U.S. Geological survey standards—I. Additional data on rocks G-1 and W-1, 1965–1967

oeochimica et Cosmochimica Acts, 1969,Vol. 33,pp. 65 to 79. PergamonPress. Printedin NorthernIreland

U.S. Geological survey standards-I. Additional data on rocks G-l and W-l, 1965-1967* MYICHAEL U.S. Geological

FLEISCHER

Survey, Washington,

D.C. 20242

(Received 23 August 1968; accepted 27 August Abstract---Analyses of samples G-l and W-l made between “best values” for many elements are suggested.

1968)

19651967

have been collected and

on these two well-known rocks have previously been summarized by FAIRet al. (1951), STEVENS et al. (1960), FLEISCHER and STEVENS (1962) and FLEISCHER (1965). An extensive review of the data in Russian has also been published (KABANOVA, 1965), and a statistical study by SCHINDLER (1966). The present report brings the data up to date ; the references include some papers previously missed and some for which the data had previously been listed from private communications. A recent paper by KLEEMAN (1967) discusses sampling error in the chemical analysis of rocks and concludes that G-l and W-l as originally prepared (to pass 80 mesh) were too coarse to serve as reference standards. Table 1 lists recommended values for the major constituents of the rocks. Table 2 DATA

BAIRN

Table

1. Recommended la

SiO, Al&‘, Fe& Fe0 MgC cao Na,O K,C H,O+ H,OTiO, pzo, Mu0 CO* Others SUIll (0 = F,) sum Total Fe as Fe&, I

G-l 2s

values for major constituents of G-l lb

3s

and W-l

W-l 2b

3b

52.58 14.94 1.38 8.71 6.52 10.92 2.15 0.63 0.45 0.08 1.08 0.14 0.17 0.07 0.196.t

52.64 14.85 1.40 8.72 6.62 10.96 2.15 0.64 0.53 0.16 1.07 0.14 0.17 0.06 -

72.64 14.04 0.87 0.98 0.41 1.39 3.32 5.45 0.34 0.06 0.26 0.09 0.03 0.08

72.52 14.08 0.85 0.94 0.35 1.36 3.29 5.52 0.25 0.02 0.26 0.09 0.026 0.08 0.292*

72.64 14.04 0.87 0.96 0.38 1.39 3.32 5.48 0.34 0.06 0.26 0.09 0.03 0.07

52.64 14.85 1.41 8.74 6.62 10.96 2.07 0.64 0.53 0.16 1.07 0.14 0.16 0.05 -

99.96

99.93 0.03

99.93

100.04 -

100.02 0.01

100.11 -

99.96

99.90

99.93

100.04

100.01

100~11

1.96

1.90

1.94

11.17

11.10

11.03

la and lb-FLEISCHER and STEVENS (1962). 2a and 2b-INQAMELLS and SUER (1963). 3a and Sb-This paper. * Trace elements, mainly ZrO, 0.028, F 0.07, BaO 0.12, SrO 0.031, Rb,O 0.024%. t Trace elements, mainly ZrO, 0.022, F 0.03, Cr,O, 0.016, V,O, 0.045, CuO 0.014, ZnO 0.015, SrO 0.021%.

* Publication 6

approved

by the Director, U.S. Geological 65

Survey.

0.014, BaO

1.89

1.73

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.82

100~00

0.04

0.07

0.24

-

0.67

6.60

3.44

1.12

-

2.03

1.90

99.73

0.02

-

-

0.09

0.28

0.06

0.42

6.45

3.33

1.38

0.38

0.93

0.87

14.12

72.41

6

0.09

0.26

-

0.48

6,42

3.34

1.33

0.34

0.96

0.78

14.26

72.47

4

1.98

-

0.03

0.07

0.22

-

-

6.44

3.45

1.23

0.38

0.91

0.96

14.32

72.35

6

-

-

1.96

-

0.02

0.09

0.26

0.06

1.96

-

0.02

0.10

0.26

0.03

-

-

-

-

1.36

1.39

0.38

-

-

14.17 -

0.41

8 72.56

-

14.04

72.64

7

1.90

-

0.03

0.07

0.27

0.03

-

-

-

1.30

0.36

-

-

14.09

72.64

9

1.4

-

-

1.99

-

1.90

-

-

0.27 0.08

-

-

-

-

-

1.9

-

1.71

-

-

-

-

0.25

-

-

6.00

3.36

1.43

-

-

-

5.40

3.26

0.39

0.39

-

-

-

13.7

72.8

13

-

72.9

12

13.9 -

14.29

72.6

11

-

-

5.44

3.37

1.62

0.47

-

-

14.28

72.13

10

2. New analyses of G-l

2.02

-

-

-

0.25

-

-

6.42

3.25

1.41

0.39

-

-

13.94

72.86

14

6.46

-

2.07

1.81

0.019

0.03

0.19 -

-

1.95

0.03

-

0.26

-

-

-

-

1.40

0.40

1.37

0.36

0.23

-

-

6.60

3.33

1.44

0.41

1.88

0.03

-

0.27

-

-

6.48

-

1.36

0.39

-

-

-

-

1.69

0.01

0.07

0.20

0.06

-

5.20

3.42

1.32

0.44

0.93

0.68

14.00 -

-

72

-

71.4

-

14.20

72.85

72.53

19

14.30

18 72.45

17

15

16

13.93

15

ARMICHAEL(1967), them.; 2. LANQMYRHand GBAFF (1965), them., IW. of 10; 3. Rodolfo Creapi. quoted by SCHIAVMATO (1966), chem.; 4. J. Muysson, quoted by REILLY rtnd 1967), rapid them.; 5. G. Pruden quoted by B~owx (1966), repid them., &v. of 2-4 analyses; 6. SCHNETZLERrendPINSON (1964), rapid them., &v. of many analyses; 7-9. MAYNE wet. them., rapid ohem.; 9. semi-k cm, EW.of 2; 10. FALCHI and TONANI (1964). rapid chem., semi-micro; 11. THOMASand MALIK (1966), calorimetric, &v. of many analyses on dried 110’; U-13. LA~ACHE (1966); 12. wet ohem; 13. spectrographic; 14-15. ROUBAULT(1964); 14. chem; 15. spectrographic; 16. ATAMAN (1963), spectrographic; 17. HORNUNG X-ray flu~r~~n~e; 18. MAJUUNDAR (1968), X-my fluorescence; 19. M&nnmDAR (1968), colorimetrio.

‘8

‘e

6.06

6.68

0.034

3.27

3.27

0.03

1.27

1.37

0.237

0.39

0.37

0.071

1.37

0.96

0.96

0.27

0.29

0.66

0.82

0.10

14.48

13.81

14.06

0.57

72.21

72.73

72.48

3

2

1

Table

c E:

r

:

$

11.11

&s Fe*O,

-

11.31

Sum Total Fe

as FepO,

11.20

11-30

11.18

16 64.50 18~00 6.7 11.60 l-96 0.60 1.19 11.8

lb

62.70 14.70 -

6.6 Il.00 2.00 0.63 -

1.10 -

-

11.3

14

b2.40 l&l0 -

-

1.08 0.17 0.16

-

11.10

t Includes CO, 0.06.

100*13*

99.64

o-13 1.11 0.14 0.17

99.78

0.12 1.10 0.14 0.13

52.41 14.81 1.60 8.64 6.76 IO.83 2.25 0.64 0.63

61.64 lb.37 1.17 9.07 6.30 10.92 2.24 0.66 0.79

62.39 14s5 l-59 8.68 6.21 11.35 2.26 0.62 0.61

0.00 1.01 0.18 o-33

4

3

2

18 52.85 14.80 6.bb 10.90 2.08 0.60 0.97 o-17 11.47

62.69 14.72 6.63 10.96 2.00 O-63 1.10 0.165 11.73

11.06

00.67

0.12 1.09 0. X6 0.18

17

ll*OO

-

1.08 0.13 0.17

-

1.14 G6 -

1.07 ;6 11.17

1.05 &6 -

1.07 0.172 10.93

IO*80

6.30 11.30 0.64 -

6.64 11.30 -

6.92 10.35 0.61 -

62.00 16.00 -

62.30 14.43 -

6.62 10.96 2+7 0.64 -

20

19

22

11.12

11.09

53.19 lb.00 -

-

-

21

-

11.16

1.07 0.14 0.16

62.65 14.85 6.62 IO.96 0.16 -

52.66 lb.36 6.47 IO.63 2.29 O-61 -

1.05 0.12 -

10

9

62.64 14.8b -

-

1-I 0.13 0.18

99*71t

1.10 0.14 -

b2.6 lb.2 8.65 6.8 IO.8 2.2 0.64 -

62.27 14.87 1.44 8.76 6.66 10*89 2.19 0.60 ( 0.76

62.52 14.76 1*62

63.09 lb.02 le.54 8.55 6.68 10.81 2.26 0.77 8.57 6.63 10.84 2.08 0.86 0.55

8

7

6

6

11.21

-

0.98 0.18

11.14

-

0.05 1.10 0.13 0.16

24 62.60 lb.10 1.43 8.74 6.89 10.40 2.10 0.64 -

23

10.97

11.09

52.66 14.90 6.75 11.00 0.69 -

-

1.08 o-13 O-16 -

1.08 0.15 0.15

12 62.78 14.96 6.61 10.90 0.14 -

11 52.70 14.87 _ 6.57 10.91 0.14 -

1. CARMICAAEL(1067), them.; 2. M. C. Gsstuche quoted by LDERSONNE (1967). them.; 3. Rodolfo Crespi quoted by SCBIAVINATO(1966), ohem.; 4. EENDE~~ON C.M.B. (1967), &v. of ssvoml analyses by wet chem. end rapid methods; 6. SCHNBTZLER rendPINSON (1964), a~. of many analyses, rapid chem; 6. G. PRUDEN, quoted by BROWN (1966), av. of 2-4 doterminations by rapid them.; 7. J. Muysson, quoted by REILLY and SHAW (1967), rapid c&m.; 8. HOUNSLOWand MOOBE (1966), av. of 3 analyses, rapid ohem.; 0. GRIBBLE (1967), rapid chem.; 10-12. MAYNES (1066); 10. wet cham.; 11-12. rapid ohem.; 12. a~. of 2 by semi-micro methods; 13. FALCIB and TON~NI (1964), rapid them., semimicro; 14. THOMASand MALIK (1966), av. of many calorimetric determinations on samples dried at 110”; lb-16. L~oaoaz (1966); 16. wet them.; 16. speotrogmphic; 17-18. ROUBAULF (1064); 17. ahem; 18. spectrographic; 10. ATAMAN /1963), spectrographic; 20. Homwxa (1963), X-ray fluorescence; 21. BALL (19661, X-my fkoresccnce; 22. KODABU et al. (1967), X-ray fluorewmoe; 23. MAJZDNDAR (1068), X-my ffuoresoence; 24. MAJ~~VD~R (1966), oolorimetrio.

-

6.93 IO*91 2.22 0.70 -

MgG C&O N&,0 KaG H,O+ HIO-

TiO, Pa% MnO

62.33 15‘07 -

SiO, AVJS FeaOa FcO

13

+ Includas CO, 0.11.

-

1.08 0. I4 0.18

-

b2.56 14.88 1.37 8.71 6.62 10.89 2.14 0.64 -

Sum Total Fe

Pa% MZlO

TiO,

H,O-

W H,O+

WO cao Ni%,O

SiO, A&% I%% Fe0

1

Table 3. New analyses of W-1

MICHAEL

68

FLEISCHER

gives the new analyses for major constituents of G-1, Table 3 for W-l. Table 4 lists new determinations of individual major elements, Table 5 new determinations of trace elements. It will be noted that the new determinations have improved the situation for the elements of the rare earth group (except Ce and La), In, and Zn, but disagreement is still great for Ba, Ce, F, and La, and the new determinations of Cl are in marked disagreement. As in a previous compilation (FLEISCHER, 1965), values are recommended while others are considered to be magnitudes. Table 4. New determinations of major elements (Number of determinations in parentheses) Constituent SiO,

G-l 72.7, 72.33

W-l

(4

(2)

(51

62*5, 52.66

Reference

Method Photornetrio Photometric

MAY and ROWE (1965) C. Campigiio, quoted by

Chem.

,J.

SCHIAVINATO

72.13 Aws

14.20 14.08 14.15 13.9

(8) (2) (3) (10)

52.50 14.99 15.08 1.5~10 14.89

14.1014.07 1470 Fe0

(2) 14.86

1.01 -

-

(8)

NAA

(2) (3) (8)

Volum&.. Volumet . Volumot. Grav. GrlW. XRF AA NAA

MEBCY and SAUNDEBS EVANS (1967) KISS (1967) &ENCER (1966) VAx Loox? f 19661 Gxmx (196i) ’ Howm (1968) YULE (1966)

Volumet. V&mot. semimicro Potent. titration

UNCJETHitM

Spectrophot.

ff. Csajaghy, quoted by PANT0 (1965) VAN LOON (1966) EVANS (1967) KISS (1967) MERCY and SAUNDERS(1966)

-

8.90 8-70

(20)

s.76 Total FB as ‘W’s

1.89

(2)

l.SB 1.84 1.88

(3) (3) (6)

I.86 2‘11 1.89 2.12 2.22 I.94 MgO

C&O

0.41 ;:;

(7) (6)

11.14 X1.11 11.04 11.07

10.17 10.7 12.20

(2) (3)

0.38 0.39 0.35 0.38 041 0.35 032

(2)

1.49 1.36 1.22 1.42 1,29 1.35 1.39

(3)

(7) (4)

(3) (6) (4) (3)

(3) (4) (6)

11.16 11.12 10.87

6.70 6.65 6.28 6.71 6.67 6.83 6.64 6.63 6.58

(11) (6) -

Volumet. V&met. Volumet. Volumet. photomet. OS AA AA NAA NAA NAA. XRF

(2) (11) (4) (4)

-

(3) (8) (4)

(1966)

(1966)

SCEAZER (1966) KISS (1967)

(1968) ALTEAUS ( 1966) BELT (1967) AJUN end SEABANA (1967) GOBDONet at. (1967, 1968) No~ararr and HASKIN (1967) GUNs (1967) cEA3P

Volumat . GrlW. AA AA AA AA OS OS XRF

KINQ and PRUDEN (1967) ABDULLAEand RILEY (1966) SPENCER(1966) ALTHAWS(1966) NESBITT (1966) BELT (1967) WALSH and Howm (1967) CHAMP(1968) KINQ and PRUDEN (1967) GUNN (1967)

Volumet. Gl%V. OS AA AA AA XRF

SPENCER(1066) ’ CHAMP(1966) ALTHAWS(1966) BELT (1967) WALSH and Howrz (1967) GU~N (1967)

COlOl+.

(4)

10.84 10.87 11.06 10.98 :;:;;

(1966)

Muysson, quoted by REILLY and Saaw (1967) VINCENTtend V~LBORTH (1967)

52.63

’

U.S. Geological Survey stmdals-I

69

Table 4 (continued) Constituent

N8,O

(13)

2.18

(9)

Fl. Phot.

3.30

(20)

2.10 2.14 2.12 2.12 2.06

(20) (10) (10)

Fl. Phot. Fl. Phot. AA AA NAA NAA NAA NAA

5.53 5.47

-

5.52 5.48 5.38 5.52 5.06 TiO,

(7) (7)

(13)

0.63

(9)

Fl. Phot.

(20)

0.65 0.64 0.63 0.64 0.67 0.60

(20)

Fl. Phot. Fl. Phot. FL Phot. XRF AA AA NAA

(2)

(7)

0.225

MnO

(4)

(10)

Speotrophot. XRF OS OS OS OS OS

1.03 1.03 l-08* 0.90 1.03

(2)

0.09 0.085 0.08 0.088

(2) (5) (16)

0.029

(2)

0.15 0.146 0.12 0.119

(7)

0.025 0.032 0.027 0.021 0.023 -

(4)

0.0719

(3)

(5) (4) (4) -

0.172

NAA

(10)

-

0.177 0.170 0.167 0.172 0.0581

Color. NAA NAA NAA Speotrophot.

-

0.181 0.162 0.176 0.180 0.189 0.129 0.169 0.176 0.199 0.19 0.174 0.15 0.161

EA Spectrophot.

0.14

0.027 0.031 0.031 0.027 0.028 -

CC,

-

1.17 1.39 I.23

0.08

0.035 0.027 0.035 0.027 0.031 0.022 0.018

(2)

-

0.193* 0.24 0.222 0.284

-

2.26 2.08

0.27 0.22 0.222 0.22

P,C,

Method

3.41

3.17 3.34 3.19 3.54 3.23 3.19

‘W

W-l

G-l

(3) (6)

(30)

Spectrophot. XRF XRF AA AA AA OS OS OS OS OS OS OS NAA NAA NAA NAA NAA NAA NAA Thermal conductivity

Referenoe G. Csajaghy quoted by PANTO (1965) GOVINDARAJ~(1966) CARYICHAEL (1967) ALTHAUS (1966) BELT (1967) BRUNFELT and STEINNES (1966) YULE (1966) GORDONet al. (1967, 1968) STUEBER and GOLES (1967) G. Csajaghy quoted by PANTO (1966) G~~IN~AR~J~ (1966) CAREICEAEL (1967) INCIAMELLSet al. (1967) 1NoAMELLS et al. (1967) ALTHAUS (1966) BELT (1967) GORDON et a.?.(1967, 1968) 0. Cmjjaghy quoted by PANTO (1965) cAk&WEL (1967) CEAMP (1968) MOXIIAM (1965) NICHOL and HENDERSONHAMILTON (1966) REILLY and SHAW (1967) MAJMUIIDAR (1968) V~I LOON and PARISSIS ( 1968) KIM snd MEINKE (1963a) ATHAVALE et al. (1966) G. Csajaghy quoted by Pmmo (1965) INOAMELLS (1966) BEUNFELT and STEINNES (1968) GREENLAND (1967) HENDERSON P. (1967) G. Csajsghy quoted by PANTO (1966) ABDULLAE (1968) CAEEICHAEL (1967) MAJMUNDAR (1968) ALTEAUS (1966) BELT (1967) HOWIE (1968) MOXRAM (1966) NICHOL and HENDEBSONHAMILTON (1966) SIQHINOLPI (1966) GILES (1967) REILLY and SHAW (1967) CHAMP (1968) MAJMUNDAR (1968) BENDER et al. ( 1966) BRUNFELT and STEIEEES (1966) YULE (1966) COBB (1967) GOEDON et al. (1967, 1968) STUEBER end GOLES (1967) JOHANSEN and STEINNES (1968) THOMAS and HIEPTJE (1966)

AA = Atomic absorption spectrophotometry, Fl. Phot. = flame photometry, NAA = neutron sotivation, OS = optical spectrogmphy, XRF = X-ray fluorescence. * Given ss % Ti, taken &s ‘A TiO,

70

MICHAEL

FLEISCHER

Table 5. Minor elements in G-l and W-l (ppm) (Number of determinations parentheses) Element

&

As

AU

B

Be

Be

By Cd

Ce

G-l

W-l

Method

in

Reference

CHAMP(1968) OS 0.08(10) ALIAN and SHABANA (1967) NAA 0.024(6) BRUNFELT and STEINNEP(1968s) NAA 0.068(a) The averages 0.04 and 0.05 of the neutron s&v&on analyses are recommended HANAQUCHIand ONUMA (1967) NAA 279 074(2) NICHOLLSet a.?. (1967) 2.38 The values 0.8 and 2.4 are recommended NAA BEARDSLEYet al. (1966) 0.011 FA-NAA ROWE and SIMON (1968) 0.0029(7) 0.0045(7) MILLARD and MCLANE (1968) NAA 0.0019 0.0034 NAA MILLARDet al. (1968) 0.0026 0.0035 The magnitudes 0.006 and 0.005 see retained MILLS (1966) 1.56 11.1 2 STANTONand MCDONALD (1966) 12 ATAMANand BESNUS (1966) 20 MOXHAM (1966) 19(6) KULBIC~I (1966) H%(4) TENNANT (1967) 15 <1 CHAMP (1968) 1.4(10) 7.5(10) The magnitudes I.6 aud 15 a~‘esuggested 1200(2) GrSW. INQAMELLS et al. (1967) 200 ENGEL et al. (1966) OS 206 f 6(2) OS 165 ATAMAN and BESNUS (1966) OS GARSON (1966) 167 OS KULBICKI (1966) 140(4) 1125 163 OS SIQHINOLFI (1966) 1255 OS 210 SPENCER(1966) OS 1200 160 INOAMEIU et al. (1967) 1150 INQAMELLSet al. (1967) 187 OS, spssk solution 1270 OS 160 GILES (1967) OS 166 GRIBBLE (1967) 1850(3) OS 229(3) REILLY and SEAW (1967) 1100(10) OS CHAMP( 1968) 170(10) 1200 200 XRF BALL (1966) 200 XRF CaRmCEAEL ( 1967) 1276(2) MS ZOO(Z) TAYLOR (1965) 146 MS NICHOLLSet al. (1967) 1039(3) ID 168(2) SCHNETZLER et al. (1967s) 1190 ID IN~A~ELLS et al. (1967) Agreement is still poor; the magnitudes 1200 and 180 sre retailed OS ENCJELet al. (1966) <2 1.7(B) OS MOXHAM (1966) 2 OS SPENCER (1966) 3.1(3) OS l%?(3) REILLY and SHAW (1967) OS CHAWP (1968) <3(10) The magnitudes 3 and 0.8 &yeretained 0.13 0.4 NAA REED and ALLEN (1966) This value for G-l disegrees with previous results 0.003(Z) 0.016(Z) Polerogr. WAHLER (1968) 0.22 Polarogr. BUTLER and THOMPSON(1967) 0.27 NAA BUTLERand THOMPSON(1967) The magnitudes 0.06 and 0.3 &yeretained 168 20.9 Color ALEKSIEVand BOYADJIEVA(1966) 160 OS TENNANTand FELLOWS (1967) 143.6(2) 20.0(Z) XRF ALEKSIEVand BOYADJIEVA(1966) 30.0 XRF CARMICHAEL(1967) 297 f 6 NAA YULE (1966) 157 f 6 NAA COBB (1967) 171 f 16(2) 23(3) NAA BRUNFELT and ,%EWNES (1967~) 21* 2 INAA GORDON et al. (1967, 1968) 179; 29(3) 21.0 & 3.6(2) NAA TOWELL (1968) 0.05(10) 0.035(6)

U.S. Geological Survey stand&s--l Table 5 (continued) Element

G-l 166 173(2) 140(2) Agreement is still poor.

Cl

9%(3) 83(3) 130 1% -

W-l 24 23.6 23.8(3) 16(2) 17.7

Referenoe

Method NAA ID ID MS MS

TOMURA et al. (1968) T~oanas et a.2.(1986) SCENETZLERel al. (1987b) TAYLOR (1966) NICEOLLS et al. (1967)

The magnitudes 170 snd 23 sre suggested X91(3) 187(4) 270

Spectrophot. Speotrophot. OS(?)

26*6(2) 208(%)

NAA NAA

HuAE~ and JOHNS (1967) HUAN~ and JOBNS (1967) Wsdepohl, quoted by HUAN~ and JOHNS (1967) REED snd ALLEN f 1986) JOEANNS~ and STE~~EES (1967)

Agreement is very poor. New work is needed co

-

46 & 3 37

-

36(2) 40 33(8) 62

<5

(10

3 trsoe -

3 2.5 6 2.2(3) 2*27(6) l-9 f 0.3 2.112) -

46.6(4) 36.3 46 52 46 41(3) 38(10) 60 63 41*6(3) 63.7(6) 64 + 4 46 & 2 43(21 42

Spectrophot. OS OS OS OS OS OS OS OS :: OS OS OS XRF XRF NAA NAA NAA INAA INAA MS

RECK (1968) ATAMAE and kGSN’JS (1966) ENQEL eb at. (1966) GAR~ON (l%Sii) MOXHAM (1965) NICHOL and HENDERSOE-HAEILTON (1966) K~LSICKI (1966) S~EI~‘OLYI (1966) SPENCEX (1986) GILES (1987) GRIBBLX (1967) REILLY and SE&W (1967) CHAMP (1988) MAJMnEDA& (1968) BALL (1988) CAmfICHAEL (1967) I&UNFELT and STEINNEB (1966) ALIAN and SHABANA (19%7) STUEBER snd GOLES (1%%7) GORDON et al. (1967. 1%68) GREENLAND (1968) NICHOLLS et al. (1967)

Most of the spectrographic analyses on W- 1 srs still well below the neutron activation analyses. The values of 2.4 and 60 are retained ck

18 9

140 105 140 126(2) 138 148 146

COIOE OS OS OS OS OS OS

-

129 116 121 120 116 76(3) llO(10) 126 115 106 114(2) 99 f 6 130 f IO %3

OS OS OS OS OS OS OS OS XRF XRF A AS NAA

14.3 17 I9 43(10) 20 30 20 -

INAA

NAA MS

IN~AX(1966) TUEEKIAE (1963) ATAVAN and BESNUS (1965) ENGEL et al. (1965) GARSON (1965) MOXEAM (1966) NICHOL and HENDERSOEHAMILTON (1965) KULBICEI (1986) SIomNOLFI (1966) SPENCER (1988) GLLES (1967) GRIBBLE (1967) REILLY and SEAW (1967) GHAAMP(1988) MAJMUNDAB (1968) BALL (1988) GAR&UCEAEL( 1987) ALTHAUS (1968) BRUNFELT end STEINNES (19678) GORDON et al. (1967, 1968) STUEBEE and GOLES (1987) NICHOLLS et (61.( 1967)

The values of 22 and 120 &re retained cs

1.76(2)

O-8 1*06(2)

OS

XRF

GURNEY and ERLANK (1966)

MOUNTJOYand WAHLBERC (1968) -

MICHAEL FLEISCHER

72

Table Element

5 (continued)

W-l

G-l

-

1.0 1.43(3) 1.06(3) 0.83 1.44(Z) 0.94(2) 1.46(2) 0.75(2) 0.95 1.76(2) 1.06(2) Values of 1.6 and 1.0 &m recommended CU

Method

Reference

AA NAA NAA NAA MS MS XRF

MOUNTJOY and WAHLBERO (1965) TOMURA et al. (1968) GORDON et al. (1967) REDDY and DAS (1967) TAYLOR (1965) NICHOLLS et al. (1967) MOUNTJOY and WAELBERC?(1968) ATAMAN and BESNU~ (1965) ENCEL et al. (1965) NICHOL and HENDERSONHAMILTON (1965) KULBICKI (1966) SICHINOLFI (1966) SPENCER ( 1966) GILES (1967) GRIBBLE (1967) REILLY and SHAW (1967) CHAMP (1968) MAJMUNDAR (1968) BALL (19661 CAR&E& (1967) MAJMUNDAB (1968) HUFFMAN (1968) MATSUI and BANNO (1966) BRUNPELT et al. (1967) NICHOLLS et al. (1967)

14

140 130(2) 105

OS OS OS

10.7 8 trace 10 17(10) 10 20 10 17.6(2) -

lOO(4) 101 107 106 120 124 120(10) 120 110 121.6 112 116(4) 116(3) 110

OS OS OS OS OS OS OS OS XRF XRF AA AA NAA NA.4 MS

The recommended values of 13 ctnd 110 &m retained

DY

5.5 2.1 + 0.4 2.70 + 0.19(3) 2.63(3) 2.52 f 0.05(2) 4.4(2) -

3.8 2.7 * 0.3 4.07 * O-26(2) 3.67(3) 4.06 3.97 f 0.06(3) 2.6 (2) 3.89

XRF NAA NAA NAA ID ID MS MS

ALEKSIEV and BOYADJIEVA (1966) COBB (1967) TOWELL (1968) TOIUJRA et al. (1968) THOMAS et al. (1966) SCHNETZLERet al. (1967b) TAYLOR (1965) NICHOLLS et al. (1967)

XRF ID ID MS MS

ALEKSIEV and BOYADJIEVA (1966) THOMAS et al. (1966) SCENETZLERet al. (1967b) TAYLOR (1965) NICROLLS et al. (1967)

OS XRF NAA NAA INAA NAA NAA ID ID MS MS

TENNANT and FELLOWS (1967) ALEKSIEV end BOYADJIEVA (1966) COBB (1967) BRUNBELT and STEINNES (196701 GORDON et al. (1967, 196Sj TOWELL (1968) TOMURAet al. (1968) THOMAS et al. (1966) SCHNETZLERet‘al. (i967b) TAYLOR (1965) NICHOLLS et al. (1967)

Speatmphot. Spectrophot. Color

HUANQ and JOHNS (1967) SHAPIRO (1967) EVANS md SERGEANT (1967)

Values are 2.5 and 4 are recommended Er

1.0 0.97(2) 1*7(2) -

1.7 2.28 2.31(3) 1.8(2) 2.08

The magnitudes 2 and 3 &m retained EU

1

-

1.0 1.3 f 0.1 1.5(2) 1.28 f 0.08(3) 1.04 1.24 * 0.01(2) 1.4(2) -

0.9 1.2 & 0.1 1.4(3) 1.08 f 0.1 1.16 f 0.06(2) 1.04 1.13 1.12 f 0.006(3) 0.95(2) 1.20

Values 1.3 and 1.1 am recommended F

706(3) 700 622(5)

208(4) 200 228(6)

73

U.S. Geological Survey stmdards-I Table 5 (continued) Element

Agremnent remains unsatisfactory; GS

700 and 250 are retained OS OS OS OS OS

l&5(6) 18

18 19?5(2) E(6) 16

17 -

19(4) 15 10

OS OS OS

18(10) 15

18(10) 17

OS

15(10) 17 -

-

37flOf

::

20(3) 15-h(4) 16

XRF NAA NAA MS

17.4(Z) -

Reference

Method

W-l

G-l

A~axa-y andBm~ns

(1966)

Emxz~eet a.2. (1965) CARSON (1965) MoxaK"d (1965) NICHOL~~HENDEBSONHAXTON (1965) KULHIOIcr(1966) SPENCER

(1966)

Gamsw (1967) SCHOENFEUI UPHELD TENNANT (1967) CHAXP (1968) CARXIOEAEL (1967) BRUNFELT

Foucal

(1967)

et al. (1967) and SMALES (196’7)

NICHOLLS etal.(1967)

The recommended valuea of 18 and 16 are retained

Cd


0.53(3)

-

G9

Hf

458 & O~Ol(2) 6.5(Z)

OS

4.6 3.4 4.0 4-01 f 3-O(2) 3.82

XRF NAA NAG ID ID MS MS

ALEKSIEV

OS OS OS XRF NAA NAA

SCHREiN (1966) TENXA~ (1967) CHAMP (1968) CARMICHAEL (1967) MORRIS and BATCHELOR (1966) Fouc~iand SHALES (1967)

NAA INAA MS MS

YULE (1966) GORDON& al.(1967, 1968) TAI-LOR (1965) NIOHOLLS

NAG

&IAN end

OS XRF NAA MS MS

TENNANT~~~FELLOWS (1967) ALEKSIEVB~~ BOYADJIEVA (1966) TOWELL (1968) TAYLOR (1966) NICKOLLS etmZ.(1967)

Polarogr. Chem. + OS NAA NAA MS

WAELER (1968) VOLAND (1967) JOHANSEN~~~STEINNES (lS66) FO~CE~~~SMALES (1967) NICHOLLS etal.(1967)

OS OS OS OS XRF XRF NAA@) NA-4 (M) NAA NAA

CARSON (1966) GEES (1967) T~~~~~dF~~ws (1967) CRAMP (1968) Ammsmvand BOYADJIEVA (19136) ~AEMICHAEL (1967) DESAI &al. (1964) DESAX ebaZ.(1964) Bsum~L~md ST-ES (1966) YULE (1966) COBB (1967)

O-04(4)

The magnitudes 5 and 4 are retained 1*6(10) 1.2 0.5 l-5(10) 0,7(10) <2 1*7(2) 1.0(4) l-2(2) 1*7(3) Magnitudes of 1 and 1.7 are taken 5.1 * 0.3 3.0 & 0.2 6.0(2) Mqpitudes

2-O(2) 0.93

<1

-

TE~AN~~~~FELLOWS (1967) and BOYADJIEVA (1966) TOWELL (1968) TOMURA et al. (1968) THOXAS &al. (1966) Sc~ia~zraa

et al. (1967b)

TAYLOR

(1966) NICHOLLS etal.(1967)

et al.

(1967)

of 6 and 2 are taken

0,246

Hg HO

-

;::5 f O-03(3) 0*70(2)

0.110 1.6 0.77 -& 0*06(2) 0*78(2) 0.63

SEfABAN-4

(1987)

Mcqqitudes of 0,5 and 1 are taken In

0.029(Z) 0.022 0.024(Z) 0.026 -

O-033(2) 0,050 0*067(2) 0*066 0.068

The values of 0.026 and 0.07 we taken LB 113 80 100(10) 105 132(4) 125(a) 97(3) 102 * 4

85 & 6

29 17 11.2 Kocr, 19*0(a) w3(4) -

9.6& O-7

NAA

MICZUEL

74

FLEISCHEB

Table 5 (continued) Element

90.7 & 8*6(3) 109 llO(2) -

12 8.93 5 1*00(Z) 13.9 14(2) 11.9

Agreement is still u~st~f~to~. Li

INAA NAA NAA MS MS

GOBDON ela2. (1967, 1968) TOWELL (1988) TOMURA et aE.(1968) TAYLOR (1966) N~CBOLLS et at. (1967)

The magnitudes 100 and 12 sro tsksu

17 23

12 16

Fl Phot. Fl Phot.

19(7) 25 22.0 20.8 f 21.9 f

ll(2) 14 lo-12 16 8 -

OS OS OS OS OS OS Speetrophot. ID ID

0.6 1.0

Referenoe

Method

W-l

G-i

SHI~A snd HONDA (1963) Roberto Potenzs, quoted by SCHIAVINATO(1966) ENQEL et al. (1966) GABSON (1965) BOWDEN (1966) GUBNEY and ERLANK (1966) SPBNCER (1966) GRIBBLE (1967) Dsws (1966) DEWS (1966) XBANKOWSKY and M~LLBR (1967)

The values 24 and 12 sre retained Mass speatrometer measurements gave for ‘Li/eLi: If-98 12.60

Lu

11-09(3) 0.5 0.12 + 0.02 0.14 _I: 0*015(3) 0.13 0.34

12.08 Il~lS(3) 0.6 0.35 f 0.03 0.44 + 0.03 o-33 f 0*06(2) 0.36 -

-

0.20

XRF NAG INAA NAA NAA ID MS

8mx~ and HONDA (1963) DEWS (1966) EBAXKOWSXY snd Mijrxim (1967) ALEKSIEV sud BOYADJIEVA (1966) COBB (1967) GORDON elo2. (1967) TOWELL (1968) TOM~BA et at. (1968) SCBNBTSLEB et al. (1967b) NICHOLLS et al. (1967)

Magnitudes of 0.2 sud 0.36 sre taken 6.3 76 6.0

MO

5 6.5 ZO(lO) 13-o 7*7(2)

0.48 1.0 -

Phot. Spectrophot. OS OS OS



0*64(10) <0*2 1*0(Z)

OS OS OS OS AAS MS

&AN and RILBY (1966s) STANTON Bud H~RDWICX (1967) Psvlenko, Dias. Moscow (1962) quoted by IVAXOVA (1966) GABSON (196s) NIOHOL sud HEINDEBSONH&nxor? (1965) IVAXOVA (1966) KUI,BICKI ( 1906) SPENCEB (1966) CHAXP

(1968)

BUPLEIL sud MATHEWS (1966) TAyLOR (1866)

Values of 7 Snd 0.6 srs retained Nb

32(6)

-

NAA

Km sud MBINKE (1963b)

OS XRF XRF NAA NAA ID ID MS MS

TENNA~~TSud FELLOWS (1967) ALEKSIEV snd BOYADJIEVA (1966) GABMICHAEL (1967) TOWELL (1968) TOBUBA et al. (1968) THOMAS et al. (1966) SCRNETZLKRet al. (1967b) TAYLOR (1966) NICHOLLS et al. (1967)

0”: OS OS

TBBE~IAN f 1963) ATAMAN and BESNUS (1966) EN~EL et al. (1966) GABSON (1966)

The vefues 20 snd 10 srs rotsiued Nd

43

-

74(2) 66.4 & 8*8(3) 44

13.3 16 16.2 & 18(2) 21 148 16-l(3) 11.0(2) 12.6

66.4(3) 40(2) -

The msguitudes 66 end 17 ers retained Ni

-

110 76 72(2) 72

U.S. Geological Survey standards-I

75

Table 6 (continued) Element

W-l

G-l 1*6(S) <:6

93(6) 75

-

70*5(4) 58 79 70 83

<:10 2 Z.514) 6 3 21 -

-

&lO, 80 29f4f 85

70 90 76

Agreement is not sstisfsotory.

0 OS Pb

47.8% 48.26(4)

Refsronoe

Method OS OS

Yoxaa~ (1968) NICHOL and HENDERSONHAMILTON (I 965) KULBICKI (1966)

0”: OS OS OS OS OS

8ICUXINOLFI

::a XRF XRF XRP AA AA. MS

(1966)

(1966) GILES (1967) GRIBBLE (1967) h3ILLLY and SEAW (1967) CIlAYP (1968) &fAJMUNOaR (1968) MAH et al. (1965) BALL f1966) CABazlCEAEL (1967) GVNN (1967) ALTHAWS (1966) MAJM~NDAX (1965) Nrcaous ez o2. (1967) &‘ENCER

The values l-2 rend 78 are retained

46.1% 44*23(4)

NAA FNA

VOoT and EHMANN (1965) VOLBORTHand VINCENT (1967)

NAA

MORGAN and LOVERING (1967)

23*7(3) 68 62

6.2(3) 20 7 traoe 8

Polarogr. OS OS OS OS

49 21 63 26&l*)

-

OS OS OS OS

WAXIXR (1968) ATAMAN and BESNUS (1966) G-SON (1966) MOXHAM (1966) NIOHOL snd I~NDERSON&XZTON (1966) IVAWOvA (1966) KULBICKI (1966) SPENCER (1966) GILES (1967) PENNANT ( 1987) CHAMP (1968) CARMICHAEL (1967) HEZEE et aE. (1967) TAYLOR (1965) NICHOLLS et al. (1967)

<0*~006(2)

@00026(2)

b*b(4)
50(2) -

:: XRF XRF MS MS

The veluos 49 and 8 sre r&&nod Pd

Pr

< 0.004 0.0025(2) -

0.014(2) 0*009(20) 0*016(10) 0.013

16

-

21 -

3.5 12

-

16.6 f l6(2) -

l*@(3)

i.21 + 0*36(2) 2.5(2) 4.15

FA-OS Speotrophot. NAA NAA

%I? XRB XRF NAA MS NS

HAFlPTY and RILEY (1918) GIDCAL~I md SCHNEPFE (1967) CROCKETmd SKIPPEN (1966) Crook&, quoted by GEWALDX and SCE~EP~E (1967) TENNANT and FELLOWS (1967) ALEKSIEV end BOYADJIEVA (1966) ALEKSIEV and BOYADJIEVA (1966) CARMICHAEL (1967) TOWEIX (1968) TAYLOR (1965) NICHOLLS et al. (1967)

The magnitudes 17 and 4 are retsined Pt Rb


0.019(2) 16(2) 22.8 3b

-210

ix

229 228(3) 216(2)

Z.5(2) 21.512) 22(3) 21*6(2)

FA-OS OS :: OS XRF XRF zz NAA ID

HAXFTY and RILEY (1968) ENOEL et al. (1965) GURNEY tand ERLAN~ (1966) SPENCER ( 1966) GRXBSW (1967) BALL (1966) CARMICHAEL (1967) POWER (1967) REDDP and DAS (1967) TOMURAet al. (1968) CEAUDHURI and FAURE (1967)

76

MICHAEL

FLEISOE[ER

Table 5 (continued) G-l

W-1

216 245(2) -

21.6 19(2) 21

Element

Referonco

Method

(1966) (1967) NICXOLLSet al. (1967)

ID N1S MS

TAYLOR

NAA NAA FA-OS

ISEUDAet oz. (1966) Moaom and Lov~zmm (1967) HAFFTY and RILEY (1968) TANNER (1966) TANNER and EHBUNN (1967) BB~FELT and STF.IXNES(1967c) Haaa~ouoar and Olrwra (1967) NICEOLLS et al. (1967)

FAURE

The values 220 and 22 src retained Ro

-

0~00025(2) 0.00042(2) <0.006

Rh

0.00056(2) <0.005

Sb

0.35(2)

0.14(3)

NAA

O-30(3) O-27(2) -

0.90(5) 1.20 0.85

INAA NAA MS

Thr values of 0*4 and 1.1 ms retained Sa

-~ -

Spectrophot. OS OS OS OS

33*8(3) 44(2) 51 36 -

a.o __ -

4400) 33.3(4) 36(3) 33,3(3) -

3.0(4) 2.75(2) 2.83(3) 3.0 2.95(6) 2.7

OS NAA NAA NAA NAA NAA NAA INAA NAA NAA &IS

37*1(6) 33 34.8 36 36 43

-

2.4 2.5 -

SEIMIZU(1967) EXPEL ebaE. (1965) GARSON (1966) REILLY and SEAW (1967) TENNANTand FELLOWS (1967) CHAMP(19681 DESAI ei oz. (1964) HA~GUC~~~~.(~@~~) BRUNPELT

and

STEINNXS(1966)

YULE (1966)

ALIAN and SHABANA (1967) COBB (1967) GORDONet al. (1967) NORM&“I‘and HASKm (1867) STUEBERand COLES (1967) NICHOLLSet 02. (1967)

The recommended values of 3 and 34 ms confirmad

Se SIB

<10 5 13.2131 7.7i3j 7-6 7.55 & 0*7(3) 7.52

0*11(a)

NAA

BRUNFELTmd STE~NES (le67b)

3.8

OS XRF XRF NAA NAA NAA INAA NAA NAA ID ID MS

TENNANTand FELLOWS (1967) ALEKSIEVmd BOYADJIEVA(1966)

3.2i4j 3.4 2.8 3.31 f 3.78

8-D(3) 7*4(2)

sn

3*31(2)

O-36(2)

The v&m

9 and 4 me suggested

2.8(3) 9.1

3.15(2) -

2

2

OS

3.4 1.5 2.0(10) 2*05(2) -

2.3 2*2(10) 2.52 2.1

OS OS

Photomet. OS

::A MS

CARMICHAEL (1967) DESAl etal.(1964) BBUNFELT~~~STEINNES COBB 119671

(1966)

GOR& et AZ. (1967) TOWELL (1968) TommA et al. (1968)

TKOXAS elal.(1966) SCHNETZLER &al. (1967b) TA~OR

(1965)

GREQORY~~~JEFFEEY

11967)

Pwhmko, Dim. Moscow ‘( 196;). quoted by IVAXOVA (1966) N&or. and HENDERSONHAMILTON(1965) IVANOVA (1966) TENNANT (1967) CRAMP (1968) HAXAGUCEI and ONUXA (1967)

NICHOLLS etal.(1967)

The values 4 and 3 mc retained

Sr

242

194(3)

Fl Phot.

200 -

200 160 X6(2) 177

Ff Phot. OS OS OS

Roberto Potenza, quoted by SCEIAVIMTO (1966) kWAMELLS et ~8. (1967) ATAXAN .~~BEsNu~ (1966)

ENQEL etaE.(1965) *ARSON

(1965)

U.S. Geological Survey stsnda&+-1

71

Table 5 (continued) Element

W-l

G-l

-

l&5(4) 178 190 200 144 210 207

346 255 270 310 286

Method OS

Referanoe

OS,

KOLBICXI { 1986) SIOHINOLFI (1966) SPENCER (1966) GILES (1967) ‘+RISBLE (1967) Ixanna~us et ~2. (1967) INOAr&ELLset at. (1967)

OS OS AA AA AA AA XRF XRF XRF XRF XRF XRF ID ID MS MS

REILLY and SHAW (1967) CEAW (1968) TRENT and SLAVIN (1984) ALTEA~~ (1966) HUFFMAN and MENSIK (1967) HUFFMAN (1908) BALL (1966) CHAMPION et d. (1966) cA.ZMICEAEL (1967) GUNN (1967) POWER (1967) PRIOE and ANDELL (1968) ,?AURE (1966) CEAUDEUBI and FAURE (1967) TAYLOB (1966) NICEOLLs et & (1967)

::

OS OS OS spark solution

280 240(10) 240(Z) -

l&10) 196(2) 210 193(3) 195(2) 165 183 195 -

260(3) 265(2) 265 221 250 -

189(2) 186(2) 192 190(2) 190(2) 175

265(2) 249 252(2) 250(2)

There is still considerable divergence. The values of 260 and 180 are retained Ta,

NAA


067 _C 0.06

INAA

KIM and MEINKE (1963b) GORDON et al. (1967)

The values of 1.6 and 0.7 iwe retained Tb

l-6 0.608 f 0*07(3) 0.40 0.96(2~ -

2.0 067 f 0.15 0.70 & 0.06(2) 0.60 @66(2) @49

XRF INAA :z MS MS

ALEICSIEYand BOYADJXEVA COEDON et nl. (1967) TOWELL (1968) TOi%ZURA et al. (1968) TAYLOR (1966) NICHOLLS et aZ. (1967)

(1966)

The magnitudes 0.6 and 0.8 sze retained Th

21 61 52 64(3) 80 -& 2 46.9(6) 46 -& 1.5 53.0(6) 63.6 f 36(2) -

3 6 2.62(6) 1.8 + o-4 2-6 3.6(6)

2

2.6 f 0.2 2*2(2) 2.2

OS XRF XRF XRF NAA NAA NAG NAA NAA Delayed NAA 1 Alphacount MS MS

TENN~WT and FELLOWS (1967) BALL (1966) C&anrcas~r, (1967) G~ihnv(1967) OSAWA et al. (1966) YULE (1966) ALLAN and SHABANA (1967) COBB (1967) GORI)ON et al. (1967) GALE (1967) AEEBNS et al. (1967) TAYLOR (1966) %CHOLLS et al. (1967)

The values b2 and 2-4 are retained Tl

0.66(3) 1.2 1.3(10) 1.3(2)


Polarogr. OS OS MS

(1968) TENNANT (1967) CHAaaP (1968) TAyLOR (1965)

XRF INAA NAA N&A MS MS

ALEKSIEVA and BOYADJLEVA (1966) GORDON et al. (1967) TOWE= (1968) ?.-OMURA et cd. f 1968) TAYLOR (1966) NICROLLS et al. (1967)

WAHLER

The valuea 1.3 tend 0.13 are retained Tm

0.8 0.5
MICHAEL FLEISCEER

78

Table 5 (continued) Element

u

G-l

4 3.75 o-5 2.16(2) 2.8(3) 4-42(6) -

Reference

Method

W-f 1

0,485 0.08 0*62(6) 0.46

XRF Alphaoount NAA NAA Delayed NAA I&S

BALL (1966) A.EBENS et al. (1967) LOVERIN~ (1965) ALIAN and PARTHASARATHY (1966) GALE (1967) NICHOLLS et OZ. (1967)

The values of 4 and 0.6 are taken V

17.2 & 0.9

-

15(4) 16 IS-& 1 -

241(4) 263(10) 276 f 7 220 300(2) 246 255(6) 235

14+(6) 10 18 21 <20(10) 15 -

231(a) 251 252 240 213 360flO) -

zF MS

CEAN and RILEY (1966) JEBFEFCYand KEBR (1967) FuaE (1967) PECK (1967) ATAMAN and BESNUS (1965) ENaEL et al. (1965) CARsON (1965) MOXHAM (1965) Nroaor, and HENDEKSONHAMILTON (1965) KVLBICK1 (1966) S~~HINOLFI (1966) SPENCER (1966) @RIBaLE (1967) REILLY and SKAW (1967) CHAMP (1968) CARMICHAEL (1967) Nrcao~zs el al. (1967)

Phot. Phot. Speotrophot. &JIOf OS OS OS OS OS OS OS OS :9

260

The values 16 and 240 are retained W Y

(O-8

-

OS

IVANOVA (1966}

12 12

33(2f 34 27 -

EN~EL et al. (1965)

12(S) 9

21 27

13.0(4) 13.2 -& l-8(3) 13-o(2) -

i&4) 26.2 f 29(g) 25

OS OS OS OS XRF XRF XRF NAA NAA MS MS OS OS XRF NAA 1NA.A NAA NAA ID ID MS

ENGEL et al. (1965) TENNANT and FELLOWS (1967) &KSIEV and BOYADJIEVA (1966) COBB (1967) GORDON et al. (1967) TOWELL (1968) TOMURA et al. (1968) THOMAS et al. (1966) SCENET~ER et aZ. (1967b) TAYLOR (1965)

3*1(2)

GARSON

(1966)

(1967) TENNANT and FELLOWS (1967) ALEKSIEVA and BOYADJIEV (1966) BALL (1966) CARMIC~~AEL(1967) DESAI et al. (1964) TOWELL (1968) TAYLOR (1966) NICHOLLS et al. (1967) GILES

The values 13 and 26 are retained Yb

0.8 ’ 1.32 0.99 -f 0 206(3) 0.63 0.86(Z) 1*10(2)

4(2)

-

3.0 2.1 & 0.2 2.2 f 0.4 2.21 f 0*25(2) 1.9 2.03 2*09(3) l-6(2)

The values l:and 2.2 are taken Zn

48(4) 41(7)

64(4) 84(g)

40*7(2) 65 &lO)

42.8(2) 85 45(6) 91(4) 95 86 83(10) 69(3)

-

CHR Anodic stripping volt&metPy Polarogr. OS OS OS OS OS OS AA

MAE et al. (1966) KOSTER WAHLER

et d.

(1967)

(1968)

ATAMAN and BESNUS (1966) Moxaax (1965) KULBICKI (1966) GILES (1967) TENNANT (I 967) CHAlaP (1968) BIJRRELL (1966)

U.S. Geological survey standaLY%--1

79

Table 5 (continued) Element

G-l 43‘6(2) 45

Zr

40 44 45.7 54.3(6) The values 46 and 82 ere 191 188 101 I70flO) 200 220 204*6(2) 210(2) -

W-I 80(2) 84

AA XRF

82.8

XRF XRF NAA NAA NAA NAA MS

86 rt 3(4f 76(6) 83 75 ret&nod 93

QW

107 84 120 93 100(10) 100 95 E(2, lOl(2) 95(2) 90

Refefence

Method

Color OS OS OS OS OS 0”: XRF XRF XRF XRF MS MS

HUFFMAN (1968) BALL and FILBY (1966) BALL (1966) CARMICHAEL (1967) GUNN (1967) BALL and F~;BY (1965) MATSUIand B-o (1966) A.LI~ and SEABUA (1967) BR~LT el aE. (1967) N~caoL~s et ~2. (1967) SCHUTTE(1965) et al. (1966) GARSON (1966) SPElVCEB( 1966) GRIBBLE (1967) REILLY snd SHAW (1967) CHAMP(1V68) MAJMUNDAR(1968) BALL (1966) &U‘MICHAEL( 1967) POWER (1967) WEBBER end VOLLRATH ( 1967) TAYLOR (1965) NICHOLLSe# ~2. (1967) ENGEL

The values of 210 and 100 sm ret&ned Abbreviations of methods: AA = atomic absorption speetrophotometry, CHR = chrom&togrsphic, FA = Assay, ID = isotope dilution, FNA = Fast neutron activation, MS z spark source 03898 spectrometry, NAA = neutron aotivation, INAA = Instrumental neutron activation, OS = optics1 speatrogrsphy, XRF = X-ray fluorescence, Fl Phot. = Flame photometry.

Fire

References for this paper are combined with those of Part II (by F. 5. follows.

FLANAGAN)

which