The Three Mile Island Accident

The Three Mile Island Accident

APPENDIX THE THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT 17 A17.1 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE THREE MILE ISLAND NO. 2 PLANT Three Mile Island (TMI) on the Susquehann...

630KB Sizes 0 Downloads 62 Views

APPENDIX

THE THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

17

A17.1 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE THREE MILE ISLAND NO. 2 PLANT Three Mile Island (TMI) on the Susquehanna River is located about 16 km SE of Harrisburg, PA, United States. It is a flat island with a surface of several square kilometers. Some years ago it was chosen as the site for a nuclear power station with two units named TMI-1 and TMI-2. Each unit has its own reactor and turbine-generator group for the conversion of steam into electric energy. The two units could supply 1700 MW to the grid, sufficient for the needs of 300,000 families (based on the average consumption of a US family). The power station was the joint property of the Pennsylvania Electric Company, the Jersey Central Power & Light Company, and the Metropolitan Edison Company. The three companies were part of a “holding,” the General Public Utilities Corporation. Operational responsibility was vested in Metropolitan Edison. The nuclear part of the plant (i.e., the reactor and its auxiliary systems—the “nuclear island”) had been supplied by the Babcock & Wilcox company. The architect engineer, Burns & Roe, had built the remainder of plant. The plant, equipped with a pressurized water reactor, is represented in a simplified way in Fig. A17.1. The vessel (1) contains the reactor core (2) in which the control rods can be inserted from above (3). The cooling system is formed by two circuits (in the figure only one is represented), each one provided with two recirculation pumps (4) and with one steam generator (5). The steam produced in the secondary side of the generator is routed to the turbine (6) and converted to water again in the condenser. The condensate returns to the steam generators through the normal feedwater pumps (7). The water is also passed through a filtration and purification device which has the objective of maintaining a high degree of purity and therefore of avoiding corrosion of the mechanical components (steam generators, turbine, piping, etc.). In addition to the normal feedwater system, an auxiliary system exists with three pumps which start automatically in case of need. The transformation of water into steam in the secondary side of the steam generators takes heat and therefore cools the water which circulates in the primary system of the same generators. The two water flows, the primary and the secondary one, are in opposite sides of the metal wall of small

503

504

APPENDIX 17 THE THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

Reactor building (containment) (12)

Auxiliary building

(15)

Cooling tower Stack

(9)

Ventilation filters Waste gas decay tank Waste gas compressor

Pilot-operated relief valve

Safety valve Core flood tank

(8)

Block valve Pressurizer Steam generator

(5)

Control

Vent header

Turbine building

(3) rods

Turbine

(6)

High pressure injection pump

Vent valve

Makeup tank

Generator

Reactor core Makeup line

(1)

Condensor Block valve

(2)

Letdown line

Borated water storage tank

Relief valve Radiation waste storage tank

(14)

Rupture disk Cold leg

(13)

Condensate Condensate pump storage tank

Demineralizer

Drain tank

(11)

Transformer

Sump

Reactor coolant pump Sump pump (4)

Circulating water pump

Main feedwater pump

Emergency feedwater pump Hot leg

FIGURE A17.1 Simplified schematic of the TMI-2 plant.

pipes located in each steam generator. Through this wall the warmer fluid, primary water, transmits heat to the colder fluid, that is the secondary water, and converts it into steam. The primary water, which therefore leaves the generator at a lower temperature than the initial one, is recirculated by pumps (4) through the reactor core and removes the heat produced by the nuclear chain reaction. Once the warmed primary water leaves the core, it reenters into the steam generators, so starting again its cooling heating cycle, transporting the heat of nuclear origin and producing the steam which operates the turbine. The stability of the pressure of the primary system is assured by the pressurizer (8). This is a vertical vessel whose volume is normally 60% filled with water and 40% by steam. The lower part of it (filled with water) is connected by a surge line with one of the two primary cooling circuits: electrical heaters are immersed in the water. The upper part (filled with steam) can be sprayed by cold water. The introduction of cold water by the sprays or the switching on of heaters takes care of the control of the pressure. In fact, when cold water is sprayed, the pressure decreases, and when the heaters are switched on, the opposite happens. When the reactor pressure exceeds a certain value, the relief valve (9) is automatically actuated. This valve is located on the upper part of the pressurizer and discharges steam in a discharge collecting tank (10), partly filled with cold water and provided with an emergency rupture disc (11), which avoids its excessive pressurization. When the pressure within the tank reaches the intervention level of the rupture disc, it breaks off discharging the excess fluid into the containment building (12). The relief valve is preceded by a block valve. If the relief valve remains stuck open, with consequent excessive loss of steam, the block valve can be closed from the control room, so preventing steam efflux from the pressurizer. The liquids collected on the bottom of the containment building are transferred by a sump pump (13) in the radioactive discharges tank (14) located in the auxiliary building (15). This building is provided with a filtered ventilation system.

APPENDIX 17 THE THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

505

The reactor is assisted by the following emergency core cooling systems: •





A high-pressure injection (HPI) system with three pumps for the injection of borated water in the reactor. In emergency operation, which is automatically activated by low pressure of the primary system or by high pressure in the containment building, two pumps activate. Analyses show that only one pump is necessary to prevent core damage in case of small breaks in the cooling system. A flooding system is provided with two systems containing pressurized borated water, which automatically inject water when the pressure goes below a preset value. This system has the objective of protecting the core in cases of intermediate and large breaks in the primary cooling system. A low-pressure injection system provided with two pumps which inject borated water in the reactor. The system is automatically operated by the same types of signal as the high-pressure system. This system ensures the cooling of the core in cases of large breaks, while in cases of small breaks it operates after the operation of the high-pressure system, when the primary pressure has reached a sufficiently low level. Analyses show that only one pump is necessary to guarantee cooling.

The primary circuit and the steam generators are located inside the containment building in prestressed concrete, with a steel liner to assure it is leak-proof. The atmosphere of the building can be refrigerated by fan cooler groups. Recombiners are provided for the treatment of hydrogen (which is possibly released within the building in an accident). Moreover, a containment atmosphere spray system exists aimed at reducing the temperature, and consequently the pressure, which could be created in the building itself as a consequence of primary coolant loss.

A17.2 THE ACCIDENT On the night of March 27 28, 1979 the TMI-1 unit was stopped as the refuelling operations were being completed. In fact, about every year and half, the water power stations are stopped in order to replace the more exhausted fuel elements with new ones. The second unit, TMI-2, was operating normally at 97% full power. TMI-2 had started its commercial operation phase only a few months earlier, at the end of 1978, after having passed the commissioning tests. Operation personnel were working on the purification plant of the water extracted from the condenser (which receives and condenses the steam released by the turbine). The operations in progress on that equipment consisted in the replacement of the filtering material (resins), normally performed by removal with compressed air, washing in water, and subsequent replacement. Possibly, during the operation of resin removal, the washing water accidentally penetrated the compressed air circuit because of a leaking valve. The presence of water in the compressed air system, which is also used for the operation of the big valves on the feedwater pipes, caused the quick closure of these valves and the complete interruption of the secondary water to steam generators.

506

APPENDIX 17 THE THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

The TMI accident started 36 seconds after 4 a.m. TMI-2 had already met problems with the feedwater purification system 18 months before the accident. During this time, however, no effective measures were taken to guarantee the needed safety of operation of this equipment. It must be noted here that the event described, a sudden and total lack of normal feedwater to steam generators, is considered in the safety analyses of power stations, among the relatively frequent ones and therefore plants are protected against them. As we will see, only a fatal combination of erroneous evaluations by the personnel with a general plant situation characterized by a substantially careless plant management and with the malfunction of another plant component, allowed the events (probable and normally without damaging consequences) to escalate into one of the worst nuclear accidents ever to happen. The interruption of feedwater to steam generators causes a decrease of their water level and within a few minutes, for this type of PWR plant, their complete voiding, when all the residual water has been transformed into steam. For this reason an automatic protection system stops the turbine when the water level in the steam generators decreases to a trigger level. This occurred correctly at TMI-2, two seconds from the start of the accident. When the secondary side of a generator dries off, as at TMI-2, the primary water no longer cools down further and therefore returns to the core inlet as warm as it had left it. Passing through the core, it heats up further and increases to ever higher temperatures. In these conditions, it is dangerous to allow the primary temperature to grow beyond certain limits, so it is necessary to stop the nuclear chain reaction, thus substantially reducing the amount of heat produced by the core. The fast shutdown of the TMI-2 reactor, in the conditions described, occurs in the following way. The increase of primary water temperature causes the expansion of the water itself which can expand in the pressurizer, which, as it has been said, is connected to the primary circuit by a pipe and is only partially filled with water: the other part of it is full of steam, as in a pressure cooker (see Fig. A17.2). The flow of water into the pressurizer compresses the steam contained in it and increases its pressure. When the pressure has reached a preset value, the chain reaction is arrested by an automatic shutdown system which causes the control rods to fall into the core. This occurred correctly in TMI-2, eight seconds after the start of the accident. In the meantime another event had happened. It too was normal and foreseen: the opening of the relief valve located on the top of the pressurizer. This had a similar effect to opening the valve on a pressure cooker lid. The combination of opening the relief valve with the arrest of the chain reaction (as if the valve on the pressure cooker was opened and the burner shut off) causes a quick decrease of the primary system pressure. However, the automatic control system of the relief valve is designed in such a way that it causes its reclosure when the pressure again reaches sufficiently low values. This lower pressure was reached in TMI-2, 13 seconds after the start of the accident, but unfortunately, something malfunctioned and the valve did not automatically reclose. The relief line stayed open for 2 hours and 20 minutes, transforming a relatively normal event of feedwater interruption into a much more serious accident of loss of coolant from the primary circuit. This malfunction was the only mechanical fault of the events that brought the accident to its serious final consequences. The other events were human evaluation errors and the poor maintenance conditions of the plant.

APPENDIX 17 THE THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

FIGURE A17.2 Pressurizer.

507

508

APPENDIX 17 THE THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

Two systems had been provided to cope with this mechanical failure. The first system signaled to the operators in the control room the “open” status of the valve and, therefore, the lack of its reclosure. It consisted of an instrument, readable in the control room, which measured the temperature in the pipe connecting the relief valve to the steam condensation tank. When the valve was open, hot steam flowed into the pipe and the temperature indicated by the instrument is high. When the valve was closed, the pipe does not contain hot steam and the indicated temperature was low. Additionally, a light on the control console indicated if the valve had received the opening electric command. This indication was, however, indirect and unsafe: in fact, the valve may receive the “close” command and, at the same time, be still open because of a mechanical fault, for example, because of a seizure of parts in its mechanism. Also, it is possible for a blown bulb to go undetected thereby giving an incorrect status reading. Both systems were provided so that an operator on seeing the primary pressure decrease in an abnormal way could check if this fact depended on a stuck open relief valve. At TMI-2, 13 seconds after the start of the accident, the valve position indicator signaled that the closure command had been given. A second system was provided to compensate for the effects of a mechanical fault of the relief valve. This consisted, very simply, of a block valve located on the same pipe as the relief valve. An operator, correctly diagnosing the failure of the relief valve to close by reading the temperature in the pipe, may stop the steam leak by closing this second valve. Hence the name of block valve. At TMI-2, even with these provisions, the carelessness with which, apparently, the plant was managed before the accident prevented the four men who happened to have to cope with it alone in the first crucial phases of it from taking the correct actions. During one of the postaccident inquiries (Kemeny, 1979), the shift superintendent for TMI-1 and TMI-2 explained that the temperature in the pipe was high even before the accident because of leaks in the relief valve: “I have seen, consulting the recordings after the accident, about 198 F. But I remember previous cases . . . slightly higher than 200 [. . .] knowing that the relief valve had opened, I expected that the temperature in the pipe had stayed high and that some time had been necessary for the pipe to cool down below 200 .” However, the records show that the temperature reached 285 F. Moreover, one of the emergency procedures of the plant says that a temperature of 200 F indicates that the relief valve is open. Another procedure requires the closure of the block valve when the temperature exceeds 130 F. All this indicated that the plant was operated in the usual way even in presence of evident leakages from the relief valve, contrary to any good practice and in violation of the procedures. This operational malpractice is not general in nuclear plants. In particular, an inquiry performed on some power stations after the TMI-2 accident has confirmed that in similar cases of valves affected by significant leaks, the plant has been stopped and the leak eliminated. The delayed closure of the block valve at TMI-2 prevented the operators from distinguishing an accident situation (relief valve stuck open) from a situation of careless operation (relief valve with continuous leaks). As we have seen, once the chain reaction arrest did intervene because of high pressure, the heat generated by the core substantially decreases but does not completely cease. In fact, the radioactive products of the fission reaction of the uranium nucleus and those generated by other secondary phenomena continue to emit radiation which, once absorbed by the surrounding materials, is transformed into heat. This heat, the core “decay heat,” immediately after the arrest equals 7% of the power of the preceding operation. It decreases to 1% after about 2 hours.

APPENDIX 17 THE THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

509

The decay heat must be removed from the primary circuit by a cooling system, otherwise the primary water and the reactor core will overheat. In the case of normal feedwater loss to steam generators, an auxiliary feedwater system automatically intervenes which, in a similar way to the main system, supplies water to the secondary side of the steam generators and performs, by steam production, the primary system cooling. Fourteen seconds after the start of the accident at TMI-2 an operator observed that the auxiliary feedwater pumps had automatically started as expected. However, he did not notice the two lights on the control panel indicating that two valves, one on each of the two auxiliary feedwater pipes, were shut and that the water could not reach the generators and so provide cooling. Eight minutes after the start of the accident, however, somebody noticed that the water had not arrived at the generators and another operator opened the two closed valves. This delay in the arrival of the auxiliary feedwater to the generators did not greatly affect the accident, but it did distract the operators. The reason why the two valves were closed is not known exactly. According to the technical specifications for operation they had to be in the open position. Two minutes after the start of the accident, because of the continuous loss of steam from the stuck open relief valve and the consequent decrease in the pressure of the primary circuit, the two powerful pumps on the high-pressure emergency injection system started up, as anticipated, on a “too low” pressure signal (indicative of the presence of a steam or water leak from the primary system). They started to automatically introduce water into the primary circuit. The HPI system is a part of the ECCS, principally aimed at the protection of the core integrity in case of primary loss of coolant accident (LOCA). These systems are capable of keeping the core submerged in water and therefore cooled even if the largest primary pipe suddenly broke. In fact we have seen that the decay heat of the shutdown core, that is, after the chain reaction ceases, must in any case be removed and, in case of a break in a large pipe, it is not possible to rely on the heat removal capability of the steam generators. As the core is under water, its excessive overheating is prevented. In fact the water heats up and is transformed into steam, so cooling the core. It then escapes from the rupture toward the containment building while new water is introduced into the primary circuit by the ECCS system in order to always keep the core submerged. The HPI system at TMI-2 correctly came into operation because the system was undergoing a LOCA because of the “stuck open” relief valve. But at the time, the operators did not know that yet. They had neither diagnosed a LOCA nor its cause, because the control room pressurizer water level instrumentation indicated a level that was higher than normal. What was happening was an extremely insidious but not yet well-known phenomenon. In a system of pipes and vessels, fluids tend to move from high-pressure zones toward low-pressure ones. At TMI-2, the lower pressure zone was closer to the opening toward the outside (relief valve open), that is the pressurizer. For this reason, while steam went out of the pressurizer top toward the outside, at the same time the content of the remaining part of the primary system flowed toward the inside of the pressurizer. Without entering into the details of the complex fluid-dynamic phenomena involved, it can be said that that flow succeeded in keeping the water level in the pressurizer high while the primary system was losing its precious content of water. This phenomenon is in some respects similar, even if not for the same reasons, to the one which happens when a gassed soft drink bottle is opened. The gas is suddenly released entraining to the outside part of the liquid. This does not happen because the bottle is too full of liquid, but because the violently outgoing gas entrains it in part.

510

APPENDIX 17 THE THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

The operators, concentrating their attention on the fact that the level in the pressurizer was higher than normal, were erroneously convinced that the primary system was full of water and that therefore the core was safe. They, unfortunately, made, at this point and later in the course of the accident, some fatal maneuvres, all consistent, however, with this erroneous conviction of theirs. One of the operators, about two and a half minutes after the start of the HPI pumps, stopped one of them and reduced the water flow rate of the other to a minimum. Subsequently a controlled spillage of the primary water was started. During the subsequent inquiries, he said: “The rapidly growing pressurizer level at the start of the accident made me believe that the HPI was excessive and that soon we would have the primary system completely full of water.” The control room instrumentation indicated a loss of coolant accident in progress. The indication of high temperature in the relief valve pipe has already been discussed. Additionally, the continuous decrease of the primary system pressure, even after the HPI intervention, was a clear indication that the system was losing water. Why did not the operators correctly interpret the signals? They simply trusted the high pressurizer level indications. A technical superintendent at TMI-2 who arrived on the plant at 03:45, subsequently said: “I had the perception that we were in a very unusual situation, since I had never seen the pressurizer level increase and stay at a high value and, at the same time, the pressure staying low. They [the pressure and the level] had always behaved in the same way.” As a consequence of the described evaluation errors the primary circuit continued to lose water for hours and in addition the automatic core cooling system, correctly activated, could not perform its function of fuel integrity protection. It is now known that if the block valve had been closed after one and half or two hours or if the operation of the HPI only had not been arrested, even without the closure of the valve, the TMI accident would have been no more than a modest nuisance of operation. For completeness of information it has to be added that the possibility of an accident of the type of TMI-2 had been foreseen by some experts. If these foresights had been confirmed by in-depth theoretical studies and possibly by experimental tests, their results, duly made known to interested people, would have enabled the TMI-2 operators to correctly diagnose the fault and react correctly. In September 1977, for example, an event similar to the TMI-2 had happened at the Davis Besse Station, United States. Luckily the reactor was operating only at 9% of normal power and therefore the decay heat was small. Moreover, the block valve was closed 20 minutes after the start of the event. No reactor damage therefore occurred. In any case, an engineer of Babcock & Wilcox, the designer of this plant too, warned, in an internal memorandum written before the TMI2 accident, that if the event had happened on a plant operating at full power, probably the core would have been uncovered with the possibility of fuel damage. An engineer of the Tennessee Valley Authority had described, in a draft technical report, the possibility of the phenomenon of increasing water level in the pressurizer with simultaneous decreasing pressure. Not enough time was available, unfortunately, for these studies to proceed beyond the stage of first initial draft and to become part of the nuclear science before the TMI-2 accident. As the incident at TMI-2 progressed, the indications that severe core damage was occurring became ever clearer. One hour after the start of the accident, at 05:00, the four primary water recirculation pumps started to strongly vibrate and had to be shutdown. The vibration was indicative of the presence of steam in the circuit and therefore of a scarcity of water.

APPENDIX 17 THE THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

511

At 06:00, alarms indicted high radiation in the containment. This was an indication of a release of radioactive products from a core that had been damaged. At 07:00, radiation levels throughout the plant increased prompting the operators to declare a state of internal emergency. This action is taken when an event threatens “an uncontrolled release of radioactivity outside the plant.” At 07:24, the station superintendent, worried by the high radiation levels in the primary containment, declared a general emergency, that is, “an accident capable of causing serious radiological consequences to the health and safety of the population.” In spite of everything, the station personnel continued to believe that the reactor core was covered by water, but at the same time, by some unknown phenomenon, that it had been damaged. The station superintendent would later say: “. . . I don’t think that in my mind I was really convinced that the core had remained completely uncovered or uncovered in a substantial measure at that time (eight o’clock in the morning).” For several hours, the operators did not understand the real condition of the core. Various strategies were tried during that time in order to terminate an unknown, but indicated, core damage situation. It is not possible to give now the rationale for any single maneuvre performed but certainly the erroneous conviction that the primary system was full of water stayed for many hours in the minds of the operators. About 16 hours after the start of the accident, maneuvres were performed which gave clear indication that the control of core cooling had been regained: the block valve was definitively closed, the HPI was started up and one of the recirculation pumps of the primary circuit was started up with one steam generator operating. Soon afterwards the decreasing trend of all the primary circuit temperatures, the correct value of the pressure and the good operating conditions of the pumps clearly indicated that the core cooling was again under control. What had happened in the meantime within the reactor core? During the first 16 hours of the accident the core had, on several occasions and for long periods, dried (even if not completely) and therefore was without adequate cooling (Figs. A17.3 and A17.4). It can be calculated that some parts of the core reached temperatures in excess of 3100 K. The many safety tests performed over the years indicate the occurrence of two dangerous phenomena when the core temperature exceeds 1500 K. The first one consists in the fact that the small tubes (claddings) containing the core uranium, made of a zirconium alloy, show a vigorous chemical reaction with water or steam at these temperatures to generate hydrogen. The hydrogen, in the presence of oxygen or air, may lead to potentially destructive explosions. The second is caused either by nuclear overheating or by the metal (zirconium) water reaction. It consists of the mechanical damage of the fuel claddings and of the fuel itself, up to its melting, with the consequent liberation of the accumulated radioactive fission products. The nuclear fission (splitting) reaction of the nucleus of the uranium atom leads to the disappearance of the atom itself and to its transformation into two or more lighter, generally radioactive, atoms. These fission products accumulate in the fuel and their release is prevented by the presence of the cladding. Fig. 3.6 shows the damaged areas of the core as now known from the available information (OECD, 1994). It can be calculated that about 50% of the zirconium present in the TMI-2 core reacted with water to produce hydrogen and that practically all the volatile fission products were released by the core into the primary circuit and hence, through the stuck open relief valve, into the

512

APPENDIX 17 THE THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

(

)

FIGURE A17.3 Pressure history and periods when the core was uncovered.

System pressure (MPa)

20 B pump transient (174 to 193)

HPI on (200–217)

15 Block valve opened

10

Coolant pumps off (100 m) Core relocation Block valve closed (139 m) (174) (224)

5 (100)

0

Initial core heatup

Loss of coolant (core cooled)

100

Degraded core heatup

200 Time (min)

FIGURE A17.4 Pressure history and significant events in the first hours.

APPENDIX 17 THE THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

513

containment building. Forty-five percent (62 t) of the fuel melted and about 20 t migrated from their original position and collected on the vessel bottom head. The formation of hydrogen in the core also occurs by the radiolytic decomposition of water molecules, made of hydrogen and of oxygen. This phenomenon generates a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen gas. The considerable production of hydrogen during the TMI-2 accident gave the operators further difficulties: no severe consequence, however, ensued. First, hydrogen collected, because of its low density, in the highest part of the vessel and other primary circuit components, forming large bubbles which impaired the good circulation of water in the circuit itself. The phenomenon, an air-lock, which occurs in a domestic central heating system when air collects in the pipes, is familiar to many: the radiator stays cold because the water cannot circulate through it. Second, for many subsequent days there was concern about the possibility that radiolytic hydrogen and oxygen could detonate within the vessel and damage it. In reality, the first calculations were too conservative and did not account for other phenomena which in effect prevented the accumulation of oxygen in a measure sufficient to give rise to a detonation. In conclusion, it was probably an unfounded fear. A real explosion, on the other hand, happened in the containment building where the hydrogen that had escaped through the relief valve mixed with the air oxygen causing an explosion about 10 hours after the start of the accident without, however, damaging either the containment or other essential equipment. The sudden pressure rise caused by the explosion was recorded by the instruments and was equal to about 0.2 MPa. In addition to the possible effects of hydrogen, the other danger to the plant was the perforation of the vessel by the molten material (B20 t) which collected on its bottom. With the aim of understanding how the vessel resisted the high temperatures and stresses imposed on it by contact with the corium, an international research program, the Vessel Investigation Project (VIP) was launched by the OECD. The VIP results are described in OECD (1994). One of the principal conclusions being that, although the vessel wall locally reached temperatures high enough to possibly make it fail, due to the fact that around the hot zone the vessel was relatively cooler, this failure did not happen. In reality, there was always some water on the vessel bottom throughout the accident and it is thought that this water succeeded in penetrating the solidified corium cracks and the gaps between the corium and vessel, thereby refrigerating the largest part of the vessel. The indication given by the accident that a molten core may be confined inside the pressure vessel has not been forgotten by nuclear safety specialists and now this fact is relied upon in various designs (see Chapter 5: Severe Accidents).

A17.3 THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE ACCIDENT ON THE OUTSIDE ENVIRONMENT The commission nominated by President Carter to investigate the accident, the “Kemeny Commission” after the name of its chairman, effectively detected responsibilities and deficiencies, and listed the damages caused by the accident. However, its final report, published at the end of

514

APPENDIX 17 THE THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

October 1979 (Kemeny, 1979), contained the following statement: “We conclude that the most serious health effect of the accident was severe mental stress, which was short lived. The highest levels of distress were found among those living within 5 miles of TMI and in families with preschool children.” The TMI-2 accident has been one of the two most serious events in the nuclear industry since its start. It engaged the US technological apparatus for many months, it has worried practically all the world and has cost an estimated one to two billion dollars. However, it has not had consequences on the external environment beyond inconvenience and the state of concern of the population in the immediate neighborhood of the plant. This concern, to a large part, is due to evaluation errors. Nuclear power stations have been designed taking into account the possibility of accidents and providing the consequent protection, generally multiple, against their effects. In the TMI-2 accident these protections, notwithstanding the damages to the plant, have not missed their principal aim of protecting the integrity of the people and the environment. The following describes the still negligible health damage of radiological origin due to the accident (USNRC, 1979a; Kemeny, 1979). The radiation damage depends on the amount of radiation dose absorbed: the more sievert (or rem) absorbed by exposure to them the more serious are the consequences on the exposed individual. Up to some hundreds of millisieverts, no consequences arise. Beyond 1 Sv up to 2 Sv, nausea, vomiting, and indisposition may occur. At about 5 Sv the probability of death is high. For the TMI accident the highest potential individual irradiation outside the plant site is more conveniently expressed in microsievert. It has been in fact measured in 800 µSv. In order to evaluate the importance of this irradiation, it is useful to compare it with the one annually absorbed by every one of us just by living in a place, in a certain type of house, of eating and drinking, watching television, traveling by air, undergoing medical diagnoses, etc. In fact, each of us is subject to cosmic radiation and to radiation emitted by the ground, by construction materials, by food, and by various electronic devices. The annual doses absorbed in this way vary from place to place, but, for example, the higher the altitude of a town where an individual lives, the higher is the amount of cosmic radiation absorbed. In many countries, the background individual annual dose ranges between 500 µSv and 2.5 mSv. The maximum potential dose at TMI is lower than the typical difference in annual dose from one part of a country and another. Many will be surprised at this. It must, however, be remembered that we live in a radioactive world. Radioactivity is everywhere around us and is part of our environment. It is true that the TMI accident has had minor health consequences of radiological nature. A similar result is obtained if, instead of the individual dose, the collective dose is considered. It is known that in a population receiving even a small individual dose, statistically, lethal cases of cancer may occur. For TMI, various evaluations of this possible effect have been made, also considering the minute dose received due to the accident by individuals living as far as 80 km from the plant. The total population within this distance is about two million. Of these, in the subsequent years, according to the statistical data, about 325,000 will die of cancer for reasons different from the accident. It is practically certain that the possible additional cases of cancer due to the accident will be less than five, and therefore, as this is so low, they are included within the statistical variation of the cases occurring for other reasons (Kemeny, 1979).

APPENDIX 17 THE THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

515

The same general conclusion holds for the probability that the subsequent offspring of the population involved in the accident show malformations of some type. This reassuring health picture is derived from the measurements taken by various teams of wellequipped specialists operating around the power station and in the air space of the same zone. However, the governor of Pennsylvania, at the time, officially issued recommendations concerning protective measures and the evacuation of the population. Late in the morning of March 30, it was suggested that the population within 16 km of the plant should stay inside their houses to shield them to the maximum possible extent from possible radioactive clouds due to releases from the power station. Soon afterwards, roughly at 12:30, following further consultations with health authorities and experts, the governor recommended that pregnant women and preschool children should leave the zone within a radius of 8 km from the power station and that in this zone all the schools should be closed. At 20:30 of the same day, the governor withdrew the first recommendation but the second was only cancelled on 9 April. These precautionary measures, which were subsequently shown to be excessive, were in the largest part suggested by pessimistic evaluations of the possible evolution of plant phenomena and by incredible fortuitous coincidences. For example, a strong belief in the importance on the decisions of the governor was held by a group of experts from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the US control body on the peaceful uses of atomic energy) who suggested the evacuation of women and children. The same experts, in issuing their recommendation, were influenced by the following coincidence. They were evaluating all the possible modes of release of radioactive products from the plant and were calculating the consequences of a release due to excessive pressure from some radioactive gas storage tanks. The calculation indicated the theoretical possibility of radiation at the fence of the plant of 12 mSv/hour. Fifteen or twenty seconds after having obtained this result, they received the news that on site a radiation field of precisely 12 mSv/hour had been measured. They concluded that the unlikely emission of gases from the tanks had happened and recommended the evacuation to the governor. In reality, the measurement had been made by an helicopter which was flying 40 m above the discharge stack. The measurement was not therefore representative of the radiation field on the ground. Another element of confusion and of pessimism was represented by the exceedingly conservative evaluation of the detonation possibility of the hydrogen bubble in the reactor vessel. The recommendations to stay inside and to evacuate the zone, at least for the people most vulnerable to radiation damage, together with news from television and the press who were not completely reassuring, caused the understandable fear of the inhabitants of the TMI-2 zone. Radiations, unlike other potentially damaging agents and elements (e.g., fire, water, toxic gases), are not detected by our senses, so we feel unsafe and uncertain because we must rely on measurements and the advice of “experts.” In this regard, the astonishment of the Harrisburgh major, who wanted to visit the power station during the crisis on 30 March, is highly indicative: “Rather strangely, one of the things that impressed me the most and that gave me the maximum sensation of confidence that everything was under control was that everybody on the site, all the employees, the president and so on, went around in their shirts and bare head. I didn’t see any indication of nuclear protection.”

516

APPENDIX 17 THE THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

The mobilization of all the industrial and health protection national resources was, however, impressive. About 10 laboratories in the United States worked night and day to analyze samples taken from the plant and to perform evaluations of the present situation of the reactor and of its possible evolution. The industries of the nuclear field, such as General Electric and Westinghouse, promptly put themselves at the disposal of Babcock & Wilcox, of Metropolitan Edison and of the NRC for whatever assistance might be needed. The pharmaceutical industry, too, had to make a powerful effort. The Mallincrodt Chemical Company of St Louis, in cooperation with Parke-Davis of Detroit and with a manufacturer of machines for filling vials, based in New Jersey, agreed at short notice to supply the Government Department for Health 250,000 doses of potassium iodide. This substance, if ingested in an opportune dose, protects the individual from the negative consequences of the inhalation of radioactive iodine, potentially released to the atmosphere by a nuclear station accident. In fact the inhaled or ingested iodine, radioactive or not, is absorbed by the thyroid until it is not saturated. At this point, even if additional iodine is ingested, it is eliminated by the body. The previous ingestion of potassium iodide saturates the thyroid with iodine and then the further possible inhalation of radioactive iodine has no health consequences as it is promptly eliminated. The first batch of vials arrived in Harrisburgh within 24 hours and the last batch arrived 4 days later. It was not necessary to use any of them. Despite the effectiveness of the emergency plans, the TMI-2 experience has shown that the preparations for an emergency must be increased in every country.

A17.4 THE ACTIONS INITIATED AFTER THE ACCIDENT The TMI-2 accident was followed by decontamination operations, that is, the removal of radioactive products contained in the systems and in the buildings. This has made it possible to enter the containment building in order to complete the decontamination operations within it and to start the inspections of the reactor. In parallel, in the United States and in all countries interested in nuclear energy, studies were initiated in order to understand the development and the causes of the accident and to identify the possible improvements to power stations and to their management which might prevent accidents of similar severity. The studies in question, initiated immediately almost everywhere after the accident, gave substantial results even in the same year. Modifications made to existing plants were relatively few, but very crucial, and have been promptly made. They mainly concerned the automatic protection systems of the reactors which have now been set in a way which takes into account the behavior, previously not well known, of the pressurizer level in LOCAs concerning, as in TMI-2, the high parts of the pressurizer itself. Numerous other improvements were instigated in the aftermath of the accident. The work done by the NRC (Rogovin, 1980; USNRC, 1979b; 1979c) has indicated the need for improvements to the instrumentation, to the containment systems, to operator training, skills in safety issues present in each power station, to the operating procedures, to the safety analyses and to the emergency provisions.

APPENDIX 17 THE THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

517

The Kemeny Commission (Kemeny, 1979) concluded its work by saying that the field in which the more fundamental modifications were necessary is that of the mindset and of the working methods of the industry and of the control bodies in the United States. It was of the opinion that “after many years of operation of nuclear power plants, with no evidence that any member of the general public has been hurt, the belief that nuclear power plants are sufficiently safe grew into a conviction. One must recognize this to understand why many key steps that could have prevented the accident at TMI were not taken.” The most important modifications that the Kemeny commission deemed necessary in order to prevent the further occurrence of accidents of the TMI-2 severity, concern the organization and the intervention procedures of the NRC, the operator training, the management of nuclear plants by the utilities, some technical aspects of the plants, the research on the effects of low radiation doses and the emergency provisions. Studies by various working groups in other countries were substantially in agreement with the NRC and with the Kemeny commission recommendations. In Italy, a country well known to the author, the attempt was made to single out through the work of an expert group, among the proposed improvements, the few which appeared to be most effective in unlikely accident situations of various types. This was because even if the study of many thinkable accidents can be made, it is not possible to be certain that all of them have been foreseen, so an effective protection against the unforeseen is necessary. On the other hand, the core of a reactor may “die” from only two “illnesses” only: the lack of water and the lack of neutron poisons for the shutdown of the chain reaction. The first case has happened in TMI-2. It is also true that the study of possible accidents, even if limited, leads to the provision of abundant water for core submersion and for the shutdown of the chain reaction. The area of possible improvement concerns the systems which diagnose the conditions of possible danger to the core itself. For this reason the group recommended, in the first place, the installation, as far as technologically feasible on each reactor, of instrumentation capable of directly and reliably measuring the water level, and the temperature and power local distribution, in the core. Recommendations were then made concerning the improvement of operator training for accident conditions, of the emergency provisions and of the study of accidents in order to pay more attention to the plant control actions even a long time after the event. Other more specific recommendations concerned detailed characteristics of plant components. Some recommendations of the American study groups were already implemented in Italy, for example, the one concerning the consideration of more simultaneous faults in the study of an accident. The studies initiated soon after the accident continued in the field of emergency provisions, of operator training and on the completion of the recommendations. In the subsequent years, the technical thinking on the accident at ENEA-DISP led to the development of a proposal for the Core Rescue System (see Appendix 10) based on the voluntary depressurization of the primary system and on the injection of cooling water by passive systems (Petrangeli et al., 1993). This type of system was subsequently adopted in various new reactor designs (e.g., on the AP600 Westinghouse reactor). In particular, the voluntary depressurization system of the primary circuit, publicly proposed for the first time (for pressurized reactors) in the course of the mentioned studies in Italy, has become a permanent feature in the new PWR plant designs.

518

APPENDIX 17 THE THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

REFERENCES Kemeny, J.G., 1979. Report of the President’s Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island: The Need for Change; the Legacy of TMI’, President’s Commission on the accident at Three Mile Island, 2100 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037. OECD, 1994. Three Mile Island Reactor Pressure Vessel Investigation Project. OECD-NEA. OECD, Paris. Petrangeli, G., Tononi, R., D’Auria, F., Mazzini, M., 1993. The SSN: An emergency system based on intentional coolant depressurization for PWRs. Nucl. Eng. Des. 143, 25 54. Rogovin, M., 1980. Three Mile Island: A Report to the Commissioners and to the Public. NRC Special Inquiry Group. USNRC, 1979a. Population Dose and Health Impact of the Accident at the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station. NUREG 0558, May. USNRC, 1979b. TMI-2 Lessons Learned Task Force: Final Report. NUREG 0585, October. USNRC, 1979c. Investigation into the March 28, 1979, Three Mile Island accident by Office of Inspection and Enforcement. NUREG 0600, August.