Tailoring odorant-binding protein coatings characteristics for surface acoustic wave biosensor development

Tailoring odorant-binding protein coatings characteristics for surface acoustic wave biosensor development

Applied Surface Science 302 (2014) 250–255 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Applied Surface Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/loca...

2MB Sizes 0 Downloads 27 Views

Applied Surface Science 302 (2014) 250–255

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Applied Surface Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apsusc

Tailoring odorant-binding protein coatings characteristics for surface acoustic wave biosensor development F. Di Pietrantonio a,∗ , M. Benetti a , V. Dinca b , D. Cannatà a , E. Verona c , S. D’Auria d , M. Dinescu b a

Institute of Acoustics and Sensors “O. M. Corbino”, National Research Council of Italy, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133 Rome, Italy National Institute for Lasers, Plasma and Radiation Physics, 409 Atomistilor Street, PO Box MG-16, 077125 Magurele, Romania c Institute for Photonics and Nanotechnologies, National Research Council of Italy, Via del Cineto Romano 42, 00156 Rome, Italy d Institute of Protein Biochemistry, National Research Council of Italy, Via Pietro Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy b

a r t i c l e

i n f o

Article history: Received 28 June 2013 Received in revised form 17 October 2013 Accepted 18 October 2013 Available online 27 October 2013 Keywords: Matrix-assisted pulsed laser evaporation, SAW biosensors Odorant-binding protein

a b s t r a c t In this study, wild type bovine odorant-binding proteins (wtbOBPs) were deposited by matrix-assisted pulsed laser evaporation (MAPLE) and utilized as active material on surface acoustic wave (SAW) biosensors. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and atomic force microscopy (AFM) were used to determine the chemical, morphological characteristics of the protein thin films. The FTIR data demonstrates that the functional groups of wtbOBPs do not suffer significant changes in the MAPLE-deposited films when compared to the reference one. The topographical studies show that the homogeneity, density and the roughness of the coatings are related mainly to the laser parameters (fluence and number of pulses). SAW biosensor responses to different concentrations of R-(–)-1-octen-3-ol (octenol) and R(–)-carvone (carvone) were evaluated. The obtained sensitivities, achieved through the optimization of deposition parameters, demonstrated that MAPLE is a promising deposition technique for SAW biosensor implementation. © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction During the last years, an increase in the number of sensors applications in various areas such as the environmental control, process industry, security, and biodefense markets, has resulted in increasing of research efforts to develop newer approaches that can provide high sensitivity, accuracy, selectivity and, in general, better performances for sensors [1]. Within this context, the use of functional protein thin films as active material represents an emerging and rapidly growing solution in the field of biosensors. In particular, piezoelectric sensors based on quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) and SAW devices, and using biomolecules as sensing material, have attracted the attention of the scientific community for vapour phase applications [2]. Specifically, SAW biosensors can overcome the intrinsic low-selectivity of polymer coated SAW chemical sensors, and, at the same time, ensure the high sensitivity and fast response time typical of these sensors [2,3]. However, the established idea that biomolecules can maintain their three-dimensional structure and, hence, their prescribed functionality, only in an aqueous environment, has delayed the development of SAW biosensors for in-air

∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 0645488736. E-mail address: [email protected] (F. Di Pietrantonio). 0169-4332/$ – see front matter © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.10.112

applications and, to date, only a limited number of works has been proposed [4–6]. In particular, the sensing capabilities of OBPs and their property to preserve their full functionality when exposed to air environment have been recently demonstrated to detect odorant molecules [7]. Regardless of the application and the operating principle of the biosensor, great attention is devoted to the method of applying biomolecules in order to preserve the chemical composition and natural conformation of deposited protein molecules, so that the biological activity is not altered. Specifically, an important issue with SAW sensors is the uniform application of the sensing layer along the wave propagation path, in order to prevent high attenuation [8,9]. As an alternative to conventional deposition techniques, such as drop casting, MAPLE has the potential to create thin films of controlled thickness on surfaces of various substrates [10–14] and in particular on SAW devices [15,16]. Nevertheless, as compared with other techniques used for depositing sensitive biological compounds onto SAW devices, MAPLE technique presents the advantage of improved and intimate adhesion of the sensing material onto the active area of the sensor, controlled morphology, homogeneity and uniformity of the surfaces, as well as confinement of the material within the active area by the use of masks. Another advantage is the use of very small amount of materials, which is important when it involves the use of expensive biological or other type of compounds.

F. Di Pietrantonio et al. / Applied Surface Science 302 (2014) 250–255

Therefore, this technique is of great interest in the area of protein thin film processing for various applications, from multifunctional coatings for biological application to biosensors. In MAPLE, a material, for example a biomolecule, is dissolved in a solvent in concentrations of 0.1–5%, and the mixture is, then, frozen, resulting in a solid target. When the laser light irradiates the target, the solvent is evaporated and the dissolved material (the organic material) is collected on a substrate. Earlier work with MAPLE has demonstrated that with an appropriate choice of experimental parameters, such as laser wavelength, fluence and pulse duration, type of solvent, target and substrate temperature, and background gas pressure, MAPLE is capable of providing conditions for “soft” ejection and deposition of biological molecules without significant modifications of the chemical structure and functionality. In this work, MAPLE is used for the deposition of wtbOBPs as active material on SAW devices and FTIR and AFM analysis were used to determine the chemical, morphological and surface wettability of the protein thin films. The homogeneity, the density and the roughness of the obtained coatings were correlated to the laser parameters. The capabilities of MAPLE were demonstrated by the responses of the SAW biosensors to concentrations of octenol and carvone, and, in particular, by the different sensitivities obtained changing the laser parameters. 2. Material and methods 2.1. MAPLE deposition of wtbOBPs on SAW devices The purification of wtbOBPs was performed as described in [7]. The target for MAPLE system was prepared by dissolving a protein solution (Tris/HCl, 10 mM, pH = 8) in distilled water (0.2% in weight). The MAPLE set-up was described elsewhere [11–14]. Shortly, a “Surelite II” pulsed Nd:YAG laser system (Continuum Company) (266 nm, 6 ns pulse duration, 10 Hz repetition rate and a laser spot size of 0.02 cm2 ) was used to irradiate the frozen targets. The laser fluence used in this study was set at 200 or 320 mJ/cm2 , while the pulses were varied between 12k and 46k pulses. The substrates were 2-port SAW resonators fabricated on ␣quartz substrates (ST-cut, x propagation) with metallic electrodes made of a thin Au film (2 nm thick) [7]. Each substrate was cut in slide (25 × 6.5 mm2 ) containing 6 resonators and was kept at room temperature during the deposition. 2.2. Thin film analysis and testing 2.2.1. Morphological and structural studies The morphological characterizations of wtbOBP coating deposited on the surface of SAW resonators were performed by AFM with a “XE 100 AFM Setup” from Park. The measurements in non-contact mode were performed to analyse the films surface roughness and morphology on several different areas. The structure composition of the deposited proteins was investigated by FTIR spectroscopy with a Jasco FT/IR-6300 type A spectrometer in the range 400–7800 cm−1 . All spectra were obtained by transmission measurements, 16 scans and with CO2 /H2 O correction. Only the 500–4000 cm−1 interval of the spectra was chosen for comparison; the signal intensity is not relevant because the thicknesses of the measured samples were different. 2.2.2. Ultrasonic characterizations The SAW biosensors were tested before and after wtbOBP depositions by microwave probes using a Network Analyzer. The resonance frequency shifts of SAW devices point out the change in mass on the sensor surface due to the protein adhesion. The surface densities of the wtbOBP coatings obtained with different

251

laser parameters were calculated considering the mass sensitivity of SAW devices as reported elsewhere [17]. 2.3. SAW biosensor system and measurement setup SAW devices are used as frequency control elements in the feedback path of RF oscillators. This configuration provides a simple, effective and accurate method for monitoring small variations in SAW velocity typical of the SAW biological- and chemical-based sensors. Details on the conditioning electronics are reported in [7]. The SAW biosensor responses, given by frequency shifts of the oscillators, were measured with a frequency counter (HP 53131A) and a multiplexer module (Agilent 34980A and 34941A). All data were acquired using a custom LabVIEWTM routine. The frequency of a uncoated device was also measured to evaluated the sensing capability of the wtbOBP coating layers. The SAW biosensors were tested in N2 atmosphere upon exposure to concentrations of octenol and carvone vapours. To obtain different concentrations of odorants, sensors were exposed to a total flux of 100 sccm controlled by two flow meters: the main for the gas carrier and the second for the odorant. Different concentrations of vapour were obtained fluxing N2 in a bubbler containing pure and liquid odorant at room temperature. Before measurements, the frequency baseline was obtained exposing the SAW biosensor to a flux of pure N2 . Then, the odorant concentration was added to the system until saturation of the frequency responses was reached. For each odorant, measurements at different concentrations were performed and the frequency shifts at saturation were recorded to evaluate the sensitivity. Finally, the detection limits were calculated considering a maximum noise level of 10 Hz. 3. Results and discussion 3.1. Morphological and structural results The morphology and homogeneity of the deposited active layers onto the SAW device are directly correlated to its response towards the tested compounds, which imply the necessity of morphological surface analysis and correlation of its characteristics with the deposition parameters. Together with number of pulses, laser fluence is one of the main determinant parameter for the deposition characteristics, not only structural, but morphological as well. In this study, the influence of both laser fluence and number of pulses on the morphology of the deposited protein is shown by the 3D AFM images of the deposited (Fig. 1a–f) and drop cast protein thin films surfaces (Fig. 1g). For the two laser fluence used, although the surface of the deposited wtbOBPs protein thin films was characterized by the presence of granular structures, the films were uniform and homogenous. The typical heights of the grain like structure were in the range of 50–150 nm and the average surface roughness (measured over 40 × 40 ␮m2 ) calculated for several areas and samples had maximum values of 26 ± 0.6 nm. There was only a 10% decrease in the average surface roughness calculated for the surfaces obtained with low fluence. However, the grains seem to agglomerate and form island like structure, with porous aspect, when the number of pulses increased from 12k pulses to 46k pulses for both fluences used (Fig. 1b, c, e and f). It can be seen that cracks may appear when larger number of pulses are used (Fig. 1c and f). These features can be explained by the size and speed of the matrix/proteins clusters generated during the ablation of the MAPLE target. In our case the process can be compared to laser ablation of a solution with spatially heterogeneous absorption, as the solvent is almost transparent to laser radiation, so the laser energy

252

F. Di Pietrantonio et al. / Applied Surface Science 302 (2014) 250–255

Fig. 1. 3D topographical AFM images of wtbOBP deposited on SAW resonators: (a) 320 mJ/cm2 with 12k pulses, (b) 320 mJ/cm2 with 24k pulses, (c) 320 mJ/cm2 with 46k pulses, (d) 200 mJ/cm2 with 12k pulses, (e) 200 mJ/cm2 with 24k pulses, (f) 200 mJ/cm2 with 46k pulses, and (g) drop control cast.

was mainly absorbed by the low concentration solute molecules [18]. This material ejected from the target and propelled toward the substrate consists in a mixture of liquid droplets and gas-phase matrix molecules [19,20]. Depending on the amount of fluence applied, smaller or bigger clusters are formed travelling with different speed. The presence of the matrix on the substrate when higher number of pulses are used might lead to a rearrangement of the already deposited proteins and their assembly as islands. However, in the cases of the thin films deposited by MAPLE, the roughness was with at least 70% lower than in the control ones (88 nm), which is important for the further testing of the SAW sensors, as lower roughness of the surface is required. The characteristic vibrations of the wtbOPB functional groups in the deposited thin films were analysed and compared with those obtained as reference by drop cast (Fig. 2). By the FTIR spectra analysis (Fig. 2), the functionality of the protein thin films deposited by MAPLE was confirmed. The characteristic absorptions band corresponding to amide I were observed at 1654 cm−1 , respectively those characteristics for amide II and which originated from amino acid side-chain absorptions at 1587 and 1564.8 cm−1 . Other bands which give indication on maintaining CH2 functionality from

Fig. 2. FTIR spectra of the wtbOBP depositions by drop cast and MAPLE.

F. Di Pietrantonio et al. / Applied Surface Science 302 (2014) 250–255

253

Fig. 3. Frequency response (amplitude of S21 ) of SAW devices before and after wtbOBP deposition: (a) 320 mJ/cm2 with 46k pulses and (b) 200 mJ/cm2 with 46k pulses.

protein side chains were observed similarly with the reference one at 2854 cm−1 and at 2923 cm−1 corresponding to n(C–H) symmetric and asymmetric stretches. The n(N–H) stretch of the protein backbone was observed within 3200 to 3500 cm−1 . The strong peak assigned to H-bonded OH stretches appeared at 3300 cm−1 gives in the drop cast samples as compared with the MAPLE ones. Another difference is related to the CH stretch bands seen in the 2800–3000 cm−1 regions, when broader bands appeared for the MAPLE deposited samples than those obtained by drop casting, although the position of the band centre is same. The presence of hydrogen bonding alters the strength of these bonds and results in changes in band intensity and band widening.

3.1.1. Surface density calculation of wtbOBP coating on SAW Devices The shifts of resonant frequency for the SAW biosensors and the corresponding surface densities of the wtbOBP coating are reported in Table 1 for different laser parameters. As expected the surface density increases with the laser fluence and the number of pulses. The frequency response of a SAW device before and after the deposition performed with a laser fluence of 320 mJ/cm2 and 46k pulses is reported in Fig. 3a. Considering a molecular weight of 37,000 Da and the frequency shift of 502 kHz (sensor A), the obtained surface density is 25.86 × 10−6 kg/m2 , corresponding to 42 × 104 molecules/␮m2 . In Fig. 3b is shown the frequency response of a SAW device coated using a laser fluence of 200 mJ/cm2 and 46k pulses. In this case, the shift of the resonant frequency is of 206 kHz

(sensor B) resulting in a surface density of the wtbOBP coating of 10.61 × 10−6 kg/m2 , corresponding to 17.3 × 104 molecules/␮m2 . 3.2. SAW biosensor measurements The measurements were performed using an uncoated SAW resonator and two SAW biosensors coated with a laser fluence respectively of 320 mJ/cm2 (sensor A) and 200 mJ/cm2 (sensor B), and 46k pulses. The SAW biosensors showed a fast, remarkable and reversible response to the selected odorants as indicated by the real-time responses of the biosensor coated with the higher laser fluence for different concentrations of carvone (Fig. 4). All the response curves to octenol and carvone showed a linear behaviour in the tested concentration ranges. In Fig. 5, the response curves for the two tested sensors and for the uncoated device upon exposure to different concentrations of carvone are shown. For sensor A, a sensitivity of 52.1 Hz/ppm was obtained with a calculated detection limit of ∼0.2 ppm, while for sensor B the obtained sensitivity and detection limit were of 43.9 Hz/ppm and ∼0.23 ppm, respectively. The uncoated SAW device showed a sensitivity of 0.7 Hz/ppm. The response curves to octenol are reported in Fig. 6. In this case, the obtained sensitivity and detection limit for sensor A were, respectively, 56 Hz/ppm and ∼0.18 ppm. Sensor B exhibited a sensitivity of 47.2 Hz/ppm with a detection limit of ∼0.21 ppm, while the sensitivity for the uncoated device was of 7.4 Hz/ppm. A comparison between the sensitivities of the two SAW biosensors toward the tested odorants is shown in Fig. 7. In this figure, the responses of the uncoated SAW device were subtracted from

Table 1 Shifts of resonant frequency for the SAW biosensors coated with the wtbOBP and corresponding surface density for different laser parameters. Laser fluence (mJ/cm2 )

Number of k pulses

Mean frequency shift (kHz)

Standard deviation (kHz)

Surface density (kg/m2 )

320 320 320 200

46 24 12 46

496.87 300.00 234.37 201.75

7.9 22.5 23.8 12.3

25.59 × 10−6 15.45 × 10−6 12.07 × 10−6 10.39 × 10−6

254

F. Di Pietrantonio et al. / Applied Surface Science 302 (2014) 250–255

Fig. 4. Frequency response of Sensor A vs. time to different concentrations of carvone.

Fig. 7. Sensitivities of the SAW biosensors to tested odorants.

the responses of the sensors in order to evaluate the sensing capability of the wtbOBP coating layers. In particular, the SAW biosensor showed a higher sensitivity to the carvone odorant, respect to the octenol as previously reported in [7]. As expected, the obtained sensitivities were proportional to the surface density of the wtbOBP coating and, hence, correlated to the laser parameters. 4. Conclusions

Fig. 5. Response curves for wtbOBP based SAW biosensors and for an uncoated device upon exposure to different concentrations of carvone.

MAPLE deposition technique was used to deposit wtbOBPs onto SAW devices. Continuous thin films of protein were obtained for all the used fluences and the surface density of the protein coating was dependent on the laser parameters. As expected, the thickness of the deposited layers increases with the laser fluence and with the number of pulses, as confirmed by the shifts of the resonant frequency of the SAW devices after the depositions. In particular, MAPLE technique provided a good repeatability as it is possible to deduce from the limited standard deviation obtained in different runs with the same parameters (Table 1). The deposition of OBPs by MAPLE without significant modifications of the biochemical structure was confirmed by the FTIR spectroscopy while the functionality was established by the measurements performed with SAW biosensors coated with two different laser fluences that showed sensitivities proportional to the thickness of the deposited coating. Acknowledgements Financial support from the European Commission—7th Framework Programme (FP7-ICT project no. 247868) e-LIFT is gratefully acknowledged. CNR Commessa “Diagnostica Avanzata ed Alimentazione” (SD) program is acknowledged. V. Dinca acknowledges funding provided by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS–UEFISCDI, project number PN-II-RUTE-2011-3-0289. References

Fig. 6. Response curves for wtbOBP based SAW biosensors and for an uncoated device upon exposure to different concentrations of octenol.

[1] F. Di Pietrantonio, M. Benetti, D. Cannata, E. Verona, A. Palla-Papavlu, V. Dinca, M. Dinescu, T. Mattle, T. Lippert, Volatile toxic compound detection by surface acoustic wave sensor array coated with chemoselective polymers deposited by laser induced forward transfer: application to sarin, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 174 (2012) 158–167. [2] N. Iqbal, G. Mustafa, A. Rehman, A. Biedermann, B. Najafi, P.A. Lieberzeit, F.L. Dickert, QCM-arrays for sensing terpenes in fresh and dried herbs via biomimetic MIP layers, Sensors 10 (2010) 6361–6376.

F. Di Pietrantonio et al. / Applied Surface Science 302 (2014) 250–255 [3] T. Alizadeh, S. Zeynali, Electronic nose based on the polymer coated SAW sensors array for the warfare agent simulants classification, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 129 (2008) 412–423. [4] L. Sang-Hun, D.D. Stubbs, W.D. Hunt, P.J. Edmonson, Vapor phase detection of plastic explosives using a SAW resonator immunosensor array, IEEE Sensors Atlanta (US) (2005). [5] W.D. Hunt, D.D. Stubbs, L. Sang-Hun, Time-dependent signatures of acoustic wave biosensors, Proceedings of the IEEE 91 (2003) 890–901. [6] D.D. Stubbs, L. Sang-Hun, W.D. Hunt, Vapor phase detection of a narcotic using surface acoustic wave immunoassay sensors, IEEE Sensors Journal 5 (2005) 335–339. [7] F. Di Pietrantonio, D. Cannatà, M. Benetti, E. Verona, A. Varriale, M. Staiano, S. D’Auria, Detection of odorant molecules via surface acoustic wave biosensor array based on odorant-binding proteins, Biosensors and Bioelectronics 41 (2013) 328–334. [8] V. Dinca, A. Palla-Papavlu, M. Dinescu, J.S. Stewart, T.K. Lippert, F. Di Pietrantonio, D. Cannata, M. Benetti, E. Verona, Polymer pixel enhancement by laser-induced forward transfer for sensor applications, Applied Physics A 101 (2010) 559–565. [9] V. Dinca, R. Fardel, J. Shaw-Stewart, F. Di Pietrantonio, D. Cannata, M. Benetti, E. Verona, A. Palla-Papavlu, M. Dinescu, T. Lippert, Laser-induced forward transfer: an approach to single-step polymer microsensor fabrication, Sensor Letters 8 (2010) 436–440. [10] A. Piqúe, R.C.Y. Auyeung, J.L. Stepnowski, D.W. Weir, C.B. Arnold, R.A. McGill, D.B. Chrisey, Laser processing of polymer thin for chemical sensor applications, Surface and Coatings Technology 163-164 (2003) 293–299. [11] E.J. Houser, D.B. Chrisey, M. Bercu, N.D. Scarisoreanu, A. Purice, D. Colceag, C. Constantinescu, A. Moldovan, M. Dinescu, Functionalized polysiloxane thin films deposited by matrix-assisted pulsed laser evaporation for advanced chemical sensor applications, Applied Surface Science 252 (2006) 4871–4876.

255

[12] A. Purice, J. Schou, P. Kingshott, M. Dinescu, Production of active lysozyme films by matrix assisted pulsed laser evaporation at 355 nm, Chemical Physics Letters 435 (2007) 350–353. [13] C. Constantinescu, N. Scarisoreanu, A. Moldovan, M. Dinescu, C. Vasiliu, Thin films of polyaniline deposited by MAPLE technique, Applied Surface Science 253 (2007) 7711–7714. [14] L. Rusen, C. Mustaciosu, B. Mitu, M. Filipescu, M. Dinescu, V. Dinca, Protein-resistant polymer coatings obtained by matrix assisted pulsed laser evaporation, Applied Surface Science 278 (2013) 198–202. [15] R.A. McGill, R. Chung, D.B. Chrisey, P.C. Dorsey, P. Matthews, A. Pique, T.E. Mlsna, J.L. Stepnowski, Performance optimization of surface acoustic wave chemical sensors, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 5 (5) (1998) 1370–1380. [16] A. Palla-Papavlu, V. Dinca, M. Dinescu, F. Di Pietrantonio, D. Cannata, M. Benetti, E. Verona, Matrix-assisted pulsed laser evaporation of chemoselective polymers, Applied Physics A 105 (2011) 651–659. [17] J.W. Grate, M. Klusty, Surface acoustic-wave vapor sensors based on resonator devices, Analytical Chemistry 63 (1991) 1719–1727. [18] F. Bloisi, M. Barra, A. Cassinese, L.R. Maria Vicari, Matrix-assisted pulsed laser thin film deposition by using nd:YAG laser, Journal of Nanomaterials 2012 (2012) 1–9, Article ID 395436. [19] E. Leveugle, L.V. Zhigilei, Molecular dynamics simulation study of the ejection and transport of polymer molecules in matrix-assisted pulsed laser evaporation, Journal of Applied Physics 102 (7) (2007) 74914–74919. [20] A. Sellinger, E. Leveugle, J.M. Fitz-Gerald, L.V. Zhigilei, Generation of surface features in films deposited by matrix-assisted pulsed laser evaporation: the effects of the stress confinement and droplet landing velocity, Applied Physics A 92–94 (2008) 821–829.