Variable number of tandem repeat profiles and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Staphylococcus haemolyticus strains isolated from blood cultures in children

Variable number of tandem repeat profiles and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Staphylococcus haemolyticus strains isolated from blood cultures in children

    Variable number of tandem repeats profiles and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Staphylococcus haemolyticus strains isolated from...

334KB Sizes 0 Downloads 14 Views

    Variable number of tandem repeats profiles and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Staphylococcus haemolyticus strains isolated from blood cultures in children Faride Hosseinkhani, Fereshteh Jabalameli, Narges Nodeh Farahani, Morovat Taherikalani, Willem B. van Leeuwen, Mohammad Emaneini PII: DOI: Reference:

S1567-1348(15)30065-4 doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.11.035 MEEGID 2568

To appear in: Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:

2 August 2015 2 November 2015 30 November 2015

Please cite this article as: Hosseinkhani, Faride, Jabalameli, Fereshteh, Farahani, Narges Nodeh, Taherikalani, Morovat, van Leeuwen, Willem B., Emaneini, Mohammad, Variable number of tandem repeats profiles and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Staphylococcus haemolyticus strains isolated from blood cultures in children, (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.11.035

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Variable number of tandem repeats profiles and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Staphylococcus haemolyticus strains isolated from blood cultures in children Hosseinkhani1,

Fereshteh

Jabalameli1,

Narges

Nodeh

SC R

1

Morovat

IP

Taherikalani3, Willem B. van Leeuwen4, Mohammad Emaneini1*

Farahani2,

T

Faride

Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences,

Tehran, Iran.

Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

3

Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences,

MA

NU

2

Khorramabad, Iran.

Leiden, the Netherlands. *

CE P

Corresponding author:

D

Department of Innovative Molecular Diagnostics, University of Applied Sciences Leiden,

TE

4

AC

E-mail: [email protected]

Tel- Fax: 098- 021- 8895- 5810 Address:

Department of Microbiology, School of MedicineTehran University of Medical Sciences 100 Poursina St., Keshavarz Blvd., Tehran, Iran

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ABSTRACT Staphylococcus haemolyticus is a healthcare-associated pathogen and can cause a variety of

T

lifethreatening infections. Additionally, multi-drug resistance (MDR), in particular

IP

methicillin-resistant S. haemolyticus (MRSH) isolates, have emerged. Dissemination of such

SC R

strains can be of great concern in the hospital environment. A total number of 20 S. haemolyticus isolates from blood cultures obtained from children were included in this study. A high prevalence of MDR-MRSH isolates with high MIC values to vancomycin was found

NU

and 35% of the isolates were intermediate resistant to vancomycin. Multilocus variable

MA

number of tandem repeats analysis (MLVF) revealed 5 MLVF types among 20 isolates of S. haemolyticus. Twelve isolates shared the same MLVF type and were isolated from different

D

wards in a pediatric hospital in Iran. This is a serious alarm for infection control; i.e. in the

TE

absence of adequate infection diagnostics and infection control guidelines, these resistant

CE P

strains can spread to other sectors of a hospital and possibly among the community.

patients.

AC

Keywords: S. haemolyticus, MLVF typing, multidrug resistance, blood culture, pediatric

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1. Introduction

Staphylococcus haemolyticus (SH) isolates have the ability to colonize the human skin and

IP

T

mucosal membranes (Cavanagh et al., 2012) and is the primary cause of catheter-related bloodstream infections (Flahaut et al., 2008; Takeuchi et al., 2005 Cavanagh et al., 2012).

SC R

The ability of SH to develop multidrug-resistance (MDR), including to glycopeptides, represents a serious threat (Blavasco et al., 2000; Cavanagh et al., 2012; Flahaut et al., 2008).

NU

The genome of SH contains large amounts of mobile genetic elements coding for antimicrobial resistance, which can be transferred to related staphylococcal species (Vollú

MA

Silva et al., 2013). Colonized healthcare workers and medical devices may serve as a reservoir for transmission (Vollú Silva et al., 2013). Epidemiological analysis and

D

identification of the antibacterial resistance pattern of this staphylococcal species are

TE

mandatory for appropriate infection control measurements (Hope et al., 2008).

CE P

Multilocus variable number of tandem repeats analysis (MLVF) is used to identify possible genetic associations among strains. MLVF is based on natural variation in the number of tandem DNA repeats, as present in multiple loci of most bacterial genomes and used as a

AC

phylogenetic marker (Cavanagh et al., 2012). This method is simple, rapid and highly discriminatory (Holmes et al., 2010). In many microbiological diagnostic laboratories worldwide, SH is not identified at the species level. Hence, no informative data is available to address basic questions concerning its population structure (Becker et al., 2014). The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial resistance of SH isolated from children's blood cultures and to identify possible transmission of isolates among patients in a pediatric hospital.

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Strain collection

IP

T

In total 20 SH strains isolated from blood cultures obtained from 18 children (10 children

SC R

between 2-5 years, average 3.4 years and 8 newborns between 10 days throught 11 months, average 99 days) hospitalized at Children's Medical Center Tehran, Iran during the period 2013 to 2014 were included. SH strains were obtained from patients hospitalized for more

NU

than 3 days (85%) and outpatients (15%).

MA

Isolates were identified to the species level using standardized biochemical methods (Winn et al., 2006) and subsequently confirmed using a PCR-method targeting thermonuclease (nuc)

D

gene as described previously (Hirotaki et al., 2011).

TE

2.2. Antibiotic susceptibility testing

CE P

All isolates were tested for cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, gatifloxacin, gentamicin, linezolid, rifampin, synercid (quinopristin-dalfopristin), tetracycline and

AC

trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole using the disc agar diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI, 2013, M100-S23). Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of all bacterial isolates to vancomycin and oxacillin was determined by the micro broth dilution method as recommended by CLSI (2013, M100-S23). S.aureus ATCC 29213 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC29212 were used as reference strains. Multidrugresistance was defined as resistance of the bacterial strain to three or more classes of antimicrobials (Cavanagh et al., 2012). 2.3. DNA extraction and mecA PCR Template DNA was generated by boiling method as described previously (Fatholahzadeh et al., 2008). DNA was stored at −20 °C until use. Presence of the mecA gene was analaysed for 4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT all phenotypically oxacillin-resistant isolates using a PCR protocol as described previously (Blavasco et al., 2000).

IP

T

2.4. MLVF typing

SC R

MLVF types were defined based on the difference in the 5 loci (L1-L5) and was performed as previously described. Isolates with a VNTR pattern difference in no more than one locus are considered the same type (Cavanagh et al., 2012).

NU

3. Results

MA

Antibiotic resistance patterns and molecular characterization of isolates are presented in Table 1. All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, however 35% of the isolates

D

demonstrated intermediate resistance (Table 2). The MIC50 and MIC90 of the isolates for

TE

vancomycin were 4mg/l and 8mg/l respectively. All strains were phenotypically oxacilin

CE P

resistant (MIC50 and MIC90 values of 32mg/l and 128mg/l respectively). Only 80% of the isolates harbored the mecA gene and were defined as MRSH isolates. Overall, 85% of the

AC

isolates were MDR.

Among the 5 loci studied in MLVF typing, no DNA fragment was observed in locus L5. Variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) pattern analysis revealed 13 unique patterns and 5 different MLVF types among all SH isolates. The most predominant type (type I) included 12 isolates. 5. Discussion Worldwide emergence of SH as a primary cause of infection has been reported (Becker et al., 2014; Gupta et al., 2012). Moreover, multidrug resistance has posed significant burden in the treatment of SH infections (Gupta et al., 2012). In this study, the frequency of MDR-SH isolates was high (85%), which is confirmed by reports from different parts of the world 5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (Becker et al., 2014). No mecA gene was detected in 20% of the phenotypically oxacillinresistant SH isolates. Possible explanation may be the presence of a novel mecA allotype,

T

beta-lactamase hyperproduction or alteration in genes encoding other penicillin binding

IP

proteins (Ba et al., 2014, Barros et al., 2012). Most of SH isolates were susceptible to

SC R

rifampin and quinopristin-dalfopristin as reported previously (Becker et al., 2014). However, these antimicrobial agents are not recommended for treatment of blood infections in children or neonates according to their toxicity (Liu et al., 2011). In our study, resistance to

NU

tetracycline was significantly higher than mentioned in Europan and US studies (Coenen et

MA

al., 1997). This could be a possible effect of a more strict antibiotic policy in these countries (Becker et al., 2014). Although all isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, it is noteworthy

D

to mention that the MIC level was high (MIC50: 4mg/l, MIC90: 8mg/l) and confirmed by

TE

previous studies from different part of the world (Barros et al., 2012; Becker et al., 2014; Vollú Silva et al., 2013). Latter phenomenon is a serious warning for infection control in the

CE P

hospital environment. The extensive use of this antibiotic may cause the emergence of vancomycin-resistant strains (Emaneini et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2012; Kresken et al., 2009).

AC

The high discriminatory power qualifies MLVF as a convenient typing method for the classification of SH isolates, which has a rather clonal population structure. High frequency of MLVF type I isolates and distribution of these isolates in the different wards of the hospital, indicating the presence of a common MDR clone in the hospital environment (Luczak-Kadlubowska et al., 2008). In conclusion, this study revealed the high frequency of MDR-MRSH among different wards of an Iranian children’s hospital. In high-risk patients (neonates and immuno-compromised patients) infection with resistant clones can significantly increase the morbidity and mortality and a prolonged stay in the hospitals. (Cavanagh et al., 2012; Srinivasan et al., 2002; Forbes et al., 2007). This is a serious alarm for infection control; i.e. in the absence of proper and 6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT suitable microbiological diagnostics and infection control guidelines, these resistant strains can spread to other sectors of a hospital and possibly among the community. Moreover, this

T

species can act as a reservoir for the transmission of antibiotic resistance markers to other

SC R

IP

related and clinically relevant species, such as S. aureus (Becker et al., 2014).

Conflict of interests

NU

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest to reveal. Acknowledgments

MA

This project has been financially supported by Tehran University of Medical Sciences

D

and Health Services, Tehran, Iran. Study grant no: 25170/93-02-30.

TE

References:

CE P

Barros, E. M., Ceotto, H., Bastos, M. C. F., dos Santos, K. R. N. & Giambiagi-deMarval, M. (2012). Staphylococcus haemolyticus as an Important Hospital Pathogen and Carrier of

AC

Methicillin Resistance Genes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50,1,166. Becker, K., Heilmann, C. & Peters, G. (2014). Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. Clinical. Microbiol Rev. 27, 4, 870. Blavasco, F., Vgnaroli, C., Lazzarini R., & Varaldo P. E. (2000). Glycopeptide Susceptibility

Profiles

of

Staphylococcus

haemolyticus

Bloodstream

Isolates.

J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 44, 3122–3126. Cavanagh, J. P., Klingenberg, C., Hanssen, A. M., Fredheim, E. A., Francois, P., Schrenzel, J., Flægstad, T. & Sollid J. E. (2012). Core genome conservation of Staphylococcus haemolyticus limits sequence based population structure analysis. J. Microbiol. Methods. 89, 159–166.

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2013). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, M100-S23 (2013), M02-A11 and M07-A9. CLSI,

T

Wayne, PA.

IP

Coenen, S., Adriaenssens, N., Versporten, A., Muller, A., Minalu, G., Faes, C.,

SC R

Vankerckhoven, V., Aerts, M., Hens, N., Molenberghs, G. and Goosens, H. (2011). European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC): outpatient use of tetracyclines, sulphonamides and trimethoprim, and other antibacterials in Europe (1997–2009). J.

NU

Antimicrob. Chemother. 66, 6, 57–70.

MA

Emaneini, M., Aligholi, M., Hashemi, F. B., Jabalameli, F., Shahsavan, S., Dabiri, H., Jonaidi, N. & Dahi, K. (2007). Isolation of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a

D

teaching hospital in Tehran. J. Hosp. Infect. 66,1, 92-93.

TE

Fatholahzadeh, B., Emaneini, M., Gilbert, G., Udo, E., Aligholi, M., Modarressi, M.H., Nouri, K., Sedaghat, H., Feizabadi, M.M. (2008). Staphylococcal cassette chromosome

CE P

mec (SCCmec) analysis and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates in Tehran, Iran. Microb Drug Resist. 14(3):217-20

AC

Flahaut, S., Vinogradov, E., Kelley, K. A., Brennan, S., Hiramatsu, K., & Lee, J. C. (2008). Structural and biological characterization of a capsular polysaccharide produced by Staphylococcus haemolyticus. J Bacteriol. 190, 5, 1649–1657 Forbes, B. A., Sahm, D. F. & Weissfeld, A. S. (2007). Bailey & Scott's Diagnostic Microbiology, (6th ed)- in Patricia Till (Eds.). Page 254. Gupta V., Garg S., Jain R., Garg S. & Chander J. (2012). Linezolid resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus: first case report from India. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 5, 10, 837-8. Hirotaki, S., Sasaki, T., Kuwahara-Arai, K. & Hiramatsu, K. (2011). Rapid and Accurate Identification of Human-Associated Staphylococci by Use of Multiplex PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49, 10, 3627-3631. 8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Holmes, A., Edwards, G. F., Girvan, E. K., Hannant, W.J., Fitzgerald, J. R., & Templeton, K. E. (2010). Comparison of Two Multilocus Variable-Number Tandem-Repeat Methods and

T

Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis for Differentiating Highly Clonal Methicillin-Resistant

IP

Staphylococcus aureus Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48, 10, 3600–3607

SC R

Hope, R., D. Livermore, M., Brick, G., Lillie, M., & Reynolds, R. (2008). Non-susceptibility trends among staphylococci from bacteraemias in the UK and Ireland, 2001–06. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 62, 65-74.

NU

Kim JW, Chung GT, Yoo JS, Lee YS and Yoo JI. (2012). Autolytic activity and molecular

MA

characteristics of Staphylococcus haemolyticus strains with induced vancomycin resistance. J Med Microbiol. 61,10, 1428-34.

D

Kresken, M., Leitner, E., Brauers, J., Geiss, HK., Halle, E., von Eiff, C., Peters, G., Seifert,

TE

H; (2009). German Tigecycline Evaluation Surveillance Trial Study Group. Susceptibility of common aerobic pathogens to tigecycline: results of a surveillance study in Germany. Eur. J.

CE P

Clin. Microbiol. 28, 1, 83-90.

Liu, C., Bayer, A., Cosgrove, S. E., Daum, R.S., Fridkin, S.K., Gorwitz, R.J., Kaplan, S.L.,

AC

Karchmer, A.W., Levine, D.P., Murray, B.E., Rybak, M.J., Talan, D.A. and Chambers, H.F. (2011). Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infections in Adults and Children. Clin Infect Dis. 1, 52,18-55. Luczak-Kadlubowska, A., Sabat, A., Tambic-Andrasevic, A., Payerl-Pal, M., KrzysztonRussjan, J., Hryniewicz, W; (2008). Usefulness of multiple-locus VNTR fingerprinting in detection of clonality of community- and hospital-acquired Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 94, 4,543-53

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Sader, H. S., Jones, R. N., Stilwell, M. G., Dowzicky, M. J. & Fritsche, T. R. (2005). Tigecycline activity tested against 26,474 bloodstream infection isolates. Diagn. Microbiol.

T

Infect. Dis. 52, 181–186.

IP

Srinivasan, A., Dick, J. D. & Perl, T. M. (2002). Vancomycin resistance in staphylococci.

SC R

Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15, 3, 430-8.

Takeuchi, F., Watanabe, S., Baba, T., Yuzawa, H., Ito, T., Morimoto, Kuroda, M., Cui, L., Takahashi, M., Ankai, A., Baba, S., Fukui, S., Lee, C. J. and Hiramatsu, K. (2005). Whole-

NU

Genome Sequencing of Staphylococcus haemolyticus uncovers the Extreme Plasticity of Its

MA

Genome and the Evolution of Human-Colonizing Staphylococcal Species. J Bacteriol. 187, 21, 7292-308.

D

Vollú Silva, P., Cruz R. S., Keim, L. S., Renato de Paula, G., Carvalho, B. T. F., Coelho, L.

TE

R., The antimicrobial susceptibility, biofilm formation and genotypic profiles of Staphylococcus haemolyticus from bloodstream infections. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo

CE P

Cruz journal.108, 6, 812-816.

Winn, W. C., Allen, S. D., Janda, W. M., Koneman, E. W. (2006). Koneman's Color Atlas

AC

and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology (6th ed.), page 649. Ba, X., Harrison, E.M., Edwards, G.F., Holden, M.T., Larsen, A.R., Petersen. A., Skov, R.L., Peacock, S.J., Parkhill, J., Paterson, G.K., Holmes, M.A. (2014) “Novel mutations in penicillin-binding protein genes in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates that are methicillin resistant on susceptibility testing, but lack the mec gene,” J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 69, 3, 594–597.

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table1. Antimicrobial resistance patterns and variable number of tandem repeats profile of Staphylococcus haemolyticus strains isolated from children's blood cultures VNTR1 loci (bp) Isolate*

MLVF

Ward** L1

L2

L3

L4

2

Resistance pattern

mecA

MDR†

+

+

+

+

+

+

ERY, CLN, CIP, RIP, GAT, TS, GM, OXA

+

+

ERY, ,CIP, GAT, TS, GM, OXA

+

+

T, OXA, ERY, CLN

-

+

TS, OXA

+

‫ــ‬

type

EMR

500

500

700

100

ERY#, CLN, CIP, RIP, GAT, TS, GM, OXA

2

NICU

500

500

700

100

ERY, CLN, T, TS, GM, OXA

3

EMR

500

500

700

100

ERY, CIP, RIP, GAT, TS, GM, OXA

4

NICU

500

500

700

100

5

NEURO

500

500

-

100

6

INF

500

500

-

100

SC R

IP

T

1

500

500

400

100

8

NEPH

500

500

500

100

T, OXA, ERY

+

+

9

OP

500

500

500, 700

100

MG, OXA

+

‫ــ‬

10

EMR

500

-

700

100

ERY, CLN, SYN, CIP, GAT, TS, GM, OXA

+

+

11

EMR

500

300, 500

700

100

ERY, T, TS, OXA

+

+

12

EMR

500

300, 500

700

100

ERY, CLN, CIP, GAT, T, OXA

-

+

13

SUR

500

300, 500

200

100

ERY, CLN, CIP, T, TS, OXA

+

+

14

OP

500

300, 500

200

100

ERY, CLN, OXA

-

‫ــ‬

15

SUR

500

300, 500

200, 600

100

ERY, CLN, , SYN, T, TS, OXA

-

+

16

NEURO

500

300, 500

400

100

ERY, RIP, GAT, TS, GM, OXA

+

+

17

OP

500

300, 500

700

-

III

T, TS, OXA

+

+

18

NICU

500

300

200, 700

100

IV

ERY, CLN, CIP, GAT, TS, GM, OXA

+

+

19

INF

500

-

600

100

ERY, CIP, GAT, TS, GM, OXA

+

+

20

NEPH

500

-

600

100

ERY, CIP, GAT, TS, OXA

+

+

CE P

AC

MA

NU

EMR

TE

7

D

I

II

* Strains 5 and 16 were recovered from one patient and strains 13 and 15 from the another patient. ** EMR: emergency; NICU: neonatal intensive care unit; NEURO: neurology; INF: infant; NEPH: nephrology; OP: outpatient; SUR: surgery 1

VNTR: Variable Number of Tandem Repeat.

2

MLVF: Multi Locus Variable number of tandem repeats Fingerprinting

#

ERY, erythromycin; CLN, clindamycin; SYN, synercid;،CIP, ciprofloxacin; RIP, rifampin; GAT, gatifloxaci; T, Tetracycline; TS; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; GM,

gentamicin; OXA, oxacillin. †

MDR: Multidrug resistant

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 2. Distribution of vancomycin and oxacillin MIC values among

T

Staphylococcus haemolyticus strains isolated from children’s blood cultures.

vancomycin oxacillin

Break point

≤0.5

1

2

R* ≥32 µg/ml

4***

-

3

R ≥0.5µg/ml

1

2

3

4

8

16

SC R

Antibiotic

IP

MIC** Values (mg/l)

32

64

≥128

6

6

1

-

-

-

-

1

1

3

4

5

NU

* Resistance, breakpoint is selected according to CLSI guidelines; ** MIC50: Bold ; MIC90: Underlined

AC

CE P

TE

D

MA

*** The number corresponds to the number of isolates with a certain MIC-value

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

IP

High prevalence of MDR-Staphylococcus haemolyticus was detected in blood cultures of children.

SC R



T

Highlights

35% of the isolates were intermediate resistant to vancomycin.



All strains were susceptible to linezolid.



5 different types among 20 isolates of S. haemolyticus were documented.



Twelve isolates had same MLVF types and were isolated from different wards in a pediatric hospital of Iran.

AC

CE P

TE

D

MA

NU



13