Animal welfare and food safety in modern animal production

Animal welfare and food safety in modern animal production

Animal welfare and food safety in modern animal production 5 Lucas J. Lara1 and Marcos H. Rostagno2 1 Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Brazil, ...

143KB Sizes 1 Downloads 145 Views

Animal welfare and food safety in modern animal production

5

Lucas J. Lara1 and Marcos H. Rostagno2 1 Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Brazil, 2Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States

5.1

Introduction

The animal production industry has been going through a period of significant change as pressure mounts to keep pace with a constantly increasing demand for animal protein (meat, poultry, milk, and eggs) led by global population and socioeconomic developments. However, simply increasing production is not enough, as consumers are increasingly concerned about how their food is produced, as well as where it comes from and how safe it is. As a consequence, animal welfare and food safety standards have become increasingly relevant, and are often perceived as indicators of quality and astutely used for driving marketing strategies. Stress is intrinsically part of the general concept of animal welfare, and inevitably, all farm animals will experience some level of stress during their lives. This situation is a very common challenge for any animal production system as the occurrence of stress reduces the fitness of the animals by affecting their overall balance or homeostasis, through deregulation of the neuroendocrine immune system axis. The consequences of stress can vary widely, from simple failure to achieve production performance targets (Mitlohner et al., 2001; Collier et al., 2006; Estevez, 2007; White et al., 2008) to variable degrees of incidence of subclinical and clinical infections and diseases (Rauw et al., 1998; St-Pierre et al., 2003; Vecerek et al., 2006; Duff and Galyean, 2007; Ritter et al., 2007; Fitzgerald et al., 2009; Lara and Rostagno, 2013). However, although the link between stress in farm animals and food safety is generally accepted, our understanding of how this interaction actually occurs is very limited. Farm animals infected/colonized by foodborne pathogens, such as Salmonella enterica, Campylobacter jejuni, and Escherichia coli O157:H7, provide a source from which these bacteria may contaminate their final products (poultry, pork, beef, eggs, and milk). In fact, many studies conducted around the world have shown that a highly variable, but most of the time significant, proportion of farm animals carry foodborne pathogens within their gastrointestinal tract (Rostagno et al., 2003; Wesley et al., 2005; Woerner et al., 2006; Arsenault et al., 2007c; Fox et al., 2008; Young et al., 2009; Cernicchiaro et al., 2013; Mughini-Gras et al., 2014; Flockhart et al., 2016). Moreover, it has been estimated that live pigs carrying Salmonella are 3 4 times more likely to produce contaminated carcasses (Berends et al., 1996), while positive correlations have been found between fecal and hide prevalence of Advances in Agricultural Animal Welfare. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101215-4.00005-5 Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

92

Advances in Agricultural Animal Welfare

E. coli O157:H7 in beef cattle (Woerner et al., 2006; Fox et al., 2008), and between cecal prevalence of Salmonella and Campylobacter, and carcass contamination, in chickens and turkeys (Arsenault et al., 2007a,b; Reich et al., 2008). In this review, we compile and present the current knowledge available in the scientific literature examining what is known about the relationship between stress in farm animals and microbial food safety risk. It is important to highlight that although potential issues resulting from changes in animal welfare and food safety regulations and standards are not within the scope of this review, they do have the potential to impact each other, positively or negatively. As consumers’ perspectives are constantly changing due to a multitude of influential factors, it is critical to realize that regulatory bodies and large corporations in the food industry are heavily influenced and respond to consumer pressures, creating an extremely challenging and fluid environment for the entire animal production industry, as well as for the scientific community.

5.2

Stress in farm animals and effects on the gastrointestinal tract

It is difficult to define “stress.” However, the classical and widely used definition is: “the nonspecific response of the body to any demand” (Selye, 1976). More specifically, stress represents the biological reaction of the animal’s body to stimuli that disturb its normal physiological homeostasis. The hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis and the autonomic nervous system are responsible for the stress response via synthesis and release of hormones, neurotransmitters, and neuropeptides, with the purpose of reestablishing homeostasis by regulating physiological processes. This restoration of homeostasis follows a predetermined time course and is stressor specific (Minton, 1994; Mostl and Palme, 2002; Carrasco and Van de Kar, 2003; Mormede et al., 2007; Marketon and Glaser, 2008; Mora et al., 2012). Farm animals are challenged by different types of stressors throughout their lives, independent of the environment they are raised in or the management practices they are subjected to. However, the stress response is highly variable between individual animals even within the same population, as the stress response is modulated by several factors intrinsic to the animal (e.g., genetics, species, sex, age, physiological state, past experiences, and learning), as well as by stressor characteristics (e.g., nature, timing, avoidability, frequency, severity, and duration). Furthermore, it is important to understand that farm animals within the same population will be exposed to stressors at variable times and intensities, leading to a broad spectrum of stress responses (Greenberg et al., 2002; Lafferty and Holt, 2003; Creel et al., 2013; McEwen, 2015; Romero et al., 2015). Some of the common factors that produce stress in farm animals within any animal production system include inadequate nutrition, deprivation of water and/or feed, extreme environmental temperatures (i.e., heat and cold), overcrowding, and handling (i.e., manipulation by humans). Additionally, most farm animals are transported at some

Animal welfare and food safety in modern animal production

93

point in their lives for a variety of reasons (e.g., availability of feed ingredients, different raising locations, and processing or harvest). The process of handling, loading, transporting, and unloading of animals generates substantial detrimental effects on their well-being by causing stress. Also during this process, animals may be exposed to a range of challenging stimuli, including handling and increased human contact, vibration, movement, and jolting during transport, as well as novel and unfamiliar environments, periods of food and water deprivation, changes in social structure, and changes in climatic conditions. These challenges perturb the homeostasis of the animals, and activate an adaptive response in an attempt to restore balance (Warriss, 2003; Rostagno, 2009). The gastrointestinal tract contains a complex nervous system with millions of neurons embedded along and within the intestinal wall. These neurons control the tract’s microcirculation, motility, and exocrine and endocrine secretions. This enteric nervous system is bidirectionally connected to the central nervous system by the sympathetic and the parasympathetic pathways composing the brain gut axis (Hao et al., 2016; Uesaka et al., 2016). Research conducted over the course of many years has shown that stress, and the associated release of catecholamines, leads to decreased gastric acid production (with increased pH in the stomach), delayed gastric emptying, and accelerated intestinal motility and colonic transit (Moon et al., 1979; Enck et al., 1989; Tache et al., 1999; Monnikes et al., 2001; Tache and Perdue, 2004; Bonaz and Bernstein, 2013). These effects lead to an increased probability that foodborne pathogens will survive gastric passage and colonize the intestinal tract. Moreover, some neuroendocrine mediators released during a stress response also exert effects on the intestinal mucosa, altering the interaction between luminal microorganisms and epithelial cells through increased intestinal permeability, mucus production, and intestinal wall motility (Lenz et al., 1988; Williams et al., 1988; Barone et al., 1990; Saunders et al., 2002; Wang and Wu, 2005; Collins and Bercik, 2009; Lyte et al., 2011). The gastrointestinal tract also contains the majority of the cells comprising the animal’s immune system (70% 80%, depending on the species), as diffused and aggregated lymphoid tissues along the intestinal wall, particularly in the small intestine (McDonald et al., 2011). It is well known that extensive crosscommunication occurs between the neuroendocrine and immune systems, via common ligands and receptors. A number of hormones, neurotransmitters, and neuropeptides are known to affect several aspects of immune development and function. Similarly, receptors for immune mediators, such as cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors are known to occur on neuronal cells and in endocrine tissues. Therefore, it is evident that an intimate multidirectional communication network exists between the nervous and immune systems along the entire gastrointestinal tract (Steinman, 2004; Marques-Deak et al., 2005; Ziemssen and Kern, 2007). As a consequence, any imbalance to any of these systems (such as a stressor) will lead to significant changes in the immune response, leading in turn to increased susceptibility to infections. In fact, it has been shown that stress mediators, such as glucocorticoid hormones and catecholamines, can markedly affect

94

Advances in Agricultural Animal Welfare

immune function (Marketon and Glaser, 2008; Taub, 2008; Kelley and McCusker, 2014). As a consequence, the close connection and interaction (from the anatomical and functional points of view) of these two complex systems has for a very long time been the basis of the generally accepted explanation as to how stress influences the susceptibility of farm animals to infection and colonization by foodborne pathogens.

5.3

Effect of stress mediators on bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract

The gastrointestinal tract contains a very dense and metabolically active microbiota. Bacterial populations can reach 1012 1014 cells per gram of intestinal contents, comprising several hundreds of species (Zhu and Joerger, 2003; Rastall, 2004; Richards et al., 2005; Wang and Kasper, 2014; Hyland and Cryan, 2016). During a stress response, catecholamines are released by the enteric nervous system and/or spill over from the systemic circulation, creating significant local concentration increases (Aneman et al., 1996; Eisenhofer et al., 1997; Freestone et al., 2008). These changes in catecholamine concentrations affect the status and behavior of the intestinal microbiota and colonizing pathogens, as previously discussed, through suppression of the immune system and physiological alterations in the gastrointestinal tract. However, a new area of knowledge has emerged and demonstrated that the enteric nervous system can exert direct effects on intestinal microbial populations, including foodborne pathogens (Lyte et al., 2011). Early studies demonstrated the direct effect of catecholamines on bacterial growth (Lyte and Ernst, 1992, 1993; Lyte et al., 1996). Also, virulence factors, such as adhesins in enterotoxigenic E. coli and toxins in enterohemorrhagic E. coli, were shown to increase in the presence of norepinephrine (Lyte et al., 1996, 1997). The observation of direct effects of catecholamines on bacteria provided evidence of a new pathway for host stress-induced alteration of infections, and provided a theoretical framework for the emerging scientific field of microbial endocrinology, defined as a new multidisciplinary area of knowledge representing the intersection between microbiology and neurophysiology (Lyte, 1993, 2004). Research in this area is rapidly growing and generating a better understanding of how bacteria actively respond to neurohormonal products of the stress response within the host. For instance, studies conducted by Aneman et al. (1996) and Alverdy et al. (2000) indicated that enteropathogens increase the expression of virulence factors in response to environmental signals indicating host stress. In fact, Cogan et al. (2007) and Dowd (2007) showed that C. jejuni and E. coli O157:H7 increase the expression of virulence factors when exposed to norepinephrine in vitro. Moreover, Chen et al. (2003, 2006) have shown that catecholamines modulate E. coli O157:H7 adherence to the cecal epithelium, and Dunn et al. (2003) reported that translocation of Salmonella typhimurium from the intestinal tract was associated with activation of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis, as well as

Animal welfare and food safety in modern animal production

95

noradrenergic and indoleaminergic responses. According to Karavolos et al. (2008) and Spencer et al. (2010), norepinephrine and epinephrine modulate Salmonella defenses against oxidative stress. More recently, Halang et al. (2015) showed that exposure to catecholamines enhanced growth and motility of Vibrio cholerae. According to Bearson (2016), a similar effect on the motility of E. coli and S. typhimurium occurs in the presence of catecholamines, with increased flagellar gene expression. Furthermore, epinephrine and norepinephrine are chemoattractants for E. coli O157:H7, and in S. typhimurium, norepinephrine enhances horizontal gene transfer and expression of genes involved in plasmid transfer (Bearson, 2016), which would pose a whole new facet of implications to be explored in the area of antimicrobial resistance dissemination (i.e., resistance genes exchange), not only in pathogenic, but also in nonpathogenic or commensal bacteria. Unfortunately, our current knowledge is very limited on this potential public health risk, as well as how much animal production might contribute via food safety and/or environmental contamination risks. As scientific interest and investment continue to increase, we should expect a clearer understanding of this issue in the coming years. An interesting study by Toscano et al. (2007) examined the effects of in vitro pretreatment of S. typhimurium with norepinephrine prior to infecting young pigs. Examination of the tissue distribution revealed that norepinephrine-treated bacteria were present in greater numbers and more widely distributed in gastrointestinal tissues than control bacteria. In another study, McCuddin et al. (2008) used three strains of S. enterica (serovars Saintpaul, Montevideo, and Enteritidis) and concurrent administration of a stress mediator (norepinephrine) to successfully reproduce Salmonella encephalopathy in cattle, which did not occur under normal conditions. These studies serve to demonstrate through two different approaches and in two different animal species how stress mediators (in particular, norepinephrine) are capable of affecting the dynamic host pathogen relationship, in favor of pathogens. It has become evident in recent years that the network of complex interactions between pathogens and their hosts is vital in determining the outcome of infections, with stress and its mediators playing an important role. Bacterial pathogens employ molecular sensors to detect and facilitate adaptation to changes in their niche, within the host. Moreover, intercellular bacterial communication is facilitated by the production, release, and detection of signaling molecules (called autoinducers) via a system known as quorum sensing. This communication system enables bacteria to alter their behavior in response to changes in population density and composition, such as caused by the occurrence of a stress response and its mediators. This is a very complex area of study, which is still in its infancy but which, over time, may greatly contribute to the development of potential interventions to mitigate some of the microbial effects and risks discussed here (e.g., increased colonization, virulence, and pathogenesis). Several interesting publications are available on this topic, including some comprehensive literature reviews (Kaper and Sperandio, 2005; Hernandez-Doria and Sperandio, 2013; Karavolos et al., 2013; Moreira et al., 2016; Luzader and Kendall, 2016; Papenfort and Bassler, 2016).

96

5.4

Advances in Agricultural Animal Welfare

The impact of stress in farm animals on food safety risk

As previously discussed, a multitude of factors can lead to quantitative and/or qualitative disruptions of the complex gastrointestinal microbiota of farm animals, causing increased susceptibility to infection and colonization by foodborne pathogens. Some of these disruptive factors include antimicrobial compounds, feed additives, dietary changes, and a variety of stressors. As a consequence, levels of pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract as well as shedding from subclinically infected animals (i.e., carriers) may be affected by many circumstances. For instance, during the process of being transported from production farms to abattoirs, animals are exposed to a variety of potential stressors (Warriss, 2003; Averos et al., 2008). As a consequence, it is believed that the number of animals carrying and shedding foodborne pathogens increases in response to stressors. In pigs, studies have shown that transportation leads to increased shedding of Salmonella (Williams and Newell, 1970; Isaacson et al., 1999; Marg et al., 2001). However, the effect is not always straightforward, particularly because stressor intensity and the additive effects of multiple stressors seem to interact, creating a dynamic scenario (Rostagno et al., 2005; Scherer et al., 2008). Nevertheless, it is clear that stress generated by the process of moving pigs to the processing facilities does have the potential to increase the risk of foodborne pathogens. For instance, a recent study by Artuso-Ponte et al. (2015) demonstrated that the administration of a herbal extract supplement (quaternarybenzo(c)phenanthridine alkaloid) to finishing pigs was effective in reducing transportation stress, determined by significantly reduced salivary cortisol. Moreover, the intervention also resulted in reduced Salmonella shedding, thus positively impacting both animal welfare and pork safety. An additional interesting observation of the study consisted of a high positive correlation between salivary cortisol and Salmonella shedding after transportation in all groups of pigs studied. In broiler chickens, several studies have shown that transportation prior to processing at the abattoir leads to increased shedding of Salmonella (Mulder, 1995; Corry et al., 2002; Marin and Lainez, 2009). Interestingly, a study conducted by Barham et al. (2002) showed an increased prevalence of Salmonella in feces and on hides of cattle transported to the abattoir, whereas the same did not occur with E. coli O157:H7 in the same animals. Miniham et al. (2003) also did not detect any difference in E. coli O157:H7 in fecal samples of cattle transported to the abattoir. These studies suggest that transportation stress does not affect all pathogens equally, particularly in regard to fecal shedding. Additional studies in cattle have reported that Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 frequency and levels increased on hides upon transport from feedlots to abattoirs, as well as when animals were subjected to preslaughter lairage (Reicks et al., 2007; Arthur et al., 2007; Dewell et al., 2008a,b). However, it is important to highlight that increased hide contamination does not directly imply increased infection frequency or shedding, although it suggests increased environmental contamination, leading to increased risk of carcass contamination with foodborne pathogens.

Animal welfare and food safety in modern animal production

97

Worth mentioning are the reported effects of weaning and movement/transportation of calves as a risk factor for E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella infection and shedding (Corrier et al., 1990; Hancock et al., 1997; Bach et al., 2004; Fairbrother and Nadeau, 2006). The reported effect on E. coli O157:H7 in these studies contrasts with the previous studies conducted with market-age cattle, suggesting that an age-related effect or predisposition exists. In this case, exposure to stressors at an early age may predispose to increased colonization with E. coli O157:H7. This is a very interesting area of investigation with many potential ramifications and implications from the food safety point of view, and which warrants further study. Still related to the transportation of farm animals, in many cases feed is withdrawn before and during transportation to the abattoir to clear the gastrointestinal tract of fecal contents, thus reducing the risk of fecal contamination of carcasses. However, studies conducted in pigs have shown that periods of feed withdrawal lead to cecal fermentation changes, with increased pH and decreased concentrations of short chain fatty acids. These effects in turn lead to changes in the intestinal microbial ecosystem, resulting in increased numbers of Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella in the feces of market pigs entering the abattoir (Nattress and Murray, 2000; Martin-Pelaez et al., 2008, 2009). In a study conducted by Harvey et al. (2001), increased levels of Campylobacter were also observed in pigs subjected to feed withdrawal. In broiler chickens, multiple studies have shown that the stressful harvesting practices of feed withdrawal and transportation cause significant increases of Campylobacter and Salmonella (Stern et al., 1995; Line et al., 1997; Ramirez et al., 1997; Byrd et al., 1998; Corrier et al., 1999; Whyte et al., 2001). Also, Barreiro et al. (2012) reported that feed withdrawal caused increased numbers of E. coli and Enterococcus in broilers. In a study conducted by Burkholder et al. (2008), feed withdrawal caused changes in the normal intestinal microbiota and epithelial structure in broilers, leading to increased attachment of Salmonella. In turkeys, Wesley et al. (2009) reported a significant increase of Campylobacter prevalence in market-age birds subjected to feed withdrawal and transportation, while Dutta et al. (2008) showed that Listeria monocytogenes colonizes liver and synovial tissues of cold-stressed turkeys, and may constitute a source of contamination during processing. Dietary stress (feed restriction or withdrawal) in cattle has also been shown to increase bacterial shedding, such as generic E. coli and E. coli O157 (Cray et al., 1998; Reid et al., 2002). Feed removal for an extended period of time was for many years a very commonly used method by the layer industry (egg production industry) to induce molting and stimulate multiple egg-laying cycles in aging hens (Golden et al., 2008). However, research has demonstrated that feed removal during forced molting decreases the resistance of hens to Salmonella enteritidis infection (Holt, 1993; Durant et al., 1999), resulting in increased severity of infection and shedding (Holt and Porter, 1992a; 1993). Increased horizontal spread of infection to molted hens in neighboring cages (Holt and Porter, 1992b, 1993; Holt, 1995), and finally, increased egg contamination (Holt, 2003; Humphrey, 2006; Golden et al., 2008; Denagamage et al., 2015) and consequent food safety risk to consumers. It is important to mention that feed removal to induce molting is generally no longer used in the

98

Advances in Agricultural Animal Welfare

North American and European egg production industries, and that the purpose of the information presented here was simply to further demonstrate the interrelation between the stress caused by feed removal and the occurrence of Salmonella in poultry. Environmental thermal stress, in particular heat stress, is another factor that can lead to colonization of farm animals by pathogens, increased fecal shedding and horizontal transmission, and consequently, increased contamination risk of animal products (Lara and Rostagno, 2013). These effects may occur through different pathways, from favoring the pathogen’s ecology and epidemiology to affecting the host’s ability to cope with the infection/colonization, as previously discussed in this review. Nevertheless, although a lot of knowledge is available on the effects of thermal stress on physiology and productivity (Slimen et al., 2016), very little has been published on the effects of heat stress on the intestinal microbial ecosystem of farm animals. In pigs, an association between the thermal environment (temperatures below or above thermal neutral zone) within a barn and Salmonella shedding has been reported (Pires et al., 2013). Several epidemiological studies have reported seasonal effects on the occurrence of Salmonella and Campylobacter in flocks of broilers and laying hens (Patrick et al., 2004; Wales et al., 2007; Van Der FelsKlerx et al., 2008; Jorgensen et al., 2011). In broilers, changes in intestinal microbial community structure were observed due to heat stress, which also lead to increased mucosal attachment of S. enteritidis (Burkholder et al., 2008). Heat stress in broilers has also been shown to increase intestinal inflammation and translocation of S. enteritidis, resulting in increased levels of the pathogen in the spleen (Quinteiro-Filho et al., 2010). Cold stress applied to chickens in the first 7 days of life was shown to increase activity of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis and the sympathetic nervous system, leading to long-term immune cell dysfunction and increased Salmonella Heidelberg invasion and persistence (Borsoi et al., 2015). A seasonal effect, with higher E. coli O157:H7 prevalence in summer months and with warmer temperatures has also been reported in feedlot cattle (Renter et al., 2008). In dairy cattle, increased environmental temperature has been shown to increase shedding of shiga toxin-producing E. coli (Venegas-Vargas et al., 2016) and Salmonella (Likavec et al., 2016). Evaluation of the effects of environmental stressors on the host pathogen interaction is an area of increasing interest and importance, particularly for farm animals commonly raised outdoors, as well as due to the increasing trend toward alternative production systems that aim to improve animal welfare by offering confined animals access to the outdoors.

5.5

Conclusion and implications

Infection and colonization of farm animals by foodborne pathogens, and the subsequent dissemination of those pathogens along the food chain, constitute a major public health concern worldwide. Based on this scientific review, it is clear that stress in farm animals can significantly affect food safety risk through a variety of

Animal welfare and food safety in modern animal production

99

potential mechanisms and pathways. However, while there is evidence linking stress to pathogen carriage and shedding in farm animals, many gaps in knowledge still exist and further study is warranted, so that risk factors can be avoided/minimized and intervention strategies applied to reduce risk to consumers. Protecting animal welfare and health is critical for maximizing productivity and efficiency as well as for reducing food safety risk, and consequently maintaining public health and consumer confidence. However, this is no simple task as animal production systems are very complex and the industry faces very broad and intricate challenges. Worth noting is that although the world population is increasingly removed from farming and food production, consumers are increasingly concerned and want more transparency and information about where and how their food is produced, with ethical concerns becoming a driving factor in consumers’ choices. However, as consumers demand more from the food industry, complex challenges (and interests) arise, particularly when the media provides misinformation. This scenario causes a lot of confusion and often creates perceptions that may be mistaken. For instance, consumers often assume that improved animal welfare automatically means improved food safety. If looking only through the perspective offered by this literature review, the assumption could be perceived as being correct. However, due to the complexity of the subject, we chose to focus on just one aspect of animal welfare (i.e., the effects of stress as a risk factor), leaving out other aspects that could also affect food safety risk, such as the effects of housing and management changes on the eco-epidemiology of foodborne pathogens. An entire book would probably be needed to cover all the potential aspects of the relationship between animal welfare and food safety. But, to be fair we must note that given the inherent complexity of modern animal production systems, as well as of host pathogen interactions, there are situations in which animal welfare standards may be improved, but at the expense of increased food safety risk. As an example, we could mention the trend of offering farm animals access to the external/outdoor environment, which exposes them to different stressors, besides allowing the emergence of pathogens not occurring in modern confined production systems (e.g., parasites, due to direct contact with soil). On the other hand, practices aiming to improve animal health and food safety (or minimizing risks), such as restrictive confinement can have detrimental animal welfare effects. The purpose here is to show that a balanced approach is essential to accommodate different needs within complex production systems. Interestingly, to date, there is no conclusive scientific evidence indicating differences in the incidence of the most common foodborne pathogens (such as Salmonella, Campylobacter, or E. coli) in different animal production systems, even though a significant number of studies have been published. The observed frequent report of conflicting results is likely due to the large number of variables and confounders usually involved (Jacob et al., 2008; Kijlstra et al., 2009; Young et al., 2009; Loo et al., 2012). As previously mentioned, there is still a lot to study and understand as we evolve in this area. However, due to the inherent complexity of animal production systems, it is critical that decisions/changes are made based on science rather than on emotions or simplistic perceptions. Otherwise, there could be

100

Advances in Agricultural Animal Welfare

unintended consequences and compromises in advances made during several decades of study and investment. Globalization of food trade provides greater food access, but also presents further potential for complications, such as the impact created by trade agreements and restrictions influencing animal welfare and food safety standards, sometimes based on diverging purposes, such as competitive marketing, market access, and market protection. Furthermore, over the last few years, the influence of large food retailers and restaurant chains with global reach has been a key driving factor. Using consumers’ perceptions to target marketing strategies, these large corporations many times impose specific standards on producers and suppliers even when those standards are not demanded by regulations. These do not necessarily translate into improved animal welfare or food safety outcomes, and in some cases, may even compromise those outcomes through some of the pathways highlighted in this review.

References Alverdy, J., Holbrook, C., Rocha, F., Seiden, L., Wu, R.L., Musch, M., Chang, E., Ohman, D., Suh, S., 2000. Gut-derived sepsis occurs when the right pathogen with the right virulence genes meets the right host: evidence for in vivo virulence expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ann. Surg. 232, 480 489. Aneman, A., Eisenhofer, G., Olbe, L., Dalenback, J., Nitescu, P., Fandriks, L., Friberg, P., 1996. Sympathetic discharge to mesenteric organs and the liver. Evidence for substantial mesenteric organ norepinephrine spillover. J. Clin. Investig. 97, 1640 1646. Arsenault, J., Letellier, A., Quessy, S., Morin, J.P., Boulianne, M., 2007a. Prevalence and risk factors for Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. carcass contamination in turkeys slaughtered in Quebec, Canada. J. Food Protect. 70, 1350 1359. Arsenault, J., Letellier, A., Quessy, S., Boulianne, M., 2007b. Prevalence and risk factors for Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. carcass contamination in broiler chickens slaughtered in Quebec, Canada. J. Food Protect. 70, 1820 1828. Arsenault, J., Letellier, A., Quessy, S., Normand, V., Boulianne, M., 2007c. Prevalence and risk factors for Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp. caecal colonization in broiler chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada. Prevent. Vet. Med. 81, 250 264. Arthur, T.M., Bosilevac, J.M., Brichta-Harhay, D.M., Guerini, M.N., Kalchayanand, N., Shackelford, S.D., Wheeler, T.L., Koohmaraie, M., 2007. Transportation and lairage environment effects on prevalence, numbers, and diversity of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on hides and carcasses of beef cattle at processing. J. Food Protect. 70, 280 286. Artuso-Ponte, V., Moeller, S., Rajala-Schultz, P., Medardus, J.J., Munyalo, J., Lim, K., Gebreyes, W.A., 2015. Supplementation with quaternary benzo(c)phenanthridine alkaloids decreased salivary cortisol and Salmonella shedding in pigs after transportation to the slaughterhouse. Foodborne Pathog. Disease. 12, 891 897. Averos, X., Knowles, T.G., Brown, S.N., Warriss, P.D., Gosalvez, L.F., 2008. Factors affecting the mortality of pigs being transported to slaughter. Vet. Record. 163, 386 390. Bach, S.J., McAllister, T.A., Mears, G.J., Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K.S., 2004. Long-haul transport and lack of preconditioning increases fecal shedding of Escherichia coli and Escherichia coli O157:H7 by calves. J. Food Protect. 67, 672 678.

Animal welfare and food safety in modern animal production

101

Barham, A.R., Barham, B.L., Johnson, A.K., Allen, D.M., Blanton Jr, J.R., Miller, M.F., 2002. Effects of the transportation of beef cattle from the feedyard to the packing plant on prevalence levels of Escherichia coli O157 and Salmonella spp. J. Food Protect. 65, 280 283. Barone, F.C., Deegan, J.F., Price, W.J., Fowler, P.J., Fondacaro, J.D., Ormsbee III, H.S., 1990. Cold-restraint stress increases rat fecal pellet output and colonic transit. Am. J. Physiol. 258, G329 G337. Barreiro, F.R., Baraldi-Artoni, S.M., Pinto, F.R., Barbosa, M.M.C., Barbosa, J.C., Amaral, L. A., 2012. Influence of chlorine added to drinking water during the preslaughter feed withdrawal on microbiology and morphology of the broiler gastrointestinal tract. Poult. Sci. 91, 2778 2784. Bearson, B.L., 2016. Molecular profiling: catecholamine modulation of gene expression in Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 874, 167 182. Berends, B.R., Urlings, H.A., Snijders, J.M., Van Knapen, F., 1996. Identification and quantification of risk factors in animal management and transport regarding Salmonella spp. in pigs. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 30, 37 53. Bonaz, B.L., Bernstein, C.N., 2013. Brain-gut interactions in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 144, 36 49. Borsoi, A., Quinteiro-Filho, W.M., Calefi, A.S., Ferreira, A.J.P., Astolfi-Ferreira, C.S., Florio, J. C., Palermo-Neto, J., 2015. Effects of cold stress and Salmonella Heidelberg infection on bacterial load and immunity of chickens. Avian Pathol. 44, 490 497. Burkholder, K.M., Thompson, K.L., Einstein, M.E., Applegate, T.J., Patterson, J.A., 2008. Influence of stressors on normal intestinal microbiota, intestinal morphology, and susceptibility to Salmonella enteritidis colonization in broilers. Poult. Sci. 87, 1734 1741. Byrd, J.A., Corrier, D.E., Hume, M.E., Bailey, R.H., Stanker, L.H., Hargis, B.M., 1998. Effect of feed withdrawal on Campylobacter in the crops of market-age broiler chickens. Avian Diseases. 42, 802 806. Carrasco, G.A., Van de Kar, L.D., 2003. Neuroendocrine pharmacology of stress. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 463, 235 272. Cernicchiaro, N., Cull, C.A., Paddock, Z.D., Bai, J., Nagaraja, T.G., Renter, D.G., 2013. Prevalence of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and associated virulence genes in feces of commercial feedlot cattle. Foodborne Pathog. Disease. 10, 835 841. Chen, C., Brown, D.R., Xie, Y., Green, B.T., Lyte, M., 2003. Catecholamines modulate Escherichia coli O157:H7 adherence to murine cecal mucosa. Shock. 20, 183 188. Chen, C., Lyte, M., Stevens, M.P., Vulchanova, L., Brown, D.R., 2006. Mucosally-directed adrenergic nerves and sympathomimetic drugs enhance non-intimate adherence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to porcine cecum and colon. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 539, 116 124. Cogan, T.A., Thomas, A.O., Rees, L.E., Taylor, A.H., Jepson, M.A., Williams, P.H., Ketley, J., Humphrey, T.J., 2007. Norepinephrine increases the pathogenic potential of Campylobacter jejuni. Gut. 56, 1060 1065. Collier, R.J., Dahl, G.E., VanBaale, M.J., 2006. Major advances associated with environmental effects on dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 89, 1244 1253. Collins, S.M., Bercik, P., 2009. The relationship between intestinal microbiota and the central nervous system in normal gastrointestinal function and disease. Gastroenterology. 136, 2003 2014. Corrier, D.E., Purdy, C.W., DeLoach, J.R., 1990. Effects of marketing stress on fecal excretion of Salmonella spp in feeder calves. Am. J. Vet. Res. 51, 866 869.

102

Advances in Agricultural Animal Welfare

Corrier, D.E., Byrd, J.A., Hargis, B.M., Hume, M.E., Bailey, R.H., Stanker, L.H., 1999. Presence of Salmonella in the crop and ceca of broiler chickens before and after preslaughter feed withdrawal. Poult. Sci. 78, 45 49. Corry, J.E., Allen, V.M., Hudson, W.R., Breslin, M.F., Davies, R.H., 2002. Sources of Salmonella on broiler carcasses during transportation and processing: modes of contamination and methods of control. J. Appl. Microbiol. 92, 424 432. Cray Jr, W.C., Casey, T.A., Bosworth, B.T., Rasmussen, M.A., 1998. Effect of dietary stress on fecal shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in calves. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 1975 1979. Creel, S., Dantzer, B., Goymann, W., Rubenstein, D.R., 2013. The ecology of stress: effects of the social environment. Funct. Ecol. 27, 66 80. Denagamage, T., Jayarao, B., Patterson, P., Wallner-Pendleton, E., Kariyawasam, S., 2015. Risk factors associated with Salmonella in laying hen farms: systematic review of observational studies. Avian Diseases. 59, 291 302. Dewell, G.A., Simpson, C.A., Dewell, R.D., Hyatt, D.R., Belk, K.E., Scanga, J.A., Morley, P.S., Grandin, T., Smith, G.C., Dargatz, D.A., Wagner, B.A., Salman, M.D., 2008a. Impact of transportation and lairage on hide contamination with Escherichia coli O157 in finished beef cattle. J. Food Protect. 71, 1114 1118. Dewell, G.A., Simpson, C.A., Dewell, R.D., Hyatt, D.R., Belk, K.E., Scanga, J.A., Morley, P.S., Grandin, T., Smith, G.C., Dargatz, D.A., Wagner, B.A., Salman, M.D., 2008b. Risk associated with transportation and lairage on hide contamination with Salmonella enterica in finished beef cattle at slaughter. J. Food Protect. 71, 2228 2232. Dowd, S.E., 2007. Escherichia coli O157:H7 gene expression in the presence of catecholamine norepinephrine. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 273, 214 223. Duff, G.C., Galyean, M.L., 2007. Recent advances in management of highly stressed, newly received feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 85, 823 840. Dunn, A.J., Ando, T., Brown, R.F., Berg, R.D., 2003. HPA axis activation and neurochemical responses to bacterial translocation from the gastrointestinal tract. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 992, 21 29. Durant, J.A., Corrier, D.E., Byrd, J.A., Stanker, L.H., Ricke, S.C., 1999. Feed deprivation affects crop environment and modulates Salmonella enteritidis colonization and invasion of Leghorn hens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 1919 1923. Dutta, V., Huff, G.R., Huff, W.E., Johnson, M.G., Nannapaneni, R., Sayler, R.J., 2008. The effects of stress on respiratory disease and transient colonization of turkeys with Listeria monocytogenes Scott A. Avian Diseases. 52, 581 589. Eisenhofer, G., Aneman, A., Friberg, P., Hooper, D., Fandriks, L., Lonroth, H., Hunyady, B., Mezey, E., 1997. Substantial production of dopamine in the human gastrointestinal tract. J. Clin. Encrinol. Metab. 82, 3864 3871. Enck, P., Merlin, V., Erckenbrecht, J.F., Wienbeck, M., 1989. Stress effects on gastrointestinal transit in the rat. Gut. 30, 455 459. Estevez, I., 2007. Density allowances for broilers: where to set the limits? Poult. Sci. 86, 1265 1272. Fairbrother, J.M., Nadeau, E., 2006. Escherichia coli: on-farm contamination of animals. Revue Scientifique et Technique (Int. Office Epizoot.). 25, 555 569. Fitzgerald, R.F., Stalder, K.J., Matthews, J.O., Schultz Kaster, C.M., Johnson, A.K., 2009. Factors associated with fatigued, injured, and dead pig frequency during transport and lairage at a commercial abattoir. J. Anim. Sci. 87, 1156 1166.

Animal welfare and food safety in modern animal production

103

Flockhart, L., Pintar, K., Cook, A., McEwen, S., Friendship, R., Kelton, D., Pollari, F., 2016. Distribution of Salmonella in humans, production animal operations and a watershed in a FoodNet Canada sentinel site. Zoonoses Public Health. doi:10.1111/zph.12281. Fox, J.T., Renter, D.G., Sanderson, M.W., Nutsch, A.L., Shi, X., Nagaraja, T.G., 2008. Associations between the presence and magnitude of Escherichia coli O157 in feces at harvest and contamination of preintervention beef carcasses. J. Food Protect. 71, 1761 1767. Freestone, P.P., Sandrini, S.M., Haigh, R.D., Lyte, M., 2008. Microbial endocrinology: how stress influences susceptibility to infection. Trends Microbiol. 16, 55 64. Golden, N.J., Marks, H.H., Coleman, M.E., Schroeder, C.M., Bauer Jr, N.E., Schlosser, W. D., 2008. Review of induced molting by feed removal and contamination of eggs with Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis. Vet. Microbiol. 131, 215 228. Greenberg, N., Carr, J.A., Summers, C.H., 2002. Causes and consequences of stress. Integrat. Comparat. Biol. 42, 508 516. Halang, P., Toulouse, C., Geibel, B., Michel, B., Flauger, B., Muller, M., Voegele, R.T., Stefanski, V., Steuber, 2015. Response of Vibrio cholerae to the catecholamine hormones epinephrine and norepinephrine. J. Bacteriol. 197, 3769 3778. Hancock, D.D., Besser, T.E., Rice, D.H., Herriott, D.E., Tarr, P.I., 1997. A longitudinal study of Escherichia coli O157 in fourteen cattle herds. Epidemiol. Infect. 118, 193 195. Hao, M.M., Foong, J.P.P., Bornstein, J.C., Li, Z.L., Berghe, P.V., Boesmans, W., 2016. Enteric nervous system assembly: functional integration within the developing gut. Develop. Biol. 417, 168 181. Harvey, R.B., Anderson, R.C., Young, C.R., Swindle, M., Genovese, K.J., Hume, M.E., Droleskey, R.E., Farrington, L.A., Ziprin, R.L., Nisbet, D.J., 2001. Effects of feed withdrawal and transport on cecal environment and Campylobacter concentrations in a swine surgical model. J. Food Protect. 64, 730 733. Hernandez-Doria, J.D., Sperandio, V., 2013. Nutrient and chemical sensing by intestinal pathogens. Microb. Infect. 15, 759 764. Holt, P.S., 1993. Effect of induced molting on the susceptibility of White Leghorn hens to a Salmonella enteritidis infection. Avian Diseases. 37, 412 417. Holt, P.S., 1995. Horizontal transmission of Salmonella enteritidis in molted and unmolted laying chickens. Avian Diseases. 39, 239 249. Holt, P.S., 2003. Molting and Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis infection: the problem and some solutions. Poult. Sci. 82, 1008 1010. Holt, P.S., Porter Jr., R.E., 1992a. Effect of induced molting on the course of infection and transmission of Salmonella enteritidis in White Leghorn hens of different ages. Poult. Sci. 71, 1842 1848. Holt, P.S., Porter Jr., R.E., 1992b. Microbiological and histopathological effects of an induced-molt fasting procedure on a Salmonella enteritidis infection in chickens. Avian Diseases. 36, 610 618. Holt, P.S., Porter Jr., R.E., 1993. Effect of induced molting on the recurrence of a previous Salmonella enteritidis infection. Poult. Sci. 72, 2069 2078. Humphrey, T., 2006. Are happy chickens safer chickens? Poultry welfare and disease susceptibility. Br. Poult. Sci. 47, 379 391. Hyland, N.P., Cryan, J.F., 2016. Microbe-host interactions: influence of the gut microbiota on the enteric nervous system. Develop. Biol. 417, 182 187. Isaacson, R.E., Firkins, L.D., Weigel, R.M., Zuckermann, F.A., DiPietro, J.A., 1999. Effect of transportation and feed withdrawal on shedding of Salmonella typhimurium among experimentally infected pigs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 60, 1155 1158.

104

Advances in Agricultural Animal Welfare

Jacob, M.E., Fox, J.T., Reinstein, S.L., Nagaraja, T.G., 2008. Antimicrobial susceptibility of foodborne pathogens in organic or natural production systems: an overview. Foodborne Pathog. Disease. 5, 721 730. Jorgensen, F., Ellis-Iversen, J., Rushton, S., Bull, S.A., Harris, S.A., Bryan, S.J., Gonzalez, A., Humphrey, T.J., 2011. Influence of season and geography on Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli subtypes in housed broiler flocks reared in Great Britain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 3741 3748. Kaper, J.B., Sperandio, V., 2005. Bacterial cell-to-cell signaling in the gastrointestinal tract. Infect. Immun. 73, 3197 3209. Karavolos, M.H., Spencer, H., Bulmer, D.M., Thompson, A., Winzer, K., Williams, P., Hinton, J.C., Khan, C.M., 2008. Adrenaline modulates the global transcriptional profile of Salmonella revealing a role in the antimicrobial peptide and oxidative stress resistance responses. BMC Genom. 9, 458. Karavolos, M.H., Winzer, K., Williams, P., Khan, C.M.A., 2013. Pathogen espionage: multiple bacterial adrenergic sensors eavesdrop on host communication systems. Molec. Microbiol. 87, 455 465. Kelley, K.W., McCusker, R.H., 2014. Getting nervous about immunity. Semin. Immunol. 26, 389 393. Kijlstra, A., Meerburg, B.G., Bos, A.P., 2009. Food safety in free-range and organic livestock systems: risk management and responsibility. J. Food Protect. 72, 2629 2637. Lafferty, K.D., Holt, R.D., 2003. How should environmental stress affect the population dynamics of disease? Ecol. Lett. 6, 654 664. Lara, L.J., Rostagno, M.H., 2013. Impact of heat stress on poultry production. Animals 3, 356 369. Lenz, H.J., Raedler, A., Greten, H., Vale, W.W., Rivier, J.E., 1988. Stress-induced gastrointestinal secretory and motor responses in rats are mediated by endogenous corticotropinreleasing factor. Gastroenterology. 95, 1510 1517. Likavec, T., Pires, A.F., Funk, J.A., 2016. Association between thermal environment and Salmonella in fecal samples from dairy cattle in Midwestern United States. Can. J. Vet. Res. 80, 183 188. Line, J.E., Bailey, J.S., Cox, N.A., Stern, N.J., 1997. Yeast treatment to reduce Salmonella and Campylobacter populations associated with broiler chickens subjected to transport stress. Poult. Sci. 76, 1227 1231. Loo, E.J.V., Alali, W., Ricke, S.C., 2012. Food safety and organic meats. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 3, 203 225. Luzader, D.H., Kendall, M.M., 2016. Commensal “trail of bread crumbs” provide pathogens with a map to the intestinal landscape. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 29, 68 73. Lyte, M., 1993. The role of microbial endocrinology in infectious disease. J. Endocrinol. 137, 343 345. Lyte, M., 2004. The biogenic amine tyramine modulates the adherence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to intestinal mucosa. J. Food Protect. 67, 878 883. Lyte, M., Ernst, S., 1992. Catecholamine induced growth of gram negative bacteria. Life Sci. 50, 203 212. Lyte, M., Ernst, S., 1993. Alpha and beta adrenergic receptor involvement in catecholamineinduced growth of gram negative bacteria. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 190, 447 452. Lyte, M., Arulanandam, B.P., Frank, C.D., 1996. Production of shiga-like toxins by Escherichia coli O157:H7 can be influenced by the neuroendocrine hormone norepinephrine. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 128, 392 398.

Animal welfare and food safety in modern animal production

105

Lyte, M., Arulanandam, B., Nguyen, K., Frank, C., Erickson, A., Francis, D., 1997. Norepinephrine induced growth and expression of virulence associated factors in enterotoxigenic and enterohemorrhagic strains of Escherichia coli. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 412, 331 339. Lyte, M., Vulchanova, L., Brown, D.R., 2011. Stress at the intestinal surface: catecholamines and mucosa-bacteria interactions. Cell Tissue Res. 343, 323 332. Marg, H., Scholz, H.C., Arnold, T., Rosler, U., Hensel, A., 2001. Influence of long-time transportation stress on re-activation of Salmonella typhimurium DT104 in experimentally infected pigs. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. 114, 385 388. Marin, C., Lainez, M., 2009. Salmonella detection in feces during broiler rearing and after live transport to the slaughterhouse. Poult. Sci. 88, 1999 2005. Marketon, J.I.W., Glaser, R., 2008. Stress hormones and immune function. Cell. Immunol. 252, 16 26. Marques-Deak, A., Cizza, G., Sternberg, E., 2005. Brain-immune interactions and disease susceptibility. Molec. Psych. 10, 239 250. Martin-Pelaez, S., Martin-Orue, S.M., Perez, J.F., Fabrega, E., Tibau, J., Gasa, J., 2008. Increasing feed withdrawal and lairage times prior to slaughter decreases the gastrointestinal tract weight but favours the growth of cecal Enterobacteriaceae in pigs. Livestock Sci. 119, 70 76. Martin-Pelaez, S., Peralta, B., Creus, E., Dalmau, A., Velarde, A., Perez, J.F., Mateu, E., Martin-Orue, S.M., 2009. Different feed withdrawal times before slaughter influence caecal fermentation and faecal Salmonella shedding in pigs. Vet. J. 182, 469 473. McCuddin, Z.P., Carlson, S.A., Sharma, V.K., 2008. Experimental reproduction of bovine Salmonella encephalopathy using a norepinephrine-based stress model. Vet. J. 175, 82 88. McDonald, T.T., Monteleone, I., Fantini, M.C., Monteleone, G., 2011. Regulation of homeostasis and inflammation in the intestine. Gastroenterology. 140, 1768 1775. McEwen, B.S., 2015. Biomarkers for assessing population and individual health and disease related to stress and adaptation. Metabol. Clin. Exp. 64, S2 S10. Miniham, D., O’Mahony, M., Whyte, P., Collins, J.D., 2003. An investigation on the effect of transport and lairage on the faecal shedding prevalence of Escherichia coli O157 in cattle. J. Vet. Med. B Infect. Diseases. 50, 378 382. Minton, J.E., 1994. Function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the sympathetic nervous system in models of acute stress in domestic farm animals. J. Anim. Sci. 72, 1891 1898. Mitlohner, F.M., Morrow, J.L., Dailey, J.W., Wilson, S.C., Galyean, M.L., Miller, M.F., McGlone, J.J., 2001. Shade and water misting effects on behavior, physiology, performance, and carcass traits of heat-stressed feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 79, 2327 2335. Monnikes, H., Tebbe, J.J., Hildebrandt, M., Arck, P., Osmanoglou, E., Rose, M., Klapp, B., Wiedenmann, B., Heymann-Monnikes, I., 2001. Role of stress in functional gastrointestinal disorders. Evidence for stress-induced alterations in gastrointestinal motility and sensitivity. Digest. Diseases. 19, 201 211. Moon, H.W., Fung, P.Y., Isaacson, R.E., Booth, G.D., 1979. Effects of age, ambient temperature, and heat-stable Escherichia coli enterotoxin on intestinal transit in infant mice. Infect. Immun. 25, 127 132. Mora, F., Segovia, G., del Arco, A., de Blas, M., Garrido, P., 2012. Stress, neurotransmitters, costicosterone and body-brain integration. Brain Res. 1476, 71 85. Moreira, C.G., Russell, R., Mishra, A.A., Narayanan, S., Ritchie, Waldor, M.K., Curtis, M. M., Winter, S.E., Weinschenker, D., Sperandio, V., 2016. Bacterial adrenergic sensors regulate virulence of enteric pathogens in the gut. MBio. 7, e00826-16. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/mBio.00826-16.

106

Advances in Agricultural Animal Welfare

Mormede, P., Andanson, S., Auperin, B., Beerda, B., Guemene, D., Malmkvist, J., Manteca, X., Manteuffel, G., Prunet, P., van Reenen, C.G., Richard, S., Veissier, I., 2007. Exploration of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function as a tool to evaluate animal welfare. Physiol. Behav. 92, 317 339. Mostl, E., Palme, R., 2002. Hormones as indicators of stress. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 23, 67 74. Mughini-Gras, L., Enserink, R., Friesema, I., Heck, M., van Duynhoven, van Pelt, W., 2014. Risk factors for human salmonelosis originating from pigs, cattle, broiler chickens and egg laying hens: a combined case-control and source attribution analysis. PLoS One 9, e87933. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087933. Mulder, R.W.A.W., 1995. Impact of transport and related stresses on the incidence and extent of human pathogens in pigmeat and poultry. J. Food Safety. 15, 239 246. Nattress, F.M., Murray, A.C., 2000. Effect of antemortem feeding regimes on bacterial numbers in the stomachs and ceca of pigs. J. Food Protect. 63, 1253 1257. Papenfort, K., Bassler, B.L., 2016. Quorum sensing signal-response systems in Gramnegative bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 576 588. Patrick, M.E., Christiansen, L.E., Waino, M., Ethelberg, S., Madsen, H., Wegener, H.C., 2004. Effects of climate on incidence of Campylobacter spp. in humans and prevalence in broiler flocks in Denmark. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 7474 7480. Pires, A.F., Funk, J.A., Manuzon, R., Darr, M., Zhao, L., 2013. Longitudinal study to evaluate the association between thermal environment and Salmonella shedding in a Midwestern US swine farm. Prevent. Vet. Med. 112, 128 137. Quinteiro-Filho, W.M., Ribeiro, A., Ferraz-de-Paula, V., Pinheiro, M.L., Sakai, M., Sa´, L.R., et al., 2010. Heat stress impairs performance parameters, induces intestinal injury, and decreases macrophage activity in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 89, 1905 1914. Ramirez, G.A., Sarlin, L.L., Caldwell, D.J., Yezak Jr, C.R., Hume, M.E., Corrier, D.E., Deloach, J.R., Hargis, B.M., 1997. Effect of feed withdrawal on the incidence of Salmonella in the crops and ceca of market age broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 76, 654 656. Rastall, R.A., 2004. Bacteria in the gut: friends and foes and how to alter the balance. J. Nutrit. 134, 2022S 2026S. Rauw, W.M., Kanis, E., Noordhuizen-Stassen, E.N., Grommers, F.J., 1998. Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livestock Product. Sci. 56, 15 33. Reich, F., Atanassova, V., Haunhorst, E., Klein, G., 2008. The effects of Campylobacter numbers in caeca on the contamination of broiler carcasses with Campylobacter. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 127, 116 120. Reicks, A.L., Brashears, M.M., Adams, K.D., Brooks, J.C., Blanton, J.R., Miller, M.F., 2007. Impact of transportation of feedlot cattle to the harvest facility on the prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and total aerobic microorganisms on hides. J. Food Protect. 70, 17 21. Reid, C.A., Avery, S.M., Warriss, P., Buncic, S., 2002. The effect of feed withdrawal on Escherichia coli shedding in beef cattle. Food Control. 13, 393 398. Renter, D.G., Smith, D.R., King, R., Stilborn, R., Berg, J., Berezowski, J., McFall, M., 2008. Detection and determinants of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Alberta feedlot pens immediately prior to slaughter. Can. J. Vet. Res. 72, 217 227. Richards, J.D., Gong, J., de Lange, C.F.M., 2005. The gastrointestinal microbiota and its role in monogastric nutrition and health with emphasis on pigs: current understanding, possible modulations, and new technologies for ecological studies. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 85, 421 435.

Animal welfare and food safety in modern animal production

107

Ritter, M.J., Ellis, M., Bertelsen, C.R., Bowman, R., Brinkmann, J., Dedecker, J.M., et al., 2007. Effects of distance moved during loading and floor space on the trailer during transport on losses of market weight pigs on arrival at the packing plant. J. Anim. Sci. 85, 3454 3461. Romero, L.M., Platts, S.H., Schoech, S.J., Wada, H., Crespi, E., Martin, L.B., Buck, C.L., 2015. Understanding stress in the healthy animal potential paths for progress. Stress. 18, 491 497. Rostagno, M.H., 2009. Can stress in farm animals increase food safety risk? Foodborne Pathog. Disease. 6, 767 776. Rostagno, M.H., Hurd, H.S., McKean, J.D., Ziemer, C.J., Gailey, J.K., Leite, R.C., 2003. Preslaughter holding environment in pork plants is highly contaminated with Salmonella enterica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 4489 4494. Rostagno, M.R., Hurd, H.S., McKean, J.D., 2005. Resting pigs on transport trailers as an intervention strategy to reduce Salmonella enterica prevalence at slaughter. J. Food Protect. 68, 1720 1723. Saunders, P.R., Santos, J., Nanssen, N.P., Yates, D., Groot, J.A., Perdue, M.H., 2002. Physical and psychological stress in rats enhances colonic epithelial permeability via peripheral CRH. Digest. Diseases Sci. 47, 208 215. Scherer, K., Szabo, I., Rosler, U., Appel, B., Hensel, A., Nockler, K., 2008. Time course of infection with Salmonella typhimurium and its influence on fecal shedding, distribution in inner organs, and antibody response in fattening pigs. J. Food Protect. 71, 699 705. Selye, H., 1976. Forty years of stress research: principal remaining problems and misconceptions. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 115, 53 56. Slimen, I.B., Najar, T., Ghram, A., Abdrrabba, M., 2016. Heat stress effects on livestock: molecular, cellular and metabolic aspects, a review. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutrit. 100, 401 412. Spencer, H., Karavolos, M.H., Bulmer, D.M., Aldridge, P., Chhabra, S.R., Winzer, K., Williams, P., Khan, C.M., 2010. Genome-wide transposon mutagenesis identifies a role for host neuroendocrine stress hormones in regulating the expression of virulence genes in Salmonella. J. Bacteriol. 192, 714 724. Steinman, L., 2004. Elaborate interactions between the immune and nervous systems. Nat. Immunol. 5, 575 581. Stern, N.J., Clavero, M.R., Bailey, J.S., Cox, N.A., Robach, M.C., 1995. Campylobacter spp. in broilers on the farm and after transport. Poult. Sci. 74, 937 941. St-Pierre, N.R., Cobanov, B., Schnitkey, G., 2003. Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industries. J. Dairy Sci. 86, E52 E77. Tache, Y., Perdue, M.H., 2004. Role of peripheral CRF signalling pathways in stress-related alterations of gut motility and mucosal function. Neurogastroenterol. Motility. 16, 137 142. Tache, Y., Martinez, V., Million, M., Rivier, J., 1999. Corticotropin-releasing factor and the brain-gut motor response to stress. Can. J. Gastroenterol. 13, 18A 25A. Taub, D.D., 2008. Neuroendocrine interactions in the immune system. Cell. Immunol. 252, 1 6. Toscano, M.J., Stabel, T.J., Bearson, S.M.D., Bearson, B.L., Lay Jr, D.C., 2007. Cultivation of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium in a norepinephrine-containing medium alters in vivo tissue prevalence in swine. J. Exp. Anim. Sci. 43, 329 338. Uesaka, T., Young, H.M., Pachnis, V., Enomoto, H., 2016. Development of the intrinsic and extrinsic innervation of the gut. Dev. Biol. 417, 158 167.

108

Advances in Agricultural Animal Welfare

Van Der Fels-Klerx, H.J., Jacobs-Reitsma, W.F., Van Brakel, R., Van Der Voet, H., Van Asselt, E.D., 2008. Prevalence of Salmonella in the broiler supply chain in The Netherlands. J. Food Protect. 71, 1974 1980. Vecerek, V., Grbalova, S., Voslarova, E., Janackova, B., Malena, M., 2006. Effects of travel distance and the season of the year on death rates of broilers transported to poultry processing plants. Poult. Sci. 85, 1881 1884. Venegas-Vargas, C., Henderson, S., Khare, A., Mosci, R.E., Lenert, J.D., Singh, P., Ouellette, L.M., Norby, B., Funk, J.A., Rust, S., Bartlett, P.C., Grooms, D., Manning, S. D., 2016. Factors associated with shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli shedding by dairy and beef cattle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 5049 5056. Wales, A., Breslin, M., Carter, B., Sayers, R., Davies, R., 2007. A longitudinal study of environmental Salmonella contamination in caged and free-range layer flocks. Avian Pathol. 36, 187 197. Wang, S.X., Wu, W.C., 2005. Effects of psychological stress on small intestinal motility and bacteria and mucosa in mice. World J. Gastroenterol. 11, 2016 2021. Wang, Y., Kasper, L.H., 2014. The role of microbiome in central nervous system disorders. Brain Behav. Immun. 38, 1 12. Warriss, P.D., 2003. Optimal lairage times and conditions for slaughter pigs: a review. Vet. Record. 153, 170 176. Wesley, I.V., Muraoka, W.T., Trampel, D.W., Hurd, H.S., 2005. Effect of preslaughter events on prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in market-weight turkeys. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 2824 2831. Wesley, I.V., Rostagno, M.H., Hurd, H.S., Trampel, D.W., 2009. Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in market-weight turkeys. J. Food Protect. 72, 43 48. White, H.M., Richert, B.T., Schinckel, A.P., Burgess, J.R., Donkin, S.S., Latour, M.A., 2008. Effects of temperature stress on growth performance and bacon quality in grow-finish pigs housed at two densities. J. Anim. Sci. 86, 1789 1798. Whyte, P., Collins, J.D., McGill, K., Monahan, C., O’Mahony, H., 2001. The effect of transportation stress on excretion rates of campylobacters in market-age broilers. Poult. Sci. 80, 817 820. Williams, C.L., Villar, R.G., Peterson, J.M., Burks, T.F., 1988. Stress-induced changes in intestinal transit in the rat: a model for irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 94, 611 621. Williams Jr, L.P., Newell, K.W., 1970. Salmonella excretion in joy-riding pigs. Am. J. Public Health. 60, 926 929. Woerner, D.R., Ransom, J.R., Sofos, J.N., Dewell, G.A., Smith, G.C., Salman, M.D., Belk, K.E., 2006. Determining the prevalence of Escherichia coli O157 in cattle and beef from the feedlot to the cooler. J. Food Protect. 69, 2824 2827. Young, I., Rajic, A., Wilhelm, B.J., Waddell, L., Parker, S., McEwen, S.A., 2009. Comparison of the prevalence of bacterial enteropathogens, potentially zoonotic bacteria and bacterial resistance to antimicrobials in organic and conventional poultry, swine and beef production: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol. Infect. 137, 1217 1232. Zhu, X.Y., Joerger, R.D., 2003. Composition of microbiota in content and mucus from cecae of broiler chickens as measured by fluorescent in situ hybridization with group-specific, 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. Poult. Sci. 82, 1242 1249. Ziemssen, T., Kern, S., 2007. Psychoneuroimmunology cross-talk between the immune and nervous systems. J. Neurol. 254, II/8 II/11.