- Email: [email protected]
Corrigendum to “The effect of solvent and counterion variation on inverse micelle CMCs in hydrocarbon solvents” [Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 494 (2016) 194–200]
Accepted Manuscript Title: Correction to “The Effect of Solvent and Counterion Variation on Inverse Micelle CMCs in Hydrocarbon Solvents” Author: Gregory N. Smith PII: DOI: Reference:
S0927-7757(16)31087-1 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.12.044 COLSUA 21251
To appear in:
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects
Author: Paul Brown PII: DOI: Reference:
S0927-7757(16)31087-1 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.12.044 COLSUA 21251
To appear in:
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects
Author: Craig James PII: DOI: Reference:
S0927-7757(16)31087-1 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.12.044 COLSUA 21251
To appear in:
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects
Author: Sarah E. Rogers PII: DOI: Reference:
S0927-7757(16)31087-1 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.12.044 COLSUA 21251
To appear in:
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects
Author: Julian Eastoe PII: DOI: Reference:
S0927-7757(16)31087-1 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.12.044 COLSUA 21251
To appear in:
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects
Received date: Accepted date:
15-12-2016 22-12-2016
Please cite this article as: Gregory N. Smith, Paul Brown, Craig James, Sarah E. Rogers, Julian Eastoe, Correction to “The Effect of Solvent and Counterion Variation on Inverse Micelle CMCs in Hydrocarbon Solvents”, (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.12.044 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Correction to “The Effect of Solvent and Counterion Variation on Inverse Micelle CMCs in Hydrocarbon Solvents” Gregory N. Smitha,1 , Paul Browna,2 , Craig Jamesa,3 , Sarah E. Rogersb , Julian Eastoea a School
of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock’s Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, United Kingdom Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Oxon, OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
cr
ip t
b ISIS-STFC,
In the original version of our article, “The Effect of Solvent and Counterion Variation on Inverse Micelle
us
CMCs in Hydrocarbon Solvents” [1], the secondary y-axis on Figure 4 was not presented correctly. This y-axis should be linear in volume (v) rather than in radius (r). The values of nagg are correct in the original version.
an
A new version of Figure 4 is now presented with a corrected secondary y-axis showing the inverse micelle volume. Dodecane-d26 Cyclohexane-d12 Benzene-d6
M
35
14 12 10
Ac ce
pt
20
10
16
v / (103 Å3)
nagg
25
15
18
ed
30
20
8 6 4
5
2
0
0.01
0 0.1
1
10
[AOT] / (mmol kg-1)
Figure 4: The inverse micelle CMC for AOT in different organic solvents in mmol kg−1 . Both nagg and the inverse micelle radius volume (v) are shown as nagg is a function solely of v, calculated from the radius (r) determined from SANS, when the surfactant molecular volumes are equal. The CMCs are essentially identical, despite the solvents being chemically different.
Email address: [email protected] (Julian Eastoe) address: Department of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, Brook Hill, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S3 7HF, United Kingdom 2 Current address: Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States of America 3 Current address: Department of Chemistry and CSGI, University of Florence, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy 1 Current
Preprint submitted to Elsevier
December 15, 2016
Page 1 of 2
References
Ac ce
pt
ed
M
an
us
cr
ip t
[1] G. N. Smith, P. Brown, C. James, S. E. Rogers, J. Eastoe, The effect of solvent and counterion variation on inverse micelle CMCs in hydrocarbon solvents, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 494 (2016) 194–200. doi:10.1016/j. colsurfa.2016.01.020.
2
Page 2 of 2
S0927-7757(16)31087-1 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.12.044 COLSUA 21251
To appear in:
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects
Author: Paul Brown PII: DOI: Reference:
S0927-7757(16)31087-1 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.12.044 COLSUA 21251
To appear in:
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects
Author: Craig James PII: DOI: Reference:
S0927-7757(16)31087-1 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.12.044 COLSUA 21251
To appear in:
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects
Author: Sarah E. Rogers PII: DOI: Reference:
S0927-7757(16)31087-1 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.12.044 COLSUA 21251
To appear in:
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects
Author: Julian Eastoe PII: DOI: Reference:
S0927-7757(16)31087-1 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.12.044 COLSUA 21251
To appear in:
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects
Received date: Accepted date:
15-12-2016 22-12-2016
Please cite this article as: Gregory N. Smith, Paul Brown, Craig James, Sarah E. Rogers, Julian Eastoe, Correction to “The Effect of Solvent and Counterion Variation on Inverse Micelle CMCs in Hydrocarbon Solvents”, (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.12.044 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Correction to “The Effect of Solvent and Counterion Variation on Inverse Micelle CMCs in Hydrocarbon Solvents” Gregory N. Smitha,1 , Paul Browna,2 , Craig Jamesa,3 , Sarah E. Rogersb , Julian Eastoea a School
of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock’s Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, United Kingdom Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Oxon, OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
cr
ip t
b ISIS-STFC,
In the original version of our article, “The Effect of Solvent and Counterion Variation on Inverse Micelle
us
CMCs in Hydrocarbon Solvents” [1], the secondary y-axis on Figure 4 was not presented correctly. This y-axis should be linear in volume (v) rather than in radius (r). The values of nagg are correct in the original version.
an
A new version of Figure 4 is now presented with a corrected secondary y-axis showing the inverse micelle volume. Dodecane-d26 Cyclohexane-d12 Benzene-d6
M
35
14 12 10
Ac ce
pt
20
10
16
v / (103 Å3)
nagg
25
15
18
ed
30
20
8 6 4
5
2
0
0.01
0 0.1
1
10
[AOT] / (mmol kg-1)
Figure 4: The inverse micelle CMC for AOT in different organic solvents in mmol kg−1 . Both nagg and the inverse micelle radius volume (v) are shown as nagg is a function solely of v, calculated from the radius (r) determined from SANS, when the surfactant molecular volumes are equal. The CMCs are essentially identical, despite the solvents being chemically different.
Email address: [email protected] (Julian Eastoe) address: Department of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, Brook Hill, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S3 7HF, United Kingdom 2 Current address: Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States of America 3 Current address: Department of Chemistry and CSGI, University of Florence, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy 1 Current
Preprint submitted to Elsevier
December 15, 2016
Page 1 of 2
References
Ac ce
pt
ed
M
an
us
cr
ip t
[1] G. N. Smith, P. Brown, C. James, S. E. Rogers, J. Eastoe, The effect of solvent and counterion variation on inverse micelle CMCs in hydrocarbon solvents, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 494 (2016) 194–200. doi:10.1016/j. colsurfa.2016.01.020.
2
Page 2 of 2