Accepted Manuscript The base medium affects ultrastructure and survival of bovine preantral follicles cultured in vitro Carolina Rodriguez Jimenez, Valdevane Rocha Araujo, Jurandy Mauro PenitenteFilho, Jovana Luiza de Azevedo, Renata Gomes Silveira, Ciro Alexandre Alves Torres PII:
S0093-691X(15)00627-5
DOI:
10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.11.007
Reference:
THE 13413
To appear in:
Theriogenology
Received Date: 11 May 2015 Revised Date:
4 November 2015
Accepted Date: 7 November 2015
Please cite this article as: Jimenez CR, Araujo VR, Penitente-Filho JM, de Azevedo JL, Silveira RG, Torres CAA, The base medium affects ultrastructure and survival of bovine preantral follicles cultured in vitro, Theriogenology (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.11.007. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Revised
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
1
The base medium affects ultrastructure and survival of bovine
2
preantral follicles cultured in vitro
3 Carolina Rodriguez Jimeneza*, Valdevane Rocha Araujob, Jurandy Mauro Penitente-
5
Filhoa, Jovana Luiza de Azevedoa, Renata Gomes Silveiraa, Ciro Alexandre Alves
6
Torresa
RI PT
4
7 a
9
Department of Animal Science, Laboratory of Physiology and Animal Reproduction,
SC
8
Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, 36.570-000, MG, Brazil. b
11
Follicles (LAMOFOPA), State University of Ceará, Fortaleza, 60.714-903, CE, Brazil.
M AN U
10
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Preantral
12 13
*
Corresponding author: Carolina Rodriguez Jimenez, Animal Nutrition Laboratory, Center of Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Avenida
15
Centenário, nº 303, Caixa Postal 96, Piracicaba, SP 13.400-970, Brazil; e-mail:
16
[email protected]
EP
TE D
14
17
Running head: different base medium in cow preantral follicles
21
AC C
18
22
The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of minimum essential medium
23
alpha modification (α-MEM), tissue culture medium 199 (TCM-199), and McCoy's
24
medium (McCoy's) on in vitro culture of preantral follicles included in the bovine
25
ovarian cortex (in situ). Bovine ovarian fragments were cultured in α-MEM, TCM-199
19 20
Abstract
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
or McCoy supplemented (+) with glutamine, insulin, transferrin, selenium, ascorbic
27
acid, bovine serum albumin (BSA), penicillin, streptomycin, and acid 4- (2-hidroxietil) -
28
1-piperazinoetanossulfónico (HEPES) buffer in 24-well plates, at 37°C and 5% CO2 for
29
1 or 7 days. The morphology of follicles, normal, primordial and development (primary
30
and secondary), as well as viability and morphometric variables of follicles and oocytes
31
were assessed. The morphology and morphometry of preantral follicles were analyzed
32
by ANOVA followed by the Tukey and Dunnett tests and viability variables were
33
determined by the Chi-square (χ2) test. The results showed that TCM-199+ reduced
34
significantly (p<0.05) the percentage of morphologically normal and viable follicles
35
after 7 days of culture compared to the (control). Similar results were observed in
36
McCoy+, in which the percentage of viable follicles after 7 days of culture was
37
significantly lower (p<0.05) compared to control. However, it was similar (P>0.05)
38
between α-MEM+ and TCM-199+. Moreover, follicular diameters in McCoy+ and TCM-
39
199+ were significantly smaller (p<0.05) compared to control and α-MEM+ after 7 days
40
of culture. In addition, the ultrastructure of preantral follicles was similar between
41
control and α-MEM+ after 7 days of culture. In conclusion, α-MEM+ showed to be the
42
most effective medium to preserve morphology, morphometry and ultrastructure of
43
bovine preantral follicles, ensuring their viability and growth after in situ culture.
45 46 47
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
44
RI PT
26
Keywords: oocyte; folliculogenesis; in situ; α-MEM; TCM-199; McCoy.
1. Introduction
48 49
In view of the wide diversity of cellular metabolism, several types of culture
50
media are used to meet the nutritional requirements of multiple cells, such as α-MEM,
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
α-MEM glutamax, TCM-199, McCoy, Waymouth, Leibowitz and Menezo B2 [1]. In
52
general, these medium have different concentrations of inorganic salts, amino acids,
53
vitamins and nucleosides. Other substances are also added, such as antioxidants,
54
proteins, micronutrients, glycoproteins, antibiotics, buffer agents, hormones and growth
55
factors, which enrich growth medium to maintain cell viability in culture.
RI PT
51
The α-MEM is widely used for in vitro culture of preantral follicles in goat
57
[2,3,4], bovine [5,6,7,8,11]; canine [9]; and murine [10]. Previous studies have shown
58
that α-MEM is an important growth medium for isolated bovine preantral follicles
59
[5,11] and enclosed in ovarian tissue [12]. However, Rossetto et al. [7] found that
60
isolated bovine secondary follicles have difficulties to grow and maturate in vitro,
61
differently from other species such as goat.
M AN U
SC
56
Similarly, TCM-199 has been widely used for in vitro culture of bovine preantral
63
follicles. Saha et al. [13] found that supplementing TCM-199 with follicle-stimulating
64
hormone (FSH) and/or epidermal growth factor (EGF) to isolated follicles, they
65
promoted an increase in follicular diameter. In addition, TCM-199+ has also been
66
successfully used for in vitro growth and development of isolated preantral follicles (>
67
150 µm) [14], leading to formation of antral follicles after in vitro culture [6]. Costa et
68
al. [15] observed that the addition of FSH to TCM-199 did not influence the viability
69
and growth of preantral follicles regardless of the presence of FSH.
EP
AC C
70
TE D
62
The McCoy medium is also highly used in studies on bovine preantral follicles.
71
It is usually supplemented with ascorbic acid [16] or insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-
72
1) [17]. Recently, McLaughlin et al. [18,19] found that the in vitro culture of bovine
73
preantral follicles in two steps, firstly, preantral follicles included into ovarian tissue (in
74
situ culture system), which leading to activation of primordial to secondary follicles,
75
and secondly the secondary follicles were isolated from the ovarian tissue and
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
individually cultured until antral follicles. In our study, the McCoy medium was
77
supplemented with FSH and/or activin. However, based on literature reports, there has
78
been no standard, reliable culture medium for bovine preantral follicles [1]. Moreover,
79
in recent years, researchers have intensified their efforts in the culture of isolated
80
advanced preantral follicles (> 150 µm).
RI PT
76
Since about 90% of preantral follicles are primordial, studies on base medium that
82
allow activation, as well as in vitro development, contribute to obtaining a greater number
83
of secondary follicles. These secondary follicles can be isolated and cultured in vitro
84
again until complete their maturation. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify the
85
effectiveness of α-MEM, McCoy and TCM-199 media on the development of bovine
86
preantral follicles enclosed in ovarian cortical tissue (in situ).
87 88
2. Material and methods
90
TE D
89 2.1. Chemicals and medium
91
94 95 96
EP
93
The culture medium and chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).
AC C
92
M AN U
SC
81
2.2. Source of ovaries
97
Ovarian cortical tissues (n = 24 ovaries) from mixed-breed cows at different
98
ages and phases of the estrous cycle were collected from a local slaughterhouse.
99
Immediately after slaughter, the ovaries were washed once in 70% alcohol for 10 sec
100
followed by two washes with TCM-199 [20] supplemented with 20 mM HEPES, 2000
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
µg/mL sodium bicarbonate [13, 21], 25 µg/mL pyruvic acid, 75 µg/mL penicillin and
102
50 µg/mL streptomycin [18] been denominated TCM-199 to ovarian manipulation. The
103
pairs of ovaries were transported in TCM-199 at 4°C [22] to the laboratory within a
104
period of 2 h. The ovaries were divided into two groups, six pairs for the study of the
105
morphology, morphometry and ultrastructure of preantral follicles in situ, and six pairs
106
for the viability analysis of isolated preantral follicles.
107 2.3. Experimental protocol
SC
108
RI PT
101
109
In the laboratory, ovarian cortical slices (3x3x1 cm) were cut from the ovarian
111
surfaces using a sterilized surgical blade. Ovarian fragments were washed in a
112
fragmentation medium, consisted of TCM-199 with 20 mM HEPES; 2000 µg/mL
113
sodium bicarbonate [13]; 2 mM sodium pyruvate; 75 µg/mL penicillin, 50 µg/mL
114
streptomycin and 10 % BSA [18]. The tissue pieces, control or placed into culture
115
medium for 1 or 7 days were directly fixed for histological and ultrastructural analysis.
116
Bovine tissues were transferred to 24-well plates containing 1 mL of culture medium. In
117
vitro culture was performed at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.
EP
TE D
M AN U
110
All culture media (α-MEM, TCM-199 or McCoy) were supplemented with 20
119
mM HEPES; 3 mM glutamine; 10 ng/mL insulin; 2.5 µg/mL transferrin; 4 ng/mL
120
selenium; 50 µg/mL ascorbic acid (α-MEM except); 0.1% BSA; 100 µg/mL penicillin
121
and 100 µg/mL streptomycin as described by McLaughlin et al. [18]. After
122
supplementation, the medium were called α-MEM+, TCM-199+ and McCoy's +.
AC C
118
123 124 125
2.4. Morphological analysis and assessment of in vitro follicular growth
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Before culture (control) and after 1 and 7 days in culture, all pieces were fixed in
127
Carnoy solution for 4 h and then dehydrated in increasing concentrations of alcohol,
128
diaphonized in xylene and embedding in paraffin. The bovine tissue fragments were cut
129
into 5 µm sections, and each section was mounted on a glass slide and stained using
130
periodic acid Schiff – hematoxylin [23]. Follicular stages were assessed microscopically
131
on serial sections. Slides were analyzed and examined under optical microscopy (400X
132
magnification, Olympus BX50, Japan). Thirty preantral follicles were evaluated in each
133
repetition, totaling 360 observations per treatment (180 at day 1 and 180 at day 7).
SC
RI PT
126
Preantral follicles were classified as primordial and developing (primary and
135
secondary). Primordial follicles were described as spherical or ovoid oocytes
136
surrounded by a single layer of flattened and some cuboid-shaped granulosa cells
137
(GCs). The primary follicles were described as spherical oocytes with a single layer of
138
cuboid-shaped GCs and the secondary follicles as spherical oocytes with two or more
139
layers of cuboid-shaped GCs [22]. Qualitative evaluation of the follicles was based on
140
the integrity of the oocyte and GCs. The follicles were classified morphologically as:
141
normal (an intact oocyte was present, surrounded by granulosa cells that were well
142
organized in one or more layers and that had no pycnotic nuclei) or degenerated (Atretic
143
follicles were defined as a retracted oocyte, pycnotic nucleus, and/or disorganized
144
granulosa cells detached from the basement membrane [24].
TE D
EP
AC C
145
M AN U
134
For the analysis of follicular and oocyte diameters, 10 morphologically normal
146
preantral follicles per animal were observed and their images captured with an optical
147
microscope (400X magnification, Olympus BX50, Japan). We evaluated 120 follicles
148
per treatment, control (n = 60), day 1 (n = 60), and day 7 (n = 60). The diameters were
149
calculated by Image J / Fiji 1:46 program [25].
150
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 151
2.5. Ultrastructure analysis
152 To examine follicular morphology, Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
154
was performed to analyze ultrastructure of preantral follicles. A portion with maximum
155
dimension of 1mm3 was cut from each fragment of the ovarian tissue and fixed in
156
Karnovsky solution (2 % paraformaldehyde and 2 % glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium
157
cacodylate buffer pH 7.2) for 4 h at room temperature (25°C). After three washes in
158
sodium cacodylate buffer, specimens were post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h at
159
room temperature. The samples were then dehydrated through a gradient of acetone
160
solutions and thereafter embedded in Spurr resin. Semi-thin sections (3 µm) were cut in
161
an ultramicrotome (RMC Products, Power Tome-X, Arizona, USA) and stained with
162
toluidine blue for light microscopy studies. The ultrathin sections (60-70 nm) were
163
contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined under a Zeiss EM 900
164
(Jena, Germany) transmission electron microscope. Based on histological results, the
165
follicles observed (n=5 per treatment) in TEM were from the control, α-MEM+ and
166
TCM-199+. Parameters such as density and integrity of ooplasmic and granulosa cell
167
organelles, vacuolization and basement membrane integrity were evaluated.
169 170 171
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
2.6. Viability analysis
AC C
168
RI PT
153
Before culture (control) and after 1 and 7 days in culture, preantral follicles were
172
isolated by the mechanical method described by Figueiredo et al. [5]. Briefly, ovarian
173
fragments were finely fragmented and transferred to 15 mL tubes containing 5 mL of
174
TCM-199 with 20 mM HEPES, 2000 µg/mL sodium bicarbonate [13, 21], 2 mM
175
sodium pyruvate, 75 µg/mL penicillin, 50 µg/mL streptomycin and 10 % BSA [18].
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Ovarian fragments were mechanically dissociated by repeated pipetting (1,600 and 600
177
µm of diameter), the material obtained was filtered through nylon mesh 100 µm of
178
diameter and subsequently the viability was analyzed with Trypan blue. We added 5 µL
179
of Trypan Blue to each 100 µL of suspension medium containing isolated preantral
180
follicles. Follicles were classified as viable or non-viable, when non-stained or blue-
181
stained, respectively [26] under an inverted microscope (100X; Leica DFC295,
182
Germany).
RI PT
176
184
SC
183 2.7. Statistical analysis
M AN U
185
The percentages of preantral follicles morphologically normal, primordial and
187
developing (primary and secondary), as well as those with follicular and oocyte
188
diameter were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA). Subsequently, comparisons
189
between the means were made using the Dunnett test (control versus treatments) and the
190
Tukey test (treatments versus treatments). The viability analysis of isolated preantral
191
follicles was compared in contingency table by the Chi-square test (χ2). We used the
192
software version 9.1 of the statistical program SAS. The values were considered
193
statistically significant different at p < 0.05.
195 196 197 198 199
EP
AC C
194
TE D
186
3. Results
3.1. Morphology and viability of bovine preantral follicles cultured in situ in α-MEM+, TCM-199+ or McCoy+
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
We analyzed 1,260 preantral follicles enclosed in ovarian tissue. Percentage of
201
control and cultured preantral follicles at days 1 or 7 in α-MEM+, TCM-199+ and
202
McCoy+ medium are presented in Figure 1. Was not found difference (p < 0.0.5)
203
between control and medium base on day 1 of in vitro culture (Table 1). However, at
204
day 7 of culture, TCM-199+ was the only treatment that significantly reduced the
205
percentage of morphologically normal follicles compared to the control (p < 0.05).
206
Comparing treatments at days 1 and 7, no differences were found (p > 0.05) regarding
207
the percentage of morphologically normal follicles.
SC
RI PT
200
Preantral follicles (n = 50 per treatment) were isolated from the ovarian stroma
209
at days 0 (control), 1, and 7 in order to confirm the morphological results of (Table 1).
210
Viable and non-viable follicles can be observed in Figure 2. The results showed that
211
only follicles cultured in α-MEM+ at days 1 and 7 did not differ from the control (p >
212
0.05). On the other hand, the rate of follicles cultured in TCM-199+ and McCoy+ was
213
significantly lower than the control at day 7. At day 7 of culture, the percentage of
214
viable follicles was significantly higher in α-MEM+ compared to TCM-199+. In
215
addition, with the progression of culture, from day 1 to day 7, only the treatments using
216
α-MEM+ and TCM-199+ kept the number of viable preantral follicles, whereas the
217
McCoy+ medium significantly reduced the percentage of viable follicles after day 7 (p <
218
0.05).
TE D
EP
AC C
219
M AN U
208
Table 2, presented the average of percentage of primordial and developing
220
follicles and their variation represented as standard error of the mean (SEM). After 7
221
days of culture, all treatments reduced the percentage of primordial follicles compared
222
to the control (p < 0.05), although the percentage of developing follicles was not
223
concomitant in cultured treatments. The percentage of developing follicles was
224
significantly higher in α-MEM+ than in TCM-199+ at day 1 of culture. Comparing the
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 225
treatments at different culture periods, there was a significant reduction in the
226
percentage of primordial follicles in all treatments from day 1 to day 7. However, the
227
developing follicles kept the same percentages during the in vitro culture (p > 0.05).
228
230
3.2. Morphometry of bovine preantral follicles cultivated in situ in α-MEM+, TCM-199+
RI PT
229
or McCoy+
231
For the morphometric analyses, we measured the dimensions of follicles and
233
oocytes (n = 210) enclosed in ovarian tissue, totaling 30 measurements per treatment.
234
The averages of follicular diameter and oocyte at days 1 and 7 of in vitro culture can be
235
observed in Table 3. At day 1 of in vitro culture, no differences were found (p > 0.05)
236
between follicular dimensions of the control and the culture media tested (α-MEM+,
237
TCM-199+ and McCoy+). However, at day 7, TCM-199+ and McCoy+ significantly
238
reduced the follicular diameter when compared to the control. In addition, all treatments
239
showed oocyte diameters significantly lower than those of the control (p < 0.05),
240
although they did not differ from each other. Comparing the culture media, no
241
differences were found in the follicular and oocyte dimensions after 1 day of culture (p
242
> 0.05). However, at day 7 of in vitro culture, the dimensions of follicles cultured in
243
McCoy+ and TCM-199+ were significantly lower than those in α-MEM+. Moreover,
244
TCM-199+ and McCoy+ reduced the follicular diameter as culture progressed from day
245
1 to day 7 (p < 0.05).
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
232
246 247 248
3.3. Ultrastructural analysis
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Transmission electron microscopy was used as a qualitative technique and
250
complementary for histological analysis and follicular viability to evaluate the integrity
251
of control (Figure 3A,B) preantral follicles and follicles cultivated for 7 days in α-
252
MEM+ (Figure 3C,D) and TCM-199+ (Figure 3E,F). Confirming the results obtained in
253
histological studies, preantral follicles cultured in α-MEM+ showed similar
254
ultrastructure to the control. In both of treatments, follicles showed nucleus and
255
organelles uniformly distributed in the cytoplasm such as mitochondria, endoplasmic
256
reticulum and some vacuoles. Moreover, granulosa cells and basal and nuclear
257
membranes were preserved and intact.
SC
RI PT
249
Follicles cultured in TCM-199+ were characterized by a high number of
259
vacuoles scattered throughout the cytoplasm, showing a very low density of organelles,
260
as well as irregular or fragmented nuclear and cytoplasmic membranes. In addition, it
261
was observed fragmentation in granulosa cells, pycnotic oocytes with a dark color in
262
most cells, as well as increased volume and disruption of the nuclear envelope along
263
some segments of the nucleus contour (Figure 3E,F).
TE D
265
3.4. Differences in α-MEM, TCM-199, and McCoy
EP
264
M AN U
258
For a better understanding of the present study, we carried out a comparative
267
analysis of the components of the base media. The α-MEM and TCM-199 have greater
268
variety of minerals salts than the McCoy medium (Figure 4). In addition, α-MEM
269
incorporates higher concentrations of amino acids L-arginine, L-asparagine, L-glutamic
270
acid and L-Histidine when compared to TCM-199 and McCoy (Figure 5). The α-MEM
271
has a greater number of nucleosides, nucleoside triphosphate type (deoxyadenosine 0.01
272
g/L; deoxycytidine 0.011 g/L and deoxyguanosine 0.01 g/L) and ribonucleosides
273
(adenosine 0.01 g/L, guanosine 0.01 g/L and uridine 0.01 g/L).
AC C
266
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
The McCoy medium shows a concentration of glucose (3 g/L) threefold greater
275
than α-MEM or TCM-199 (1.0 g/L). Although α-MEM does not show high glucose
276
concentrations, it has pyruvic acid (0.11 g/L), an intermediate organic compound
277
extremely important for glucose metabolism, Krebs cycle, synthesis of fatty acids,
278
steroids and amino acids [27].
RI PT
274
TCM-199 contains cholecalciferol or vitamin D (100 ng/mL). It also has
280
menadione sodium disulfide (0.000016 g/L), which is a synthetic form of vitamin K3, a
281
product of low stability in light, heat, humidity and pH. Most vitamins of α-MEM and
282
TCM-199 show concentrations equal and/or similar. However, the McCoy medium has
283
higher vitamin concentration compared to α-MEM and TCM-199 (Figure 6).
M AN U
SC
279
284 285
4. Discussion
In the present study, we evaluated the efficiency of commercial media α-MEM,
287
TCM-199 and McCoy`s for in-vitro culture of preantral follicles in bovine ovarian
288
tissue. For parameters of analysis, we considered the percentage of morphologically
289
normal and viable follicles, as well as the percentage of follicular activation (primordial
290
and developing follicles) and follicular and oocyte diameters. We also investigated the
291
composition differences in the medium used, such as concentration of mineral salts,
292
amino acids, vitamins and nucleosides. The results showed that α-MEM+ had a
293
percentage of morphologically normal and viable follicles similar to that of the control,
294
and these percentages were higher than those in TCM-199+. In addition, α-MEM+ was
295
able to increase the follicular diameter compared to TCM-199+ and McCoy+.
AC C
EP
TE D
286
296
After 7 days of culture, only the follicles cultured in α-MEM+ and McCoy+
297
showed a percentage of morphologically normal follicles similar to that in the control.
298
However, only in α-MEM+, the percentage of viable follicles remained similar to that in
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
the control after 7 days of culture. Similar results were observed when α-MEM+ was
300
used for in vitro culture of isolated bovine preantral follicles, which can replace TCM-
301
199+ [1,11]. In contrast, in a similar experiment, Rossetto et al. [6] verified that TCM-
302
199+ was better to keep the morphology and viability of isolated bovine preantral
303
follicles compared to α-MEM+ and McCoy+. In the current study, however, TCM-199+
304
was less efficient than α-MEM+. These results may be attributed to the differences in
305
their compositions. The α-MEM has a greater number of nucleotides and amino acids.
306
In addition, α-MEM and TCM-199 have equal and, or similar concentrations of
307
vitamins. TCM-199 was not efficient in the follicular viability or morphometry,
308
possibly because of the presence of cholecalciferol and menadione sodium disulfide
309
absent in α-MEM. Cholecalciferol, or vitamin D3, is a fat-soluble vitamin, and one of
310
the most toxic and slowly metabolized vitamins [28]. Premaor [29] showed that vitamin
311
D levels below 3.2×10-5 g/L (32 ng/mL) can be characterized as deficient. However,
312
Castro et al. [3] showed that high doses (0.0002 g or 100 ng) can cause calcium
313
destabilization. Menadione sodium disulfide, also found in TCM-199, is not used
314
directly as a nutritional supplement due to its high toxicity and low stability [31]. Lima
315
[32] stated that the storage of high concentrations of vitamins can lead to toxic
316
symptoms and large doses may interfere in the metabolism of other vitamins. Therefore,
317
bovine preantral follicles respond differently to conditions and, or culture systems used,
318
enclosed (in situ) or isolated from the ovarian tissue.
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
319
RI PT
299
The morphometric responses showed that at day 7 of culture, the dimensions of
320
the follicles cultured in McCoy+ and TCM-199+ were lower than those in the control
321
and α-MEM+. Similar to our findings, Previous researches showed that the diameter of
322
bovine preantral follicles increases after in vitro culture in α-MEM+ with [12] or without
323
the addition of hormones (follicle-stimulating, luteinizing and estradiol) [8]; vascular
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [1, 11]. On the other hand, Rossetto et al. [6] showed
325
that the addition of FSH and activin promoted follicular growth and antral formation in
326
secondary follicles cultured in TCM-199+. Using McCoy+ in the presence of FSH, EGF
327
and IGF-1, for the first time in the literature, Gutierrez et al. [33] obtained the first
328
bovine antral follicles cultured in vitro from preantral secondary follicles. Years later,
329
these results were confirmed by McLaughlin et al. [18], who added FSH and, or activin
330
to McCoy+ to a culture of bovine preantral follicles in two phases (in situ and isolated).
331
In this study was observed that McCoy medium has higher concentrations of vitamins.
332
than α-MEM and TCM-199. The TCM-199 has contents of vitamins similar to those of
333
α-MEM, however, with some additional vitamins that may interfere negatively on the
334
follicles. Nevertheless, it can be inferred that the smaller follicular diameter observed
335
from day 1 to day 7, and the low viability observed, both in TCM-199 and McCoy, may
336
be a result of a high concentration of vitamins in preantral follicles. Thus, the efficiency
337
of α-MEM can be associate with to additional amino acids and nucleosides, as well as
338
mineral salts and vitamins, which collaborated to the positive response in in vitro
339
culture of preantral follicles.
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
324
It has been a challenge to produce an ideal medium to activate bovine primordial
341
follicles from its natural quiescence until the later stages in situ and,or isolated culture
342
systems. It is known that several factors may interfere in this process, such as the
343
culture system performed (in situ or isolated culture system), the concentrations of
344
substances added to culture media (growth factors, hormones etc.), as well as the
345
metabolites produced by the follicle cells through the culture. Considering that about
346
90% of the follicular population is composed by the primordial follicles, the
347
optimization of the in vitro culture systems to promote the development of this follicle
348
is very important. However, it is still difficult to develop those follicles in most species,
AC C
EP
340
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
including bovine. Based on difficulty of promoting their in vitro activation and
350
development, this study tested three base media. The base medium is the first source of
351
the nutrients that come into contact with the follicle. Thus, this study have proved that
352
α-MEM may be the medium of choice to maintenance of the follicular integrity and
353
development as previously shown by Araújo et al. (1, 11). On the other hand, both
354
TCM-199 and McCoy media besides not promote follicular activation, did not show any
355
influence about development and viability. Thus, these results are a starting point to
356
begin an organized series of research with substances that could improve the in situ
357
culture system and promote follicle development using α-MEM as a base medium.
SC
RI PT
349
Therefore, the knowledge the action of the medium in the culture system is of
359
vital importance because of the great variety and the medium act differently in terms of
360
species, cells and culture types. Although in recent years, researchers have worked more
361
intently in the culture of isolated preantral follicles (> 150 µm). In addition, several
362
studies have succeeded in using α-MEM to culture preantral follicles in caprine [34, 35,
363
36, 37, 4] canine [9]; murine [38, 10]; primate [39]; and even bovine [5, 6, 7, 8, 1, 11].
364
Therefore, studies on culture medium to provide activation and development of these
365
follicles contribute to the recovery of a higher number of developing follicles that can
366
be used in two-phase culture.
TE D
EP
The result of the morphological analysis was confirmed by ultrastructural
AC C
367
M AN U
358
368
analysis. This technique is considered an important tool because it provides more
369
information about the quality of preantral follicles and is able to detect damage to cell
370
membranes and organelles. Transmission electron microscopy studies showed that
371
granulosa cells and basal and nucleus membranes were preserved, as well as important
372
organelles, such as mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum, even after 7 days of
373
culture in the presence of α-MEM+. Similar results were described by Araujo et al., [2]
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 374
who observed that after 7 days of in vitro culture using only α-MEM+, the follicles
375
showed preserved ultrastructural integrity. Similarly, Chaves et al. [40] and Lopes et al.
376
[41] suggested that the use of α-MEM at 4°C preserves the quality of caprine and canine
377
preantral follicles, respectively, for further in vitro culture. Rossetto et al. [7] verified that the ultrastructure was preserved in bovine
379
preantral follicles cultured in both α-MEM+ and TCM-199+, after 16 days of culture,
380
although hormones were added to these medium. Silva et al. [24] observed by
381
transmission electron microscopy the presence of vacuoles and, consequently, the
382
decrease of organelles, such as mitochondria. These vacuoles are possibly comprised of
383
changed organelles that were phagocytized, but remained in the cells, characterizing one
384
of the first signals of follicular degeneration [24]. Such observations have already been
385
reported in preantral follicles in caprine [41]. Thus, we highlight the importance of the
386
ultrastructural analysis before and after in vitro culture of preantral follicles in different
387
species as a valuable tool for quality evaluation of follicles (bovine: [26]; murine: [42,
388
43]; and goats: [34, 2].
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
378
390
Conclusion
EP
389
The results showed that α-MEM+ is an effective medium to preserve
392
morphology, morphometry and ultrastructure of bovine preantral follicles, ensuring
393
their viability and growth after short term in situ culture system.
394
AC C
391
395 396
Acknowledgments
397
The authors wish to thank: Federal University of Viçosa (UFV), CAPES/CNPq
398
– IEL National – Brazil – for the scholarship granted, to FAPEMIG and CNPq, for
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 399
financial support and NAP/MEPA (ESALQ/USP) and NMM-CCB (UFV) for technical
400
Support.
401 402
Conflict of interest
RI PT
403 404
There is no conflict of interest that could be compromise the impartiality of the research
405
reported.
407
SC
406 Figure legends
M AN U
408
Figure 1 – Bovine preantral follicles (control; a, b) and cultivated after 1 and 7 d in the
410
presence of α-MEM+ (c, d); TCM-199+ (e, f) and McCoy+ (g, h), respectively. O =
411
oocyte; n = nucleus; GC = granulosa cells; PF = primordial follicles; PaF = primary
412
follicle; and SF = secondary follicle. 400X magnification; PAS-hematoxilin.
413
Figure 2 – Bovine preantral follicles mechanically isolated before the control (a, b) and
414
after 1 day (c, d) or 7 day (e, f) of culture in α-MEM+, stained with Trypan blue (dead)
415
and not stained (alive).
416
Figure 3 - Ultrastructural analysis (n=5 follicles) of control and cultured bovine
417
preantral follicles after 7 days of in vitro culture. (A, B) normal preantral follicles
418
control; C, D) normal preantral follicles after 7 d of culture in vitro in α-MEM+ (E, F)
419
degenerate preantral follicles after 7 d of culture in vitro in TCM-199. O = oocyte; Nu =
420
oocyte nucleus; m = mitochondria; GC = granulosa cells; ER=endoplasmic reticulum;
421
Mb = basement membrane; oocyte membrane (white arrow); vacuoles (black arrow).
AC C
EP
TE D
409
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 4 – Minerals in minimal essential medium (α-MEM-●), tissue culture medium
423
(TCM-199-◌) and McCoy medium (McCoy-▼) 199.
424
Figure 5 – Amino acids in minimal essential medium (α-MEM-●), tissue culture
425
medium (TCM-199-◌) and McCoy medium (McCoy-▼) 199.
426
Figure 6 – Vitamins in minimal essential medium (α-MEM-●), tissue culture medium
427
(TCM-199-◌) and McCoy medium (McCoy-▼) 199.
429
SC
428 References
432
M AN U
430 431
RI PT
422
[1] Araújo VR, Gastal MO, Figueiredo JR, Gastal EL. In vitro culture of bovine preantral follicles: a review. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol 2014;12:78. [2] Araújo VR, Gomes Da Silva CM, Magalhaes DM, Da Silva GM, Bao SN, Viana
434
Silva JR, Figueiredo JR, Rodrigues APR. Effect of bone morphogenetic protein 7
435
(BMP-7) in vitro survival of caprine preantral follicles. Pesq.Vet. Bras 2010; 30:
436
305-310.
TE D
433
[3] Saraiva MVA, Celestino JJH, Araujo VR, Chaves RN, Almeida AP, Lima-Verde I
438
B, Duarte AB, Silva GM, Martins FS, Bruno JB, Matos MHT, Campello CC,
440 441
AC C
439
EP
437
Silva JRV, Figueiredo JR. Expression of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) in goat ovarian follicles and the impact of sequential culture medium on in vitro development of caprine preantral follicles. Zygote 2011; 19: 205-214.
442
[4] Magalhães-Padilha DM, Duarte ABG, Araújo VR, Saraiva MVA, Almeida AP,
443
Rodrigues GQ, Matos MHT, Campello CC, Silva JR, Gastal MO, Gastal EL,
444
Figueiredo JR. Steady-state level of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) receptor
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 445
mRNA and the effect of IGF-I on the in vitro culture of caprine preantral follicles.
446
Theriogenology 2012; 77: 206-213. [5] Figueiredo JR, Hulshof SCJ, Van Den Hurk R Nusgens B Bevers MM, Ectors F J,
448
Beckers JF. Preservation of oocyte and granulosa cell morphology in bovine
449
preantral follicles cultured in vitro. Theriogenology 1994; 41: 1333-1346.
RI PT
447
[6] Rossetto R, Saraiva MV, Santos RR, Silva CM, Faustino LR, Chaves RN, Brito IR,
451
Rodrigues GQ, Lima IM, Donato MA, Peixoto CA, Figueiredo JR. Effect of
452
medium composition on the in vitro culture of bovine preantral follicles:
453
morphology and viability do not guarantee functionality. Zygote 2012; 21:125-
454
128.
M AN U
SC
450
455
[7] Rossetto R, Santos RR, Silva GM, Duarte ABG, Silva CMG, Campello CC,
456
Figueiredo JR. Comparative study on the in vitro development of caprine and
457
bovine preantral follicles. Small Ruminant Research 2013; 113:167-170.
459
[8] Sun J, Li X. Growth and antrum formation of bovine primary follicles in long-term
TE D
458
culture in vitro. Reprod. Biol 2013;13: 221-228. [9] Serafim MK, Silva GM, Duarte AB, Araújo VR, Silva TF, Lima AK, Chaves RN,
461
Campello CC, Silva LD, Figueiredo JR. High insulin concentrations promote the
462
in vitro growth and viability of canine preantral follicles. Reprod. Fertil. Dev
463
2013; 25: 927-34.
AC C
EP
460
464
[10] Jee BC, Kim JH, Park Da H, Youm H, Suh CS, Kim SH. In vitro growth of mouse
465
preantral follicles: effect of animal age and stem cell factor/insulin-like growth
466
factor supplementation. Clin. Exp. Reprod 2012, 39- 193.
467
[11] Araújo VR, Gastal MO, Wischral A, Figueiredo JR, Gastal EL. In vitro
468
development of bovine secondary follicles in two- and three-dimensional culture
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 469
systems using vascular endothelial growth factor, insulin-like growth factor-1, and
470
growth hormone. Theriogenology 2014; 82: 1246-1253.
472 473 474
[12] Braw-Tal R, Yossefi S. Studies in vivo and in vitro on the initiation of follicle growth in the bovine ovary. J. Reprod. Fertil 1997; 109: 165-171. [13] Saha S, Saha S, Shimizu M, Geshi M, Izaike Y. In vitro culture of bovine préantral follicles. Anim. Reprod. Sci 2000; 63: 27-39.
RI PT
471
[14] Itoh T, Kacchi M, Abe H, Sendai Y, Hoshi H. Growth, antrum formation, and
476
estradiol production of bovine preantral follicles cultured in a serum-free medium.
477
Biol. Reprod 2002; 67: 1099-1105.
SC
475
[15] Costa LFS, Gonçalves PBD, Figueiredo JR, Carámbula SF, Neves JP, Montagner
479
MM. In vitro development of bovine preantral follicles in monolayer of ovarian
480
cells. Ciênc. Rural 2001; 31: 323-327.
M AN U
478
[16] Thomas FH, Leask R, Srsen V, Riley SC, Spears N, Telfer EE. Effect of ascorbic
482
acid on health and morphology of bovine preantral follicles during long-term
483
culture. Reproduction 2001;122: 487-495.
484
[17] Thomas
TE D
481
FH, Campbell BK, Armstrong DG, Telfer EE. Effects of IGF-1
bioavailability on bovine preantral follicular development in vitro. Reproduction
486
2007;133:1121-128.
EP
485
[18] Mclaughlin M, Bromfield JJ, Albertinid F, Telfer EE. Activin promotes follicular
488
integrity and oogenesis in cultured preantral bovine follicles. M. Hum. Reprod
489
AC C
487
2010a; 16; 644-653.
490
[19] Mclaughlin M, Telfer DE. Oocyte development in bovine primordial follicles is
491
promoted by activin and FSH within a two-step serum-free culture system. Soc.
492
Reprod. Fertil 2010b; 139: 971-978.
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[20] Celestino JJH, Santos RR, Martins FS, Matos MHT, Figueiredo JR, Costa SHF,
494
Silva JRV, Rodrigues APR. Preservation of bovine preantral follicles in 0.9%
495
saline solution or TCM-199. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec 2007; 59: 591-599.
496
[21] Roy SK, Terada DM. Activities of glucose metabolic enzymes in human preantral
497
follicles: In vitro modulation by follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing
498
hormone, epidermal growth factor, insulin-like growth factor I, and transforming
499
growth factor beta1. Biol. Reprod 1999; 60: 763-8.
RI PT
493
[22] Basso AC, Esper CR. Isolamento e caracterização ultraestrutural de folículos pré-
501
antrais de vacas da raça Nelore (Bos taurus indicus). Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci
502
2002; 39; 311-319.
M AN U
SC
500
503
[23] Matos MHT, Silva JRV, Rodrigues APR, Figueiredo JR. Técnicas para avaliação
504
da qualidade de folículos ovarianos pré-antrais cultivados in vitro. Rev. Bras.
505
Reprod. Anim 2007; 31: 433-442.
[24] Silva JRV, Ferreira MAL, Costa SHF, Santos RR, Carvalho FCA, Rodrigues APR,
507
Lucci CM, Báo SN, Figueiredo JR. Degeneration rate of preantral follicles in the
508
ovaries of goats. Small Ruminant Research 2000; 43: 203-209.
510
[25] Ferreira T, Rasband W. Image. J. User Guide IJ 1. 46 r. Reviewed by Michael
EP
509
TE D
506
Schmid September/October 2012. [26] Van Den Hurk R, Spek ER, Hage WJ, Fair T, Ralph JH, Schotanus K.
512
Ultrastructure and viability of isolated bovine pré-antral follicles. Human Reprod
513 514 515
AC C
511
1998; 4: 833-841.
[27] Lehninger A L, Nelson DL, Cox MM. Principles of biochemistry. 5. ed. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company 2008; 528 p.
516
[28] Silva BC, Camargos BM, Fuji GB, Dias EP, Soares MMS. Prevalência de
517
deficiência e insuficiência de vitamina D e sua correlação com PTH, marcadores
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 518
de remodelação óssea e densidade mineral óssea, em pacientes ambulatoriais.
519
Arq. Bras. Endocrinol. Metab 2008; 52: 482-488,2008. [29] Premaor MO, Furlanetto TW. Hipovitaminose D em adultos: entendendo melhor a
521
apresentação de uma velha doença. Arq. Bras. Endocrinol. Metab 2006; 50: 25-
522
37.
524 525 526
[30] Castro LCG. O sistema endocrinológico vitamina D. Arq. Bras. Endocrinol. Metab 2011; 55:8.
[31] Rezende JRR, Alves AP, Oliveira FC, Motta MS, Martins CH, Neto CPW.
SC
523
RI PT
520
Diagnóstico da deficiência de Vitamina K. Revista Científica do ITPAC 2012; 5. [32] LIMA A. História, ação, hipervitaminose e hipovitaminose de cada vitamina.
528
Disponível em:
529
vitaminas>. Acesso em: 22 Abril. 2015.
M AN U
527
[33] Gutierrez CG, Ralph JH, Telfer EE, Wilmut I, Webb R. Growth and antrum
531
formation of bovine preantral follicles in long-term culture in vitro. Biol. Reprod
532
2000; 62;1322-1328.
TE D
530
[34] Matos MH, Van Den Hurk R, Lima-Verde IB, Luque MC, Santos KD, Martins FS,
534
Báo SN, Lucci CM, Figueiredo JR. Effects of fibroblast growth factor-2 on the in
535
vitro culture of caprine preantral follicles. Cells Tissues Organs 2007b;186: 112-
536
120.
AC C
EP
533
537
[35] Bruno JB, Celestino JJH, Lima-Verde IB, Lima LF, Matos MHT, Araújo VR,
538
Saraiva MVA, Martins FS, Name KPO, Campello CC, Báo SN, Silva JRV,
539
Figueiredo JR. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor
540
in goat ovaries and improvement of in vitro caprine preantral follicle survival and
541
growth with VEGF. Reprod. Fertil. Dev 2009; 21: 679-687.
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 542
[36] Araújo VR, Chaves RN, Duarte ABG, Celestino JJH, Silva GM, Fernandes DD,
543
Matos MHT, Campello CC, Figueiredo JR. Effect of culture medium replacement
544
protocol on the in vitro development of isolated caprine secondary follicles. Small
545
Ruminant Res 2011a; 95:139 -143. [37] Araújo VR, Silva GM, Duarte ABG, Magalhaes DM, Almeida AP, Gonçalves
547
RFB, Bruno JB, Silva TFP, Campello CC, Rodrigues APR, Figueiredo JR.
548
Vascular endothelial growth factor-A165 (VEGF-A165) stimulates the in vitro
549
development and oocyte competence of goat preantral follicles. Cell Tissue Res
550
2011b; 346:273–281.
SC
RI PT
546
[38] Jin SY, Lei L, Shikanov, A, Shea LD, Woodruff TK. A novel two-step strategy for
552
in vitro culture of early-stage ovarian follicles in the mouse. Fertil. Steril 2010;
553
93; 2633-2639.
555
[39] Xu M, Kreeger PK, Shea LD, Woodruff TK. Tissue-engineered follicles produce live, fertile offspring. Tissue Eng 2006; 12: 2739-2746.
TE D
554
M AN U
551
[40] Chaves RN, Martins FS, Saraiva MVA, Celestino JJH, Lopes CAP, Correia JC,
557
Lima-Verde IB, Matos MHT, Báo SN, Name KPO, Campello CC, Silva JRV,
558
Figueiredo JR. Chilling ovarian fragments during transportation improves
559
viability and growth of goat preantral follicles cultured in vitro. Reprod. Fertil
560
2008; 20:640- 647.
AC C
EP
556
561
[41] Lopes CAP, Santos RR, Celestino JJH, Melo MA, Chaves RN, CampellO CC,,
562
Silva JR, Báo SN, Jewgenow K, Figueiredo JR. Shortterm preservation of canine
563
preantral follicles: Effects of temperature, medium and time. Animal
564
Reproduction Science 2009; 115: 201-214.
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 565
[42] Zhao J, Van Tol HTA, Taverne MAM, Van Der Weijden GC, Bevers MM, Van
566
Den Hurk R. The effect of growth hormone on rat preantral follicles in vitro.
567
Cambridge University Press 2000; 8: 275-283. [43] Salehnia M, Moghadam EA, Velojerdi MR. Ultrastructure of follicles after
569
vitrification of mouse ovarian tissue. Fertility and Sterility 2002; 78: 644-645.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
568
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 1 – Percentages of morphologically normal preantral follicles (mean ± standard error of the mean) and viable follicles (%) cultivated in α-MEM+, TCM-199+ and McCoy’s+ medium during 1 and 7 days. Morphologically normal Viability follicles
Day 1 Control
RI PT
preantral follicles
Treatments
Day 7
Day 1
70 ± 7
Day 7
44/50 (88%)
66 ± 2 aA
48 ± 9 aA
41/50 (82) abA
41/50 (82) aA
TCM-199+
52 ± 7 aA
39 ± 5 *aA
36/50 (72) bA
26/50 (52) *bA
McCoy’s+
52 ± 5 aA
44 ± 8 aA
46/50 (92) aA
35/50 (70) *abB
M AN U
SC
α-MEM+
* Significant difference for the treatment-control (P < 0.05); letters in the same column are different (P < 0.05);
A, B
a, b
superscript lowercase
superscript uppercase in the
TE D
rows indicate a statistically significant difference between the days of culture (P < 0.05); Cont = control; α-MEM+ = minimum essential medium supplemented; TCM-
EP
199+ = tissue culture medium supplemented 199; and McCoy’s+ = McCoy’s medium supplemented.
The percentage of morphologically normal follicles and viable
AC C
follicles represents all the stages of preantral follicles (primordial, primary and secondary follicles).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 2 – Percentages of primordial and developing follicles (average ± standard error of the mean) cultured in α-MEM+, TCM-199+ and McCoy’s+ medium during 1 and 7 days. Primordial
Developing
Treatments
Control
Day 7
Day 1
Day 7
RI PT
Day 1 49 ± 8
22 ± 5
28 ± 6 aA
8 ± 1 *aB
38 ± 6 aA
39 ± 10 aA
TCM-199+
35 ± 6 aA
13 ± 5 *aB
17 ± 3 bA
26 ± 6 aA
McCoy’s+
31 ± 7 aA
18 ± 4 *aB
22 ± 5 abA
26 ± 7 aA
M AN U
SC
α-MEM+
* Significant difference for the treatment-control (P < 0.05); letters in the same column are different (P < 0.05);
A, B
a, b
superscript lowercase
superscript uppercase in the
rows indicate a statistically significant difference between the days of culture (P <
TE D
0.05); Control = non cultured tissue; α-MEM+ = minimum essential medium supplemented; TCM-199+ = tissue culture medium supplemented 199; and McCoy's+
AC C
EP
= McCoy’s medium supplemented.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 3 – Mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of the follicular diameter/oocyte in micrometers (µm) of bovine preantral follicles cultured in α-MEM+, TCM-199+ and McCoy’s+ medium during 1 and 7 days. Mean ± SEM Day 1
Primordial
Primary
Secondary
Control
36 ± 1.1 (6)
47 ± 1.5 (16)
75 ± 2.9 (8)
α-MEM+
35 ± 0.6 (12)
48 ± 1.4 (14)
66 ± 3.1 (4)
TCM-199+
37 ± 0.6 (9)
44 ± 0.9 (17)
73 ± 5.2 (4)
McCoy’s+
38 ± 0.6 (4)
47 ± 1.0 (21)
62 ± 0.8 (5)
45 ± 2.0 (30) aA 46 ± 2.2 (30) aA
48 ± 1.4 (30)
aA
Mean ± SEM Day 7
M AN U
Follicles ± SEM (n) - Day 7
52 ± 2.8 (30)
SC
Treatment
RI PT
Follicles ± SEM (n) - Day 1
36 ± 1.1 (6)
47 ± 1.5 (16)
75 ± 2.9 (8)
52 ± 2.8 (30)
α-MEM+
34 ± 0.9 (16)
45 ± 2.8 (4)
77 ± 5.4 (10)
50 ± 4.1 (30) aA
TCM-199+
34 ± 0.7 (19)
48 ± 1.8 (10)
69 ± 0.0 (1)
39 ± 1.7 (30) *bB
McCoy’s+
34 ± 0.5 (22)
49 ± 2.8 (7)
60 ± 0.0 (1)
39 ± 1.5 (30) *bB
TE D
Control
Oocyte ± SEM (n) - Day 1
Mean ± SEM Day 1
24 ± 0.7 (6)
27 ± 1.0 (16)
35 ± 3.2 (8)
28 ± 1.2 (30)
α-MEM+
19 ± 0.8 (12)
24 ± 1.1 (14)
30 ± 5.0 (4)
23 ± 1.0 (30) *aA
TCM-199+
20 ± 1.5 (9)
22 ± 0.7 (17)
27 ± 4.3 (4)
22 ± 0.8 (30) *aA
McCoy’s+
22 ± 2.1 (4)
22 ± 0.6 (21)
24 ± 1.3 (5)
22 ± 0.5 (30) *aA
AC C
EP
Control
Oocyte ± SEM (n) - Day 7
Mean ± SEM Day 7
Control
24 ± 0.7 (6)
27 ± 1.0 (16)
35 ± 3.2 (8)
28 ± 1.2 (30)
α-MEM+
19 ± 0.5 (16)
21 ± 2.0 (4)
26 ± 2.2 (10)
22 ± 1.0 (30) *aA
TCM-199+
20 ± 1.0 (19)
22 ± 1.0 (10)
29 ± 0.0 (1)
21 ± 0.79 (30) *aA
McCoy’s+
18 ± 0.7 (22)
24 ± 1.8 (7)
41 ± 0.0 (1)
20 ± 1.0 (30) *aA
*
Follicular difference or oocyte of the control treatment with cultivated treatments (P <0.05);
a, b
superscript lowercase letters indicate follicular or oocyte difference in
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT cultivation day between treatments (P < 0.05);
A, B
superscript uppercase letters
indicate follicular or oocyte difference between days 1 and 7 of cultivate and treatments (α-MEM+, TCM-199+ or McCoy's+ - P < 0.05); α-MEM+ = minimal essential medium supplemented; TCM-199+ = tissue culture medium 199 and
RI PT
McCoy's+ = medium McCoy's+ supplemented.
* Diferença folicular ou oocitaria do tratamento controle com os tratamentos cultivados a,b
Letras minúsculas sobrescritas indicam diferença folicular ou oocitaria
no dia de cultivo entre os tratamentos (P<0.05);
SC
(P < 0.05);
A,B
Letras maiúsculas sobrescritas
M AN U
indicam diferença folicular ou oocitaria entre os dias de cultivo 1 e 7 e tratamento (αMEM+, TCM-199+ ou McCoy’s+ - P < 0,05); α-MEM+ = meio essencial mínimo suplementado; TCM-199+ = meio de cultivo de tecido 199 suplementado e McCoy’s+
AC C
EP
TE D
= meio McCoy’s+ suplementado.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 1
(a)
PaF
(b)
PaF
n
GC GC
RI PT
n
(c)
PF
(d)
O
n
M AN U
GC
SC
O
O
O
GC
(e)
O
n
(f)
TE D
PF
PF
PF
n
o n
GC
AC C
EP
GC
PaF
(g)
(h)
PF
GC
O
n
o GC
n
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 2
(b)
(c)
PF (alive)
(d)
(e)
SF (dead)
PaF (alive)
RI PT
SF (alive)
PF (dead)
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
(a)
(f)
SF (alive)
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 3
A
B
m
O
O GC
C
GC
O
m
D
M AN U
ER
SC
Nu
m
RI PT
Nu
m
mb
GC
Nu
E
TE D
Nu
F
m
EP
O
GC
O
Nu
AC C
ER
GC
Nu
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 4 – Minerals
10
4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
EP
TE D
Minerals
8
Minerals CaCl2*H2O Fe(NO3)3 *9H2O MgSO4 (anhydrous) KCl KH2PO4 Na * Acetate (anhydrous) NaHCO3 NaCl Na2HPO4 (anhydrous)
M AN U
0
AC C
[1x] g / L
6
α-MEM
0,2 0 0.09767 0.4 0 0 2.2 6.8 0.122
SC
8
RI PT
Alpha - MEM TCM-199 McCOY
TCM-199
0.1396 0.00072 0.09767 0.4 0.06 0.05 0.35 8.0 0.04788
McCOY
0.1324324 0 0.0976876 0.4 0 0 2.2 0 0.504
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 5 Amino acids
0.12 0.10
0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00
4
6
8
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
L-Alanine L-Arginine * HCL L-Asparagine * H2O L-Aspartic Acid L-Cysteine L-Cysteine *HCL*H2O L-Cystine *2HCL L-Glutamic Acid Glycine L-Histidine *HCL*H2O Hydroxy-L-proline L-isoleucine L-Leucine L-Lysine L-Lysine L-Methionine L-Phenylalanine L-Proline L-Serine L-Threonine L-Tryptophan L-Tyrosine * 2Na * 2H2O L-Valine
M AN U
2
EP
TE D
0
AC C
g/L
0.08
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
RI PT
Alpha-MEM TCM-199 McCoy's
SC
0.14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 6
Vitamin B12 Thiamine *HCL
Alpha-MEM TCM-199 McCoy's
RI PT
p-Amino Benzoic Acid Nicotinic Acid Niacinamide
SC
myo-Inositol Menadione sodium bisulfite Folic Acid Choline Chloride Calciferol
0.000
M AN U
D-Biotin L-Ascorbic Acid * Na 0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
EP
TE D
g/L
AC C
Vitamins
Riboflavin Pyridoxine *HCL Pyridoxal * HCL D-Panthothenic Acid
0.010
0,020
0,050
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
Highlights • Bovine preantral follicles were cultured in vitro in α-MEM+, TCM-199+ and McCoys+. • We Analyzed the different components of α-MEM+, TCM-199+ and McCoys+. • We evaluated the morphological, morphometric, viability and ultrastructure parameters. • The α-MEM+ preserved the morphology, morphometric and ultrastructure of preantral follicles. • The α-MEM+ maintained the viability and promoted the growth after cultivation in situ.