, Tank J, Altinova H, Deumens R, Dabhi C, et al. Efficient bridging of 20

13

mm rat sciatic nerve lesions with a longitudinally micro-structured collagen scaffold.

14

Biomaterials 2016;75:112-122.

[6] Meyer C, Stenberg L, Gonzalez-Perez F, Wrobel S, Ronchi G, Udina E, et al. Chitosan-film

16

enhanced chitosan nerve guides for long-distance regeneration of peripheral nerves.

17

Biomaterials 2016;76:33-51.

TE D

15

[7] Cirillo V, Clements BA, Guarino V, Bushman J, Kohn J, Ambrosio L. A comparison of the

19

performance of mono- and bi-component electrospun conduits in a rat sciatic model.

20

Biomaterials 2014;35:8970-8982.

21

[8] Wang H, Zhao Q, Zhao W, Liu Q, Gu X, Yang Y. Repairing rat sciatic nerve injury by a

22

nerve-growth-factor-loaded, chitosan-based nerve conduit. Biotechnology and applied

23

AC C

EP

18

biochemistry 2012;59:388-394.

24

[9] Keilhoff G, Goihl A, Stang F, Wolf G, Fansa H. Peripheral nerve tissue engineering: autologous

25

Schwann cells vs. transdifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue engineering

26

2006;12:1451-1465.

27

[10] Hsueh YY, Chang YJ, Huang TC, Fan SC, Wang DH, Chen JJ, et al. Functional recoveries of

28

sciatic nerve regeneration by combining chitosan-coated conduit and neurosphere cells

29

induced from adipose-derived stem cells. Biomaterials 2014;35:2234-2244.

30 31

[11] Nair AM, Tsai YT, Shah KM, Shen J, Weng H, Zhou J, et al. The effect of erythropoietin on autologous stem cell-mediated bone regeneration. Biomaterials 2013;34:7364-7371.

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

[12] Ning R, Xiong Y, Mahmood A, Zhang Y, Meng Y, Qu C, et al. Erythropoietin promotes

2

neurovascular remodeling and long-term functional recovery in rats following traumatic brain

3

injury. Brain Res 2011;1384:140-150. [13] Yin ZS, Zhang H, Bo W, Gao W. Erythropoietin promotes functional recovery and enhances

5

nerve regeneration after peripheral nerve injury in rats. AJNR American journal of

6

neuroradiology 2010;31:509-515.

RI PT

4

7

[14] Elfar JC, Jacobson JA, Puzas JE, Rosier RN, Zuscik MJ. Erythropoietin accelerates functional

8

recovery after peripheral nerve injury. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume

9

2008;90:1644-1653.

11

[15] Li X, Gonias SL, Campana WM. Schwann cells express erythropoietin receptor and represent

SC

10

a major target for Epo in peripheral nerve injury. Glia 2005;51:254-265.

[16] Zhang W, Gao Y, Zhou Y, Liu J, Zhang L, Long A, et al. Localized and sustained delivery of

13

erythropoietin from PLGA microspheres promotes functional recovery and nerve regeneration

14

in peripheral nerve injury. BioMed research international 2015;2015:478103.

15

[17] Wyse RD, Dunbar GL, Rossignol J. Use of genetically modified mesenchymal stem cells to

16

treat

17

2014;15:1719-1745.

19

neurodegenerative

diseases.

International

journal

of

molecular

sciences

[18] Hofer HR, Tuan RS. Secreted trophic factors of mesenchymal stem cells support

TE D

18

M AN U

12

neurovascular and musculoskeletal therapies. Stem cell research & therapy 2016;7:131. [19] Lee EJ, Xu L, Kim GH, Kang SK, Lee SW, Park SH, et al. Regeneration of peripheral nerves by

21

transplanted sphere of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from embryonic stem cells.

22

Biomaterials 2012;33:7039-7046.

EP

20

[20] Inoue G, Gaultier A, Li X, Mantuano E, Richardson G, Takahashi K, et al. Erythropoietin

24

promotes Schwann cell migration and assembly of the provisional extracellular matrix by

25 26 27 28 29 30 31

AC C

23

recruiting beta1 integrin to the cell surface. Glia 2010;58:399-409.

[21] Kim CL, Kim DE. Self-healing Characteristics of Collagen Coatings with Respect to Surface Abrasion. Scientific reports 2016;6:20563.

[22] Geuna S, Gnavi S, Perroteau I, Tos P, Battiston B. Tissue engineering and peripheral nerve reconstruction: an overview. International review of neurobiology 2013;108:35-57. [23] Chiono V, Tonda-Turo C. Trends in the design of nerve guidance channels in peripheral nerve tissue engineering. Progress in neurobiology 2015;131:87-104.

32

[24] Petratos S, Butzkueven H, Shipham K, Cooper H, Bucci T, Reid K, et al. Schwann cell apoptosis

33

in the postnatal axotomized sciatic nerve is mediated via NGF through the low-affinity 20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

neurotrophin

2

2003;62:398-411.

receptor.

Journal

of

Neuropathology

&

Experimental

Neurology

3

[25] Zhang W, Sun B, Yu Z, An J, Liu Q, Ren T. High dose erythropoietin promotes functional

4

recovery of rats following facial nerve crush. Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal

5

of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia 2009;16:554-556.

7

[26] Yin Z-S, Zhang H, Gao W. Erythropoietin promotes functional recovery and enhances nerve

RI PT

6

regeneration after peripheral nerve injury in rats. Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:509-515.

8

[27] Parrinello S, Napoli I, Ribeiro S, Wingfield Digby P, Fedorova M, Parkinson DB, et al. EphB

9

signaling directs peripheral nerve regeneration through Sox2-dependent Schwann cell sorting. Cell 2010;143:145-155.

SC

10

[28] Weber RA, Breidenbach WC, Brown RE, Jabaley ME, Mass DP. A randomized prospective

12

study of polyglycolic acid conduits for digital nerve reconstruction in humans. Plastic and

13

reconstructive surgery 2000;106:1036-1045.

M AN U

11

14 15

17

TE D

16

Figures captions

19

Figure.1 Preparation and characterization of the EPO-loaded Chitosan scaffold. (A)

20

The schematic summary of the EPO-loaded Chitosan scaffold constructing process;

21

and (B) SEM observation of the scaffold; (C) in vitro release of EPO; (D) Swelling

22

ration and (E) elastic modulus of the Chi or EPO/Chi conduits.

AC C

23

EP

18

24

Figure.2 In vivo transplantation and functional evaluation. (A) The schematic

25

summaryof the implantation surgery process, (B) Representative images of

26

walking-foot-print analysis and its quantitative analysis results SFI (C);(D) MNCV of

27

the electrophysiological examination; and the motor performance evaluated by EPT

28

(E) and WRL (F). “*” for P<0.05, and “**” for P<0.01.

29

21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Figure.3 In vivo observation of the DiI labeled MSCs (A) and quantitative analysis

2

results (B) after 4 weeks surgery. “*” for P<0.05, and “**” for P<0.01.

3

Figure.4 In vivo histological and immunohistological examination. (A) H&E staining

5

results of the injured nerve 8 weeks after surgery; immunohistochemical staining of

6

the PGP9.5 protein (B) and the quantitative analysis results (C). “*” for P<0.05, and

7

“**” for P<0.01.

RI PT

4

8

Figure.5 Axon number, diameter and myelin thickness of the regenerated nerve. (A)

10

Modified Bielschowsky silver staining for axon numbers calculation (C); the

11

represent images of atomic force microscope (AFM) results (B), and quantitative

12

analysis of the axons diameter (D) andmyelin sheaths thickness (E). “*” for P<0.05,

13

and “**” for P<0.01. Scale bar = 20µm.

M AN U

SC

9

14 15

Figure.6 Masson trichrome staining of the targeting gastrocnemius muscles and the

16

quantitative analysis. “*” for P<0.05, and “**” for P<0.01.

17

Figure.7 In vitro cell viability and wound-healing migration assay. (A)

19

Wound-healing migration assay of the MSCs on EPO/Chi coated glass and (B) the

20

quantitative analysis of migrated cells; (C) MTT results for the cell viability assay; (D)

21

qRT-PCR results for measurement of the neur-protective genes expression in MSCs;

22

(E) ELISA assay results for measurement of the SDF-1(E), FGF-2 (F), BDNF (G)

23

proteins concentration from MSCs; the quantitative analysis (H) of the migrated

24

Schwann cell(RT4-D6P2T) (I); “*” for P<0.05, and “**” for P<0.01.

26 27

EP

AC C

25

TE D

18

28 29 30 31 32 33 22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 2 3 4 5

RI PT

6 7 8 9

SC

10 11

M AN U

12 13 14 15 16

18

A

19

EP

20

TE D

17

21

AC C

22 23 24 25 26

B

C

23

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT EPO

100 80 60 40 20 0 0

1

D

E

15

18

Figure. 1

EP

A

AC C

9

TE D

8

15 16 17 18

24

B

0.5

/C

hi

0.0

EP O

7

14

12

1.0

hi

6

13

9

SC

Elastic Modulus (Mpa)

5

12

1.5

M AN U

4

11

6

Time (day)

3

10

3

C

2

RI PT

Cumulative Release (%)

120

21

24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 2

Control

Gel/MSC

Conduit

C

Conduit+Gel/MSC

D

**

3

**

**

**

**

**

**

** *

5 6

**

E

*

**

15

WRL Time (Sec)

100

9 EPT (%)

80

10

60 40 20

11

0

17 18 19

EP

16

A

AC C

14

TE D

Figure. 2

13

10

*

** **

5

0

Time = 8 weeks

12

F

M AN U

8

SC

7

15

*

RI PT

4

20 21 22

25

B

Time = 8 weeks

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 2 3

Figure. 3

RI PT

4 5 6

SC

7

M AN U

8 9 10 11

13 14 15

A

AC C

16

EP

TE D

12

17 18 19 20 21

B

22

26

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 2

**

C

**

3

RI PT

4 5 6

SC

7

M AN U

8

Figure. 4

9 10 11

15 16 17

EP

14

AC C

13

TE D

12

27

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1

Figure. 5

2

6 7 8 9

EP

5

AC C

4

TE D

3

10 11 12 13

28

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 2 3

RI PT

4 5 6

**

SC

**

7

M AN U

8 9 10 11

TE D

12

Figure. 6

13

EP

14 15

AC C

16 17 18 19

A

B

20 21 22 29

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT C

1 2 3

D

E

RI PT

4 5 6

SC

7

9

F

G

10 11

15 16 17 18

I

EP

14

AC C

13

H

TE D

12

M AN U

8

Figure. 7

30