Gene, 145 (1994) 261-265 0 1994 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
261
0378-l 119/94/$07.00
GENE 07969
The human DNA-binding protein, PO-GA, is homologous to the large subunit of mouse replication factor C: regulation by alternate 3’ processing of mRNA (Recombinant DNA; poly(A)-addition
site; Drosophila; transcription factor)
Yang Lu” and Anna Tate RiegelaTb ‘Department of Pharmacology, and bVincent TLombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA Received by R. Padmanabhan:
27 December
1993; Accepted:
11 February
1994; Received at publishers:
17 March
1994
SUMMARY
We have previously cloned a human gene encoding a 128-kDa protein which we termed PO-GA [ Lu et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 193 (1993) 779-7861. In the present report, we compared PO-GA to recent DNA database entries and determined that PO-GA was 80% identical, at the amino-acid level, to the large subunit of replication factor C (activator 1) cloned from mouse [Burbelo et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91 (1994) in press]. This indicates that PO-GA probably represents the corresponding subunit of human replication factor C. In addition, PO-GA has high homology to a putative Drosophila transcription factor. All three proteins contain a nuclear translocation signal and an ATP/ADP-binding motif, and are highly conserved in regions with homology to Escherichia coli and yeast DNA ligases. We determined that PO-GA mRNA species of 5.3 and 4.5 kb can be detected in most human tissues, but levels are especially high in ovary. Analysis of the sequence of a new PO-GA cDNA clone that we obtained reveals a previously undetected 650-bp 3’-UTR extension. This region contains several A + U-rich regions potentially involved in regulation of mRNA stability. This fragment only hybridizes to the larger 5.3-kb mRNA. Comparison of cDNA sequences revealed that the two mRNA species arise as a result of alternate use of poly(A)-addition sites. Since the ratio of the two mRNA species is variable in different tissues, we speculate that alternative 3’ processing of the PO-GA mRNA is utilized as a mechanism of regulating cellular levels of mRNA.
INTRODUCTION
The PO-GA cDNA clone was initially detected (Lu et al., 1993) by expression screening of a HeLa cDNA Correspondence to: Dr. A.T. Riegel, Department of Pharmacology, Georgetown University Medical School, Washington, DC 20007, USA. Tel. (l-202) 687-1479; Fax (l-202) 687-6437. acid(s); ARE, A + U-rich response Abbreviations: aa, amino element(s); bp, base pair(s); GCG, Genetics Computer Group (Madison, WI, USA); kb, kilobase or 1000 bp; nt, nucleotide(s); oligo, oligodeoxyribonucleotide; ORF, open reading frame; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PO-GA, DNA-binding protein; PO-GA, gene (DNA, RNA) encoding PO-GA; RFC, replication factor C; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; UTR, untranslated region(s). SSDI 0378-I
119(94)00180-2
library with the cognate binding site of the PO-B transcription factor we have previously described (Wellstein et al., 1991). Although the properties of PO-GA indicated that it was not PO-B several features of this 128-kDa protein suggested it had a function in DNA regulatory mechanisms, i.e., regions of homology to DNA ligases and DNA repair proteins plus a strong preference to bind to G + A-rich DNA fragments (Lu et al., 1993). We speculated that this protein was likely to have a function in transcription, replication or repair processes (Lu et al., 1993). We now report that PO-GA has 80% identity to the large subunit of mouse replication factor C (RFC) (Burbelo et al., 1994). This RFC complex is also known as Activator 1 (Lee and Hurwitz, 1990; Lee et al., 1991). Purified RFC is composed of a number of proteins of
262 varying
molecular
DNA-dependent and Stillman,
activity
large subunit
proteins
of human
preference
indicates
for certain
those
associated
(Tsurimoto
and Stillman,
unusual with
the DNA binding
domain
sequence
cession may
Drosophila
No. L17340). perform
similar
transcription
identity
structures 3’
ends
of RFC of
(PO-GA)
of aa identity
factor (GenBank
It is possible functions
is the
and the large subunit
RFC have a high percentage
that in
to ac-
these proteins
DNA
region ( Fig. 1, aa 400-456) tween the human
specificity
of its largest subunit
(Lu et al., 1993) is not clear. PO-GA a putative
DNA recessed
and S. /~>/nhe ligascs (Lu et al.. 1993). Illtercstingly,
of the
to have DNA
1990). How the binding
to DNA is related to the apparent
and
in Melendy
that PO-GA
RFC. RFC appears
especially
of mouse
DNA binding
(reviewed
1992). The high degree of relatedness
mouse and human binding
mass and exhibits ATPase
regulatory
mechanisms. In our previous study we described two different POGA mRNA forms, 5.3 and 4.5 kb. In the present report we demonstrate that the larger form arises from a 6SO-bp extension of the 3’-UTR which we have now sequenced. The shorter 4.5 kb form arises from utilization of an earlier poly(A)-addition site. The preponderance of the 5.3 or 4.5kb forms of the PO-GA mRNA is variable, depending on the human tissue examined and suggests that differential processing of the PO-GA mRNA 3’ end may play a role in regulation of PO-GA (large subunit RFC) cellular transcripts.
(a) Homology
comparison and structural aspects of the
PO-GA gene Comparison of the original PO-GA sequence with recent entries in the GenBank and EMBL databases revealed that PO-GA had 80% aa identity with the large subunit of RFC from the mouse, (GenBank accession No. U01222; Burbelo et al., 1994). Interestingly, significant homology between the PO-GA sequence and a putative Drosophilu transcription factor (accession No. L17340) was also revealed by a database search (highlighted aa in Fig. 1). The identical aa which occur more than once between the mouse, human and Drosaplziiu sequences are shown as a consensus sequence in Fig. 1. The homology is especially apparent between the 3’ C-terminal sequences of PO-GA (distal to aa 350), the large subunit of mouse RFC and the Drosophila protein (Fig. I). Furthermore, in all three proteins, the N-terminal domain is Lys-rich and contains a conserved nuclear transport consensus sequences (Kate et al., 1992, and Fig. 1, Box I). We had previously observed that the PO-GA protein contained several domains with high homology to E. co/i
identical
proteins
this
(98%) be-
and has 67’/;, aa
with the D~~~~~~)~~j~u protein.
This domain
lies
protein (aa I90 - 52X)
of the human
that binds to DNA (Lu et al.,l993).
However,
the 3’ por-
tion of this domain,
a possible
helix-turn-
helix structure
which contains
in PO-GA,
is the least conserved
between all three proteins. influence
Sequences
the DNA-binding
Another situated
in the N-terminal
identical
between
of each protein.
region is between aa 653 and motif (Box II in Fig. I ) is portion
of this stretch
the three proteins. between
precisely
conserved
residues
may play a role in the tertiary
protein
through
disulfide
binding
structure
formation
of the
or an even
such as the zinc-finger
from the comparison
quence of the large subunit large
The Cys
structure
DNA-
motif.
We conclude, human
of which is
the three proteins. bridge
and is
Distal to this region
is an area rich in His and Cys. the spacing
more complicated
region
in this region might
specificity
highly conserved
796. An ATP~ADP-binding
PO-GA subunit
sequences, of RFC.
between
the aa se-
of RFC of the mouse and the that
PO-GA
In addition
is the human
it appears
that
a
D~~sop~j~~l protein exists that has high homology to PO-GA and it is tempting to speculate that this is a protein DNA
AND DISCUSSION
and mouse
within a larger portion
which plays a role in the Drosophila
tion process.
EXPERIMENTAL
is almost
Whether
tr~lnscription
these proteins
and repair
DNA replica-
also play a role in
processes
is a matter
of
conjecture.
(b) Sequence of the PO-GA 3’4JTR extension Initial sequencing of overlapping PO-GA vealed
a cDNA
of approx.
clones
re-
4500 bp encompassing
a
S-UTR of 393 bp and a 3’-UTR of 666 bp (Lu et al., 1993) (depicted in Fig. 2A). A poly(A)-addition site (AATAAA)
was observed
an A, string conjectured
in the PC20 that
these
poly(A) polymerase.
approximately clone
A residues
Consistent
had been
and
the sequence
added
with this notion,
PC21 (Fig. 2B), the string of A residues not detected
140 bp before
(Lu et al., 1993). We by
in clone
after nt 4360 was
continued
for another
6.50 bp until an A,, string (Fig. 2B). This poly(A)
stretch
was preceded approx. 30 bp earlier by a putative poly(A) processing site (underlined in Fig. 28). We now report the
sequence
of the
650-bp
extension
in this
clone
(GenBank accession No. L24783). This sequence is compared in Fig. 2B to the 3’ sequence of clone PC20. Since the difference in size of these two clones was 650 bp, we speculated that this potential differential processing of the mRNA
could result in the two different
RNA species
263
H ..MDIRKFPG M ..MDIRKF?G D mqrgSdsFFk c --NDTru*FG
“IPSGKKl”s “IsSGKKpm
rip.......
ETvkKNEKTK ET”.KNEKTK
GdEeTlKaKK aSEgTvKgKK
.._....
“IPSGmt-v-
EN-KNEKTK
--E-T-K-KK
GIKElaVNSS G”KEAK”N”S . . ..AxakSa G-KKAKvHss
60 rKBDdfKqKQ gKBDasKPKQ eaBngetPsk -xED--KPI[Q
of 5.3 and 4.5 kb that we had previously Northern
blot analysis
observed
using
(Lu et al., 1993).
120
SmESmnlQ SDSESERTVQ ,S.SDeDRv"s SDSESEETVQ
!iIlz
"KNAKRppEK LpvSsKPGXI "XNAXKksBK LslSyKPGKV ppetl(l(rkas ktaS...... VxnAKL--EK L--S-KPGK-
SrqDPVTYIS SqMPmS SedDvYaatp s--rem-s
ETDEEDDFmC ETDEDDDFvC &PxakkaRng BTDE-DDF-C
(c) Northern blot analysis of human tissues detected with different PO-GA cDNA probes
H M 0 C
KWSKSKEN KKAASKSKEN qXpA. KKu.SKSKW
GrSTNShLGT G"STmyLGT
KLTPTSVLDY KLTPTSVLDY ..El KLTPTSVLLDY
180 w;TgS"QRSn POTES"QRSg FGgIz....t PCTBSVQRS-
from differential
G-STNS-LGT
SNMRKNEE~ SNVKKNEEN" SkLKrhvDpT SI-IImEm
H M D C
KKMVaSXRXE KKMVtSXRXE KrvIvpXpX. KKHV-SKRKE
1SQNTDESgL sSQNTEDSrL
NDEAIAKQLQ NDEAIAKQLQ
LH*DBEFART LHBDBEFART .fBnBDidRs LXED~EPART
240 LAMLDEEPKt LULDEEPKI LmevDlDesI IA-LDEEPKI
H
M D C
KKKR IYD SKKKRIIYD Rrrk Ii KKKPT YD
. . . . . . ...1
-sQNT--S-L
KTKNXPLSPI KTKNKPLSPI KTKNKPLSPI
WEDZxELBRQ LDEDRELERQ ..tknvLB.. NDEA1AKpL.p LDEDAELBRQ
300 H KKARKDtEaG
.ErPSS”Qan
M KKARKDsEeG D Xelapskkv. C mARmU)-E-G
eEsFSSVQdd
LSKAEKhKyP LSKAEKqKsP
hkmtaqvsd n..KaelfSt
-E-PSSYQ--
LSKAEK-K-P
---K----S-
H M D C
QhsKSSADkl ge"SSPXASs KLA=MKrKEE QpcK SAhrk eacSSPKASa KLAlMKaKEE raknSSpE.. Q--X%%.--- ---SSPIuLS- KLA-m-Km
SSY-E-E--A
skRKEnAlK1 arRKEsATeP .ppKpksTKs --RKB-ATK-
SSYkE=Ep"A SSYnEtEllA
H M D C
RKBLXERYGG AKSLZERYGG AeSvIkeYOG AKSLIERYGG
KVTGNVSKKT KmNVSXXT KVmtvVgXK1 KVTGNVSKKT
NYLVMGRDSG NYI.mmRDSG kYLVvCeEaG HYLVMGRDSG
QSKSDKAAAL QSKSDKA?aL pkKlavAeeL *SISDKuAL
480 GTKI~~GL GTKI.LDBrmL nipILsBDGL GTKILDEDGL
MIU(B.SKLER MRKEkSKLER gXKBvktsrR MKKB-SKLER
TPQKNvQGKR TPQKNoQGKR ssdKkEkeat TPQm-*GKR
540 XlSPsKXESE RISPaKKESE KlkygeKh d KISP-KKESE
XEqvaeetsg KS........ Kkepssqkeh KE________
dskaRnladD ..thgn ppspR..taD _-_-R-_--D
600 sSeNK"EnLL rSsNKeEcLL lktld""gMa _S_~"E_LL
SKKsrpTskr SKKcKlTllk laXhKvkeeh SKK_X_T___
dSlaKTIKKE tD"fwksLDf nSPmKa"XXE astcprgZ,D" tSPkeTkdR1 nD"pa"tLk" _S*_I[T_KI[E _D"____LDV
660 H WVDXYXPTSL M WMXYgPaSL D WVDXhKPTSl C WVDKYKPTSL
KtIIQQQGDQ SD.NKLLlWL RNWqKSSsED KMIGQQGDQ SCANKLLrWL RNWhKSSpEE XeTVlipaGaa SnvtKLMnLn skWyvnhdgn K-IIGC4GDQ SCANltIL-WL BNW-KSS-E-
SLYC SLVC tLVv SLYC
RHH.sKFGKF KKHaaXFGKL XX.pqrpnpW KXR--KPGK-
sgKDDnSSFK AsKDDGSSFK AknDDGSfyK A-~~DDGSSPK
QPLGYSYVRL QBLGYSWSL kELGFdaVBP *ELGYSYvEL
720 NrSDTKSKsS LKAIVAESLN NTSIKGPYsn tW3tX'WRnS Ll‘?+WAESLN NrsIKGFVTs NASBT'Rt!,Wl Wlde'VstlLs NkSIsGYFT. IPlrSDTBSX-S L.KP.-VAESLNNTSTIICPYT-
SIAFKEGLRI SIAPREGLKI SIcPRELkvRI SIAPI[EGLKT
PPPAMNRIIL PPPAMNWIL sPakve&IIa PPPAMNXIIL
840
H M D C
YCFDLRBQRB YO?X,RFQRP YCMfldlppRp YCPDLRPQRP
RvtppIXGAMM RVBQlXsAML RlBQXKGkiM RvEQItG-
GANQDIRQVL KNLSMWCArS G.WQWRQ"L "NLSMWCAqS atNnDIRQsi nhiaLlsRke G~NQDrrtpvr. BNLSMWCA-S
human
adult
QENYiHVKPV
QENYLHVKP" QqNyLqVlP. QEKnaVRPV
AAGGDMKKHL MLLSRAADSI AAGGDMKKHL MLLSRRADSI ..qGnlcKd"L akvaatADa1 AAGGDHXRRL MLLSRJADSI
CMjDLVDsQI CWDLVDnQI slGDL"EkrS CDGDLM-QI
RSKQNWSLLP RSKQNWSLLP RansaWSLLP RSRQNWLLP
960 aQAIYASVLP TQAIYASVLP TQAfFsSYLP TQAIYAS"LP
H M D C
LVqPLTSQG" LVRPLTSQG" l"RPLakdGq LVRPLTSQGV
DG"Qd""aLM EGaQhVIkLM EGVpaaldvM EGVQ-"--La
DTYYLMKEDP ENIMBISSWG DTYYLMYdtDF HNIMBVSSWG kdYhL,,rl(DLDslvBltSWP D TrnxKEDP ENmE-BSRG
GKPSPFSKLD GKPSaFSKLD GKkSPldavD GKPSPPSKLD
1080 PKVKAAFTRA PXVKaaFTRA gr"KiW.LTRs PKVKAAFTRA
H M D C
WLTPY YNRsRHLTPY YMCEvmaysY YWKBABLTPY
aLQAIKaSRh SLQvVKtSRl SaQAgikkkk SLQA-K-SR-
STsPsLDSEY STgPaLDSEY SeaagaDdDV ST-P-LDSEY
. . . ..SQSDE . . . ..tQS.E agghlSseED -----SQS-E
KDQDAIETDA KEQDAVETDA eDkDnlElDS KDQDA-ETDA
1140
"EELnEDD.. sEBFqEDD.. lDEgpgBEdg -ES--ED-1176
H MIKKK.....
M Mnau. D LIKaKkrttt C KmM-----
TKSSKPSKpE kDDKEprRGI[GRssKK' TrSSKPSItsE REKEskRGKG EnwKR SKaSggSKka RssrasKsKa Ka.KK TKSSI[PSI[-E R-R.E--KGRG r--m
tissues
PO-GA
mRNA
Northern both
blot, containing species
(Fig. 3A). Interestingly,
species was especially
a different extended in most the 5.3-kb
preponderant
in
human ovary when compared with other tissues (Fig. 3A and B, lane 4). Although both the 5.3 and 4.5-kb species were detectable in most tissues it is clear that the 4.5-kb species is less abundant and the ratio of the two species is highly tissue dependent (e.g., Fig. 3A, compare ovary to testis, lane 4 vs. 5). After stripping the blot of PC1 probe we re-hybridized with the 190-bp 3’-UTR probe PRl shown in Fig. 2A. This probe only hybridized to the 5.3-kb species and no 4.5-kb species was detected (Fig. 3B) even upon a twoweek exposure of the blot (data not shown). This result fits the prediction that the 650-bp fragment is not present in the 4.5-kb species because the earlier poly(A)-addition site at 4360 is used to generate the lower molecular mass species. Since the ratio of the two species is organdependent it appears that this processing site is underutilized in some tissues compared with the later site at 5067 (Fig. 2A). However, the half-life of the two species may not be equivalent. In this regard it should be noted that the 650-bp 3’-UTR extension contains four signals similar to the ARE (A + U-rich response element) (Shaw and Kamen, (highlighted
H M D C
species in many human
are present
M X"SPtKrES" D KpaadlesSV C K-SP-K-ES"
H M D C
mRNA
the observation
that
PC1 and
(Lu et al., 1993). Hybridization
360 KGETkTPKKT KGEktTPKKT KatrprvRKe KGET-TPKI[T
CLEGLxFVIT CLEGLTWlT CtsGLTFVVT CLEGLTWIT
SKYHiAvEtE SXYRmAaEaE pKkghssEek SKYE-A-B-E
to both PO-GA
tissues but not placenta
previously,
SKBIPKGAEN SKBIIPKGAEN SKUPKfispd SKEIPKGAEN
. . . . . . ..Ck . ..Xr &vkeekXs --------I-
bridizes
blot with two probes
a
PC1 is in the PO-GA ORF and hy-
set of tissues from those examined
MREGPKALG LE(REGPKALG kNRssclnpG LmREGPmLG
LnLIRmPG LDLIRTMPG FDLIReksGr LDLIRTMPG-
tissue Northern
(Fig. 3). Probe
to a different human
RTNYQAYRSY RTNVQAVRSY RasavlYqkY RTIWQAYRSY
H M D C
PRl
species resulted
of the 3’end, we hybridized
SKyeSSkEsq gKgRaSeDaK SitRSSpspK SX-MS---X
SPEDS..EKK SPEDS..$KX 1tDEerhBrK SPED?.--EXK
GVLESIBRDE GVLESIBRDB GVLESmEREE GVLESIERDE
human
PO-GA mRNA
processing
eRKsYSPrKq aRKtYSPaKH . . . . . . . ..H -RR-YSP-W
420 H KsSPaKkESV
To test if the different
1986) which has a loose consensus AUUUA in Fig. 2B) and has been reviewed by Sachs
(1993). This element, either alone or in multiple copies, has previously been shown to destabilize some cellular
Fig. 1. Comparison of the human PO-GA aa sequence (H) (Lu et al., 1993) with the sequence of the mouse large subunit of RFC (M) GenBank Accession No. U01222 (Burbelo et al., 1994) and with a putative Drosophila transcription factor (D) GenBank Accession No. L17340. The dashes represent areas of non-identity of aa between the three proteins. The dots represent gaps which improve the homology alignment. The consensus sequence (C) represents aa shared by two or three proteins (bold). Identical aa between the H, M and D proteins are highlighted. Box I represents an area with homology to a nuclear localization consensus sequence (Kato et al., 1992) and Box II represents an area containing the ATP/ADP binding site consensus. Methods: Sequence alignments were performed using the GCG program.
264 A.
PC1
PRl
A*lt
PC20
PO-GA
cDNA clones
t
PCZI
PI tAA
t
7.5-
B
_is’../
4
4.4-
*
,.
,
Fig. 3. Northern analysis of a multiple human Palo Alto. CA, USA) with two different probes (A) The blot was first hybridized
tissue blot (Clontcch. from PO-GA cDNAs.
with the 982-bp
PC1 probe which is
contained
within the ORF of the PO-GA cDNA (Fig. 2A). The two species of PO-GA mRNA detected at 5.3 and 4.5 kb are indicated by arrows.
PBL-peripheral
blood leukocytes.
(B) The blot was then rehy-
bridized with probe PRl representing nt 203 to 393 of the 3’-LTTR sequence of clone PC21 shown in Fig. 2B. Only a 5.3-kb band hybridized as indicated Fig. 2. Alternative
poly(A)-addition
sites of the 3’-UTR
described
of PO-GA
by arrow.
Methods: The PC1 probe was generated
for colony hybridization
as
in the legend to Fig. 2. Hybridization
mRNA. (A) Two PO-GA cDNA clones PC20 and PC21 were purified from an UniZAP HeLa cDNA library by hybridization with the 5’ PO-
and prehybridization solution were composed of 5 x SSPE (1 x SSPE is 0.8 M NaCIIO.O1 M NaHLPO,/l mM EDTA pH 7.4): IO x Denhardt’s
GA cDNA
solution/50% formamide. 2”/;I SDS100 ug per ml of freshly denatured. sheared salmon sperm DNA. The DNA probes. PCI and PRI. were
clones
sequence
(PCl)
and their position
(Lu et al., 1993). The overlap relative
shown. The heavy line represents tion ofprobable poly(A)-addition represents’s
DNA fragment
to the full length
between
PO-GA
the
cDNA
is
the ORF of PO-GA cDNA. The posisignals are indicated (AATAAA). PRl
used for hybridization
of Northern
blots
(see Fig. 3). (B) The nt sequence of these clones is identical until nt 4498 at which point a poly(A)-tail is added in clone PC20. PC21 contains
labeled
by nick translatton
buffers at a concentration
and mixed thoroughly of 2 x IO6 cpmiml.
in the hybridization
The blot was hybridized
at 42°C for 24 h in a shaking water bath. The blot was washed at room temperature for IO min in 2 x SSC ( I x SSC is 0.15 M NaCl,/O.O15 M Na,citrate
pH
7.6)iO.5%
SDS.
twice.
and
then
washed
with
no poly (A) sequence at this position but extends an extra 649 bp (GenBank accession no L24783), at which point a string of A bases is
0.1 x SSC/O.5% autoradiography,
observed preceded by a poly(A)-addition signal, AATAAA (underlined). The extended 3’-liTR in clone PC21 contains several ARE (Shaw and
The blot was re-exposed for autoradiography to check if all the probe had been removed. The clean blot was rehybridized with a PRI probe,
Kamen.
which was generated as a PCR product from PC21 template with a pair of primers. T3j4: 5’-GAC CAG TAG GAA CCA CCC; and T3X:
1986) which are highlighted.
Materials: PC1 is a 982-bp
frag-
ment representing nt 953 to 1934 of the full length PO-GA cDNA clone (Lu et al., 1993). Methods: PC1 was labelled for library hybridization using nick translation. described previously 5 x IO4 recombinants
The screening
of the HeLa cDNA
libraries
was
(Lai et al.. 1992). Briefly, plaques were plated at per plate and transferred to nitrocellulose filters.
After denaturation and renaturation then hybridized with the radiolabeled
the filters were prehybridized and PC1 probe. Initial positive clones
were subjected to second and third rounds of screening to obtain pure positive clones. All positive clones were subcloned into pBluescript phagemid vector by excision. The sucloned inserts were sequenced on both strands using synthetic oligos and the dideoxy chaintermination method.
mRNAs (Shaw and Kamen, 1986). Reiterations of this sequence are capable of conferring instability on a previously stable mRNA (Shaw and Kamen, 1986). The mechanism seems to be through direct interactions of trans-acting cellular proteins with the ARE sequence (Kruys et al., 1989; Malter, 1989; Gillis and Malter, 1991; Bohjanen et al., 1991; 1992; Vakalopoulou et al., 1991).
5’-CTA GGT
SDS once at 50 C and once at 65’ C for 20 min. After the PC1 probe was removed from the blot by boiling.
CCA TAG CCT CAC (Fig. 2B), using 35 cycles of 94‘C
for denaturing, 56C for annealing and 72’.C for extension. The PCR product was purified with the Stratagene DNA fragment purrhcation kit (LA Jolla, CA, USA) and was analyzed
by
I O/O agarose gel electro-
phoresis. The same washing condition were used as described for the PC1 probe. After washing the blot was exposed for autoradiography.
Conversely, in some contexts this sequence may also be involved in prolonging the half-life of some cellular mRNAs (Schuler and Cole, 1988; Lindsten et al., 1989). Clearly the precise role of these potential ARE in the regulation of cellular levels of PO-GA will have to be determined by mutational analysis. However it should be noted that similar signals are not present in the 3’-UTR of the shorter 4..5-kb mRNA. (d) Conclusions PO-GA is the human large subunit of RFC sharing 80% identity with the mouse homologue of RFC and
265 significant homology with a putative Drosophila transcription factor. The two PO-GA mRNA species detected in many human tissues arise from different utilization of poly(A)-addition sites in the primary transcript. Since the ratio of the two mRNA species varies quite substantially between different human tissues we speculate that utilization of these sites may be a factor in determining the overall amount of a particular species of PO-GA cellular mRNA present in human tissues.
Kruys,
V., Marinx,
Translational quences.
O., Shaw,
blockade
G.,
Deschamps,
imposed
J. and
by cytokine-derived
Huez,
G.:
UA-rich
se-
Science 245 (1989) 852-855.
Lai, S., Czubayko, human
F., Riegel, A.T. and Wellstein,
heparin-binding
Biophys.
growth
Res. Commun.
factor
A.: Structure
gene pleiotrophin.
of the
Biochem.
187 (1992) 1113-l 122.
Lee, S.H. and Hurwitz,
J.: Mechanism
of elongation
by DNA polymerase
d, proliferating
cell nuclear
of primed antigen
DNA
and activa-
tor I. Proc. Nat]. Acad. Sci. USA 87 (1990) 5672-5676. Lee, S.H., Kwong, A.D., Pan, Z.Q. and Hurwitz, J.: Studies activator
I protein
nuclear
complex
an accessory
antigen-dependent
on the
factor for proliferating
DNA polymerase
cell
d. J. Biol. Chem. 266
(1991) 5944602. Lindsten,
T., June, C.H., Ledbetter,
Regulation
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
of lymphokine
T cell activation
We thank Dr. Anton Wellstein for advice during this project and helpful review of the manuscript. This work was supported, in part, by grants from the National Institutes of Health MH49105 and DK43127 (A.T.R.) and a grant from American Cancer Society (Y.L.), IRG-193. A.T.R. is the recipient of a Research Career Development Award (DK02141).
pathway.
J.A., Stella, G. and Thompson,
mRNA
stability
Science 244 (1989) 339-343.
Lu, Y., Zeft, AS. and Riegel, A.T.: Cloning human
DNA
Commun.
binding
protein,
Malter, J.S.: Identification
tively to AUUUA
multimers
in the 3’untranslated
region of lympho-
of a AUUUA-specific
Mol. Biol. 6 (1992) 129-158. Sachs, A.B.: Messenger RNA
messenger
degradation
RNA bind-
Nucleic
in eukaryotes.
Acids
Cell
74
(1993) 4133421. regulated
and oncogene
in trans
mRNA stabiht-
in a mouse
monocytic
Cell 55 (1988) 115551122.
ficities and affinities. J. Biol. Chem. 267 (1992) 6302-6309. Burbelo, P.D., Utani, A., Pan, Z.Q. and Yamada, Y.: Cloning of activator
1 (replication
of the
factor C) reveals homology
DNA ligases. Proc. Nat]. Acad. Sci. USA 91 (1994)
Gillis, P. and Malter, J.S.: The adenosine-uridine
binding
nizes the AU-rich elements of cytokine, lymphokine mRNAs. J. Biol. Chem. 266 (1991) 317223177. G.J., Lee, W.F., Chen, L. and Dang,
mains and interaction
degradation.
factor recogand oncogene
C.V.: Max: functional
with c-Myc. Genes Dev. 6 (1992) 81-92.
do-
Cell 46 (1986) 6599667.
Tsurimoto, T. and Stillman, B.: Purification of a cellular replication factor RF-C that is required for co-ordinated synthesis of leading and
Mol. Cell. Biol. 11 (1991) 32883295.
Bohjanen, P.R., Petryniak, B., June, C.H., Thompson, C.B. and Lindsten, T.: AU RNA binding factors differ in their binding speci-
Kato,
Res.
Shaw, G. and Kamen, R.: A conserved AU sequence from the 3’untranslated region of GM-CSF mRNA mediates selective mRNA
Bohjanen, P.R., Petryniak, B., June, C.H., Thompson, C.B. and Lindsten, T.: An inducible cytoplasmic factor (AU-B) binds selec-
with bacterial in press.
of a novel
Biophys.
ing protein. Science 246 (1989) 664-666. Melendy, T. and Stillman, B.: SV40 DNA replication.
tumor.
large subunit
Biochem.
193 (1993) 779-786.
ies are independently
kine mRNA.
and expression
PO-GA.
Schuler, G.D. and Cole, M.D.: GM-CSF
REFERENCES
C.B.:
by a surface-mediated
lagging
strands
during
SV40 replication.
Mol. Cell. Biol. 9
(1989) 609-619. Tsurimoto, T. and Stillman, B.: Functions of replication proliferating cell nuclear antigen: functional similarity merase accessory
proteins
from human
factor C and of DNA poly-
cells and bacteriophage
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87 (1990) 1023-1027. Vakalopoulou, E., Schaack, J. and Shenk, T.: A 32-kilodalton
protein
binds to the AU-rich domains in the 3’untranslated regions rapidly degraded mRNAs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11 (1991) 3355-3364. Wellstein,
A, Dobrenski,
A.F.,
Radonovich,
M.N.,
Brady,
T4.
J.F.
of and
Riegel, A.T.: Purification of PO-B, a protein that has increased affinity for the pro-opiomelanocortin gene promoter after dephosphorylation.
J. Biol. Chem. 266 (1991) 12234-12241.