Six Midwest IOUs form ISO

Six Midwest IOUs form ISO

T H E IN NEWS F 0 C U S systems. “Although FERC’s [open IS0 puts a wolf in care of the Centerior Energy Corp., CINergy access rulemaking]...

254KB Sizes 0 Downloads 24 Views

T

H

E

IN

NEWS

F

0

C

U

S

systems. “Although FERC’s [open

IS0 puts a wolf in care of the

Centerior Energy Corp., CINergy

access rulemaking] has moved

sheep.”

Corp., Detroit Edison Co., North-

the nation’s transmission net-

Williamson told The EZectricit>/

ern Indiana Public Service Co.

works substantially closer to a

Journal that his company decided

and Wisconsin Electric Power

competitive, open-access regime,

to advocate the “D-word”--dives-

Co. Together, the companies own

MGE believes a truly competitive

titure-as

bulk power system requires com-

ence on a task force in the state

voltage transmission in portions

plete divestiture of transmission

studying restructuring. That led

of Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan,

facilities by all electric utilities and

to a recent proposal from the state

Ohio, Tennessee, Wisconsin, West

other entities owning generation

regulators on the subject. “The

Virginia, and Virginia. The group

or distribution facilities,” David

more we discussed the problem

says it is open to anyone who

Mebane, MGE chairman, said in

of the potential for gaming the

owns or controls transmission in

a letter to the federal regulators.

transmission system, the more

the East Central Area Reliability

MGE said its request was prompted by the debate over how

a result of his experi-

38,830 miles of combined high-

convinced I became that this is the

Council (ECAR) and the Mid-

only way to avoid market power.”

America Interconnected

Net-

work (MAIN).

to define the role of the inde-

T

pendent system operator. MGE says the transmission system

he utilities will form working groups to develop proto-

should be organized on a regional

cols covering operations, admini-

basis in which the operator would:

stration, planning, pricing,

l

management and dispute resolu-

Provide all users with open

access and grid-wide pricing on

tion. Ownership of the transmis-

terms and conditions equivalent

sion facilities will not transfer to

to transmission owners;

the ISO, but will stay with the

l

utilities that now own the lines.

Eliminate incentives and op-

The group says it “is likely that

portunities to constrain the system in favor of a local generator’s

management of the IS0 will re-

market power;

port directly to a board of direc-

l

tors, whose membership will rep-

Provide workable ways to

eliminate transmission con-

Six Midwest IOUs Fovm IS0

resent balanced and diverse

ehold the super-ISO. Six Mid-

B

director of electric operations, told

western investor-owned utili-

Electricity Daily that details of gov-

straints; and l

Allocate costs to users equita-

bly

interests.” Jose Delgado, Wepco

“If access to transmission networks is shared without divesti-

ties yesterday said they have

ernance have not been worked

agreed to pursue an independent

out, but “we intended governance

ture of ownership, as suggested

operation of an open transmission

to be balanced among the users of

by all other proposals, transmis-

system covering more than

the network.”

sion owners will face irresistible

100,000 square miles. The organi-

temptations to favor affiliated dis-

zation will be known as the Mid-

Delgado says the super-IS0 will offer two benefits. First, he said,

tributors and generators over

west Independent

“is an independent organization

nonaffiliated providers,” says

tor.

Mark Williamson,

MGE senior

System Opera-

The utilities signing the memo-

that will, beyond suspicion, offer open, comparable access on a fair

vice president for energy services.

randum of understanding are

and equitable basis.” As impor-

“Even the slightest interest in an

American Electric Power Co.,

tant, he said, the group will bring “a large regional overview to im-

T

H

E

NEWS

IN

F

0

What needs to happen next, Del-

prove reliability of the network.” He said that with the current sys-

gado said, “is to put meat on the

tern, “It is difficult to know who is

bones.” There are many technical

C

U

S

these independent system operators are truly independent.” Details of the new IS0 structure

doing what to whom. Things can

issues that need to be worked out,

likely will be submitted to the

get very dicey”

he said, including the “mechanics

Federal Energy Regulatory Com-

of how to relate” to existing con-

mission late this year, and will be

may end up looking very much

trol areas. “For a system as large

implemented in stages once FERC

like what people have been call-

as the one we are talking about,

gives the group a green light.

ing a “regional transmission

we need to decide what kind of

group. ” “If you look at what it

control centers we need, and that

will be doing, an RTG just may

sort of issue.”

Delgado notes that the new IS0

DOE Backs New Solar/H2 Production, Storage Zchnology

The American Public Power

not be necessary. Concepts are evolving at such speed in this in-

Association’s Dave Penn com-

dustry.”

mented, “I understand that the

Although the new IS0 so far in-

A

tiny Star Wars spin-off thinks it has come up with a way to

market is driving this, but I hope

overcome one of solar energy’s

eludes only IOUs, Delgado said

these institutions are not devel-

chief drawbacks-the

that there is no intent to exclude

oped strictly by IOUs. We need

storing it-and

public power. “This is not in-

state and federal regulators to be

of Energy is putting $2.5 million

tended to be an IOU organization,

really involved to be sure that

into the technology for a demon-

but a network organization.”

+

M

E

E

T

difficulty of

the Department

stration. The technology also of-

IN

Conference

G Date

S

0

F

Place

INTEREST Sponsor

Q Contact

Hydropower: Capturing the Competitive Edge

Mar. 19-22

Washington, DC.

National Hydropower Association

(202) 383-2530

PowerFair ‘96: A Conference & Trade Show for the Electricity and Natural Gas Industries

Mar. 25-27

New Orleans, LA

Enerdata Ltd.

(905) 470-0117

Innovative Electricity Pricing: Managing The Transition to Market-Based Pricing

Mar. 27-29

San Dlego, CA

EPRI, EEI, Southern California Edison and Tabors, Caramanis & Assoc.

(415) 8558763

The Virtual Utility: Accounting, Technology, & Competitive Aspects of the Emerging Industry

Mar. 31 -Apr. 2

Niagara Mohawk, CSC Index, NYSERDA, Rensselaer (Host)

(518) 276-6751

Utilrty Strategic Marketing Conference: Shaping the Competitive Environment

Apr. 17-18

Orlando, FL

Electric Power Research Institute, Synergic Resources Corp., XENERGY Inc.

@lo) 667-2’60

The Risk Management Institute: Hedging Strategies & Derivatives in the Energy Industry

Apr. 22-26

White Plains, NY

INFOCAST

(818) 609-9145

9th Annual Pricing Conference

Apr. 23-26

Chicago, IL

The Pricing Institute

(800) 999-3123

Wheeling and Dealing: Opportunities and Challenges in the New Electric Industry

Apr. 25-26

Chicago, IL

Center for Regulatory Studies and Institute of Government and Public Affairs

(309) 438-3765

Energy Services Marketing

Apr. 25-26

Cambridge, MA

INFOCAST

(818) 609-9145

Strategic Issues for Power Marketers

May 2-3

Houston, TX

INFOCAST, ENRON, Electric Clearinahouse. Inc.

(818) 609-9145

Legal Challenges for Today’s Utilities

May 6-7

Washington, DC.

Reid & Priest, INFOCAST

(818) 609-9145

March 1996

Saratoga Springs’ NY

7